--%>

When is a good taken as scarce, explain

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding scarcity in economics generally?

A good is taken as scarce when people: (w) lack the funds required to make sure their survival. (x) requirement to consume large amounts of this. (y) need more of this than the amounts available when this were free. (z) can have more and more they need without paying for this.

Pleases friends help me for the given problem as in above.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Government as a trustee on nonhuman

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. Government acts as the trustee over nonhuman resources beneath: (i) Laissez-faire capitalism. (ii) Socialism. (iii) Fee-simple property rights systems. (iv) Feu

  • Q : Critical features of Technological

    New services and goods, new forms and types of equipment, and new knowledge regarding how to combine resources productively are all critical features of: (1) entrepreneurial profits. (2) winning the global war against scarcity. (3) net investment with

  • Q : Explain about the good economics models

    Good economic models are: (1) intricate models of all aspects of the actual economy. (2) designed to create economics hard. (3) simplifications of the real world. (4) scientific only when expressed mathematically.

  • Q : People moods towards Positive Economics

    Average men are innately further perceptive than average women within ascertaining people’s moods and predicting behavior, when average women classically have relatively better depth perception and intrinsically more precise geometric intuition. So, the precedin

  • Q : Market adjustments within equilibrium

    When the soybean market is originally into equilibrium, on S0D0, raises in the wages of farm workers will cause change(s) to: (w) S1D0.(x) S0D1. (y) S2D2.  (z

  • Q : Define the normative economic statement

    Which of the given is a normative economic statement? (1) Most Republicans favor the death penalty for murderers. (2) Punishment which is surer, swifter, and harsher decreases the rates of violent crime. (3) Most Democrats oppose the death penalty for

  • Q : Current situation- better off without

    When it is possible to make somebody better off without making anybody worse off, the current condition is: (w) efficient. (x) inefficient. (y) optimal. (z) simply enhanced. How can I solve my problem of Economic Efficiency

  • Q : Consequence of the increased

    People would be least probable to be happier like a consequence of the increased accessibility of: (1) free goods. (2) economic resources. (3) superior technologies. (4) economic goods. (5) economic bads. Hello guys I want your adv

  • Q : Explain about the positive technical

    Positive technical statements: (w) need value judgments. (x) should be valid by definition. (y) can be proved and tested or disproved by fact and logic. (z) are the excellent guides in specifying economic policies.

  • Q : Worse off and better off condition in

    When an economic change makes one person worse off and one thousand persons better off, this is: (1) good for society. (2) bad for society. (3) neither bad nor good for society. (4) not possible to assess without a va