--%>

Strategy of lowering then high price in market power

Juan, Celia, Cassie and Gupta operated rival gas stations at 4 corners of an intersection. Every one originally charged similar price for their gasoline but after Gupta slashed his prices, Juan and Celia as well as Cassie all shut down. Gupta in that case boosted prices sharply. Therefore Gupta’s strategy was an illustration of: (i) monopolistic competition. (ii) tit-for-tat game theory. (iii) cartelization. (iv) predatory behavior. (v) monopoly capitalism.

Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some views for above Economics problems.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Imposition of rent controls under

    The imposition of rent controls below equilibrium rental rates tends to create: (i) a housing surplus. (ii) booms of new apartment construction. (iii) declines in the quantity and upkeep of rental units. (iv) rising incomes for landlords. (v) enhanced

  • Q : Gini Coefficient in Loren Curve A Gini

    A Gini coefficient for this demonstrated figure can be computed as: (w) area A minus area B. (x) area A × area B.  (y) area C minus [area A + area B]. (z) [area A] / [area A + area B].

    Q : Pure competition for quantity adjustment

    The only industrial structure in that all firms are pure quantity-adjusting price takers is: (1) impure oligopoly. (2) pure monopoly. (3) pure or perfect competition. (4) monopolistic competition. (5) pure oligopoly.

    Q : Short run effects of income tax rate If

    If this illustrated figure given Lorenz curves for distribution of income after taxes and transfers, the probably short run effects of 10 percent increases within both income tax rates and government transfer

  • Q : Current consumption over future

    When households’ start increasingly to prefer current consumption over future consumption, in that case the: (w) interest rate rises. (x) interest rate falls. (y) present value of future income rises. (z) equilibrium rate of investment within hu

  • Q : Determine competitive price of purely

    In this demonstrated figure purely competitive lumber mill’s generic 2×4s now sell for: (1) $3.60 each. (2) $3.00 each. (3) $2.70 each. (4) $2.40 each. (5) $2.10 each.

    Q : Law of demand is price in the law of

    is price in the law of demand an absolute or relative price

  • Q : Enter an industry by barriers to entry

    Barriers to entry: (w) make this complicated or impossible for new firms to profitably enter an industry. (x) uniformly violate U.S. antitrust statutes. (y) are fundamentally technological instead of economic. (z) stimulate aggressive competition.

  • Q : Organizing business to maximize the

    I have a problem in economics on organizing business to maximize the funds. Please help me in the following question. The entrepreneur who wants to maximize her firm’s admittance to funds from investors or banks must organize the business as a: (1) Proprietorshi

  • Q : Kinked Demand by increasing price In

    In this kinked demand curve model as in demonstrated, when this firm operates at point a and increases its price from P2 to P3 and its rival firms respond by increasing their prices, in that case this firm will move from point a