--%>

When is a thing termed as a good as opposite to a bad

A thing is termed as a "good" (as opposite to a "bad") when: (w) its use improves human happiness. (x) its production needs capital and labor. (y) its value to society is restricted. (z) this is a service to people, as housecleaning.

How can I solve my economics problem of Bads? Please suggest me the answer for the same.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Economic problem of increase employment

    I need a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please give me your suggestion that the concept that restricting steel imports will increase employment within the steel industry that is a: (w) normative argument. (x) Positive argument, since the idea can be te

  • Q : Description about the wealth of nations

    In 1776 Adam Smith’s work, The Wealth of Nations, is mainly a description of how: (1) democratic socialism is more efficient than totalitarianism. (2) self interest is coordinated within a market system. (3) barriers to internat

  • Q : Example of economic costs regarding the

    The economic costs of attending college to receive a bachelor’s degree would not comprise: (i) Potential wages earned through incoming work force right after high school. (ii) Potentially higher standards of living throughout the four years or therefore spent st

  • Q : Where illustrations of production are

    I require a good answer on the topic of Economic problems. Please provide me your suggestion that where illustrations of production are not contain: (i) Using canned chocolate icing to decorate a cake made with “store-bought” cake mix, (ii

  • Q : Punishment must fir to crime by Jeremy

    In words of Jeremy Bentham, punishment for a particular committing a wrong against society must be: (i) decided by a jury of the person’s peers. (ii) depends on the individual’s intentions. (iii) depends on the criminal’s position in

  • Q : Explain TANSTAAFL TANSTAAFL is an

    TANSTAAFL is an acronym suggestive of that: (1) Tax agents never observe the awful influences from levies. (2) Tenants and needy must take all assets by landlords. (3) There ain't no all things like a free lunch. (4) Temperance and non satiety togethe

  • Q : When is Economics LEAST related with

    Economics like a science is LEAST related with how people: (w) try to make themselves happy. (x) utilize resources to try to satisfy their desires. (y) adjust to changes within government policies. (z) morally justify cheating upon their income taxes.

  • Q : Economic growth and development I have

    I have a problem in economics on Economic growth and progress. Please help me in the following question. The Economic growth in a proficient economy will be decreased by: (i) Investment in new capital. (ii) Technological advances. (iii) Expanding the

  • Q : Problem regarding the distributive

    Ted and Willy are eating lunch. Ted has a Snowball and Willy a Ding Dong for dessert. Strongly prefer both Ding Dongs. A required trade of Willy's Ding-Dong for Ted's Snowball would be likely to enhance: (w) distributive efficiency as Fred is better off. (x) allocativ

  • Q : Basic economic questions NOT included

    The three basic economic questions do NOT include: (w) What?, (x) For whom?, (y) Where? and (z) How? Can someone explain me with about above problem of fundamental economic concept...