Small market capitalization
Why would stocks perform better in the month of January than other months of the year, and discuss whether small market capitalization companies outperform large capitalization companies in the short to medium term?
Expert
January effect is the calendar-related anomaly in the financial market where financial security prices raise in the month of January. This makes an opportunity for the investors to buy stock for lower prices before January and sell them after their value rises. Therefore, the main characteristics of the January Effect are an increase in buying securities before the end of the year for a lower price, and selling them in January to produce profit from the price differences. This kind of pattern in price behavior on the financial market supports the fact that financial markets are not completely efficient.The January effect is perhaps the most accepted seasonal anomaly. In an early paper, Rozeff and Kinney (1976) found evidence for abnormally high returns in January using returns on the NYSE index between 1904 and 1974. The most popular explaination for this is the well known tax-loss selling motivation. Because the high correlation of international stock markets with the US market one would expect to that the January effect in the US data is transmitted towards international data. Between 1960 and 1976 the average January return was 0.14%. In this period the returns in January were significantly higher than in other months. Between 1976 and 2003, January essentially generated the same average return as any other day (t¼ 0.37). Right after 1976, the year of the publication of Rozeff and Kinney (1976) report about the January effect, the strength of the effect dropped immensely.
People who decline to buy the products of a firm whose activities they disapprove, especially whenever such rejection is intended to support the employees who are on strike, and who advise others to not purchase such products, or to not deal with these firms, are enga
This below figure demonstrates how consumption of goods A, B, C and D changes as a family’s income changes. When income increases, the income elasticity of demand is positive although declining for: (w) good A. (x) good B
Onto average, African-Americans into the U.S., when compared to whites: (1) earn lower incomes. (2) have less education. (3) experience higher rates of unemployment. (4) are less likely to be capable to retire on Social Security. (5) All of the above. Q : Economies of positive scale with When economies of scale are full time positive in an industry, in that case the industry will: (1) evolve into a natural monopoly. (2) become inefficient before it gets very huge. (3) be unregulated by government. (4) be not capable to compete along w
When economies of scale are full time positive in an industry, in that case the industry will: (1) evolve into a natural monopoly. (2) become inefficient before it gets very huge. (3) be unregulated by government. (4) be not capable to compete along w
Purchasing low in one market and concurrently selling at a high price in another is NOT a mechanism which: (i) Rises supply in the low-price market. (ii) Risklessly produces profits. (iii) Is termed as arbitrage. (iv) Decreases price differentials among markets. (e) I
When 200,000 gallons of water are applied per acre, 4 tons are harvested by each acre of linguini trees yearly, but cutting back to 160,000 gallons causes the crop per acre to reduce to 2 tons yearly. Then water elasticity of linguini production is as
A price discriminating-monopoly will NOT: (w) charge various prices for a good to various consumers. (x) charge various prices for a good without cost differential. (y) charge similar price to all consumers. (z) charge more for those consumers who hav
Calendar Anomaly: Calendar anomalies can be defined as any irregularity or consistent pattern occurring at a regular interval or at a specific time in calendar year. Presence of these anomalies in a calendar year is the biggest threat to the concept o
An accusation of predatory pricing is complicated to prove within a court of law since: (w) firms generally have too much power. (x) consumers and juries like the low prices and are less likely to fine a firm for lowering price. (y) predatory behavior
A huge firm which slashes prices to drive smaller competitors out of business, and after that raises prices due to its enhanced market power is pursuing a strategy of: (1) predatory pricing. (2) cut-throat competition. (3) price discrimination. (4) ma
18,76,764
1953126 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1454915
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!