--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Applied Writing must use graphs to

    must use graphs to demonstrate/support answers where available. Submission is to be made tonight, so needs to be finished urgently

  • Q : Problem on monopolistically competitive

    Refer to the given diagram for a monopolistically competitive firm give the answer of following question. Long-run equilibrium price will be: 1) above A. 2) EF. 3) A. 4) B.

    Q : Automation process I have a problem in

    I have a problem in economics on Automation process. Please help me in the following question. The procedure of substituting complicated machinery for human labor is termed as: (1) automation. (2) Bionic engineering. (3) Robotics. (4) Scientific manag

  • Q : Determine probable price taker Of the

    Of the given firms, the probably to be a price taker would be: (1) Microsoft. (2) Wal-Mart. (3) Toyota. (4) the Los Angeles Lakers. (5) the biggest wheat farm in Canada. I need a good answer on the topic of

  • Q : Problem on demand of rising exports

    Meager Russian grain harvests during the year 2001 led to increasing exports of U.S. grain to Russia, that symbolized a raise in the: (1) Demand for Russian grain. (2) Supply of U.S. grain. (3) Supply of Russian grain. (4) Demand for the U.S. grain.

    Q : Marginal social benefits of products If

    If an oligopoly achieves equilibrium, in that case the marginal social: (w) benefits of their products exceed the marginal social costs. (x) cost of their product exceeds the marginal social benefit. (y) benefits equal the marginal so

  • Q : Long run in production theory Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the most precise answer from the given options. The long run in the production theory is a period just long sufficient for: (i) Firms to totally differ all resources. (ii) Profits to be maximized. (iii) Marginal costs curves to be re

  • Q : Effected income of a small changes The

    The income effect of a small change in wage rate in demonstrated figure of Glynn dominates the substitution effect at: (1) point a. (2) point b. (3) point c. (4) point d. (5) every point specified in the figure.

  • Q : Competitive theory of prices Normal 0

    Normal 0 false false

  • Q : Pure competition for quantity adjustment

    The only industrial structure in that all firms are pure quantity-adjusting price takers is: (1) impure oligopoly. (2) pure monopoly. (3) pure or perfect competition. (4) monopolistic competition. (5) pure oligopoly.

    Discover Q & A

    Leading Solution Library
    Avail More Than 1423562 Solved problems, classrooms assignments, textbook's solutions, for quick Downloads
    No hassle, Instant Access
    Start Discovering

    18,76,764

    1950301
    Asked

    3,689

    Active Tutors

    1423562

    Questions
    Answered

    Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!

    Submit Assignment

    ©TutorsGlobe All rights reserved 2022-2023.