--%>

When scientific economic analysis NOT utilized for test

Please help me to solve the problem of Normative Economics that is specified below:

Scientific economic analysis could NOT be utilized for test if there: (i) higher tax rates cause tax revenues to decrease. (ii) only cigarette companies are harmed through higher cigarette taxes. (iii) gambling must be legalized to increase tax revenue. (iv) outlawing "happy hours" will decrease drunk driving.

Please guys describe the problem as in above.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Illustrate an example of Efficiency in

    Bobby Joe Bob owns a hog feed factory within Los Angeles, CA. Oddly adequate, there is not a large market for hog feed within L.A. Bobby Joe Bob moves his operation to a minute, backwards town termed as The Sticks, NC, where a huge market for hog feed awaits him. That

  • Q : Spending money for enhancement in

    Choosing NOT to spend the additional money required to enhance the safety of a dangerous traffic intersection is an illustration of: (v) macroeconomic policy decisions. (w) positive economics. (x) how society assigns prices to human lives. (y) economic inefficiency. (

  • Q : Illustrate the argue by David Hume

    Argument by David Hume that: (w) money is a “veil” which hides the actual workings of the economic system. (x) Corn Laws prevented English workers through competition through low-wage foreign workers. (y) capitalism is the system mainly co

  • Q : Determine the requirements of

    Within broad economic terms "efficiency" needs: (w) an upward move within the production curve. (x) full employment. (y) it being not possible to make someone better off without creating someone else worse off. (z) producing cars with low gas consumption.

  • Q : Better off and worse off condition in

    When an economic change makes ten percent of the population better off and has no consequence on the economic welfare of the other ninety percent, in that case: (w) the community is better off. (x) the community is worse off. (y) community economic welfare does not ch

  • Q : Better off with less in economic

    Anything of that people would be better off with less is which from given issue: (1) economic surplus, (2) external cost, (3) economic bad and (4) adverse consequence. Hello guys I need your advice. Please recommend some idea for a

  • Q : Relative market prices and ratios of

    Jeremy Bentham would have been least familiar along with the concept such that: (1) criminals must be punished proportionally to the harm completed to society, without consideration of intention, remorse or motive. (2) consumers are in equilibrium whe

  • Q : Improvements in Economic growth I have

    I have a problem in economics on Improvements in Economic growth. Please help me in the following question. Economic growth would be encouraged by enhancements in: (1) Economic efficiency. (2) Technology. (3) People’s attitudes. (4) Unemployment

  • Q : Explain about the Opportunity Cost in

    Opportunity cost is explained as the value of the: (w) best alternative specified for the decision made. (x) sum of all alternative choices while a decision is made. (y) monetary cost of making a decision. (z) cost incurred while one ignores alternati

  • Q : Problem on Welfare Can someone help me

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the following options. The equal shares criterion of distribution recommends that each and every individual must: (i) Receive income according to necessitate. (ii) Contribute equivalent producti