--%>

Theorem-Group is unique and has unique inverse

Let (G; o) be a group. Then the identity of the group is unique and each element of the group has a unique inverse.

In this proof, we will argue completely formally, including all the parentheses and all the occurrences of the group operation o. As we proceed with later work, we will very soon relax our level of formality, omitting avoidable parentheses and uses of the operation symbol.

E

Expert

Verified

Proof:

First, we prove uniqueness of the identity. Suppose that e; e' ≡ G both have the property stated in the axiom for the identity; that is,

g o e = e o g = g and g o e' = e' o g = g

for all g ≡ G. For uniqueness, we need to prove that e = e'.

Applying the First equation above to g = e' and the second to g = e, we get

e'o e = e o e' = e' and e o e' = e'o e = e:

Comparing these gives e = e', as required.

Second, we prove that each element of G has a unique inverse. Suppose that for a fixed g ≡ G there are elements h and k which both have the property required of an inverse; that is,

g o h = h o g = e and g o k = k o g = e:

We need to prove that h = k.

Multiplying through the equation k o g = e on the right by h gives

(k o g) o h = e o h;

associativity gives

k o (g o h) = e o h;

and then since g o h = e we have

k o e = e o h:

Using the fact that e is the identity, we nally

get k = h, as required.

   Related Questions in Mathematics

  • Q : Explain a rigorous theory for Brownian

    Explain a rigorous theory for Brownian motion developed by Wiener Norbert.

  • Q : Elasticity of Demand For the demand

    For the demand function D(p)=410-0.2p(^2), find the maximum revenue.

  • Q : How to get calculus homework done from

    How to get calculus homework done from tutor

  • Q : Problem on Nash equilibrium In a

    In a project, employee and boss are working altogether. The employee can be sincere or insincere, and the Boss can either reward or penalize. The employee gets no benefit for being sincere but gets utility for being insincere (30), for getting rewarded (10) and for be

  • Q : Problem on mixed-strategy equilibrium

    Assume three Offices (A, B, & C) in downtown,  simultaneously decide whether to situate in a new Building. The payoff matrix is illustrated below. What is (are) the pure stratgy Nash equilibrium (or equilibria) and mixed-strtegy equilibrium of the game?

  • Q : Numerical solution of PDE this

    this assignment contains two parts theoretical and coding the code has to be a new. old code and modified code will appear in the university website .

  • Q : Abstract Boolean Algebra I. Boolean

    I. Boolean Algebra Define an abstract Boolean Algebra, B,  as follows:  The three operations are:  +   ( x + y addition) ( x y multiplic

  • Q : What is Non-Logical Vocabulary

    Non-Logical Vocabulary: 1. Predicates, called also relation symbols, each with its associated arity. For our needs, we may assume that the number of predicates is finite. But this is not essential. We can have an infinite list of predicates, P

  • Q : Row-echelon matrix Determine into which

    Determine into which of the following 3 kinds (A), (B) and (C) the matrices (a) to (e) beneath can be categorized:       Type (A): The matrix is in both reduced row-echelon form and row-echelon form. Type (B): The matrix

  • Q : Breakfast program if the average is

    if the average is 0.27 and we have $500 how much break fastest will we serve by 2 weeks