--%>

Utilization of Bond market to make and destroy money

How does the FED utilize the bond market to make and destroy money? Which technique do developed countries utilize to decrease the chance of experiencing inflation? What about the Banana Republicans and inflation, do they have this means acessible to them?

E

Expert

Verified

The bond market is a frequently used tool for creating or destroying money. When the Fed wants to create money, it purchases the government securities from dealers, so that the dealers’ bank accounts will be credited. The dealers are most probably the banks and when banks have more deposits, they have more to lend to the economy and thus money is created by purchase of bonds by the Fed. Similarly, when the Fed wants to destroy money, it sells government securities to dealers, so that the dealers’ bank accounts will be debited. When banks have fewer deposits, they have less to lend to the economy and thus money is destroyed by sale of bonds by the Fed.

Inflation occurs when the money supply has largely exceeded demand. In order to reduce the chance of experiencing inflation, money supply needs to be lowered or money has to be destroyed and hence the Fed will sell more of government bonds. In this case, the prices eventually drops and interest rates increase thus reducing the chance of experiencing inflation. Banana Republics refer to nations which propose public policies entirely to benefit private corporations for exploiting the public lands and the debts, if any, incurred will be public responsibility. Thus such republics have unstable politicians and hence they do not care for inflation or any such issues. Since Banana Republicans do not concern about public property or the public in general, they certainly do not have any inflationary control measures.

   Related Questions in Macroeconomics

  • Q : Marginal utility of good at its maximum

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The consumer maximizes utility whenever the spending patterns cause: (1) Marginal utility of each and every good to be at its maximum value. (2) Marginal utilities of each and every goods cons

  • Q : If the MPC is .70 and investment

    If the MPC is .70 and investment increases by $3 billion, the equilibrium GDP will:

  • Q : Unemployment (a) Do you think that

    (a) Do you think that macroeconomic policy should be designed to achieve a measured unemployment rate of zero?

  • Q : Define Quantity of a good Quantity of a

    Quantity of a good: The quantity of a good which buyers demand is found out by the price of the good, income, the prices of associated goods, expectations, tastes, and the number of buyers.

  • Q : Principles of macroeconomics What are

    What are the “powers of the Federal Reserve

  • Q : Define Administrative revenue

    Administrative revenue: Administrative revenueis the revenue which occurs on account of the administrative function of government. It comprise: (a) Fees (college/school) (b) License fees paid to obtain permission to carry out a service (c) Fines and p

  • Q : Problem related to rising GDP Between

    Between 1961 and 2007, the rising share of the Canadian population in paid employment contributed to rising GDP per person. But suppose that the share of the Canadian population in paid employment had remained constant between 1961 and 2007. What would Canadian GDP pe

  • Q : Important issues in Macroeconomics to

    Macroeconomics is primarily focused on issues about: (w) economy extensive aggregate variables as like national income. (x) the structure of economic activity quite than its level. (y) resource allocations through households and business firms. (z) po

  • Q : Market demand curve for new houses The

    The market demand curve for latest houses would rise in response to a rise in: (1) construction technology. (2) The costs of lumber. (3) Housing prices. (4) Legal price ceilings on rental properties. (5) Expectations regarding future housing prices.

    Q : Microeconomic and macroeconomic effects

    Predictions which restricting international trade to protect specific industries and “infant” firms would (a) inefficiently decrease aggregate output and employment, (b) raise the market power of the protected firms and their workers, and