--%>

When scientific economic analysis NOT utilized for test

Please help me to solve the problem of Normative Economics that is specified below:

Scientific economic analysis could NOT be utilized for test if there: (i) higher tax rates cause tax revenues to decrease. (ii) only cigarette companies are harmed through higher cigarette taxes. (iii) gambling must be legalized to increase tax revenue. (iv) outlawing "happy hours" will decrease drunk driving.

Please guys describe the problem as in above.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Explain about the Invisible hand of

    The “invisible hand” of Adam Smith explained: (w) a large function for the government. (x) altruist motives within civilized society. (y) technological advances promoted through monopolies. (z) self correcting market mecha

  • Q : Define decisionsmaking on opportunity

    Decisions based upon opportunity costs are not concerned in a direct way whiles: (i) you fail to buckle up before driving a car. (ii) a brilliant high school graduate works like a rapid food cook in place of attending college. (iii) lightning starts a main forest fire

  • Q : Better off and worse off condition in

    When an economic change creates one person better off and a thousand persons worse off, this is: (w) good for society. (x) bad for society. (y) neither good nor bad for society. (z) not possible to assess without a value judgment.

  • Q : In fundamental economic each society

    I need a good answer on the topic of existence in society economically. Please give me your suggestion that The fundamental economic questions that each society should address contain: (i) what, how, and for whom,

  • Q : Demonstration of scarcity in the U.S.

    By which is scarcity in the U.S. economy demonstrated: (v) The "energy crisis" of the 1970s, (w) Welfare payments to impoverished families, (x) Government budgeting more funding for defence or more for education, (y) Housing shortages in Santa Monica

  • Q : Determine when a good is scarce A good

    A good is scarce when: (1) individuals are willing to pay a positive price for more of this. (2) this is socially but not individually beneficial. (3) individuals are willing to pay to have this not produced. (4) more is obtainable at

  • Q : Social economics and philosophy

    The early school of social economics and philosophy which strongly emphasized education like a mechanism for social reform were: (i) utilitarians. (ii) physiocrats. (iii) mercantilists. (iv) classical. (v) neoclassical.

    Q : Concept of income more to the poor than

    The concept about, on average, further income implies more to the poor than to the rich conforms most to the teachings or philosophy of: (1) Thorstein Veblen. (2) Friedrich Nietzsche. (3) Gautama Buddha. (4) Jeremy Bentham. (5) Nostradamus. (6) Adam S

  • Q : Case of unsuccessfulness of goods in

    Consider the several possible goods currently producible within the United States, specified our available technologies and resources. When we produced only cat litter and razor blades, there would be a failure to get: (i) distributive efficiency. (ii) economic equity

  • Q : Issues of normative economic policy

    Economic policy matters are usually: (w) simply resolved by positive analysis alone. (x) normative, but workable solutions based on positive analysis. (y) either strictly macroeconomic, or strictly microeconomic. (z) better resolved using common sense