Why do not you utilize GNU SCONS or autoconf for building
Why do not you utilize GNU SCONS or autoconf for building?
Expert
The short answer is that when you get this from CCP4, this does. If you determine it from me it doesn't, since autoconf is unreasonably complex and I have better options to fill my head along with.
The long answer is that while Paul (who is an autoconf guru) and I set up autoconf for clipper this took us a week, and needed sufficient specialist knowledge which I couldn't really maintain this. By contrast, while I set it up with SCONS, this took me less than a day and was easily maintainable; though at that stage SCONS didn't handle other platforms very well. Therefore, I distribute development versions of clipper along with simple build scripts which in fact work for me, CCP4 distribute release versions along with autoconf since they have enough experience to keep it, and PHENIX distribute this with SCONS since that's what they use. When you want an autoconf version, use the CCP4 release (granted it’s all the time a bit out of date).
Explain the types of the Containers?
Explain the types of views within Data stage Director?
Describe the various categories of the range of database application?
Explain some of the ETL Tools?
Illustrate briefly the term SQL sub query?
Explain the term version Control?
What are the techniques in which an Oracle database can be created?
Describe briefly the four JDBC driver types which Sun defines?
Differentiate between start schma and Fsldm?
Describe in brief about the Mobile enterprise application enablement?
18,76,764
1954259 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1448177
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!