--%>

When are relative prices serving as rationing device

The behavior on the given list most consistent along with relative prices serving like a rationing device, and not mainly as incentives, would be as: (i) Marcia, a status-seeking social climber that turning down requests of Wayne for dates after seeing small numbers upon his pay stub. (ii) Bob cautiously driving the speed limit since he is afraid of a sixth (and last) speeding ticket. (iii) soaring prices for pickled chicken feet inducing Arkansas chicken breeders to boost output. (iv) Carla flunking economics because instead of studying a further six hours, she partied and woke up along with a hangover. (v) Marcia reheating burritos for dinner again since refried beans are cheaper than steak.

Please help me to solve the problem of Prices that is given above.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Case of priceless in relative prices

    While people sincerely refer to something like "priceless", so they most likely mean that this is: (a) mostly meaningless to name a monetary price since its opportunity cost is more high. (b) worthless junk on that they place no value. (c) irreplaceab

  • Q : How would be an example of a free good

    An example of a free good would be: (1) a cool breeze upon a hot humid day. (2) DVDs specified as door prizes to the first 100 shoppers at the grand opening of a Best Buy. (3) the care and attention mothers provide babies. (4) trinkets at the Dollar Store that cost me

  • Q : Explain the positive economic statement

    A positive economic statement is one which: (w) involves scientifically testable predictions. (x) is based upon value judgments. (y) explains the world idealistically. (z) applies primarily to microeconomic data. H

  • Q : Define the economic theories Economic

    Economic theories are: (w) true with definition. (x) generally excellent in theory but wrong during practice. (y) made up of generalizations regarding economic behavior. (z) normative, whereas economic policy is more positive.

    Q : Prohibition in illustrations of

    Illustrations of normative statements would not comprise assertions which: (1) premeditated murderers deserve the death penalty. (2) Leonardo DiCaprio is a terrible actor. (3) AIDS and HIV are transmitted through sexual contact. (4) women must be paid

  • Q : Explain about market buyers A buyers’

    A buyers’ market is a market in that: (w) queuing to secure goods is common. (x) the current market price is below equilibrium. (y) demand exceeds supply. (z) several sellers experience surpluses. I need a go

  • Q : Example of Normative Economics with no

    A statement which needs no value judgments would be which an optimal distribution of goods is: (w) invariably best for society. (x) better for society than any non-optimal distribution of goods. (y) better for society only when this conforms to the will of the majorit

  • Q : Moral dimensions of social decisions in

    Positive economics is LEAST related with the: (w) allocation of economic resources. (x) conflict of obtainable resources and societal needs. (y) mechanisms by that resources are used to satisfy societal requirements. (z) moral dimensions of social dec

  • Q : Define the specific explanation of

    Hey friends please give your opinion for the problem of Economic Analysis that is given below: Economic analysis: (w) focuses only on financial relations. (x) is a step-by-step guide to gaining wealth. (y) centers

  • Q : Problem on private property rights and

    I have a problem in economics on private property rights and laissez faire. Please help me in the following question. The basics of pure capitalism comprise: (i) Social ownership of all non-human resources. (ii) Strong two party electoral system. (iii