--%>

Small market capitalization

Why would stocks perform better in the month of January than other months of the year, and discuss whether small market capitalization companies outperform large capitalization companies in the short to medium term?

E

Expert

Verified

January effect is the calendar-related anomaly in the financial market where financial security prices raise in the month of January. This makes an opportunity for the investors to buy stock for lower prices before January and sell them after their value rises. Therefore, the main characteristics of the January Effect are an increase in buying securities before the end of the year for a lower price, and selling them in January to produce profit from the price differences. This kind of pattern in price behavior on the financial market supports the fact that financial markets are not completely efficient.The January effect is perhaps the most accepted seasonal anomaly. In an early paper, Rozeff and Kinney (1976) found evidence for abnormally high returns in January using returns on the NYSE index between 1904 and 1974. The most popular explaination for this is the well known tax-loss selling motivation. Because the high correlation of international stock markets with the US market one would expect to that the January effect in the US data is transmitted towards international data. Between 1960 and 1976 the average January return was 0.14%. In this period the returns in January were significantly higher than in other months. Between 1976 and 2003, January essentially generated the same average return as any other day (t¼ 0.37). Right after 1976, the year of the publication of Rozeff and Kinney (1976) report about the January effect, the strength of the effect dropped immensely.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Limitation of economies capacity I have

    I have a problem in economics on Production Possibilities Frontiers. Please help me in determining the right answer from the following question. The economy’s capacity to generate/make is NOT limited by the: (i) Amount of resources accessible. (

  • Q : Elasticity of supply when product

    Since the supply of land is fixed, then the: (w) demand for land is absolutely horizontal. (x) supply of land is completely elastic. (y) demand for land is absolutely vertical. (z) supply of land is perfectly inelastic.

    Q : Economies of scale in natural monopoly

    Economies of scale which are substantial relative to market demand result within the market evolving to a: (w) contestable market. (x) collusive oligopoly. (y) natural monopoly. (z) "high tech" industry.

    Q : Unitary price elasticity of demand curve

    HoloIMAGine has patented a holographic technology which makes 3-D photography obtainable to consumers. So the demand curve facing HoloIMAGine has unitary price elasticity at: (i) output q1. (ii) output q3. (iii) output q4

  • Q : Change in response in determinants of

    In short run, the demand for mink coats is least probable to change in response to: (i) Development of the petroleum based faux fur fabric which can’t be differentiated from genuine mink except via DNA analysis. (ii) Armies of a

  • Q : Needs Standard for Income Distribution

    The needs standard for income distribution would certainly involve: (w) difficulty in the measurement of productivity. (x) an enormous bureaucracy. (y) greater incentives for production than the contribution standard. (z) economic ef

  • Q : Internal financing in Corporate Finance

    Can someone help me in finding out the precise answer from the given options. The corporations might get internal financing by: (i) Borrowing from the stockholders. (ii) Reinvesting the corporate income rather than paying it out as the dividends to stockholders. (iii)

  • Q : Experiencing the Diminishing Marginal

    James has watched a latest blockbuster film twice a week for the precedent three weeks and can now narrate most of the dialogue. He is probably starting to experience: (1) Disequilibrium. (2) Diminishing the marginal utility. (3) Diminished capacity. (4) Clinical depr

  • Q : Preferance of food after income rises

    Assume that, for you, lobster is an ordinary good and peanut butter is a poorer good. When your income increases, you will probably consume: (1) Greater of both goods. (2) Less of both goods. (3) Greater peanut butter and less lobster. (4) Greater lobster and less pea

  • Q : Federal minimum wage rose over

    The LEAST likely outcome, when the federal minimum wage is increased $1 over the equilibrium wage rate, that would be for the: (w) unemployment rate of teenagers and unskilled workers to rise. (x) quantity of unskilled workers supplie