--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Problem on Paradox of Value I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Problem on Paradox of Value. Please help me in the following question. Since diamonds are much expensive as relative to water, the: (i) Fundamental needs of people don’t comprise water. (ii) Consumer surplus from consuming the di

  • Q : Price ceilings and price floors Price

    Price ceilings and price floors: 1) cause surpluses and shortages respectively. 2) make the rationing function of free markets more efficient. 3) interfere with the rationing function of prices. 4) shift demand and supply curves and therefore have no effect on the rat

  • Q : Effects of average production costs on

    The economies of scale exist whenever average production costs: (1) Increase as the level of output increases. (2) Drop as the level of output increases. (3) Stay similar as the level of output increases. (4) Drop as the level of output drops.

    Q : Relative utility-Consumer Equilibrium

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The relative utility from the last dollar used up on food is the ratio: (i) Marginal utility of food or production cost of food. (ii) The Price of food or net grocery bill. (iii

  • Q : Problem on Agency Shop Agreements Can

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. Needs for all the workers to pay union dues or the equivalent are features of collective bargaining agreements that firms will function: (1) An open shop. (2) A closed shop. (3)

  • Q : Illustration of price elasticity of

    The Outlaw Scooter Club bought 170 motor scooters while the price was $875 every, but ordered only 30 while the price soared to $2,125. Then for scooters group's price elasticity of demand is: (i) 0.42. (ii) 3.36. (iii) 0.84. (iv) 1.68. (v) 4.20.

  • Q : Price discriminate maximizes joint

    When a successful cartel which cannot price discriminate maximizes the joint profits of its members: (1) the marginal social benefits of additional output exceed the marginal social costs of output. (2) this is impossible for any consumer to gain with

  • Q : Decrease prices as firms enter the

    When most firms in a competitive industry experience economic profits, in that case long run competitive pressures tend to cause: (w) greater economic profits. (x) prices to decrease as firms enter the industry. (y) industry output to fall. (z) severa

  • Q : Complementary goods problem When a

    When a price cut for licorice gummy bears decreases the demand for tuna fish ice cream, then: (i) tuna fish ice cream and licorice gummy bears are both complementary goods. (ii) Price scrambles for tuna fish ice cream will diminish the demand for licorice gummy bears.

  • Q : Effective price discrimination to

    Effective price discrimination to maximize profit does NOT needs the firm to be capable to: (w) separate the market within different groups along with different demand elasticities. (x) erect entry barriers to defend a monopoly position. (y) prevent t