--%>

Structure conduct performance paradigm model

From about 1890 till 1970, the “structure-conduct-performance paradigm” dominated theories concerning how firms behave in various kinds of markets. The word “conduct” in this context refers to these things as: (i) decisions by firms regarding pricing, profitability, production and investments in research and development as well as marketing strategies. (ii) how the distribution of income is influenced by the activities of unregulated firms. (iii) various of firms, the markets from that these firms hire resources, and the kinds of goods produced and sold. (iv) the relative consequences on social welfare of different possible industrial structures. (v) All of the above.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding Economics generally?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Market power and market inefficiency

    This is socially undesirable for a monopolist to produce where the price exceeds to marginal social cost [P > MSC] since: (w) resources are allocated inefficiently since too small is produced. (x) too many resources are used and production is exces

  • Q : Immunity of Corporate giants in market

    Can someone help me in finding out the most precise answer from the given options. The Corporate giants are not immune to the market pressures since: (i) They experience the diseconomies of scale. (ii) Advertising decreases the barriers to entry. (iii) Profits give an

  • Q : Demography of Wealth and Poverty

    Poverty within the United States can be explained most properly by: (w) differences in effort and sacrifice. (x) voluntary choices of low income persons to consume more leisure at the expense of more income. (y) monopsonistic exploitation of labor by

  • Q : Competitive equilibrium in competitive

    I have a problem in economics on Competitive equilibrium in competitive labor markets. Please help me in the following question. The Competitive equilibrium in competitive labor markets need: (1) P = MR = AVC. (2) VMP - P is maximized. (3) MPP = P. (4

  • Q : Differences in site values An acre of

    An acre of Manhattan is worth additional than an acre of prime Iowa farm land due to differences in: (1) perpetuities. (2) time preferences. (3) site values. (4) interest rates. (5) taxes. Can someone explain/help me with best solu

  • Q : Influences of Ceteris Paribus The Latin

    The Latin phrase applies to the idea which all other effects on some dependent variable are to be supposed constant if examining the effect of changing a single independent variable is as: (1) Fiat justitia, ruat coelum. (2) Platea unum. (3) Unum paribus. (4) Ceteris

  • Q : Risk and Uncertainty of Probability

    If estimating the nature of a probability function for an event entails considerable guesswork since experience along with the event is more sporadic or rare which any estimates are extremely speculative, in that case we confront a concept Fra

  • Q : Problem regarding to intermediation for

    Ticket-scalpers allow latecomers to ignore standing into line for tickets and permit people to wait till the last moment before deciding to attend athletic or concerts events. Are promoters of an event harmed through scalping? Must ticket scalpers' services be free? S

  • Q : Price floor for Whopper Slushees The

    The government price floor for Whopper Slushees at P3 would result a: (i) shortage of Q1 – Q3. (ii) Excess of Q3 - Q1. (iii) Supply price of P1. (iv) Quantity demanded of Q2. (v) Demand price of P2.

    Q : Consumers for Mortgage Funds Not in

    Not in between the total demands for loanable funds would be the demands of: (1) consumers for financial capital. (2) business firms for financial capital. (3) government for loanable funds to cover budget deficits. (4) consumers for mortgage funds. (