--%>

Who thought Murderers do more harm than Shoplifters

Murderers do more harm than shoplifters; therefore they must be punished proportionally more harshly as per the school of thought developed through: (i) medieval scholar Thomas Aquinas. (ii) Chinese leader Mao Zedong. (iii) lawyer and social reformer Jeremy Bentham. (iv) mercantilist David Ricardo. (v) physiocrat François Quesnay.

Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some views for above economics problems.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : People moods towards Positive Economics

    Average men are innately further perceptive than average women within ascertaining people’s moods and predicting behavior, when average women classically have relatively better depth perception and intrinsically more precise geometric intuition. So, the precedin

  • Q : Explain about the term whom in

    The fundamental economic questions are "What?”, “How?”, and “For whom”? When we ask, "For whom?", we need to know who will: (w) produce the goods. (x) consume the goods. (y) get the profits. (z) decide wh

  • Q : Payments to entrepreneurs in

    The payments to entrepreneurs are called as: (i) Profits increasing from bearing risk and uncertainty, innovating new products and organizing production as well as processes. (ii) Rental payments by extensive land holdings. (iii) Interest through loaning money. (iv) I

  • Q : Technological advance in costs All else

    All else equivalent, when the output of one good raises, the output of other goods: (1) Should fall in an underemployed economy. (2) May rise as well when society begins on its PPF. (3) Will drop in an efficient and completely employed economy. (4) Essentially experie

  • Q : Examples of scientifically positive

    Illustrations of scientifically positive statements would comprise the assertion that: (i) executing jaywalkers and atheists will enhance the morality of average Americans. (ii) racial prejudice and violent criminal acts are symptoms of dysfunctional

  • Q : When is a good taken as scarce Can

    Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding scarcity in economics generally? A good is taken as scarce when people: (w) lack the funds required to make sure their survival. (x) require

  • Q : Explain about the positive economic

    Positive economic statements: (1) are factual and can never be wrong. (2) predict political viewpoints. (3) are attempts to explain economic relationships. (4) estimate the fairness of social programs. (5) can resolve the matter of equity.

  • Q : Illustrate Prices of gold and silver in

    Gold and silver, both although better conductors of electricity than copper, are not generally used for household electric circuits since they are much more expensive. It illustrates prices like: (i) Information. (ii) Rationing devices. (iii) Incentiv

  • Q : When is an economic theory a positive

    Economic theory is a positive science only to the extent which this yields: (i) scientifically testable predictions. (ii) moral answers to ethical disputes. (iii) absolutely exact descriptions of how the world works. (iv) optimistic, quite than pessim

  • Q : Price elasticity of demanded in

    The price elasticity of demand is the relative proportional change within the: (1) quantity of a good demanded yielded by a given absolute price change. (2) price generated through a specified change in quantity demanded. (3) quantity of a good demand