--%>

What is Non-Logical Vocabulary

Non-Logical Vocabulary: 1. Predicates, called also relation symbols, each with its associated arity. For our
needs, we may assume that the number of predicates is finite. But this is not essential. We can have an infinite list of predicates, P1, …, Pn, …, provided that the arity of Pn can be effectively computed as a function of n. 
         
2. Individual constants, c1, c2,… We shall assume that their number is finite, but this again is not essential.

3. Function symbols, f1, f2, … each with its associated arity. Again, we may assume that their number is finite, but this is not essential as long as the arity of fn is a computable function of n.

   Related Questions in Mathematics

  • Q : Explain a rigorous theory for Brownian

    Explain a rigorous theory for Brownian motion developed by Wiener Norbert.

  • Q : Formal Logic It's a problem set, they

    It's a problem set, they are attached. it's related to Sider's book which is "Logic to philosophy" I attached the book too. I need it on feb22 but feb23 still work

  • Q : Calculus I need it within 4 hours. Due

    I need it within 4 hours. Due time March 15, 2014. 3PM Pacific Time. (Los Angeles, CA)

  • Q : What is the definition of a group Group

    Group: Let G be a set. When we say that o is a binary operation on G, we mean that o is a function from GxG into G. Informally, o takes pairs of elements of G as input and produces single elements of G as output. Examples are the operations + and x of

  • Q : First-order formulas over the

    Consider the unary relational symbols P and L, and the binary relational symbol On, where P(a) and I(a) encode that a is apoint and a (sraight) line in the 2-dimensional space, respectively, while On(a,b) encodes  that a is a point, b is a line, and o lies on b.

  • Q : Explain the work and model proposed by

    Explain the work and model proposed by Richardson.

  • Q : Law of iterated expectations for

     Prove the law of iterated expectations for continuous random variables. 2. Prove that the bounds in Chebyshev's theorem cannot be improved upon. I.e., provide a distribution that satisfies the bounds exactly for k ≥1, show that it satisfies the bounds exactly, and draw its PDF. T

  • Q : Formulating linear program of an oil

    An oil company blends two input streams of crude oil products alkylate and catalytic cracked to meet demand for weekly contracts for regular (12,000 barrels) mind grade ( 7,500) and premium ( 4,500 barrels) gasoline’s . each week they can purchase up to 15, 000

  • Q : Define Big-O notation Big-O notation :

    Big-O notation: If f(n) and g(n) are functions of a natural number n, we write f(n) is O(g(n)) and we say f is big-O of g if there is a constant C (independent of n) such that f

  • Q : Numerical solution of PDE i want you to

    i want you to solve this assignment. this consist of two parts theoretical and coding. the code has to be created by you. no modified or copying code. you have to mention the exact solution and the proportion error. also you have to explain the sketch that you get from the code. these information