--%>

Small market capitalization

Why would stocks perform better in the month of January than other months of the year, and discuss whether small market capitalization companies outperform large capitalization companies in the short to medium term?

E

Expert

Verified

January effect is the calendar-related anomaly in the financial market where financial security prices raise in the month of January. This makes an opportunity for the investors to buy stock for lower prices before January and sell them after their value rises. Therefore, the main characteristics of the January Effect are an increase in buying securities before the end of the year for a lower price, and selling them in January to produce profit from the price differences. This kind of pattern in price behavior on the financial market supports the fact that financial markets are not completely efficient.The January effect is perhaps the most accepted seasonal anomaly. In an early paper, Rozeff and Kinney (1976) found evidence for abnormally high returns in January using returns on the NYSE index between 1904 and 1974. The most popular explaination for this is the well known tax-loss selling motivation. Because the high correlation of international stock markets with the US market one would expect to that the January effect in the US data is transmitted towards international data. Between 1960 and 1976 the average January return was 0.14%. In this period the returns in January were significantly higher than in other months. Between 1976 and 2003, January essentially generated the same average return as any other day (t¼ 0.37). Right after 1976, the year of the publication of Rozeff and Kinney (1976) report about the January effect, the strength of the effect dropped immensely.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Area above supply curve of resource The

    The area above a resource’s supply curve although below its price is a pure: (w) economic rent. (x) consumer surplus. (y) capitalization. (z) monopoly profit. Please choose the right answer from above...I wan

  • Q : Perfectly elastic supply problem When

    When will a rise in demand entail an increase in the quantity demanded however no change in the price?

  • Q : Loss in social welfare with quantity

    When pharmaceutical manufacturers conspire to generate only Q1 penicillin, in that case the: (i) purely-competitive firms which produced penicillin would experience economic losses. (ii) resulting excessive antibiotic treatments would produce strains of dru

  • Q : Regulatory barrier to entry Billy

    Billy recently invented and in that case patented a motorized flying skateboard which transports people to and from their destinations in less than half the time this would take to ride or drive a bus. Billy is protected from competition from a: (1) regulatory barrier

  • Q : Elucidate GNI per capita Elucidate GNI

    Elucidate GNI per capita?

  • Q : Upwardly sloping supplies of resources

    When supplies of some resources are upwardly sloping to an industry, in that case increasing the industry’s output results within: (w) higher output due to increased profits from falling input prices. (x) reductions of output because of increase

  • Q : Creating externalities to spread costs

    In efforts to offset specific failures of the private sector, government policy within a mixed-capitalist economy would be least reasonably intended at an objective of: (1) creating externalities to spread the costs of various activities across all me

  • Q : Power monopsonist I have a problem in

    I have a problem in economics on Power of monopsonist. Please help me in the given question. The firm which is the sole buyer of a specific good or resource is a: (m) Monopsonist. (n) Plutocracy. (o) Bilateral monopolist. (p) Price discriminator. (q) Conglomerate.

  • Q : Problem on monopolistically competitive

    Refer to the given diagram for a monopolistically competitive firm give the answer of following question. Long-run equilibrium price will be: 1) above A. 2) EF. 3) A. 4) B.

    Q : Boosting minimum wage laws Boosting

    Boosting minimum wage laws from $5 to $8 per hour is LEAST probable to: (w) give some unskilled workers with higher incomes. (x) cause some low-wage workers to lose their jobs. (y) raise friendship like a basis for employment. (z) decrease unemploymen