--%>

Who explained put–call parity

Who explained put–call parity?

E

Expert

Verified

In 1956 Kruizenga and 1961 Reinach explained put–call parity.

   Related Questions in Corporate Finance

  • Q : Difference between capitalization and

    Is the difference for the value creation in a company among the market value of the shares (capitalization) and their book value a good measure since its foundation?

  • Q : Is PER an excellent guide to investments

    Is PER an excellent guide to investments?

  • Q : Porters Primary activities Porter’s

    Porter’s Primary activities: 1. Inbound Logistics: • Suppliers’ details.• Storage details with respect to materials.• Details regarding pl

  • Q : Problem on Bank branch networks While

    While banks across the United States and Europe are cutting down their number of branches, the number of bank branches in Hong Kong has increased in the same period. Hong Kong Monetary Authority statistics show the number of bank branches in Hong Kong at the end of 20

  • Q : Strategy of Bull Spread State when

    State when market is expected to go up then what is the Strategy of Bull Spread?

  • Q : Explain the definition of WACC An

    An investment bank computed my WACC. The report is as: “the definition of the WACC is defined as WACC = RF + βu (RM – RF); here RF being the risk-free rate and βu the unleveraged beta and RM the market risk rate.” It is differ from what we

  • Q : An example of use beta of Kinepolis in

    A financial consultant is valuing the company I set as an objective (an entertainment centre) by discounting the cash flows until the end of the dealership at 7.26% (interest rate on 30-year-bonds = 5.1%; market premium = 5%, and Beta = 0.47%). 0.47 is a beta provided

  • Q : Discounting Free Cash Flow or

    Which of these two ways is better: discounting the Free Cash Flow or discounting the Equity Cash Flow?

  • Q : Historical return on stock market and

    The market risk premium is difference among the historical return upon the stock market and the risk-free rate, for yearly. Why is this negative for some years?

  • Q : Is ROE a correct measurement of return

    The ROE is the ratio among net income and Shareholders’ equity. The meaning of Return on Equity is return to shareholders. Therefore, is ROE a correct measurement of the return to shareholders?