--%>

Small market capitalization

Why would stocks perform better in the month of January than other months of the year, and discuss whether small market capitalization companies outperform large capitalization companies in the short to medium term?

E

Expert

Verified

January effect is the calendar-related anomaly in the financial market where financial security prices raise in the month of January. This makes an opportunity for the investors to buy stock for lower prices before January and sell them after their value rises. Therefore, the main characteristics of the January Effect are an increase in buying securities before the end of the year for a lower price, and selling them in January to produce profit from the price differences. This kind of pattern in price behavior on the financial market supports the fact that financial markets are not completely efficient.The January effect is perhaps the most accepted seasonal anomaly. In an early paper, Rozeff and Kinney (1976) found evidence for abnormally high returns in January using returns on the NYSE index between 1904 and 1974. The most popular explaination for this is the well known tax-loss selling motivation. Because the high correlation of international stock markets with the US market one would expect to that the January effect in the US data is transmitted towards international data. Between 1960 and 1976 the average January return was 0.14%. In this period the returns in January were significantly higher than in other months. Between 1976 and 2003, January essentially generated the same average return as any other day (t¼ 0.37). Right after 1976, the year of the publication of Rozeff and Kinney (1976) report about the January effect, the strength of the effect dropped immensely.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Downward slope of consumer demand curves

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The downward slope of the consumer demand curves for normal goods is partly described by: (i) Income effects. (ii) Diminishing marginal utility. (iii) Substitution effects. (iv)

  • Q : Explain about price-taker The purely

    The purely competitive firm: (w) is a price-taker. (x) confronts an inelastic demand curve. (y) should decide what price to charge. (z) maximizes total revenue. How can I solve my Economics problem

  • Q : Monopoly and competition theory The

    The theorist who set the stage for much of the “new” theory of international trade through blending theories of monopoly and competition to suit the case of several sellers offering differentiated products was: (1) Leon Walras. (2) Vilfred

  • Q : Requirement of production costs

    Decreasing average production costs needs raising the size of a firm when the raised production encounters economies of: (i) Growth. (ii) Coordination. (iii) Growth. (iv) Scale. (v) Scope. Find out the right answer from the above o

  • Q : Competition in Labor Markets The

    The horizontal labor supply curve signifies that: (i) The supply of labor is perfectly inelastic. (ii) The firm can hire as much labor as it requires at going wage rate. (iii) Labor and capital are in the fixed supply. (iv) Marginal physical product of the labor is co

  • Q : Engel curve and the income effect I

    I can't get the answer of this question of Engel curve. Help me in determining answer of this question. Describe relationship between the Engel curve and the income effect?

  • Q : Meaning of Caveat emptor I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Meaning of Caveat emptor. Please help me in the following question. Caveat emptor signifies: (i) Let the seller beware! (ii) Everything else held steady. (iii) Let things modify if they should. (iv) Charge whatever the market will allo

  • Q : Monopolist in the product market Can

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. For a monopolist in a product market, the value of marginal product of the labor: (i) Equivalents the marginal revenue product of the labor

  • Q : Emergence and development of common

    The economist most intimately identified along with the emergence and early development of common equilibrium analysis was: (w) Adam Smith. (x) Leon Walras. (y) Alfred Marshall. (z) William Stanley Jevons. Can some

  • Q : Union Strategies and the Taft-Hartley

    The union strategy made illegal through the Taft-Hartley Act of 1948 was: (1) Jurisdictional strikes centered on which the unions would symbolize a firm’s staff. (2) Contracts in which the firms agreed to preferentially encourage the union members. (3) ‘Ri