--%>

When scientific economic analysis NOT utilized for test

Please help me to solve the problem of Normative Economics that is specified below:

Scientific economic analysis could NOT be utilized for test if there: (i) higher tax rates cause tax revenues to decrease. (ii) only cigarette companies are harmed through higher cigarette taxes. (iii) gambling must be legalized to increase tax revenue. (iv) outlawing "happy hours" will decrease drunk driving.

Please guys describe the problem as in above.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Validation of a new theory in

    A new theory evolves within common sense only after this is determined: (1) Helpful through extensive testing. (2) Within conformity along with Newtonian mechanics and Occam's razor. (3) To contain relatively only some exceptions. (4) Acceptable through the Institute

  • Q : Improvements in Economic growth I have

    I have a problem in economics on Improvements in Economic growth. Please help me in the following question. Economic growth would be encouraged by enhancements in: (1) Economic efficiency. (2) Technology. (3) People’s attitudes. (4) Unemployment

  • Q : Explain the problem of Self Interest in

    As per the view of humans as Homo economics, individuals: (w) can simply achieve states of whole satisfaction. (x) must learn to get by along with what they have. (y) want to maximize personal satisfaction by self-interested behavior. (z) have fewer requirements as th

  • Q : Economic welfare-Production possibility

    Maximizing the community's economic welfare needs production: (i) On production-possibility curve. (ii) Of minimum exports and maximum imports. (iii) Of more consumer durables and fewer services. (iv) Exterior to the production-possibility curve.

  • Q : Economic equity consideration in

    Economic equity considered as to: (1) financial settlements of court cases. (2) the balance of national trade. (3) questions of the fairness of several economic arrangement. (4) passing hidden costs upon to consumers. (5) the gross value of any stocks

  • Q : Explain TANSTAAFL TANSTAAFL is an

    TANSTAAFL is an acronym suggestive of that: (1) Tax agents never observe the awful influences from levies. (2) Tenants and needy must take all assets by landlords. (3) There ain't no all things like a free lunch. (4) Temperance and non satiety togethe

  • Q : Modern sociobiologists concept

    Modern sociobiologists concept perpetuation of individual gene pool like the fundamental human drive, and give numerous illustrations of behavior which apparently conflict along with the economist's homo economicus supposition: Parents sacrifice their whole lives for

  • Q : When is a thing termed as a good as

    A thing is termed as a "good" (as opposite to a "bad") when: (w) its use improves human happiness. (x) its production needs capital and labor. (y) its value to society is restricted. (z) this is a service to people, as housecleaning.<

  • Q : Find out supply shifted to higher

    This market for clothing started on S0 and D0. Inside this market for clothing,: (w) demand has increased, possibly because of a raise in income. (x) new equilibrium price lies below the original equilibrium price. (y) supply may have transferred

  • Q : When economists disagree in normative

    Can someone give details with best solution about problem of normative economics... Economists disagree MOST often about regions involving: (i) normative economics, while value judgments are involved. (ii) explanat