--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Neoclassical and heterodox One of my

    One of my friends can't succeed to get the answer of this question. Provide answer of this question. Economists of neoclassical argue that goods contain just subjective (or personal) use-value dimension; heterodox economists argue that goods contain use-value and soci

  • Q : Corollary of the law of equal marginal

    The corollary of the law of equal marginal benefit is the principle of: (1) Equal marginal utilities per dollar. (2) Diminishing marginal utility. (3) Income injection. (4) Substitution in demand. (5) Diminishing returns. Can someo

  • Q : Monopsony Power-sole buyer Can someone

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The firm which is the sole buyer of a specific good or resource is the: (1) Monopsonist. (2) Conglomerate. (3) Price discriminator. (4) Plutocracy. (5) Bilateral monopolist.

  • Q : Vertical Integration-Controlling

    The firm is vertically integrated when it: (1) Consists of an internationally recognized brand name. (2) Promotes career staffs to executive positions rather than hiring the experienced outsiders. (3) Merges with another firm which sells unrelated products. (4) Monopo

  • Q : Equilibrium moves market reduce in

    When equilibrium moves from point a to point b, the simple market experiencing a reduce in supply is demonstrated within: (w) Panel A. (x) Panel B. (y) Panel C. (z) Panel D.

    Q : When market for a good is in equilibrium

    Whenever the market for the good is in equilibrium, this signifies that the: (i) Demand and supply are equivalent. (ii) Tax wedge is perfectly offset by the government advantages. (iii) Differences among demand prices and supply prices equivalent profit per unit. (iv)

  • Q : Normative goals of microeconomics

    Normative goals of microeconomics comprise: (w) economic growth. (x) price-level stability. (y) high employment. (z) equity within the distribution of income. Please friends choose one choice from the above. I want your suggestion

  • Q : Benefit of the market system One

    One political benefit of the market system over the majority of other economic systems is that: (1) The power to take decisions is comparatively decentralized. (2) Democratic decisions are steadier than individual selections (3) Centralized decisions

  • Q : Complements for good Can someone help

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Price hikes outcome less substitution away from a good the more: (i) Close substitutes there are for good. (ii) Various uses there are to which the good was place at lower price. (iii) Extende

  • Q : Kinked Demand by decreasing price In

    In this kinked demand curve model as in given graph, when this firm operated at point a and lowered its price by P2 to P1 and other firms in the industry also lower prices, in that case this firm will move from point a to: (w) po