--%>

Small market capitalization

Why would stocks perform better in the month of January than other months of the year, and discuss whether small market capitalization companies outperform large capitalization companies in the short to medium term?

E

Expert

Verified

January effect is the calendar-related anomaly in the financial market where financial security prices raise in the month of January. This makes an opportunity for the investors to buy stock for lower prices before January and sell them after their value rises. Therefore, the main characteristics of the January Effect are an increase in buying securities before the end of the year for a lower price, and selling them in January to produce profit from the price differences. This kind of pattern in price behavior on the financial market supports the fact that financial markets are not completely efficient.The January effect is perhaps the most accepted seasonal anomaly. In an early paper, Rozeff and Kinney (1976) found evidence for abnormally high returns in January using returns on the NYSE index between 1904 and 1974. The most popular explaination for this is the well known tax-loss selling motivation. Because the high correlation of international stock markets with the US market one would expect to that the January effect in the US data is transmitted towards international data. Between 1960 and 1976 the average January return was 0.14%. In this period the returns in January were significantly higher than in other months. Between 1976 and 2003, January essentially generated the same average return as any other day (t¼ 0.37). Right after 1976, the year of the publication of Rozeff and Kinney (1976) report about the January effect, the strength of the effect dropped immensely.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Problem onto Saving and Spending Money

    The owners of a construction company would not be saving when they collected a big check after finishing a project and after that bought: (w) a long term certificate of deposit at their local bank. (x) stock in a newly-formed corporation. (y) a corporate jet for use o

  • Q : Monopsonistic exploitation-labor union

    The labor union contracts, a comparable worth rule, or minimum salary laws might boost up equilibrium employment when a firm has been practicing: (i) Price discrimination. (ii) Monopolistic exploitation. (iii) Feather-bedding. (iv) Blacklisting. (v) Monopsonistic expl

  • Q : Involvement of price makers firms

    Price-maker firms would most likely comprise: (1) a tomato farmer in California. (2) a sheep herder who produces wool in a remote part of New Zealand. (3) a stock broker who contacts customers through the internet. (4) a rural grocery store. (5) the b

  • Q : Price elasticity of demand when price

    When diet faddists gulp 205 million unsweetened as “No-Carb” milkshakes of $2.30 apiece, if cut back to 155 million per week while the price rises to $3.70 every, the price elasticity of their demand for shakes equivalents

  • Q : Buying on margin What does “ buying on

    What does “buying on margin” means?

  • Q : Income elasticity of inferior goods

    Negative income elasticities of demand entail those goods are: (1) luxuries. (2) necessities. (3) inferior. (4) substitutes. (5) expensive. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding

  • Q : How consumption influence the

    How does rise in price of a substitute good in consumption influence the equilibrium price?

  • Q : Inferior good from income elasticity of

    When income elasticity of market demand is minus 1 (one), the good is: (w) average good. (x) intermediate good. (y) inferior good. (z) "image" good. How can I solve my economics problem? Please suggest me the corre

  • Q : Demands for productive resources The

    The demands for productive resources are eventually “derived” by the: (w) marginal utility they directly generate. (x) demands for consumer goods and services. (y) disutility incurred in supplying labor. (z) equity of resource owners as ju

  • Q : Opponents of Contribution Standard

    Opponents of contribution standard for income distribution, the: (w) prefer a more efficient mechanism to distribute income. (x) accept marginal productivity theory. (y) question how well the market system measures productivity. (z) generally favor de