--%>

Scope of spiral and waterfall approach

Explain the difference in changing the scope between a spiral approach and a waterfall approach?

E

Expert

Verified

The scope of requirements changes in Waterfall model is less comparative to the Spiral Model. You progress to the next stage in Waterfall model only when the requirements of the above stages are finalized and signed off. So exactly, we do not have any scope of changing the requirements once we move down the phases in this model.

However, during the life cycle Spiral model gives us flexibility to change the requirements and scope anytime.

In this model, we implement the individual requirements following all the standard phases of Software Life Cycle. If there is any new change in the software we can implement it in the next version of the software.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Oligopoly and Economic Welfare Assume

    Assume that P = MSB and the firms in an oligopoly are in equilibrium where P>MC. This follows that: (1) P=MSC. (2) MSB>MSC. (3) MSB<MSC. (4) oligopolists will gain zero economic profit. (5) the minimum point on the LRATC curve will achieved i

  • Q : Operating analytic Time of

    When this purely-competitive firm makes output level Q, this is operating within the: (i) technological long run. (ii) long run. (iii) short run. (iv) shut down period. (v) boom period of the business cycle.

  • Q : Marginal social cost and marginal

    If marginal social cost (MSC) equivalents marginal social benefit (MSB) as: (i) no injurious pollutants are being pumped within the environment. (ii) consumers enjoy more surplus than do producers. (iii) producers surplus is minimized

  • Q : Cut price and earn negative profit A

    A huge firm may cut price and earn negative profit when a new firm enters the market so as to: (w) induce the new firm to exit. (x) build a reputation for cutting price so as to deter future entry. (y) gain market control. (z) All of the above. <

  • Q : Characterized purely-competitive markets

    Purely-competitive markets are NOT characterized through: (i) substantial barriers to entry and exit. (ii) many small potential buyers. (iii) many small potential sellers. (iv) homogeneous products. (v) zero long-run economic profits.

    Q : Completely elastic price of demand On

    On such demand curve, the demand for DVD games is completely elastic at a price of: (w) $50. (x) $25. (y) $20. (z) None of the above.

    Q : Non discriminating firm-monopsony power

    The non discriminating firm with monopsony power in labor market confronts the: (1) Wage rate which consistently surpasses the marginal revenue. (2) MRP less than w. (3) MFC which surpasses w. (4) Monopolistic seller of firm's output. (5) MRP more tha

  • Q : Example of demand curve shifts upward

    Can someone help me in finding out the precise answer from the given options. When consumers become willing and capable to purchase more of a good at each and every possible price, then the: (i) Demand curve shifts up-ward and to right. (ii) Quantity demanded increase

  • Q : For luxury items absolute value of

    The absolute value of price elasticity of demand tends to be lower when: (w) the greater the number of substitutes available. (x) the more important the product is in classical budgets. (y) for necessities than for luxury items. (z) when more time is

  • Q : Words of Joseph A. Schumpeter about

    According to Joseph A. Schumpeter as: (1) refined and popularized the idea that profits derive by innovation. (2) perceived profits as rewards for bearing uncertainty. (3) believed which monopoly firms are so inefficient which none fully realize their