--%>

Substitution effects resulting from relative price changes

The Law of Demand mainly relies heavily on the: (1) Buying power consequences of relative price modifications. (2) Substitution effect resultant from the relative price changes. (3) Increase in opportunity costs as income is worn out. (4) Principle of the non satiety.

Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the above options.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Vigorously competitive market

    Economic rents which can be capitalized are least possible to arise by: (1) production cost advantages. (2) proprietary knowledge. (3) being first to market a differentiable new product or to innovate a new production technology. (4) a vigorously comp

  • Q : Income elasticity of demand when

    When average income rises from $18,000 to $22,000 yearly and yearly gasoline consumption per household increases from 1000 to 1500 gallons, in that case the income elasticity of demand for gas is: (1) in the inferior range. (2) 0.5. (

  • Q : Illustrates the Loren curve by total

    When 40 percent of total personal income was received by 20 % of the highest income families, in that case the: (w) income distribution would be perfectly equal. (x) income pattern would be foreign to the U.S. (y) Lorenz curve would be the 45 degree r

  • Q : NO profit-maximizing firm in long run

    In the long run no profit-maximizing firm would produce yet a level of output at that: (w) marginal revenue is below the price charged consumers. (x) demand is relatively price inelastic. (y) total revenue would exceed total variable costs but not tot

  • Q : Equilibrium rent imposing price ceiling

    When the New York City government only permits landlords to charge $800 a month for a little apartment while equilibrium rent would be $1,500, this has imposed: (w) price floor. (x) regulation which will result in market surpluses. (y) regulation that

  • Q : Critics of contestability theory

    Critics of contestability theory argue which: (i) easy entry and exit isn't enough to make sure competitive prices. (ii) even though the firms charged a competitive price for their goods, that they would not have the incentive to make the competitive

  • Q : Net income under the negative income tax

    Under the negative income tax system demonstrated in this given figure, a family of four along with earned income of $75,000 per year would have a net as [after-tax] income of: (i) $15,000 per year. (ii) $30,000 per y

  • Q : Output From the heterodox approach,

    From the heterodox approach, what options does the enterprise need to produce more output? What effect do these options put on its cost structure?

  • Q : Monopolistic-Exploitation problem In

    In equilibrium for the price maker firm, the rate of monopolistic exploitation is the difference between: (i) P and MR. (ii) P and MC. (iii) Total revenue and net cost per unit of output. (iv) Output price and rate of monopsonistic exploitation. (v) VMP and MRP.

  • Q : Substitutes and Complements The

    The increase in the price of a good generally also rises the: (i) Demands for its substitutes. (ii) Supply of its complements. (iii) Purchasing power of the consumer incomes. (iv) Demand for its complements. Can someone please help