--%>

When is a thing termed as a good as opposite to a bad

A thing is termed as a "good" (as opposite to a "bad") when: (w) its use improves human happiness. (x) its production needs capital and labor. (y) its value to society is restricted. (z) this is a service to people, as housecleaning.

How can I solve my economics problem of Bads? Please suggest me the answer for the same.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Problem of macroeconomics in economics

    Can anybody advise me the proper explanation for given problem regarding macroeconomics in Economics generally. In macroeconomics, where we examine all things like the: (w) problems of What, How, and For Whom. (x)

  • Q : Determine an example of net investment

    When gross investment is $100 billion whereas $10 billion of capital is worn out, in that case net investment is: (w) $90 billion. (x) $100 billion. (y) $110 billion. (z) not possible to calculate without more information.

    Q : Description about the wealth of nations

    In 1776 Adam Smith’s work, The Wealth of Nations, is mainly a description of how: (1) democratic socialism is more efficient than totalitarianism. (2) self interest is coordinated within a market system. (3) barriers to internat

  • Q : Combination of land People who seek

    People who seek gains and bear risks and improbability while they combine land, capital and labor in productive ways is: (i) socialists. (ii) sole proprietors. (iii) professional managers. (iv) entrepreneurs. (v) bureaucratic capitalists.

  • Q : Defining the term Money in Economic I

    I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion that how is defining Money a form of: (i) basic economic resource. (ii) the capital stock., (iii) financial capital. and (iv) precious metal.

    Q : Give an example of Production in

    By using knowledge and/or technology to apply energy to change materials, thereby making the materials more precious is: (w) production. (x) demand. (y) a total cure for scarcity. (z) economically profitable. Can someone clarify/he

  • Q : Explain about the NO economic reform NO

    NO economic reform could probably: (w) remove scarcity. (x) decrease the average costs of production. (y) abolish equality in income distribution. (z) increase wages for most workers. How can I solve my eco

  • Q : Majority worse off and minority better

    When an economic change makes a huge majority of the population worse off and a minute minority better off, the alteration is: (w) good for society because it made some people better off. (x) bad for society since only a few people ar

  • Q : Ratios of proportional changes in

    he ratios of proportional changes within related variables are expressed numerically termed as: (1) interdependency coordinates. (2) best linear unbiased estimators (BLUE). (3) elasticity coefficients. (4) relative betas. (5) beta feedback estimates.

    Q : When scientific economic analysis NOT

    Please help me to solve the problem of Normative Economics that is specified below: Scientific economic analysis could NOT be utilized for test if there: (i) higher tax rates cause tax revenues to decrease. (ii) on