--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

When is a thing termed as a good as opposite to a bad

A thing is termed as a "good" (as opposite to a "bad") when: (w) its use improves human happiness. (x) its production needs capital and labor. (y) its value to society is restricted. (z) this is a service to people, as housecleaning.

How can I solve my economics problem of Bads? Please suggest me the answer for the same.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Issues of normative economic policy

    Economic policy matters are usually: (w) simply resolved by positive analysis alone. (x) normative, but workable solutions based on positive analysis. (y) either strictly macroeconomic, or strictly microeconomic. (z) better resolved using common sense

    		•
  • Q : Effect of current investment Can

    Can someone help me in determining the right answer from the given options. Expanding the current investment associative to current consumption most directly raises an economy’s rate of: (1) Stagnation. (2) Capital absorption. (3) Economic growt

    		•
  • Q : Esurience of economy-wide efficiency

    For a specified distribution of income, economy-wide efficiency would make sure a: (i) Redistribution to make equal income. (ii) Minimal level of pollution. (iii) Maximum level of particular identity. (iv) Maximum value for whole production.

  • Q : Illustrates a problem of Distributive

    Bob the Baker and Bill the Butcher while both would be willing to trade three loaves of bread for a pair of T-Bone steaks, but for several reasons they not include: (i) Bob must become a vegetarian so he doesn't contain to rely upon Bill. (ii) The economy has producti

    		•
  • Q : Payments for Resources Incorrect

    Incorrect statements would contain the assertion which payments for: (a) The use of land is termed as land rent. (b) Labor is termed as wages. (c) Services are termed as profits. (d) Capital is termed as interest. Hello guys I need

    		•
  • Q : Why are Land Land, labor, and capital

    Land, labor, and capital are all scarce since: (w) human wants are restricted. (x) less is obtainable than people want. (y) each productive resource needs a monetary return for its use. (z) once employed they cannot be used again.

    Q : Economist-Conclusion for redistribution

    I want a good answer on the topic of normative economics. Please give me your opinion that if wealth and income both were redistributed by the richest one to the poorest five percent of the population, conclusion of an economist would be that: (w) soc

    		•
  • Q : When a free good enjoyed by people is

    A free good is something which people enjoy but that is not scarce since: (w) people can costlessly have all they want. (x) people can purchase this along  with credit without containing to immediately pay for htis. (y) luxuries

    		•
  • Q : Society based on pure capitalism Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. In a society, based on pure capitalism, the government: (i) Is completely needless, as anarchy is ideal. (ii) Specifies the production and distribution plans in detail. (iii) Enforces the prop

    		•
  • Q : Entails of a technical approach to

    A technical approach to economics entail: (1) positive questions since this cannot resolve normative matters. (2) normative questions since this cannot resolve positive matters. (3) positive and normative questions since this can resolve all matters.

    		•