--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Uses of Normative Economics over Positive Economic analysis

Can anybody propose the proper explanation for specified problem regarding Normative Economics.

Positive economic analysis might NOT be used to test the idea which higher cigarette taxes would reasons of: (w) Tax revenue to increase and nicotine consumption to fall. (x) Tax burdens to fall most deeply on low-income smokers. (y) Tobacco farmers to lose income. (z) Smokers who stop to advantage the most from such taxes.

Please friends explain above problem..I really need that.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Hypothesis included by normative

    Please help me to solve the problem of hypothesis in normative statements in normative economics that is given below: Normative statements would consist of the hypothesis which: (v) Abuse of alcohol lowers GPAs. (w

    		•
  • Q : Problem of Economic Policies and

    Hello guys I want your opinion. Please recommend your view for given Economic Policies and Normative Economics problems. Disagreements in between economists about economic policies most commonly occur from differences within their:

    		•
  • Q : Weather ruins crop-equilibrium

    When the soybean market is firstly in equilibrium on S0D0 and in that case severe weather ruins much of the crop, then the market moves to: (1) S1D0. (2) S1D2. (3) S2D0<

    		•
  • Q : Find out supply shifted to higher

    This market for clothing started on S0 and D0. Inside this market for clothing,: (w) demand has increased, possibly because of a raise in income. (x) new equilibrium price lies below the original equilibrium price. (y) supply may have transferred

    		•
  • Q : Offsetting effects of Economic Growth I

    I have a problem in economics on Offsetting effects of Economic Growth. Please help me in the following question. Technological advances and resource diminution tend to join and hence a society’s production possibilities curve experiences: (i) R

    		•
  • Q : When is a good taken as scarce Can

    Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding scarcity in economics generally? A good is taken as scarce when people: (w) lack the funds required to make sure their survival. (x) require

    		•
  • Q : Combination of land People who seek

    People who seek gains and bear risks and improbability while they combine land, capital and labor in productive ways is: (i) socialists. (ii) sole proprietors. (iii) professional managers. (iv) entrepreneurs. (v) bureaucratic capitalists.

  • Q : Define cut costs without reducing the

    A firm which could cut costs without reducing the value of its output is experiencing as: (i) Allocative inefficiency. (ii) Productive inefficiency. (iii) Distributive inefficiency. (iv) Technological decline. Can

    		•
  • Q : Explain about the NO economic reform NO

    NO economic reform could probably: (w) remove scarcity. (x) decrease the average costs of production. (y) abolish equality in income distribution. (z) increase wages for most workers. How can I solve my eco

    		•
  • Q : Worse off and better off condition in

    When an economic change makes one person worse off and one thousand persons better off, this is: (1) good for society. (2) bad for society. (3) neither bad nor good for society. (4) not possible to assess without a va

    		•