--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Monopsonistic exploitation of many

    NCAA rules the forbidding standard employment negotiations among colleges and amateur athletes tend to outcome in: (i) Monopsonistic exploitation of numerous athletes. (ii) Incentives for the collusion among individual college coaches and individual owners of the prof

  • Q : Technological innovations and demands

    Pharmaceutical companies have currently developed and tested drugs which reverse the affects of alcohol upon the brain only in a half hour. Such pills allow drivers to sober up before driving and to decrease the severity of hangovers. Within the past few years, variou

  • Q : Relative Prices-Rational consumer I

    I have a problem in economics on Relative Prices-Rational consumer. Please help me in the following question. The rational consumer buying decisions based on: (1) Present prices. (2) Absolute prices. (3) Nominal prices. (4) Relative prices.

    Q : Enhancing society economic efficiency

    Society-extensive economic efficiency is most probable to be improved by: (1) competitive advertising. (2) cooperation between firms in a cartel. (3) increases in asymmetric information. (4) informative advertising. (5) wage and price controls. <

  • Q : Poverty line define officially Official

    Official poverty rates for U.S. families [the “poverty line”] are: (a) higher than in most other countries. (b) very similar for different types of families. (c) higher for the middle class than for lower class families. (

  • Q : Efficiency Wages problem The employees

    The employees at times pose principal-agent problems for the firm’s owners in the deficiency of constant monitoring. Such problems are most probable to be lessened when a firm adopts the policy of: (1) dynamically opposing the attempts to unionize. (2) Paying em

  • Q : Shift in market equillibrium Grape

    Grape jelly and Peanut butter are strong complements. Assume that severe mold ruined half of this year’s peanut harvest. When the grape jelly market was primarily in equilibrium on S0D0, then this market would shift to: (a) S1D0. (b) S0D2. (c) S2D0. (d) S2D2. (e

  • Q : Labor Contracts-Check-off Provisions

    I have a problem in economics on Labor Contracts-Check-off Provisions problem. Please help me in the given question. The statement of check-off provision: (1) Was outlawed through Taft Hartley Act. (2) Is unlawful in union shops. (3) Simplifies the un

  • Q : Law of Demand and the Demand Curve

    Question: Describe the differences between shifts in demand and movements along the demand curve. What are the main factors which can shift the demand curve? Explain why they cause the demand curve to shift. Use e

  • Q : Oligopoly and the law An illegal

    An illegal practice from an oligopolistic firm would be: (w) price leadership. (x) direct price collusion with rivals. (y) non-price competition. (z) mutual interdependence in price and output decisions. I need a g