--%>

When is a good taken as scarce, explain

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding scarcity in economics generally?

A good is taken as scarce when people: (w) lack the funds required to make sure their survival. (x) requirement to consume large amounts of this. (y) need more of this than the amounts available when this were free. (z) can have more and more they need without paying for this.

Pleases friends help me for the given problem as in above.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Problem on private property rights and

    I have a problem in economics on private property rights and laissez faire. Please help me in the following question. The basics of pure capitalism comprise: (i) Social ownership of all non-human resources. (ii) Strong two party electoral system. (iii

  • Q : Problem on Laissez-faire The movement

    The movement towards laissez-faire policies would best be described by a strategy to: (1) Stimulate the domestic production by raising import tariffs. (2) Remove laws to subsidize farming. (3) Guarantee food stamps for fundamental survival. (4) Functi

  • Q : Illustration regarding to market

    When the soybean market begins within equilibrium upon S0D0 and in that case a highly publicized study demonstrates yoghurt to be much more nutritious than the tofu made by soybeans, the market changes to: (w) S0D2. (x) S

  • Q : Specialization and Gains from Trade

    While people develop expertise by dividing up the assignments encountered within major productive activities as like making a movie or manufacturing a plane, one of the most likely consequences is:  (i) Political instability originates by unavoidable frictions in

  • Q : Critical features of Technological

    New services and goods, new forms and types of equipment, and new knowledge regarding how to combine resources productively are all critical features of: (1) entrepreneurial profits. (2) winning the global war against scarcity. (3) net investment with

  • Q : Punishment to criminals devoid of

    The early philosopher who argued about criminals must be punished proportionally to the harm completed to society, but without consideration of remorse, intent or motive was: (1) John Stuart Mill. (2) Edwin Chadwick. (3) Jeremy Bentham. (4) Adam Smith. (5) Aristotle.<

  • Q : Majority worse off and minority better

    When an economic change makes a huge majority of the population worse off and a minute minority better off, the alteration is: (w) good for society because it made some people better off. (x) bad for society since only a few people ar

  • Q : Hedonistic calculus–regulation of human

    Social welfare is exploited while a “hedonistic calculus” regulates all human action as per the interventionist “liberal”: (i) John Stuart Mill. (ii) Thorstein Veblen. (iii) Milton Friedman. (iv) Karl Marx. (v)

  • Q : Limitations of economic resources Hey

    Hey friends please give your opinion for the problem of economic resources that is given below: Resources (factors of production) do NOT comprise: (i) entrepreneurship. (ii) competition. (iii) land. (iv) capital. (

  • Q : Assignments I want it tomorrow night or

    I want it tomorrow night or before, please.