--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Monopsonistic exploitation-labor union

    The labor union contracts, a comparable worth rule, or minimum salary laws might boost up equilibrium employment when a firm has been practicing: (i) Price discrimination. (ii) Monopolistic exploitation. (iii) Feather-bedding. (iv) Blacklisting. (v) Monopsonistic expl

  • Q : Labor market-Monopsony power Can

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The firm probable to encompass significant monopsony power in its labor market would be: (1) Big cotton farm in the Texas hiring migrant workers. (2) Textile manufacturer in Hon

  • Q : No close substitutes in monopoly When

    When Perpetual Motion Corporation’s recently-invented and patented teleporter buttons have no close substitutes, in that case Perpetual Motion operates: (1) along with absolute certainty of realizing a pure economic profit. (2) in violation of the laws of demand

  • Q : Problem on Marginal resource costs Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The synonymous words marginal factor costs or the marginal resource costs signify to the: (i) Cost incurred in generating an additional unit of capital. (ii) Cost to the resource owner of secu

  • Q : Relatively elastic of demand in

    While a price hike yields a decline within total revenue, in that case the demand faced through the producing firm: (w) relatively elastic. (x) relatively inelastic. (y) unitarily elastic. (z) inferior. Can anybody

  • Q : Labor Supply-Elasticity I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Labor Supply-Elasticity. Please help me in the following question. When we try to list the labor supplies from least elastic to the most elastic, then the most accurate ranking would most likely be: (i) Competitive fir

  • Q : Calculation of market demand To compute

    To compute the market demand for air-filled mattresses, add up the: (i) Amounts demanded at each and every price. (ii) Amounts supplied at each and every price. (iii) Demand prices at each and every quantity. (iv) Supply prices at each and every quant

  • Q : Example of variable in Short Run The

    The resource which a carpet manufacturer is most probable to view as the variable in short run would be: (i) The warehouse it owns (ii) Truck driver. (iii) The truck on a 5-year lease agreement. (iv) Firm’s biggest factory. C

  • Q : Economic losses generate competitive

    Economic losses in an industry generate competitive pressures which cause: (1) industry output to fall. (2) market price to decrease. (3) each firm’s short-run output to increase. (4) rising costs for industry inputs. (5) firms to expand product

  • Q : Monopolistic competition in long run

    When this firm initially had important market power along with potential long-run economic profit, a likely cause of the firm finally being in a stable equilibrium of an $18 price and output of 5,000 units every day would be:  (1