--%>

Small market capitalization

Why would stocks perform better in the month of January than other months of the year, and discuss whether small market capitalization companies outperform large capitalization companies in the short to medium term?

E

Expert

Verified

January effect is the calendar-related anomaly in the financial market where financial security prices raise in the month of January. This makes an opportunity for the investors to buy stock for lower prices before January and sell them after their value rises. Therefore, the main characteristics of the January Effect are an increase in buying securities before the end of the year for a lower price, and selling them in January to produce profit from the price differences. This kind of pattern in price behavior on the financial market supports the fact that financial markets are not completely efficient.The January effect is perhaps the most accepted seasonal anomaly. In an early paper, Rozeff and Kinney (1976) found evidence for abnormally high returns in January using returns on the NYSE index between 1904 and 1974. The most popular explaination for this is the well known tax-loss selling motivation. Because the high correlation of international stock markets with the US market one would expect to that the January effect in the US data is transmitted towards international data. Between 1960 and 1976 the average January return was 0.14%. In this period the returns in January were significantly higher than in other months. Between 1976 and 2003, January essentially generated the same average return as any other day (t¼ 0.37). Right after 1976, the year of the publication of Rozeff and Kinney (1976) report about the January effect, the strength of the effect dropped immensely.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Aggregate effective demand Why,

    Why, according to Keynes, is investment the key economic variable? Why does he think that the volatility of investment spending is likely to cause a problem of aggregate effective demand? Why does he think that this problem can only be solved by government interventio

  • Q : Interest Rate by Holding a Bond When

    When you hold a bond if the interest rate rises, you will: (w) have less money when you sell it. (x) receive more interest income. (y) gain by shifting funds to the stock market. (z) eventually spend more and save more.

    Q : Breaking natural monopoly Breaking a

    Breaking a natural monopoly within a number of competing firms would probably: (w) increase output and lower price to consumers. (x) reduce output and raise price to consumers. (y) reduce efficiency but lower price. (z) have no effect on output or pri

  • Q : Equilibrium market price In a perfectly

    In a perfectly competitive market, market demand curve is provided by Qd = 200 − 5Pd, and the market supply curve is provided by Qd = 35Ps. a) Determine the equilibrium market price

  • Q : Determine total revenue when maximizes

    Total revenue when this firm maximizes economic profits would be: (w) $72,000 per period. (x) $80,000 per period. (y) $96,000 per period. (z) $100,000 per period.

    Q : Slope of demand curve for negative

    The slope of this illustrated graph demand curve for DVD games equivalents negative: (w) 0.2. (x) 0.50. (y) 5.0. (z) 2.0. 313_Price El</span></p>
                                        </div>
                                        <!-- /comment-box -->
                                    </li>
   
   </td>
	</tr><tr>
		<td>
       
      <li>
                                        <div class=

    Q : Determine competitive price of purely

    In this demonstrated figure purely competitive lumber mill’s generic 2×4s now sell for: (1) $3.60 each. (2) $3.00 each. (3) $2.70 each. (4) $2.40 each. (5) $2.10 each.

    Q : Long run equilibrium for a purely

    In long-run equilibrium for a purely competitive firm: (w) MC = P = MR = min.(LRAC). (x) MC = TR = PQ = AVC. (y) LRAC = PQ = TVC + TFC = MR. (z) P = Q = wL + rK = Y. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation fo

  • Q : Opportunity costs in different prices

    While a firm is NOT able of price discrimination: (w) various prices are charged for units of remotely related goods. (x) only opportunity costs are reflected in various prices for units of similar good. (y) any short term profit stimulates long run l

  • Q : Lowest possible price in transaction

    Is the assertion such that "Everyone all the time buys everything at the lowest possible price" right? Have you paid more than you had to for any good yet, after permitting for all transaction costs?