--%>

Small market capitalization

Why would stocks perform better in the month of January than other months of the year, and discuss whether small market capitalization companies outperform large capitalization companies in the short to medium term?

E

Expert

Verified

January effect is the calendar-related anomaly in the financial market where financial security prices raise in the month of January. This makes an opportunity for the investors to buy stock for lower prices before January and sell them after their value rises. Therefore, the main characteristics of the January Effect are an increase in buying securities before the end of the year for a lower price, and selling them in January to produce profit from the price differences. This kind of pattern in price behavior on the financial market supports the fact that financial markets are not completely efficient.The January effect is perhaps the most accepted seasonal anomaly. In an early paper, Rozeff and Kinney (1976) found evidence for abnormally high returns in January using returns on the NYSE index between 1904 and 1974. The most popular explaination for this is the well known tax-loss selling motivation. Because the high correlation of international stock markets with the US market one would expect to that the January effect in the US data is transmitted towards international data. Between 1960 and 1976 the average January return was 0.14%. In this period the returns in January were significantly higher than in other months. Between 1976 and 2003, January essentially generated the same average return as any other day (t¼ 0.37). Right after 1976, the year of the publication of Rozeff and Kinney (1976) report about the January effect, the strength of the effect dropped immensely.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Present Value and Rates of Return When

    When the annual interest rate is 12 percent and a rental house can be expected to rent perpetually for $1,000 monthly, rough computation suggests the house contain a present value of: (1) $240,000. (2) $144,000. (3) $100,000. (4) $72,000. (5) $12,000.

  • Q : Explain about federal income tax Can

    Can somebody help me to solve this query.. The federal income tax, wherein the rate rises as income increases, is taken as: (w) a progressive tax. (x) a regressive tax. (y) skewed towards the poor. (z) unfair to th

  • Q : Problem on production costs I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Problem on production costs. Please help me in the following question. From the viewpoint of sellers, the market demand for the good mainly based least on: (i) Consumer preferences and tastes. (ii) Income and its distr

  • Q : Problem of Nash Equilibrium Carlos and

    Carlos and Ivana are room-mates and friends. Carlos and Ivana eat together despite who cooks on a given night. Within this payoff matrix, Nash equilibrium could never be obtained in that: (w) neither Carlos nor Ivana cook, nor do they eat. (x) Carlos

  • Q : Price discrimination in the sale of a

    Price discrimination in the sale of a good show charging various prices that: (w) reflect differences in production costs. (x) do not reflect differences in production costs. (y) are dictated by market conditions. (z) cause a monopoly to be inefficien

  • Q : Public Policy and the Distribution of

    The two policies that most likely account for most of the trend toward greater income equality during 1929 and 1975 are: (w) improved educational opportunities, and tax and transfer policies. (x) reduced sex discrimination and public availability of b

  • Q : Quantity demanded and goods price The

    The law of demand defines that there is a negative relationship among: (1) A good’s price and quantity demanded. (2) Limitless demands and inadequate resources. (3) The quantities demanded and supplied. (4) People’s income and demands for

  • Q : Perfectly Competitive market condition

    In which market condition, the effect of an individual seller is (0) zero? Answer: In Perfectly Competitive market condition.

  • Q : Supply in short-run equilibrium When a

    When a purely competitive industry is within short-run equilibrium, this: (w) should also be in long-run equilibrium. (x) won’t be in long-run equilibrium. (y) may or may not be within long-run equilibrium. (z) will experience m

  • Q : Problem regarding monopsonistic

    I have a problem in economics on monopsonistic exploitation. Please help me in the following question. The Labor union contracts, an analogous worth rule or the minimum wage laws might boost equilibrium employment when a firm has been practicing: (1)