--%>

Raising prices raises total costs for total revenue

Total revenue at your fried hushpuppy stand has been declining currently. Your partner persevere that increasing hushpuppy prices will increase total revenue, although you believe only as fervently which lowering prices will produce more total revenue by attracting greater customer faithfulness. You can be sure that: (1) lowering prices will raise total revenue. (2) your partner believes demands for hushpuppies to be more price elastic than you do. (3) lowering prices will decrease your total costs. (4) you view customers’ demands for hushpuppies as more price elastic than your partner does. (5) raising prices will raise total costs.

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding Economics generally?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Demonstrates the Lorenz Curve This

    This given figure demonstrates as: (w) Lorenz curve. (x) familial income distribution graph. (y) Gini curve. (z) Blanc income standard curve. </span></p>
                                        </div>
                                        <!-- /comment-box -->
                                    </li>
   
   </td>
	</tr><tr>
		<td>
       
      <li>
                                        <div class=

    Q : Problem on Ceteris Paribus Can someone

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. Supposing everything to be constant apart from the variables being studied is termed as the: (1) Ceteris paribus assumption. (2) Ex post facto assumption. (3) Post hoc ergo prop

  • Q : Maximizes profits when price equal to

    A purely competitive firm will turn out where P = MC since this: (w) is good for society. (x) is all which is permitted through law. (y) maximizes profits. (z) permits price adjustment although not quantity adjustment.

    Q : Economic of short-run shuts down firm

    When a firm shuts down within the short run, in that case it’s economic: (w) profit is zero. (x) resources have zero opportunity cost. (y) loss equals its fixed cost. (z) value to shareholders rises. Please guys help to solve

  • Q : Long run supply Illustrate and explain

    Illustrate and explain using diagrams, the difference between long run supply in a constant cost individual firm and industry and an increasing cost firm and industry.

  • Q : Determine price elasticity of demand

    The price elasticity of demand for DVD games among prices of $10 and $20 is approximately: (w) 3/2. (x) 3/7. (y) 1. (z) 16.333.

    Q : Bargaining power of the union problem

    When a firm's inventories are comparatively high, then the bargaining power of union is: (i) Huge, since the firm cannot afford interruptions of the production. (ii) Great, since the firm's gains are low. (iii) Low, since the firm can sell its invento

  • Q : Illustrations of homogeneous goods

    Illustrations of homogeneous goods would comprise: (i) automobile tires. (ii) athletic shoes. (iii) personal computers. (iv) most farm products. (v) college textbooks. Hey friends please give your opinion for the p

  • Q : Burden of tax reduce on suppliers of

    Most of the burden of an excise (i.e., per unit) tax would be borne through consumers of the taxed good, although some of the tax burden would reduce on suppliers of the good demonstrated in: (w) Panel A. (x) Panel B. (y) Panel C. (z)

  • Q : Demand and Supply in short run Both

    Both demand and supply of hamburgers would plummet in short run, as would be quantity sold, however we can’t be certain how the price would adjust when: (i) 75 % of the population became serious vegetarians. (ii) People abruptly decreased their intake of milk pr