--%>

Scenario Analysis

Based on the recent success of Ontario tennis star Milos Raonic, Nike Canada will make new state of the art tennis racket with a red maple leaf on the strings. Mike expects to sell 10,000 rackets yearly for the next 4 years. Each racket will retail at a manufacturer’s suggested retail price (MSRP) of $475. Up-front depreciable costs related with this project are $800,000 and there will be no recovery of such costs at the end of the four years. Variable costs are $350 per racket and fixed costs are $300,000 per year. The project will need original net working capital of $450,000 which will be fully recovered in year 4. The firm operates with a 9% discount rate and a 36% marginal tax rate. The firm utilizes straight line depreciation over the life of project.

(a) Compute the NPV of this project.

(b) With the current economic conditions, Nike is worried regarding how sales of high-end rackets will be affected. What will be the latest NPV for this project when the sales price reduces by 10%, unit sales per year reduce to 7,500 and the company’s up-front costs rise to $950,000?

(c) Compute the firm’s accounting breakeven point in sales dollars for the base case.

(d) Compute the firm’s NPV breakeven points in sales dollars for the base case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Marginal costs for producing and selling

    Monsieur Cournot has a monopoly on an artesian well from that flows tasty spring water along with medicinal properties. To ignore variable costs, he insists which customers bring their own pails as well as fill them individually. Cour

  • Q : Prices of resources in constant cost

    When industry expansion or contraction does not influence the prices of resources used through its firms, then the industry tends to experience: (w) increasing costs. (x) constant costs. (y) decreasing costs. (z) diseconomies of scale.

    Q : Arising of perfect price discrimination

    Perfect price discrimination would arise when a firm: (1) extracted full consumer surpluses from its customers. (2) permitted monopolistic customers quantity discounts. (3) redistributed real income among consumers. (4) inefficiently allocated its res

  • Q : Unregulated monopoly economic efficiency

    Mainly economists object to unregulated monopoly primarily since: (w) economies of large scale operation may be attained. (x) technological advance may be fostered. (y) economic efficiency would be promoted. (z) economic efficiency may be decreased.

  • Q : Restricting output below competitive

    Below the competitive equilibrium output, restricting output will: (w) raise price above the competitive equilibrium price. (x) raise price above the marginal cost of the last unit produced. (y) generate a deadweight efficiency loss from underproducti

  • Q : Increased value of product due to time

    The farmer stores corn after its harvest in the fall and then vends it in the spring as a hog food at very higher price. The raised value of the corn is due to its modifying: (i) Place. (ii) Form. (iii) Possession. (iv) Time. Can s

  • Q : Maximizing firm profit conflicts with

    Whenever maximizing the firm profit conflicts with self-interests of business managers, this can lead to the: (i) Principal-agent problems. (ii) Negative accounting gain. (iii) Maximization of the revenues. (iv) Negative economic gain.

    Q : Absolute value of the proportional

    The absolute value of proportional change within labor hired divided through a proportional change within the wage rate is termed as the: (w) income/substitution coefficient. (x) employment wage response. (y) labor force participation rate. (z) elasti

  • Q : Reducing proportion of the work force

    The assertion which unions are more powerful nowadays than ever before is: (i) Supported by the consequences of the union contracts on an inflationary spirals. (ii) Reflected in the growing proportion of workers included in violent, protracted and costly strikes. (iii

  • Q : Problem on spending shares of national

    The view which big corporations unfailingly capture much stable shares of spending out of national income is: (i) Accepted by almost all the economists. (ii) Contrary to the confirmation of turnover among big over the decades. (iii) The symptom of strong competition.