--%>

Theorem-Group is unique and has unique inverse

Let (G; o) be a group. Then the identity of the group is unique and each element of the group has a unique inverse.

In this proof, we will argue completely formally, including all the parentheses and all the occurrences of the group operation o. As we proceed with later work, we will very soon relax our level of formality, omitting avoidable parentheses and uses of the operation symbol.

E

Expert

Verified

Proof:

First, we prove uniqueness of the identity. Suppose that e; e' ≡ G both have the property stated in the axiom for the identity; that is,

g o e = e o g = g and g o e' = e' o g = g

for all g ≡ G. For uniqueness, we need to prove that e = e'.

Applying the First equation above to g = e' and the second to g = e, we get

e'o e = e o e' = e' and e o e' = e'o e = e:

Comparing these gives e = e', as required.

Second, we prove that each element of G has a unique inverse. Suppose that for a fixed g ≡ G there are elements h and k which both have the property required of an inverse; that is,

g o h = h o g = e and g o k = k o g = e:

We need to prove that h = k.

Multiplying through the equation k o g = e on the right by h gives

(k o g) o h = e o h;

associativity gives

k o (g o h) = e o h;

and then since g o h = e we have

k o e = e o h:

Using the fact that e is the identity, we nally

get k = h, as required.

   Related Questions in Mathematics

  • Q : Explain lognormal stochastic

    Explain lognormal stochastic differential equation for evolution of an asset.

  • Q : Set Theory & Model of a Boolean Algebra

    II. Prove that Set Theory is a Model of a Boolean Algebra The three Boolean operations of Set Theory are the three set operations of union (U), intersection (upside down U), and complement ~.  Addition is set

  • Q : State Measuring complexity Measuring

    Measuring complexity: Many algorithms have an integer n, or two integers m and n, as input - e.g., addition, multiplication, exponentiation, factorisation and primality testing. When we want to describe or analyse the `easiness' or `hardness' of the a

  • Q : Law of iterated expectations for

     Prove the law of iterated expectations for continuous random variables. 2. Prove that the bounds in Chebyshev's theorem cannot be improved upon. I.e., provide a distribution that satisfies the bounds exactly for k ≥1, show that it satisfies the bounds exactly, and draw its PDF. T

  • Q : Probability and Stochastic assignment

    Introduction to Probability and Stochastic Assignment 1: 1. Consider an experiment in which one of three boxes containing microchips is chosen at random and a microchip is randomly selected from the box.

  • Q : Containee problem For queries Q 1 and Q

    For queries Q1 and Q2, we say Q1 is containedin Q2, denoted Q1 C Q2, iff Q1(D) C Q2

  • Q : Examples of groups Examples of groups:

    Examples of groups: We now start to survey a wide range of examples of groups (labelled by (A), (B), (C), . . . ). Most of these come from number theory. In all cases, the group axioms should be checked. This is easy for almost all of the examples, an

  • Q : Problem on mixed-strategy equilibrium

    Assume three Offices (A, B, & C) in downtown,  simultaneously decide whether to situate in a new Building. The payoff matrix is illustrated below. What is (are) the pure stratgy Nash equilibrium (or equilibria) and mixed-strtegy equilibrium of the game?

  • Q : Numerical Analysis Hi, I was wondering

    Hi, I was wondering if there is anyone who can perform numerical analysis and write a code when required. Thanks

  • Q : Bolzano-Weierstrass property The

    The Bolzano-Weierstrass property does not hold in C[0, ¶] for the infinite set A ={sinnx:n<N} : A is infinite; Show that has no “ limit points”.