--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Average variable cost at price of

    A monopoly facing a demand curve which has segments higher than its average variable cost curve that sets price: (w) equal to MR. (x) equal to marginal costs [MC]. (y) from the market demand curve after finding the quantity where is m

  • Q : Preference current consumption over

    When the preference for current consumption over future consumption weakens, in that case the: (w) interest rate rises. (x) interest rate falls. (y) present value of future income falls. (z) equilibrium level of investment falls.

  • Q : Funding crisis The Social Security

    The Social Security program in the United States faces a long-term funding crisis because: 1) the Social Security trust fund was exhausted in the year of 2002. 2) the number of retirees receiving benefits is rising more rapidly than the number of workers paying payrol

  • Q : Social welfare function what do you

    what do you mean by a social welfare function? if you assume that such a function exists, what properties of social optima would be considered by you? discuss such properties.

  • Q : Ceteris Paribus assumption The ceteris

    The ceteris paribus (all as well constant) assumption is most obviously implicit in the statement of a tailor who states that, “We will vend more suits in the month of May of 2008: (i) Than we sold in the month of May 2003. (ii) Than we sold in

  • Q : Purely competitive industry in market

    Within a purely competitive industry: (w) firm faces a perfectly elastic demand for its product. (x) market demand is completely elastic. (y) individual firms set prices for their output. (z) supply curve is based on fixed costs.

    Q : Purely competitive buyers and sellers

    Purely competitive buyers and sellers are: (w) price-takers. (x) price-makers. (y) powerless to make decisions. (z) quantity-takers. Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some views for above Econ

  • Q : Opportunity Cost to the User An

    An opportunity cost to the user, although not to society as an entire, which would be the: (w) accounting profits realized by a firm of CPAs. (x) interest paid by a borrower for a bank loan. (y) rent paid by a sharecropper to a plantation owner. (z) m

  • Q : Shift in demand in the price of auto

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The price per mile of mass transit has increases much rapid since the year 1980 than the price of private auto travel. This has contributed to the shift in demand

  • Q : Immobility of Labor-Monopsony Power I

    I have a problem in economics on Monopsony Power and Immobility of Labor. Please help me in the given question. The immobility of labor is economically significant as: (1) Most of the people like to move, however can't. (2) People in high salary occupations won't be c