--%>

Small market capitalization

Why would stocks perform better in the month of January than other months of the year, and discuss whether small market capitalization companies outperform large capitalization companies in the short to medium term?

E

Expert

Verified

January effect is the calendar-related anomaly in the financial market where financial security prices raise in the month of January. This makes an opportunity for the investors to buy stock for lower prices before January and sell them after their value rises. Therefore, the main characteristics of the January Effect are an increase in buying securities before the end of the year for a lower price, and selling them in January to produce profit from the price differences. This kind of pattern in price behavior on the financial market supports the fact that financial markets are not completely efficient.The January effect is perhaps the most accepted seasonal anomaly. In an early paper, Rozeff and Kinney (1976) found evidence for abnormally high returns in January using returns on the NYSE index between 1904 and 1974. The most popular explaination for this is the well known tax-loss selling motivation. Because the high correlation of international stock markets with the US market one would expect to that the January effect in the US data is transmitted towards international data. Between 1960 and 1976 the average January return was 0.14%. In this period the returns in January were significantly higher than in other months. Between 1976 and 2003, January essentially generated the same average return as any other day (t¼ 0.37). Right after 1976, the year of the publication of Rozeff and Kinney (1976) report about the January effect, the strength of the effect dropped immensely.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Profit-maximizing pure competitor at

    The break-even point as illustrated below for that profit-maximizing pure competitor happens at the price consequent to: (w) point f. (x) point h. (y) point j. (z) point k.

    Q : Economically non–viable industry What

    What happened when demand and supply curve do not intersect with each other? Answer: The outcome is: Economically non–viable industry.

  • Q : Consumer behaviour Graphical

    Graphical representation of relationship between MPC and multiplier?

  • Q : Effect of higher price for normal good

    Let consider the law of demand. The idea that the higher price for a normal good will outcome in less of good being purchased never based logically on the: (1) Income effect, by which the higher price decreases the purchasing power of the income. (2) Demand for good f

  • Q : Supply of Labor-Income and Substitution

    I have a problem in economics on Supply of Labor: Income and Substitution Effects. Please help me in the following question. When the income effect of higher wage rate is more influential than the substitution effect, then: (1) The supply curve of labor is positively

  • Q : Define Capital expenditure Capital

    Capital expenditure: Any expenditure which will lead to formation of an asset or reduction in liability. This is financed out of capital receipts of government. Illustrations: Expenses on construction of roads, canals, bridges, grant of loans by the c

  • Q : Question on demand curve If the price

    If the price of K declines, the demand curve for the complementary product J will: A) shift to the left. B) shift to the right. C) decrease. D) remain unchanged. Help me to get through from this problem.

  • Q : Existence of purely competitive farm in

    This purely competitive rose farm would most likely exit in this industry with the long run when the wholesale price per dozen roses fell below: (i) $4.50 per dozen roses. (ii) $5.00 per dozen roses. (iii) $5.50 per dozen roses. (iv) $6.00 per dozen r

  • Q : Percentage of incomes persistently The

    The percentage of American families along with incomes persistently below the poverty line is around: (w) 1 2%. (x) 3 5%. (y) 5 7%. (z) 8 10%. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regardi

  • Q : Exploitation and Competitive Markets

    The removal of exploitation of labor (or wage payments beneath the value to the society of each and every individual worker’s productive contribution) is automatic when business decision makers: (1) Should set wages via collective bargaining agreements by labor