--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Illustration of Economic Capital An

    An illustration of economic capital would be: (1) loanable funds in banks. (2) factory buildings. (3) gold held through price speculators. (4) labor’s productive skills. (5) corporate stocks. How can I solve

  • Q : Changes in supply and demand curves

    This alters in the supply- and demand-curves for textbooks could not have resulted from a change in: (w) taxes. (x) relative prices for text books. (y) expectations about future prices. (z) prices for related goods.

  • Q : Price ceilings and price floors Price

    Price ceilings and price floors: 1) cause surpluses and shortages respectively. 2) make the rationing function of free markets more efficient. 3) interfere with the rationing function of prices. 4) shift demand and supply curves and therefore have no effect on the rat

  • Q : Negatively relative interest rate

    Interest rates tend to be negatively associated to: (w) household preferences for more liquid assets. (x) typical rates of return on alternative investments. (y) household willingness to delay consumption. (z) investor optimism concerning rates of ret

  • Q : Relatively price inelasticity of demand

    When cuts into the price of cowboy hats drive down total revenues to hat makers, in that case demand: (1) relatively price elastic. (2) relatively price inelastic. (3) unitarily price elastic. (4) infinitely price elastic. (5) zero pr

  • Q : Marginal revenue at monopolist

    At the quantity where a demand of monopolist is unitarily elastic, so marginal revenue is: (1) positive. (2) negative. (3) one. (4) zero. (5) infinite. Hey friends please give your opinion for the problem of

  • Q : NOT operating area of monopolistic firm

    Monopolistic competitors within long-run equilibrium do NOT operate where: is (1) MR = MC. (2) P = ATC. (3) P > MC. (4) MSB > MSC. (5) economic profits are realized. How can I solve my Economics

  • Q : Disadvantage of sole proprietorships

    The disadvantage of both sole partnerships and proprietorships is that the: (i) Financial resources are generally more restricted than for a corporation. (ii) Income is subject to the double taxation. (iii) Principal-agent troubles are far less simple

  • Q : Determining type of good An increase in

    An increase in the income of Consumer X leads to fall in demand for that good by that consumer. Name the good X termed? Answer: Inferior good

  • Q : Main cause of oligopolies A main cause

    A main cause of oligopolies is: (w) mergers. (x) economies of scale. (y) barriers to entry. (z) all of the above. Please choose the right answer from above...I want your suggestion for the same.