Total revenue raised by output decreasing

A firm’s total revenue can definitely be raised by decreasing its output when: (1) its supply curve is perfectly price inelastic. (2) the demand curve for its output is relatively income inelastic. (3) this is currently losing money each period. (4) patent protection gives this along with a monopoly on its products. (5) the demand curve for its output is relatively price elastic.

I need a good answer on the topic of Economics problems. Please give me your suggestion for the same by using above options.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Marginal revenue of purely competitive

    When boosting output by hundred units raises total revenue by $1200, in that case a purely competitive firm’s marginal revenue the same as: (w) $1,200. (x) $120. (y) $12. (z) $120,000. I need a good answer on

  • Q : Problem regarding Hicks Model of

    The time period of union strikes and the equilibrium wage rate at conclusion of the strike are focus at: (i) Dept. of Labor’s Collective Bargaining Arbitration Division. (ii) Collective bargaining model made by Sir John Hicks. (iii) Bilateral monopoly model.(iv)

  • Q : Total revenue in profit-maximizing

    Total revenue (i.e., TR=PQ) for such profit-maximizing competitive firm equals area as: (a) 0P1gq5. (b) 0P1dq4. (c) 0P2cq3. (d) P2

  • Q : Purely competitive market and constant

    When this firm is typical in illustrated figure of this purely competitive market and when this is a constant-cost industry, in that case the long run supply curve for the industry is a horizontal line which would go from: (1) point c

  • Q : Purely-competitive market demand For

    For the purely-competitive cranberry market, as in below figure there Curve H is: (i) industry’s long-run supply curve. (ii) firm’s demand curve in the short run. (iii) industry’s marginal cost curve. (iv) firm’s long run margi

  • Q : Problem regarding monopsonistic

    I have a problem in economics on monopsonistic exploitation. Please help me in the following question. The Labor union contracts, an analogous worth rule or the minimum wage laws might boost equilibrium employment when a firm has been practicing: (1)

  • Q : Pure competition market A purely

    A purely competitive market would NOT be illustrated by: (1) many potential buyers and sellers. (2) each buyer or seller being a price taker. (3) an absence of long-run barriers to entry or exit. (4) aggressive advertising to compare brands. (5) a sin

  • Q : Burden of tax reduce on suppliers of

    Most of the burden of an excise (i.e., per unit) tax would be borne through consumers of the taxed good, although some of the tax burden would reduce on suppliers of the good demonstrated in: (w) Panel A. (x) Panel B. (y) Panel C. (z)

  • Q : Occurrence of the price discrimination

    Price discrimination occurs when a good is: (1) priced by a formula yielding monopoly profit. (2) denied to customers who refuse to pay the going price. (3) sold at different prices not reflecting differences in costs. (4) subject to government price

  • Q : NOT cartelized product in market power

    Products which have NOT been cartelized comprise: (w) oil. (x) bananas. (y) sugar. (z) wheat. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding Economics generally?

©TutorsGlobe All rights reserved 2022-2023.