--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Profit Maximization problem Can someone

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The Firms adjust their inputs of the labor or other resources till: (1) Revenue is maximized. (2) Employment is maximized. (3) Marginal product of the labor is maximized. (4) Gain is maximized

  • Q : Securing financing by selling stock Can

    Can someone please help me in finding out the precise answer from the following question. One of the reasons that some new corporations secure much financing by selling the stock is that: (1) Financial investors form higher rates of return from the bond interest than

  • Q : Centers for production in circular flow

    I have a problem in economics on Centers for production in circular flow model. Please help me in the following question. The centers for production in a circular flow model are termed as: (1) Households. (2) Public enterprises. (3) Business firms. (4

  • Q : Infinite price elasticity of supply The

    The price elasticity of supply in given grph is infinite therefore supply is perfectly price elastic within: (w) Panel A. (x) Panel B. (y) Panel C. (z) Panel D.

    Q : Demonstrates the Lorenz Curve This

    This given figure demonstrates as: (w) Lorenz curve. (x) familial income distribution graph. (y) Gini curve. (z) Blanc income standard curve. </span></p>
                                        </div>
                                        <!-- /comment-box -->
                                    </li>
   
   </td>
	</tr><tr>
		<td>
       
      <li>
                                        <div class=

    Q : Substitution effects resulting from

    The Law of Demand mainly relies heavily on the: (1) Buying power consequences of relative price modifications. (2) Substitution effect resultant from the relative price changes. (3) Increase in opportunity costs as income is worn out. (4) Principle of the non satiety.

  • Q : Economic profits in long run A monopoly

    A monopoly will make economic profits within the short run: (w) but cannot create economic profits in the long run. (x) if average total costs [ATC] > P. (y) as long as total revenue exceeds total costs. (z) All of the above.

  • Q : Managerial economics and good business

    please find the attached file (project) and qoute for it. minimus 7 pages required.

  • Q : Relationship between Total Revenue and

    What is the relationship among Total Revenue (TR) and Marginal Revenue (MR)? Answer: A) If MR is positive, TR rises although at

  • Q : Substitution effect on supply curves

    One of the reasons for positive relationship among relative price and quantity supplied is the: (1) Technology effect, whereby bigger firms generate at lower average costs than the smaller firms. (2) Substitution effect, whereby firms switch among for