--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Roles Play by Entrepreneurs Innovating

    Innovating new technologies and products when bearing risks and uncertainty is amongst the roles played by: (1) bureaucrats. (2) entrepreneurs. (3) monopolists. (4) politicians. (5) inventors. How can I solve my Economics <

  • Q : Forward-Shifting of Tax This would be

    This would be most complicated for resource owners to forward-shift a tax onto: (w) capital. (x) accounting profit. (y) land. (z) labor. Can someone explain/help me with best solution about problem of Econo

  • Q : Linear supply curves-elasticity for

    A straight-line that positively sloped supply curve which starts from the basis is: (w) elastic for all prices and quantities. (x) inelastic for all prices and quantities. (y) unitarily elastic for all quantities and prices. (z) negatively associated

  • Q : Unite to form cartels and share

    Oligopolies which unite to form cartels and share monopoly profits give an illustration of: (i) collusive behavior. (ii) territorial imperatives. (iii) mergers and acquisitions. (iv) non-collusive strategy. (v) corporate raiding.

  • Q : Dynamic Tit-for-Tat Carlos and Ivana

    Carlos and Ivana are friends and roommates. They eat together despite who cooks. But this cooking game is repeated mostly every evening, across time the probable result would be which: (1) neither Carlos nor Ivana cook, nor do they eat. (2) Carlos alone cooks for both

  • Q : Can the value of APS be negative Can

    Can the value of APS be negative:Yes, the value of APS is negative; when there are dissavings.

  • Q : Example of bilateral monopoly The most

    The most excellent example of bilateral monopoly from the given list would be the condition of negotiations among: (i) U.S. Immigration Service and undocumented workers from Mexico. (ii) Fast food franchises and workers who are high-school dropouts. (

  • Q : Open Shop-union membership Firms which

    Firms which employ workers devoid of needing any form of either union membership or dues are the: (i) Agency shops. (ii) Laissez-faire shops. (iii) Union shops. (iv) Closed shops. (v) Open shops. Can someone please help me in findi

  • Q : Marginal tax rate under negative income

    The marginal tax rate upon earned income under negative income tax system demonstrated in this figure is: (1) 15 percent. (2) 20 percent. (3) 25 percent. (4) 33.3 percent. (5) 50 percent.

    Q : Determine infinity price elasticity

    When the demand for cheesy fried grits of Pixie is relatively price elastic, then its price elasticity is: (i) zero. (ii) greater than zero but less than one. (iii) one (unitary.) (iv) greater than one but less than infinity. (v) infi