--%>

Strategy of lowering then high price in market power

Juan, Celia, Cassie and Gupta operated rival gas stations at 4 corners of an intersection. Every one originally charged similar price for their gasoline but after Gupta slashed his prices, Juan and Celia as well as Cassie all shut down. Gupta in that case boosted prices sharply. Therefore Gupta’s strategy was an illustration of: (i) monopolistic competition. (ii) tit-for-tat game theory. (iii) cartelization. (iv) predatory behavior. (v) monopoly capitalism.

Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some views for above Economics problems.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Devaluation and depreciation of

    Distinguish among devaluation and depreciation of domestic currency

  • Q : When is marginal costs equivalent to

    A purely competitive firm adjusts production therefore its marginal costs equivalent the market price, thus: (w) minimizing losses or maximizing profit. (x) ensuring that total costs do not exceed total revenue. (y) surviving the shor

  • Q : Estimate total revenue when unitarily

    When the demand for computer hard drives is unitarily price elastic among lower prices and current prices, lowering prices slightly will yield as: (w) higher total revenue. (x) lower total revenue. (y) no change in total revenue. (z)

  • Q : Relative Income Measures and

    After adjusting income for taxes and transfers, affects that would be least responsible for the reducing percentages of the U.S. population classified like “middle relative income” from 1976 is probably: (

  • Q : Supply curve for price elasticity of

    Suppose that all these demonstrated curves are infinitely long straight lines. So, a supply curve for that price elasticity of supply is constant for each possible price and quantity is: (i) supply curve S2. (ii) supply curve S3. (iii) supply curve S5

  • Q : Freedom to enter or leave the market in

    Purely competitive industries are not described by: (i) numerous potential buyers. (ii) product homogeneity. (iii) numerous potential sellers. (iv) freedom to enter or leave the market within the short run. (v) power to adjust quantities although no p

  • Q : Monopolistically competition in long

    When a monopolistically competitive firm is in long-run equilibrium, in that case this is unlikely for: (w) MR = MC. (x) P to be greater than MC. (y) P to be greater than the minimum of the long run average cost curve. (z) accounting

  • Q : Effects of high probability of

    Since of the high probability of bankruptcy and default of a latest corporation, new corporations: (i) Encompass little trouble selling bonds. (ii) Would prefer to the issue stock. (iii) Encompass more trouble selling bonds than the established corporations. (iv) Woul

  • Q : Horizontally summing the short-run

    For a competitive industry the short-run supply curve is derived through summing the short-run supply curves of all firms within the industry: (w) vertically. (x) horizontally. (y) diagonally. (z) and computing their arithmetic average.

  • Q : Price taker in perfect competition

    State how is a single buyer a price taker in the perfect competition? Answer: A single buyer’s share in total market demand is too significant that the buyer