--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Problem regarding law of Diminishing

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. According to the law of diminishing marginal utility, the longer that Chris and Lee kiss: (i) The less invested each will be in enduring this relationship. (ii) The closer they are to arriving

  • Q : Pricing strategy In a competitive

    In a competitive pricing strategy how does one can arrive for a multi-service practice where there are no specific products in question?

  • Q : Needs of families by poverty line

    The official “poverty line” computed by the federal government is the income level needed to meet the perceived fundamental needs of families along with differing characteristics as size, location, etc. Therefore, it is based on: (1) a rel

  • Q : Affects of costs and revenues in

    When the relative positions of all affects on costs and revenues are the same for all the several firms in this industry, in that case this firm is most likely operating in a: (w) differentiated oligopoly market in the short run. (x) monopolistically

  • Q : Operating in state-Right-to-Work Laws

    When it is illegal to necessitate union membership as a condition of employment for firm, then the firm: (1) Needs all the employees to sign the yellow dog contracts. (2) Can’t sign an agency shop agreement with the union. (3) Can need settlement before workers

  • Q : Lacking of competition-product market

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options? The lack of competition in the product market outcomes in: (p) Less labor being appointed than if the markets were competitive. (q) More labor being hired than if the markets were competitive.

  • Q : Function of negative economic profits A

    A function of negative economic profits is to: (w) attract new firms into the industry. (x) keep competition within. (y) signal to other firms to invest their capital into this industry. (z) correct resource allocations by forcing firms generating los

  • Q : Excess of good in market problem The

    The excess of papayas would appear when: (1) seller’s supply prices increase to P1. (2) Govt. set a price ceiling of P1. (3) Growers predicted prices to soar. (4) Hurricane destroyed all Central American papaya plantations. (5) Government obliged a price floor o

  • Q : Problem on facing comparable risks in

    When a firm experiences an accounting profit which is less than the normal profit realized by the firms of comparable size and facing the comparable risks, the firm: (i) Has failed to compute the implicit costs. (ii) Should be facing entry barriers to the industry. (i

  • Q : Price of Substitute goods What occurs

    What occurs to the demand for a good whenever the price of Substitute goods downs?Answer: Whenever the price of substitute good downs, then the demand for the specified good too downs.