--%>

The failure of the Supercommittee

Question:

Some commentators have argued that the failure of the "Supercommittee" is good thing for the economy?  Do you argree?

Answer:

The Super committee failure means that there will not be premature spending cuts. The economy is still in the state of uncertainty and the spending cuts may further dent the recovery prospects. Furthermore, a scope for raising the taxes moderately is there. A tax increase is definitely something the government can look forward to reduce the fiscal deficit rather than reducing the expenditure. So the main is that the economy does not seem to be in a state to take a risk of reduced spending and high taxes, and this is what comes out of the failure of the Super Committee.

 

 

   Related Questions in Macroeconomics

  • Q : Consumption curve Illustrate a point on

    Illustrate a point on consumption curve at which APC = 1. Answer: APC = C/Y = 1 is possible when C = Y, that is, Consumption is

  • Q : Demand according to range of adjustments

    As longer time periods are taken and a bigger range of adjustments (or substitutions) become obtainable, then demand curves tend to become: (1) flatter, as supply curves become steeper. (2) Steeper as supply curves become flatter. (3) Flatter, and therefore do supply

  • Q : Adaptive expectations & Rational

    Question: Compare and contrast 'adaptive expectations' (Hubbard uses adaptive expectations)  and 'rational expectations' in modeling expectations. Answer:<

  • Q : Explain Tax rate increase. A change in

    A change in tax rate changes the IS equation, LM equation remaining the same. Let same, let us suppose that the government raises the tax rate from 20 percent to 25 percent<

  • Q : Full-employment and Under-employment

    Distinguish between full-employment equilibrium and Under-employment equilibrium. Whenever equality among AD and AS is at full employment level it is termed as full employment equilibrium. Although whenever equali

  • Q : Problem on equivalent Consumer Surplus

    Tom reimburses $5.00 for a ticket to see a present hit movie. If Tom was willing to reimburse up to $7.00 for that ticket, his consumer surplus equals: (1) $5.00 (2) $2.00 (3) $7.00 (4) Tom does not receive any consumer surplus as he purchased the ticket.

  • Q : Transfer of wealth problem The transfer

    The transfer of wealth from developed countries to oil exporting countries (abbreviated as OPEC) which followed sky-rocketing oil prices in the year 1970s points out that the price elasticity of demand for oil was: (i) Unitary. (ii) Relatively high. (

  • Q : Consumer Equilibrium when current

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. When Brussels sprouts cost $1 per pound and tofu is $2 per pound and your marginal utilities (additional jollies) from either an additional pound of tofu or an additional pound

  • Q : Inflation Inflation is frequently

    Inflation is frequently described as "too much money chasing too few goods." Is this a satisfactory definition?

  • Q : Principles of macroeconomics Explain

    Explain the concept of “economies of scale” and “increasing returns”.