--%>

Uses of Normative Economics over Positive Economic analysis

Can anybody propose the proper explanation for specified problem regarding Normative Economics.

Positive economic analysis might NOT be used to test the idea which higher cigarette taxes would reasons of: (w) Tax revenue to increase and nicotine consumption to fall. (x) Tax burdens to fall most deeply on low-income smokers. (y) Tobacco farmers to lose income. (z) Smokers who stop to advantage the most from such taxes.

Please friends explain above problem..I really need that.

   Related Questions in Public Economics

  • Q : Rationally optimal decisions hinge on

    Economic scarcity is pervasive, that makes choices essential. Therefore, rationally optimal decisions hinge on tradeoffs which essentially reflect as: (1) using cooperative allocative mechanisms to minimize inequity. (2) opportunity costs. (3) competi

  • Q : Value of the best foregone alternative

    The value of the best foregone alternative explains: (w) opportunity costs. (x) monetary costs. (y) irrational behavior through a consumer. (z) retail price margins over production costs. How can I solve my above e

  • Q : Primarily dealing of positive economic

    Please help me to solve the problem of Positive Economics which is specified above. Positive economic statements deal primarily along with: (w) the way things should be. (x) Technically testable ec

  • Q : Define the behave of standard economic

    Standard economic theory supposes that individuals behave: (w) along with charity towards others while they are particularly moral. (x) irrationally while they are in large groups. (y) like home economists when they are Homo sapiens. (z) purposefully

  • Q : Opportunity cost of absent class in

    Why is class attendance mostly always higher on days while examinations are specified?

  • Q : Gains from trade and economic consensus

    While considering current events and matters, economists and the common public seem to disagree relatively the most about: (i) what to do regarding the War in Iraq. (ii) whether Democrats or Republicans must win the next election. (iii) the relative costs and advantag

  • Q : Changes in relative prices make

    Changes in relative prices make easy allocative efficiency through operating like a rationing mechanism while: (i) Ken and Barbie postpone their wedding since they both lost their jobs throughout a recession. (ii) Political instabilit

  • Q : What would be contained in fundamental

    Fundamental economic questions consist of: (w) what, for whom and how. (x) where, how and when. (y) when, how and what. (z) how many, how much and what color,. Hey friends please give your opinion for the problem o

  • Q : Worse off and better off condition in

    When an economic change makes one person worse off and one thousand persons better off, this is: (1) good for society. (2) bad for society. (3) neither bad nor good for society. (4) not possible to assess without a va

  • Q : Opportunity costs in alternate activity

    Why is this probably precise to believe that you can believe of nothing better to do along with your time immediately than to study economics?