--%>

Value of MPC

Why can be value of MPC be not more than one?

Answer: The value of MPC will not be more than one since increment in consumption (ΔC) can’t be more than the equivalent increment in income (ΔY), that is, ΔC < ΔY.

   Related Questions in Macroeconomics

  • Q : Components of aggregate demand What are

    What are the components of aggregate demand (AD)? Answer: The components of AD are as follows:AD = C + I + G + (X - M) By Simplifying AD = C + I, Here C refers to Household consumption demand and I refer

  • Q : Control of Inflation Economists agree

    Economists agree that inflation beyond a moderate rate is undesirable as it can often prove disastrous and therefore, it must be kept under control. Economists agree also that an appropriate mix of fiscal and monetary policies can be helpful in controlling inflation.

  • Q : EQUILIBRIUM GDP WHAT IS THE CHANGE IN

    WHAT IS THE CHANGE IN EQUILIBRIUM gdp CAUSED BY THE ADDITION OF NET EXPORTS?

  • Q : Cost of a foreign currency When cost of

    When cost of a foreign currency increases its supply too increases. Elucidate why?

  • Q : FX Rates & The Balance of Payments The

    The Financial Account captures international fund flows due to

  • Q : Market Economy Explain the statement "

    Explain the statement "Hypothes is the basic short run and long run behaviors of the airline industry in a market economy".

  • Q : GDP gap "The economic cost of

    "The economic cost of unemployment is measured by the GDP gap." Explain this statement. ?

  • Q : Definition of equilibrium price

    Definition of equilibrium price: It is the price which balances quantity demanded and quantity supplied. The equilibrium price is frequently termed as the "market-clearing" price since both buyers and sellers are p

  • Q : Role of price in market economies What

    What is the role of price in market economies?

  • Q : Microeconomic and macroeconomic effects

    Predictions which restricting international trade to protect specific industries and “infant” firms would (a) inefficiently decrease aggregate output and employment, (b) raise the market power of the protected firms and their workers, and