--%>

When is a thing termed as a good as opposite to a bad

A thing is termed as a "good" (as opposite to a "bad") when: (w) its use improves human happiness. (x) its production needs capital and labor. (y) its value to society is restricted. (z) this is a service to people, as housecleaning.

How can I solve my economics problem of Bads? Please suggest me the answer for the same.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Requirements of each and every economic

    In contrast to free goods, each and every economic goods: (1) Raise happiness. (2) Are taxed. (3) Need large amounts of human labor to generate. (4) Entail opportunity costs? Please help me to solve the problem of

  • Q : Explain the normative economic analysis

    Normative economic analysis: (w) involves only non-quantitative measures. (x) gives precise predictions of economic effects. (y) emphasizes a social science approach to problems. (z) is based upon value judgments.

  • Q : Building blocks for a capitalist system

    Building blocks for a capitalist system comprise: (i) supplies and demands. (ii) private property rights. (iii) laissez-faire policies. (iv) market-determined prices and outputs. (v) All of the above.I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems

  • Q : Economic goals of all economic activity

    Adam Smith believed about the ultimate suitable objective of all economic activity is to maximizing: (w) wealth and power of the national government. (x) satisfaction of individuals by giving people along with the goods they want. (y) employment oppor

  • Q : High rates of saving and investment Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Production possibilities frontiers can be employed to demonstrate why maximizing economic growth needs: (1) The amount of investment goods to equivalent the quantity of consum

  • Q : Problem on equivalent amounts of goods

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. According to the equivalent share criterion of distribution, individuals must: (i) Share income according to personal requirement. (ii) All produce equivalent shares of output. (iii) Each cons

  • Q : Determine the Supply and Demand in

    This vigorously competitive clothing market is at firstly in equilibrium at S0 and D0. When the moves in the demand for clothing to D1 occurred before the transfer in supply to S1, in that case: (1) the primary signal to fir

  • Q : Problem on Welfare Can someone help me

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the following options. The equal shares criterion of distribution recommends that each and every individual must: (i) Receive income according to necessitate. (ii) Contribute equivalent producti

  • Q : When is normative economics crucial Can

    Can anybody suggest me the appropriate explanation for given problem regarding normative economics generally. Normative economics is critical while an economist tries to: (i) predict how OPEC's refuse will influenc

  • Q : Example of Normative Economics with no

    A statement which needs no value judgments would be which an optimal distribution of goods is: (w) invariably best for society. (x) better for society than any non-optimal distribution of goods. (y) better for society only when this conforms to the will of the majorit