--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Kinked demand curves and sticky prices

    Sticky prices within oligopoly markets are: (w) predicted by the kinked demand curve model. (x) substantiated by many statistical studies. (y) most common for highly differentiated products. (z) a result of price discrimination.

    Q : Question based on type of economy An

    An industry comprised of a small number of firms, each of which considers the potential reactions of its rivals in making price-output decisions is called: A) monopolistic competition.  B) oligopoly.  C) pure monopoly.  D) pure competition.

  • Q : Right-to-Work Laws The states which

    The states which have ‘Right to Work’ laws, and collective bargaining agreements: (i) Can’t need all the employees to join a union in a certain period after being hired. (ii) Generally specify the number of employees a firm should hire. (iii) Should

  • Q : Proprietorships and

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The sole proprietorship owned and executed by the lone individual is at a drawback whenever compared to the corporation since it lacks relatively: (i) Flexible legal options reg

  • Q : Meaning of Caveat emptor I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Meaning of Caveat emptor. Please help me in the following question. Caveat emptor signifies: (i) Let the seller beware! (ii) Everything else held steady. (iii) Let things modify if they should. (iv) Charge whatever the market will allo

  • Q : Firms in purely competitive markets

    Firms within purely competitive markets as: (1) practice price discrimination more often than do firms along with market power. (2) do not price discriminate since they are more interested in their customers than are monopolists. (3) cannot price disc

  • Q : Resources to escape state of destitution

    When an individual or family lacks adequate resources to escape a state of destitution, their circumstances are described as: (1) involuntary poverty. (2) relative poverty. (3) a vicious cycle of poverty (4) institutional poverty. (5) a culture of pov

  • Q : Reducing prices due to a commodity

    Which of the given would NOT be taken as predatory behaviour: (w) Rapid technological innovation. (x) Reducing prices due to a commodity surplus. (y) Duplicative products intended to absorb shelf space. (z) Introduction of close substitutes for rivals

  • Q : Effect of prices declining in

    Can someone please help me in finding out the precise answer from the following question. Americans would start cultivating bigger, greener lawns when the: (i) Prices of the fertilizer and water declined. (ii) Government imposed stricter safety standards for the lawn

  • Q : Problem on individual supply curves The

    The market supply curve is derived via: (i) Evaluating the net costs for each potential level of output. (ii) Inverting (or taking the mirror image of) the market demand curve. (iii) Horizontally summing up individual supply curves. (iv) Averaging the