--%>

Utility with food coupons

Question:

In Vancouver the Salvation Army encourages people to make food voucher donations to panhandlers instead of simply giving them cash. You can buy a food voucher for $5 and give it to a panhandler who can use it to purchase food. The Salvation Army says it's a way to ensure that a gift actually goes to food, rather than alcohol or drugs. Suppose a panhandler (PH) consumes two goods: food (F) and drugs (D). The PH has a utility function u = F0D1. This can also be written as u= D. Answer and explain the following using a diagram which is completely labeled.

(a) If drugs and food each cost $1 per unit, and the PH has $20 is cash, how much D and F will he consume.

(b) If instead the PH has $10 in cash and $10 in food vouchers, how much D and F will he consume?

(c) Is the PH better off with $20 in cash, or with $10 in cash and $10 in food vouchers.

Solution:

a)

u = D

PH will only consume drugs. This is because food does not give him additional utility. Whether he consumes 0 units or 1000000 units of food, it does not make a difference. Therefore, he will spend all his income on drugs. He will consume 20 units of drugs.

758_additional utility.png

b)

In this case, he will consume 10 units of drugs, and he is indifferent between consuming 0 units or 10 units of food.

968_Utility with food coupons.png

c) Utility with $20 cash = 20

Utility with food coupons = 10

Therefore, PH is better with $20 cash.

   Related Questions in Business Economics

  • Q : Organization identify the reasons for

    identify the reasons for the formation of organizations

  • Q : Favor laissez- faire economic policies

    Favor laissez- faire economic policies tended by Adam Smith, who also: (w) saw the requirement for several state intervention. (x) believed there were no conditions in which the government must intervene. (y) supported most government

  • Q : Describe High operating leverage

    Briefly describe High operating leverage?

  • Q : Define condition when one gain unless

    When no one can gain unless someone else loses, in that case current arrangements are: (w) economically efficient. (x) not optimal. (y) inequitable. (z) the best cure for scarcity. Can someone explain/help me with best solution abo

  • Q : Problem regarding to intermediaries and

    Society gains from the activities of intermediaries which succeed within: (1) falling uncertainty and transaction costs for last consumers. (2) arbitrating strikes and defending workers’ rights. (3) creating productive jobs for unskilled workers

  • Q : Firm costs and revenues Question:  You

    Question:  You are given the following data about two firms: FIRM A Quantity 0

  • Q : Resource market for economic capital

    Janet has loaned a start-up coffee house $50,000 and predicts to earn interest from her financial investment. In circular flow model this transaction is an illustration of: (1) An exchange of her saving for interest, via a resource market for the economic capital. (2)

  • Q : Describe North American Free Trade

    Describe North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)?

  • Q : Economic bailout of Spain and Greece

    Question: Conduct an analysis on the following topic and prepare an Executive Summary-style report with supporting exhibits (Insightful Graphs, tables etc. from quality expert analyst references used to write the r

  • Q : Briefly state the pros and cons of

    Briefly state the pros and cons of Proprietorship?