Why demand curve is more elastic
Why demand curve is more elastic under monopolistic competition as compare to monopoly.
Expert
The elasticity of demand is high whenever the product has close substitutes and that elasticity of demand tends to low whenever the product does not encompass close substitutes as we know in monopolistic competition there is a large number of close substitutes whereas in monopoly there is no close substitutes therefore the demand curve beneath monopolistic competition is much more elastic than beneath monopoly.
When the interest rate is 5% and a financial investment produces annual payments of price $50,000, in that case the present value of this asset is: (w) $1,000,000. (x) $5,000,000. (y) $500,000. (z) $10,000,000. Q : Effect on tax burdens by price When the price elasticity of demand for wine as 2.5, in that case rise in the excise tax which raises its price will be: (w) increase total spending upon wine. (x) reduce total spending upon wine. (y) not influence wine consumption. (
When the price elasticity of demand for wine as 2.5, in that case rise in the excise tax which raises its price will be: (w) increase total spending upon wine. (x) reduce total spending upon wine. (y) not influence wine consumption. (
Onto average, African-Americans into the U.S., when compared to whites: (1) earn lower incomes. (2) have less education. (3) experience higher rates of unemployment. (4) are less likely to be capable to retire on Social Security. (5) All of the above. Q : Variable costs in short run A monopoly A monopoly tends to shut down within the short-run when: (i) price is less than the minimum of average total costs [ATC]. (ii) price cannot cover all overhead costs. (iii) variable costs are not covered. (iv) total costs exceed total revenues. (v) the
A monopoly tends to shut down within the short-run when: (i) price is less than the minimum of average total costs [ATC]. (ii) price cannot cover all overhead costs. (iii) variable costs are not covered. (iv) total costs exceed total revenues. (v) the
A firm’s capability to alter the price of its output due to inadequate competition or a lack of perfect substitutes for its products is an illustration of: (i) adverse selection. (ii) simple game theory. (iii) X-inefficiency. (iv) strategic behavior. (v) market
Collusive oligopolistic pricing behavior: (1) leads to natural monopoly when only some firms dominate an industry. (2) entails overt agreement among many firms in setting outputs and prices. (3) arises while contestable firms simultaneously raise or l
A purely competitive firm: (w) faces a perfectly inelastic demand curve. (x) sets its own price. (y) is a price taker. (z) sells a differentiated product. Can someone explain/help me with best solution about proble
The market supply schedule for a resource or good shows the: (i) Points in time if production is scheduled for completion. (ii) Amounts sellers wish could be given at prices exceeding the costs. (iii) Maximum quantities which will be offered for sale at particular pri
I have a problem in economics on Minimum Wage Laws. Please help me in the following question. Minimum wage legislation has been promotes as a technique to: (i) Make sure that workers are paid beneath the subsistence salaries. (ii) Perpetuate poverty. (iii) Maxim
When wage discrimination is not probable for the first 40 workers this profit-maximizing organization hires, however it can wage discriminate perfectly whenever hiring all the subsequent workers, it hires a net of: (i) Forty workers at an average salary of $700 per we
18,76,764
1923084 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1448914
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!