--%>

Who explained put–call parity

Who explained put–call parity?

E

Expert

Verified

In 1956 Kruizenga and 1961 Reinach explained put–call parity.

   Related Questions in Corporate Finance

  • Q : WCR fend off takeover bid WCR fend off

    WCR fend off takeover bid: The WCR estimation ensures that a firm takes corrective action in time to correct its WC status. This ensures that the firm is always in a positive WC status. In other words, the firm will be able to pay off all its short-te

  • Q : Weighted return and simple return to

    What is the difference between weighted return and simple return to shareholders?

  • Q : Explain the result of volatility

    Explain the result of volatility structure.

  • Q : Problem on stock market John Wong is a

    John Wong is a fresh graduate and has a limited amount of funds for investments. He expects that the Hong Kong stock market will fall soon but he is not familiar with derivatives. In order to gain more money to buy a car, he explores engaging in Hang Seng Index (HSI)

  • Q : Expected return for a portfolio What is

    What is the expected return for a portfolio consisting of 200 shares of Nike, 200 shares of Home Depot, and 400 shares of Intel if their expected returns are 10%, 8% and 12% respectively, and their current prices are $25, $50, and $25 per share respec

  • Q : Bond Price Information What is Bond

    What is Bond Price Information: Answer: Corporate bond market is not considered to be much transparent as it trades predominantly over the counter and investors do n

  • Q : Relationship between flow to

    Is there any relationship in between the flow to shareholders and the net income?

  • Q : Problem on HIBOR Below are the

    Below are the three-month HIBOR and three-year EFN futures (that is, Exchange Fund Note) prices for the September 2010 contracts.a) Find out the HIBOR in three-months for settling the future contract utilizing the quotation on August 16.

    Q : Does value of the company increase when

    According to the valuation method depends on tax shields, the value of the company (Vl) is the value of the unleveraged company (Vu) in addition with the value of tax shields (VTS), thus, the higher the interest and the higher the VTS. Therefore, does

  • Q : Illustrates cost of its equity is zero

    Is this true that the cost of its equity is zero, if a company does not distribute dividends?