--%>

Relationship between interest rate and bond prices

What is the relationship among interest rate and bond prices? Is there any difference among T-Bills versus Corporate bonds in reaching your assessment? Whenever the stock market falls, where do you assume that most investor place their money and why?

E

Expert

Verified

As the interest rate increases, the bond prices decline. Suppose a bond (face value $1000) paying an annual interest of $100 was purchased when the interest rate is 10% as well. If it is to be sold currently where the interest rate is 12%, when current bonds would pay an interest rate of $120, its price need to be lowered so that it attracts investors. The price an investor may be willing to buy this bond which matures in a year can be determined as:

Price of bond = Amount to be paid in one year/(1+interest rate in the market)

Thus bond price and interest rates are inversely related (Gamber & Colander, 2006). Yes, there are differences between T-bills vs Corporate bonds. Corporate bonds are issued by corporations to raise capital for investing in their new projects and operations, whereas T-bills are issued by the Government to decrease money supply or any other reasons. It is possible for a company to go bankrupt and default on the bonds but it is much less probable for governments to default on bonds. Hence in my assessment, T-bills are much safer as compared to corporate bonds.

Whenever the stock market falls, it may be due to any reason such as a declining economy, recession, etc. In such a period, it is highly probable that companies make much lower profits than expected and some companies may even default in their obligations. Hence I suppose that most investors place their money on bonds, which are much safer than the stock market and especially the government bonds, because they are the safest and also just have lower interest rates, which can be easily paid off by the US government.

   Related Questions in Macroeconomics

  • Q : Fiscal deficit in government budget

    What does fiscal deficit in government budget mean? Answer: This means more borrowing on the portion of government.

  • Q : FX rates In June 2005, a Big Mac sold

    In June 2005, a Big Mac sold for 6,000 pesos in Colombia and $3.00 in the United States. The exchange rate in June 2005 was 2,300 pesos per dollar. So, on Big Mac purchasing power parity grounds the Colombian peso was

  • Q : Value of MPC when MPS is zero Determine

    Determine the value of MPC whenever MPS is zero? Answer: Whenever MPS = 0, MPC = 1 – 0 = 1.

  • Q : Fiscal deficits What are the causes of

    What are the causes of the fiscal deficits experienced by many developed nations in the past three years and what are the main effects of the resulting government borrowing? For example – Greece/Ireland/Portugal/Spain situation and the large def

  • Q : GDP gap "The economic cost of

    "The economic cost of unemployment is measured by the GDP gap." Explain this statement. ?

  • Q : Market experiencing a rise in demand

    When equilibrium moves from point a to point b in the figure shown below, the only market experiencing a rise in demand is illustrated in: (1) Panel A. (2) Panel B. (3) Panel C. (4) Panel D.

    Q : POSSIBILITIES Possibilities Food

    Possibilities Food (millions of tons per year) Tractors (millions per year) A 0 30 B 4 28 C 8 24 D 12 20 E 16 14 F 20 8 G 24 0 a. Is it possible for this nation to produce thirty million tons of food per year? Why or why not. b. Is it possible for this nation to produce thirty million

  • Q : Reallocation of resources through budget

    Reallocation of resources: In case, the market economy fails or does not attain the desired social objectives, the government has to interfere via budget and reallocate resources accordingly. Through its budgetary

  • Q : Is sale of scooter is national income

    Describe whether the sale of old scooter is comprised in national income?

  • Q : Macro economics policy (a) Do you think

    (a) Do you think that macroeconomic policy should be designed to achieve a measured unemployment rate of zero? Why or why not should this be the case?