--%>

When scientific economic analysis NOT utilized for test

Please help me to solve the problem of Normative Economics that is specified below:

Scientific economic analysis could NOT be utilized for test if there: (i) higher tax rates cause tax revenues to decrease. (ii) only cigarette companies are harmed through higher cigarette taxes. (iii) gambling must be legalized to increase tax revenue. (iv) outlawing "happy hours" will decrease drunk driving.

Please guys describe the problem as in above.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Lifelong objectives with utilitarian

    To be everlastingly part of an association where utilitarian principles were discussed was between the lifelong objectives of: (w) Jeremy Bentham. (x) Robert Owen. (y) Saint Simon. (z) John Stuart Mill Can someone

  • Q : Determine the positive technical

    Which of the given is a positive technical statement? (i) The Miss America contest is sexist and tasteless. (ii) The moon is made of green cheese. (iii) Microsoft’s record of innovation justifies Bill Gates’ incredible wealth. (iv) Capitalism improves peop

  • Q : Economic goals of all economic activity

    Adam Smith believed about the ultimate suitable objective of all economic activity is to maximizing: (w) wealth and power of the national government. (x) satisfaction of individuals by giving people along with the goods they want. (y) employment oppor

  • Q : Technological advance in costs All else

    All else equivalent, when the output of one good raises, the output of other goods: (1) Should fall in an underemployed economy. (2) May rise as well when society begins on its PPF. (3) Will drop in an efficient and completely employed economy. (4) Essentially experie

  • Q : Influencing goods in Economic Growth I

    I have a problem in economics on Economic Growth. Please help me in the following question. Across time, raising the output of military goods devoid of decreasing the output of civilian goods is: (1) Always unfeasible. (2) Impossible in an economy with very high unemp

  • Q : Basic economic questions NOT included

    The three basic economic questions do NOT include: (w) What?, (x) For whom?, (y) Where? and (z) How? Can someone explain me with about above problem of fundamental economic concept...

  • Q : Determine the initial distribution of

    When goods are traded and several families gain without worsening other families' well-being, so in that case the initial distribution of goods should have been: (w) optimal. (x) distributively inefficient. (y) superior to the new dis

  • Q : Problem on equivalent amounts of goods

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. According to the equivalent share criterion of distribution, individuals must: (i) Share income according to personal requirement. (ii) All produce equivalent shares of output. (iii) Each cons

  • Q : Define smog as in Bads economics problem

    Smog is: (w) a good since this gives the air texture. (x) a bad because most people would pay to find rid of this. (y) a free good since you could consume all you desire without having to pay for this. (z) an inefficient utilization of resources.

    Q : Punishment to criminals devoid of

    The early philosopher who argued about criminals must be punished proportionally to the harm completed to society, but without consideration of remorse, intent or motive was: (1) John Stuart Mill. (2) Edwin Chadwick. (3) Jeremy Bentham. (4) Adam Smith. (5) Aristotle.<