--%>

Why every society confronts the problem of scarcity

Each society confronts the problem of scarcity since: (i) human wants are virtually limitless relative to the resources obtainable. (ii) technology, resources and human potential are limitless. (iii) most people can't have enough money the goods they require. (iv) human beings become satiated as consumption raises. (v) government bureaucracies make production inefficient.

Can someone give explanation with best solution about problem of economic concept of scarcity...

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Illustrate Prices of gold and silver in

    Gold and silver, both although better conductors of electricity than copper, are not generally used for household electric circuits since they are much more expensive. It illustrates prices like: (i) Information. (ii) Rationing devices. (iii) Incentiv

  • Q : Illustration of Economic Reasoning by

    Occam’s razor refers to the idea which while evaluating a theory: (1) good theory describes the phenomenon as simply as possible, but not moreso. (2) complexity is obvious to make sure that correct answers are reached. (3) conformity along with

  • Q : Define cut costs without reducing the

    A firm which could cut costs without reducing the value of its output is experiencing as: (i) Allocative inefficiency. (ii) Productive inefficiency. (iii) Distributive inefficiency. (iv) Technological decline. Can

  • Q : Prohibition in illustrations of

    Illustrations of normative statements would not comprise assertions which: (1) premeditated murderers deserve the death penalty. (2) Leonardo DiCaprio is a terrible actor. (3) AIDS and HIV are transmitted through sexual contact. (4) women must be paid

  • Q : Problem on Private ownership of property

    I have a problem in economics on Private ownership of property. Please help me in the following question. The hallmarks of ‘pure’ capitalism are illustrated by the: (1) Absence of productive and allocative efficiency. (2) Interaction of th

  • Q : Better off and worse off condition in

    When an economic change creates one person better off and a thousand persons worse off, this is: (w) good for society. (x) bad for society. (y) neither good nor bad for society. (z) not possible to assess without a value judgment.

  • Q : When is normative economics crucial Can

    Can anybody suggest me the appropriate explanation for given problem regarding normative economics generally. Normative economics is critical while an economist tries to: (i) predict how OPEC's refuse will influenc

  • Q : Erroneous analysis LEAST attributable

    The erroneous analysis that economists seldom agree is LEAST attributable to the fact such that economists are: (w) acquire little media coverage while they agree, when disputes about how economic theory must be translated in policy a

  • Q : Define much of a good as need at zero

    I need a good answer on the topic of free good in economic. Please give me your suggestion that when all people can consume as much of a good as they desire at zero cost, this is a: (w) welfare good. (x) bonus for buying something else. (y) surplus su

  • Q : Explain TANSTAAFL TANSTAAFL is an

    TANSTAAFL is an acronym suggestive of that: (1) Tax agents never observe the awful influences from levies. (2) Tenants and needy must take all assets by landlords. (3) There ain't no all things like a free lunch. (4) Temperance and non satiety togethe