--%>

Structure conduct performance paradigm model

From about 1890 till 1970, the “structure-conduct-performance paradigm” dominated theories concerning how firms behave in various kinds of markets. The word “conduct” in this context refers to these things as: (i) decisions by firms regarding pricing, profitability, production and investments in research and development as well as marketing strategies. (ii) how the distribution of income is influenced by the activities of unregulated firms. (iii) various of firms, the markets from that these firms hire resources, and the kinds of goods produced and sold. (iv) the relative consequences on social welfare of different possible industrial structures. (v) All of the above.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding Economics generally?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Problem regarding Bilateral Monopoly

    The bilateral monopoly model is most likely most applicable in analyzing a case where a: (1) Major employer collectively bargains with the influential union. (2) Firm consists of monopoly power in output market and monopsony power in the labor market. (3) Labor market

  • Q : Determining type of good An increase in

    An increase in the income of Consumer X leads to fall in demand for that good by that consumer. Name the good X termed? Answer: Inferior good

  • Q : Problem on utilitarian philosophy Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The utilitarian philosophy didn’t depend on the supposition that: (i) The greatest good for greatest number is the finest social goal. (ii) Individual utilities can be summed up to measu

  • Q : Nonexistent market supply and power

    HoloIMAGine has patented a holographic technology which creates 3-D photography obtainable to consumers. There is a market supply curve for HoloIMAGine technology: (w) nonexistent since price-maker firms simultaneously set prices as well as quantities

  • Q : Breaking natural monopoly Breaking a

    Breaking a natural monopoly within a number of competing firms would probably: (w) increase output and lower price to consumers. (x) reduce output and raise price to consumers. (y) reduce efficiency but lower price. (z) have no effect on output or pri

  • Q : Function of Capitalization Winning

    Winning $50,000 yearly for 20 years is similar as winning: (w) $1 million today. (x) less than $1 million today. (y) more than $1 million today. (z) $100 per day, forever. Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some views

  • Q : Oligopoly and Economic Welfare Assume

    Assume that P = MSB and the firms in an oligopoly are in equilibrium where P>MC. This follows that: (1) P=MSC. (2) MSB>MSC. (3) MSB<MSC. (4) oligopolists will gain zero economic profit. (5) the minimum point on the LRATC curve will achieved i

  • Q : Elucidate GNI per capita Elucidate GNI

    Elucidate GNI per capita?

  • Q : Explain an example of price

    A Ferris wheel operator at the county fair charges of $2 per ride. Individual seat is vacant on what will be the final ride of the day. He asks when you would like a ride for a dollar. It is an illustration of: (1) reservation pricing. (2) price discrimination. (3) as

  • Q : Relation of transaction costs with

    Transaction costs are costs mainly related with the: (w) transportation and gathering information about goods or resources. (x) direct production costs for goods. (y) inputs quite than outputs. (z) supply prices rather than demand prices.