--%>

When is Self-interest evident

How can I solve my following problem? Please suggest me the correct answer.

Explain reason Self interest is evident while: (i) A mugger utilizes a $1 bullet upon his victim to take $100 by his wallet. (ii) Helen creates a $100 donation to her favorite charity. (iii) At the espresso cart you buy a cup of coffee. (iv) A miser hides all her money within a mattress. (v) All of the above.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Laws and government regulations of

    Most of the economists agree that the property rights are finally defined and recognized primarily by: (i) The ‘invisible hand’ of the market system. (ii) The labor theory of value. (iii) Laws and government regulations. (iv) Supply and demand. (v) The bru

  • Q : Wealthy entrepreneurs by perfectly

    Do you agree along with the adage such that "You cannot find rich working for somebody else"? Should successful entrepreneurs serve others to enrich themselves? Can wage earners acquire great wealth without investing? How may you test the accuracy of your answ

  • Q : Influencing goods in Economic Growth I

    I have a problem in economics on Economic Growth. Please help me in the following question. Across time, raising the output of military goods devoid of decreasing the output of civilian goods is: (1) Always unfeasible. (2) Impossible in an economy with very high unemp

  • Q : Driving issues in economics The driving

    The driving issues within economics are like: (w) income distribution and wealth. (x) productive inefficiency and waste. (y) restricted resources and unlimited human desires. (z) financial planning and mismanagement.

    Q : Define economic assumption of

    As per the economic assumption of rationality, there people: (w) always behave with ideal rationality. (x) never behave in erratic or random ways. (y) tend to make decisions consistent along with their goals. (z) foresee completely the effects of thei

  • Q : Example of distributive efficiency in

    I found a seashell which you would truly like to have, and you determined a coconut that I would truly like to include. Trading your coconut for my seashell would improve: (i) allocative efficiency. (ii) productive efficiency. (iii) distributive efficiency. (iv) quali

  • Q : Explain about the Opportunity Cost in

    Opportunity cost is explained as the value of the: (w) best alternative specified for the decision made. (x) sum of all alternative choices while a decision is made. (y) monetary cost of making a decision. (z) cost incurred while one ignores alternati

  • Q : Existence of shortages or surpluses

    Shortages or surpluses exist while: (w) transaction costs are zero. (x) quantity supplied be different from quantity demanded. (y) monopolists enjoy exorbitant profits. (z) supply prices equivalent demand prices. H

  • Q : Most dealing of normative economic

    Normative economic statements deal mainly along with: (w) the way things should be. (x) production possibilities frontier analysis. (y) facts in place of theories. (z) how to measure economic variables. Please choo

  • Q : Case of unsuccessfulness of goods in

    Consider the several possible goods currently producible within the United States, specified our available technologies and resources. When we produced only cat litter and razor blades, there would be a failure to get: (i) distributive efficiency. (ii) economic equity