--%>

Reasonable analytic objection to land taxes

A reasonable analytic objection to the argument which full taxation of economic rents would not hinder allocative efficiency is about: (w) reducing income streams by rents does reduce the incentive of the resource owner to acquire the transaction costs related with putting the resource to its most efficient use. (x) income taxes have already been paid while the person who now owns the resource generated the income to buy the resource, therefore taxing rent constitutes “twice taxation.” (y) land is not unique into generating economic rent. (z) death taxes unfairly damage the interests of the heirs of people who obtained wealth.

I need a good answer on the topic of Economics problems. Please give me your suggestion for the same by using above options.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Variation in supply and demand curves

    These supply and demand curves for housing do NOT involve that the: (w) demand for housing has increased. (x) supply has increased, because rental price has risen. (y) equilibrium price and quantity of housing have increased. (z) housing market will c

  • Q : History of labor-Yellow Dog Contracts

    The agreements not to join unions were once general needs for employment. Now outlawed, such are termed as: (1) Blacklist contracts. (2) Feather-bedding certificates. (3) Employment screens. (4) Exclusionary provisions. (5) Yellow dog contracts.

    Q : Economic profit of purely competitive

    Purely competitive firms will experience economic profit, in a short-run equilibrium which is: (w) zero. (x) positive. (y) negative. (z) negative, zero, or positive are all possibilities. Hey friends please give yo

  • Q : When price of a good or resource drops

    When the price of a good or resource drops/falls, the demands for: (i) that good or resource rise. (ii) Complementary goods or resources reduce. (iii) Replacement of goods or resources reduces. (iv) Luxury goods and inferior resources drop/fall.

  • Q : Question on production possibilities

    Refer to the given diagram. Which of the following positions relative to PP1 would be the most likely to result in a future production possibilities curve of PP3, rather than PP2 ?  1) A. 2) B. 3) C.  4) D.

    Q : Quantity supply or demand to changes in

    When a measure of the responsiveness of one variable to other (for example, quantity supplied [or demanded] to changes within price), elasticity: (w) provides no criterion for identifying responsiveness. (x) depends on the units used to express change

  • Q : Total variable costs in monopolistic

    When this firm produces 5,000 units of output monthly in this demonstrated figure, in that case its total variable costs equal as: (w) $75,000 per month. (x) $15,000 per month. (y) $18,000 per month. (z) $3,000 per month.

    Q : Opinion about kinked demand curve model

    George Stigler concluded which the kinked demand curve model is incorrect to the extent that this depends on: (w) marginal cost pricing. (x) pure competition. (y) interdependent decision making.  (z) sticky prices.

  • Q : Problem on Ceteris Paribus Can someone

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. Supposing everything to be constant apart from the variables being studied is termed as the: (1) Ceteris paribus assumption. (2) Ex post facto assumption. (3) Post hoc ergo prop

  • Q : Demand curves rightward of potential

    Monopolistically competitive firms advertise in try to shift their: (1) own supply curves leftward. (2) competitors' costs upward. (3) existing customers' demand curves leftward. (4) tax burdens to resource suppliers. (5) potential customers' demand c