--%>

Set Theory & Model of a Boolean Algebra

II. Prove that Set Theory is a Model of a Boolean Algebra

The three Boolean operations of Set Theory are the three set operations of union (U), intersection (upside down U), and complement ~.  Addition is set union, multiplication is set intersection, and the complement of a set is the set all elements that are in the universal set, but not in the set.  The universal set is the set of which all other sets are subsets and the empty set is the set, which has no elements and which therefore all other sets contain.  For purposes of this question, let S denote the universal set and Ø the empty set. (Just state the Boolean Algebra equalities of sets below, the proofs are considered self-evident, we do not require Venn diagrams to be written to establish their validity.)

1. State the commutative law of addition: _________________________________________

2. State the associative law of addition: _____________________________________________

3. State the law that says Ø is an additive identity __________________________________

4. State the commutative law of multiplication: ____________________________________

5. State the associative law of multiplication: _______________________________________

6. State the law that says S is a multiplicative identity _____________________________

7. State the distributive law of multiplication: ______________________________________

8. State the distributive law of addition: _____________________________________________

9.   State the Boolean Algebra property x  +  ˜ x  = 1 in terms of a set A.

10. State the Boolean Algebra property x  •  ˜ x  = 0 in terms of a set A.

The above ten properties are necessary and sufficient conditions to prove that Set Theory is indeed a model of a Boolean algebra.

11. In Set Theory the difference of two sets, A and B is defined as:

A - B = { s | s  belongs to A and s does not belong to B } 

Define the difference of two sets A and B, using the basic operations of set theory: union, intersection, and complement.

A - B =            

12. In terms of an Abstract Boolean Algebra, for two elements x and y define the difference, x - y using the basic operations  +,  •, and ~ of  Boolean Algebra, using the definition from Set Theory as your guide.

x - y  

13.  In Boolean Algebra rewrite the expression  x - (y + z) using only the basics operations of ~ , • and  +.

x - ( y + z ) = 

14.  Using the results of Boolean Algebra in problem 13 above, rewrite  the set theoretic expression of A - ( B U C ) using only the basics operations of set theory : union, intersection, and complement.

A - ( B U C ) = 

   Related Questions in Mathematics

  • Q : Budgeted cash disbursements The ABC

    The ABC Company, a merchandising firm, has budgeted its action for December according to the following information: • Sales at $560,000, all for cash. • The invoice cost for goods purc

  • Q : How do it? integral e^(-t)*e^(tz) t

    integral e^(-t)*e^(tz) t between 0 and infinity for Re(z)<1

  • Q : Explain the work and model proposed by

    Explain the work and model proposed by Richardson.

  • Q : Define terms Terms : Terms are defined

    Terms: Terms are defined inductively by the following clauses.               (i) Every individual variable and every individual constant is a term. (Such a term is called atom

  • Q : Problem on reduced row-echelon The

    The augmented matrix from a system of linear equations has the following reduced row-echelon form. 280_row echelon method.jpg

  • Q : Theorem-G satis es the right and left

    Let G be a group. (i) G satis es the right and left cancellation laws; that is, if a; b; x ≡ G, then ax = bx and xa = xb each imply that a = b. (ii) If g ≡ G, then (g-1)

  • Q : Explain Factorisation by Fermats method

    Factorisation by Fermat's method: This method, dating from 1643, depends on a simple and standard algebraic identity. Fermat's observation is that if we wish to nd two factors of n, it is enough if we can express n as the di fference of two squares.

  • Q : Explain Factorisation by trial division

    Factorisation by trial division: The essential idea of factorisation by trial division is straightforward. Let n be a positive integer. We know that n is either prime or has a prime divisor less than or equal to √n. Therefore, if we divide n in

  • Q : Numerical solution of PDE this

    this assignment contains two parts theoretical and coding the code has to be a new. old code and modified code will appear in the university website .

  • Q : Formal Logic It's a problem set, they

    It's a problem set, they are attached. it's related to Sider's book which is "Logic to philosophy" I attached the book too. I need it on feb22 but feb23 still work