--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Long-run purely competitive industry

    For a purely competitive industry in the long-run: (w) neither net entry nor net exit of firms will arise. (x) firms will experience significant economies of scale. (y) the typical firm’s economic profit will exceed its accounting profit. (z) th

  • Q : Effects of less liquid assets on

    When households become more willing to hold less liquid assets, the: (w) interest rate rises. (x) present value of future income falls. (y) interest rate falls. (z) stock market will crash. How can I solve my

  • Q : Measurement of price cross-elasticity

    Price cross-elasticity of demand measures the virtual responsiveness of the quantity sold of a specified good to a change in the: (w) price of which good. (x) individual's income. (y) sales of another good. (z) price of another good.

    Q : Example of determining new equilibrium

    As per such supply and demand curves for peanuts, there is the: (w) demand for peanuts has fallen. (x) price rises to P1 due to better peanut technology. (y) production of peanuts was initially Q0. (z) new equilibrium price of pe

  • Q : Exceeds marginal revenue curve by

    That this firm can’t successfully price discriminate is most strongly indicated through the fact that: (1) the linear demand curve exceeds the marginal revenue curve for all outputs shown. (2) MR = MC maximizes profit. (3) total revenue total co

  • Q : Optimization and Heuristics Can someone

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. No one can execute all the mental gymnastics essential to perfectly process information and hence all their decisions are mathematically optimal, therefore most of the people rely heavily on m

  • Q : Define revenue Revenue : This refers to

    Revenue: This refers to total money income from the sale of output.

  • Q : Economic profit of purely-competitive

    This purely-competitive lumber mill experiences on the average day is an: (w) economic profit of about $340. (x) economic loss of roughly $150. (y) accounting profit of less than $300. (z) accounting loss of more than $100.

    Q : Another name of micro economics What is

    What is another name of micro economics? Answer: Price theory

  • Q : Increase total revenue at a diminishing

    When a monopolist increases output along with elastic demand, then total revenue: (w) increases at a constant rate. (x) increases at an increasing rate. (y) increases at a diminishing rate. (z) All of the above are possible.