--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Selling product below cost by predatory pricing

Nintendo Co. of Japan has been accused of discarding its products (as selling below cost) upon the U.S. market that harms U.S. producers. When true, it is an illustration of: (w) excessive international competition. (x) protectionism. (y) aggressive advertising. (z) predatory pricing.

How can I solve my Economics problem? Please suggest me the correct answer.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Least likely example of Substitution

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. Assume that the War in Iraq spilled over into another oil exporting countries. When U.S. gasoline prices rose to, state, $10 per gallon, the least likely outcome would be that:

    		•
  • Q : Labor Contracts-Check-off Provisions

    I have a problem in economics on Labor Contracts-Check-off Provisions problem. Please help me in the given question. The statement of check-off provision: (1) Was outlawed through Taft Hartley Act. (2) Is unlawful in union shops. (3) Simplifies the un

    		•
  • Q : Economists statement for sales to a

    When Serena Williams, Cindy Crawford, Hillary Clinton, Katy Couric, Jennifer Lopez, and Ashanti all start wearing Wal-Mart jeans at public appearances, economists would explain any resultant raise in Wal-Mart’s jean sales to the change in: (1) Expectations regar

    		•
  • Q : Price and output combination by demand

    Not like a purely competitive firm, here a profit-maximizing monopolist can: (w) charge any price it finds advantageous and be assured of selling all this produces. (x) select a price and output combination by a downward-sloping demand curve. (y) spen

    		•
  • Q : Negatively sloped market power The

    The demand curve which confronts a: (i) competitive industry is perfectly elastic. (ii) purely competitive firm is downward sloping. (iii) monopolistic firm is horizontal. (iv) monopolistic industry is upward-sloping. (v) firm along with market power

    		•
  • Q : Inverse relationship in Law of Demand

    The law of demand signifies to: (i) The direct relationship accessible between quantity and prices demanded. (ii) The inverse relationship accessible between quantity demanded and opportunity cost. (iii) How demand shifts due to modifications in price

    		•
  • Q : Contradiction of the law of diminishing

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Which of the following below seems the contradiction of the law of diminishing marginal utility? (1) Ken enjoys his 13th beer of the evening more than his initial. (2) Joan recognizes that her

    		•
  • Q : Market economies of individual

    In the market economies, resources are finally owned by the: (i) Corporations which dominate the economic activity. (ii) Proprietorships and partnerships. (iii) Business firms collectively. (iv) Individual house-holds. (v) Government acting as the social trustee.

    		•
  • Q : Minimum Wage Laws-Unemployment Rises in

    Rises in the legal minimum wage rate have not been answerable for rising: (i) Unemployment among the teenagers. (ii) Racial discrimination in the employment. (iii) Unemployment between skilled workers who have lost their jobs since of competition from the cheaper impo

    		•
  • Q : Importance of study of the model of

    The study of the model of pure competition is very significant since this: (w) explains the behavior of most U.S. firms. (x) gives the underpinnings for supply and demand. (y) helps explain why government economic policy is essential. (z) gives a rati

    		•