--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Example of how marginal utility

    An illustration of how marginal utility diminishes takes place when: (1) Todd only requires 180 screws for his bike repair shop however purchases a box of 200 screws. (2) Amy Sue decides she would instead contain 150 hogs than 151 on her pig farm. (3)

  • Q : Uncertainty and Decision-making I have

    I have a problem in economics on Uncertainty and Decision-making. Please help me in the following question. The error of omission would be: (i) The failure of an individual to invest in Microsoft 20 years ago. (ii) Individual cheating on a test. (iii)

  • Q : Total revenue and profit Monsieur

    Monsieur Cournot has a monopoly on an artesian well from that flows tasty spring water along with medicinal properties. To ignore variable costs, he insists which customers bring their own pails as well as fill them personally. When C

  • Q : Problem on volatility of prices Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. In long run, the activities of successful speculators tend to: (i) Decrease the volatility of prices. (ii) Attract legal attention resultant in imprisonment. (iii) Raise the level and volatili

  • Q : Case study on Microeconomics Hello, I

    Hello, I did attach case study on Microeconomics. Regards,

  • Q : Problem on least monopsony power The

    The Firms which have at least some monopsony power will never: (i) Practice wage discrimination. (ii) Find out wage rates in portion by the number of workers it hires. (iii) Pay higher wages than would a firm hiring from the competitive labor market. (iv) Raise the em

  • Q : Social opportunity cost of resource

    Economic rent is: (w) income received by a factor owner in excess of the social opportunity cost of supplying the resource. (x) the difference between a firm’s revenues and the sum of the fixed and variable costs of production. (y) a form of eco

  • Q : Incentive to work and earn income The

    The incentive to work and earn income is likely to be least powerful if an individual who faces. (w) low income tax rates. making the cost of leisure high, and who possesses important amounts of valuable human capital. (x) high effect

  • Q : Illustration of Substitution Effect

    Sally is very rich that money hardly matters to her, although when the price of JIF chunky peanut butter doubled Sally switched to Peter Pan chunky peanut butter. This alters is an example of the: (1) Income effect. (2) Payback effect. (3) Substitution effect. (4) Pri

  • Q : Barriers to entry in the long run

    Imperfectly competitive firms protected by important barriers to entry are as: (1) assured of positive accounting profits in the short run. (2) almost certain to succeed in collusively fixing prices at high levels. (3) assured of positive economic pro