--%>

What is covalent radii? Explain its calculation.

Average covalent radii can be assigned on the basis of molecular structures.


The accumulation of structural data by spectroscopic studies and both electron and x-ray diffraction studies allows one to investigate the possibility fo assigning a covalent bound molecule, i.e. of assigning a covalent radius to each atom. One begins by assigning half the length of a homonuclear bond as the covalent radius of the atoms forming the bond. Thus, from the equilibrium bond length of Cl2 of 199 pm, one obtains the value of 100 pm for the covalent radius of chlorine. From the carbon-carbon distance of 154 pm in ethane, for example, one obtains a value of 77 pm for the covalent radius of carbon and so forth. To proceed, one must now establish the extent to which the length of covalent bonds can be treated in terms of the sums of such covalent radii. 

More extensive treatments of this type show that the bond lengths of many bonds are given within a few picometers by the sum of assigned atomic covalent radii. This suggests that covalent bonds have lengths sufficiently independent of factors other than the fixed radii for there to be some value in assigning radii to the bonded nuclei. 

Some tests of additivity of covalent bond radii, pm:

390_covalent radii.png 

Further comparisons of these values with experimental results indicate, as shown in fact by some of the examples of table 1, that serious discrepancies can occur between simply predicted covalent-bond lengths and those observed. The C-F bond, for example, is calculated from the data of table 1 to have a length of 146 pm, whereas microwave spectral results forCH3F give it as 138.5 pm and electron-diffraction results for CF4 give 132 pm.

Such discrepancies led V. Schomaker and D. P. Stevenson to suggest that a bond length calculated from covalent radii must be adjusted for the difference in electronegativity of the bonded atoms. They suggested the relation:

rAB = rA + rB - 90 (xA - xB) r in pm

Some but not all, the interesting violations of simple covalent radii additivity are removed by this empirical expression. In other cases the Stevenson-Schomaker correction makes the agreement with the observed length pooper than that obtained by a simple addition of the covalent radii. Although a number of factors must be operating to affect the length of a bond between a pair of nuclei in any given molecule, the covalent radii of table 2 are often of value in estimating this bond length.

Covalent radii for atoms involved in single-bonded compounds, pm:

   Related Questions in Chemistry

  • Q : Problem on mole fraction of glucose

    Provide solution of this question. While 1.80gm glucose dissolve in 90 of H2O , the mole fraction of glucose is: (a) 0.00399 (b) 0.00199 (c) 0.0199 (d) 0.998

  • Q : Dipole moment Elaborate a dipole moment

    Elaborate a dipole moment?

  • Q : Liquid surfaces The surface between a

    The surface between a liquid and a vapour distinguishes these fluids. The surface tension of liquids can be looked upon as that the property which draws a liquid together and forms a liquid vapour interface, therefore, distinguishing liquids from gases.<

  • Q : Problem related to molarity Provide

    Provide solution of this question. Increasing the temperature of an aqueous solution will cause: (a) Decrease in molality (b) Decrease in molarity (c) Decrease in mole fraction (d) Decrease in % w/w

  • Q : What are lattices and unit cells? The

    The repeating, atomic level structure of a crystal can be represented by a lattice and by the repeating unit of the lattice, the unit cell.It was apparent very early in the study of crystals that the shapes of crystals stem from an ordered array of smaller

  • Q : Preparation of normal solution Give me

    Give me answer of this question. What weight of ferrous ammonium sulphate is requiored to prepare 100 ml of 0.1 normal solution (mol. wt. 392): (a) 39.2 gm (b) 3.92 gm (c)1.96 gm (d)19.6 gm

  • Q : Calculating total number of moles

    Choose the right answer from following. While 90 gm of water is mixed with 300 gm of acetic acid. The total number of moles will be: (a)5 (b)10 (c)15 (d)20

  • Q : Group IV Cations Chromium(III)

    Chromium(III) hydroxide is highly insoluble in distilled water but dissolves readily in either acidic or basic solution. Briefly explain why the compound can dissolve in acidic or in basic but not in neutral solution. Write appropriate equations to support your answer.

  • Q : Why aryl halides are less reactive?

    Aryl halides are much less reactive towards nucleophilic substitution reactions than haloalkanes. The less reactivity of aryl halides can be described

  • Q : Chem Explain how dissolving the Group

    Explain how dissolving the Group IV carbonate precipitate with 6M CH3COOH, followed by the addition of extra acetic acid.