--%>

Uses of Normative Economics over Positive Economic analysis

Can anybody propose the proper explanation for specified problem regarding Normative Economics.

Positive economic analysis might NOT be used to test the idea which higher cigarette taxes would reasons of: (w) Tax revenue to increase and nicotine consumption to fall. (x) Tax burdens to fall most deeply on low-income smokers. (y) Tobacco farmers to lose income. (z) Smokers who stop to advantage the most from such taxes.

Please friends explain above problem..I really need that.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Condition to being a free good Which of

    Which of the given probably comes closest to make a free good: (1) Unexpected warmth through the sun within Chicago in January. (2) A hot school lunch given for a needy student. (3) A microwave pizza bought along with food stamps. (4) Income earned th

  • Q : Economic goals of all economic activity

    Adam Smith believed about the ultimate suitable objective of all economic activity is to maximizing: (w) wealth and power of the national government. (x) satisfaction of individuals by giving people along with the goods they want. (y) employment oppor

  • Q : Explained economics capital generally

    Where is generally economic capital referred: (1) Money and other financial assets. (2) Machinery, buildings and equipment. (3) Net investment minus depreciation. (4) Corporate bonds and stocks. Can anybody suggest

  • Q : Define cut costs without reducing the

    A firm which could cut costs without reducing the value of its output is experiencing as: (i) Allocative inefficiency. (ii) Productive inefficiency. (iii) Distributive inefficiency. (iv) Technological decline. Can

  • Q : Occurrence problem of Economic

    Economic inefficiency is most obviously a problem while: (i) Elmer hates Alpo but eats this so he can afford a cheap daily bottle of Gertrude's Hi Test Wine. (ii) Emma forgot to turn off the water and this runs down the street in a storm sewer six blo

  • Q : Current situation- better off without

    When it is possible to make somebody better off without making anybody worse off, the current condition is: (w) efficient. (x) inefficient. (y) optimal. (z) simply enhanced. How can I solve my problem of Economic Efficiency

  • Q : Illustrates a case of entrepreneurs in

    The economic profits realized through organizing production, bearing uncertainty, taking risks and innovating are rewards to: (i) corporate managers. (ii) astute financial investors. (iii) corporate stockholders. (iv) creative inventors. (v) entrepreneurs.

  • Q : Explain Economics as the extensive

    Economics can be explained as the extensive study of the effects of: (w) money and why having this is good. (x) production costs and profits. (y) how people attempt to gratify their boundless needs. (z) purchases, acquisitions and mergers.

  • Q : Define an example of a free good of

    The closest of the given to being a free good would be from below: (i) affection and support by your parents. (ii) a $100 bill you determined after a stiff breeze blew this onto your porch. (iii) health insurance given by a firm to all its workers. (iv) the second bag

  • Q : Market adjustments change equilibrium

    A movement along the demand curve for a good would be caused through changes within: (1) preferences and tastes. (2) costs for productive resources. (3) supply which change the equilibrium price of the good. (4) expectations regarding future prices.