--%>

Who explained put–call parity

Who explained put–call parity?

E

Expert

Verified

In 1956 Kruizenga and 1961 Reinach explained put–call parity.

   Related Questions in Corporate Finance

  • Q : Illustrates reserves are real money or

    The part of the net income which is not distributed to shareholders goes to reserves (to shareholders’ equity). As dividends shows real money, reserves are real money as well. Is it true?

  • Q : Expected return for a portfolio What is

    What is the expected return for a portfolio consisting of 200 shares of Nike, 200 shares of Home Depot, and 400 shares of Intel if their expected returns are 10%, 8% and 12% respectively, and their current prices are $25, $50, and $25 per share respec

  • Q : What did better mean specified by

    What did ‘better’ mean specified with Markowitz questioned regarding portfolio selection?

  • Q : Explain the result of volatility

    Explain the result of volatility structure.

  • Q : What is Stock Market Stock Market : To

    Stock Market: To trade company shares (or stock) and derivatives, a stock market or equity market is public entity where these shares and derivatives are sold at agreed price. These are to be listed on a stock exchange in order to trade publicly.

  • Q : Calculating Beta when market

    A company with a market capitalization of $100 million has no debt and a beta of 0.8. What will its beta be after it borrows $50 million (giving that there are no other changes and no taxes)?

  • Q : Why do a Split Why do a Split?

    Why do a Split?

  • Q : Problem on maintaining dividend Jackson

    Jackson Company has 6 million shares of common stock selling at $55 each. It also has $120 million in long-term bonds with coupon 7%, selling at 90. The tax rate of Jackson is 33%. Next year its EBIT is expected to be $25 million with a standard deviation of $7 millio

  • Q : What repercussions do variations in

    What repercussions do variations in the oil price have on the value of a company?

  • Q : Illustrates cost of its equity is zero

    Is this true that the cost of its equity is zero, if a company does not distribute dividends?