--%>

Uses of Normative Economics over Positive Economic analysis

Can anybody propose the proper explanation for specified problem regarding Normative Economics.

Positive economic analysis might NOT be used to test the idea which higher cigarette taxes would reasons of: (w) Tax revenue to increase and nicotine consumption to fall. (x) Tax burdens to fall most deeply on low-income smokers. (y) Tobacco farmers to lose income. (z) Smokers who stop to advantage the most from such taxes.

Please friends explain above problem..I really need that.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Efficiently distribution of goods If

    If goods are efficiently distributed in between households, then all family is: (w) sure to lose when any income redistribution arises. (x) treated equitably. (y) and also off as possible without making any other family worse off. (z) able of gaining by a better distr

  • Q : Household consumer in a circular flow

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. In a simple circular flow model, economists classify the people who finally experience joy or suffer pain, consume goods, own resources, and who accept the burdens of inflatio

  • Q : Prohibition in illustrations of

    Illustrations of normative statements would not comprise assertions which: (1) premeditated murderers deserve the death penalty. (2) Leonardo DiCaprio is a terrible actor. (3) AIDS and HIV are transmitted through sexual contact. (4) women must be paid

  • Q : Define subjective opportunity cost for

    Can someone explain me with excellent solution about problem of economic concept of Opportunity Cost... If you exchange your Audi for a race horse you hate, and exchange the race horse for 100 shares of gold-mine stock you believe

  • Q : Opportunity cost of absent class in

    Why is class attendance mostly always higher on days while examinations are specified?

  • Q : Rationally optimal decisions hinge on

    Economic scarcity is pervasive, that makes choices essential. Therefore, rationally optimal decisions hinge on tradeoffs which essentially reflect as: (1) using cooperative allocative mechanisms to minimize inequity. (2) opportunity costs. (3) competi

  • Q : When are relative prices serving as

    The behavior on the given list most consistent along with relative prices serving like a rationing device, and not mainly as incentives, would be as: (i) Marcia, a status-seeking social climber that turning down requests of Wayne for dates after seeing small numbers u

  • Q : Case of unsuccessfulness of goods in

    Consider the several possible goods currently producible within the United States, specified our available technologies and resources. When we produced only cat litter and razor blades, there would be a failure to get: (i) distributive efficiency. (ii) economic equity

  • Q : Positive declaration in positive

    When a mother tells her young child that thunder is caused by the angels bowling up in heaven, scientists would classify her statement as most clearly: (w) a normative statement. (x) a positive statement. (y) microeconomics in place of macroeconomics. (z) scientifical

  • Q : Influencing goods in Economic Growth I

    I have a problem in economics on Economic Growth. Please help me in the following question. Across time, raising the output of military goods devoid of decreasing the output of civilian goods is: (1) Always unfeasible. (2) Impossible in an economy with very high unemp