--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Adjustments in demand When Mad Cow

    When Mad Cow Disease erupted internationally, so what would occur to the demand, price, supply and quantity of hamburgers: (w) demand = fall, price = ???, supply = fall and quantity = fall. (x) demand = fall, price = rise, supply = rise and quantity =

    		•
  • Q : Yellow Dog Contracts-non-union

    The worker who signed a yellow dog contract in the year 1920s agreed: (i) To support the union’s feather-bedding efforts. (ii) Not to work with the ‘scab’ non-union strike-breakers. (iii) To pay the union dues as protection from the violent union org

    		•
  • Q : Calculating Present Value by Interest

    When all bonds are perpetuities which annually pay $1000 (the sum of one thousand and 00/100 dollars) per annum, at an interest rate of 10 percent, the price of these bonds is: (1) $4000. (2) $5000. (3) $6250. (4) $8000. (5) $10,000.<

    		•
  • Q : Product differentiation in market If

    If new soap operas that, although same to the previous ones, all are advertised as original and new, the TV networks are engaging within: (i) bait and switch. (ii) product differentiation. (iii) monopolistic competition. (iv) dynamic game theory. (v)

    		•
  • Q : Non-discriminating firm through

    The non-discriminating organization with monopsony power in the labor market confronts the: (i) Wage rate which consistently surpasses the marginal revenue. (ii) MRP less than w. (iii) MFC which surpasses w. (iv) Monopolistic seller of the organization’s output.

    		•
  • Q : Effect of an increase in the price

    Which of the following diagrams depictes(s) the effect of an increase in the price of Budweiser beer on the market for Coors beer? A) A and C. B) A only. C) B only. D) C only. 190_gh.pn</span></p> </div> <!-- /comment-box --> </li> </td> </tr><tr> <td> <li> <div class=

    Q : Purely competitive firm in pure

    A purely competitive firm: (w) maximizes profits where MR=MC. (x) makes economic profits while its total revenue is greater than its total cost. (y) has no control over the price of its products. (z) all of the above.

    Q : Problem regarding Rational Ignorance

    Whenever decision makers select not to pursue further information as the expected reward for the searching for it does not surpass its expected cost, the outcome is: (1) Adverse choice. (2) Consumer exploitation. (3) Unintended effects. (4) Asymmetric information. (5)

    		•
  • Q : Pure competition and monopolistic

    Pure competition and monopolistic competition are: (1) polar opposites on the continuum of market structures. (2) the two market structures in that firms are pure quantity adjusters. (3) both characterized by an absence of barriers to long run entry a

    		•
  • Q : Movement of Supply Curve towards up and

    The rise in the price of Pepsi will effect a: (1) Shift of the supply curve of Coke to left. (2) Shift of the supply curve of Pepsi to right. (3) Movement downwards all along the supply curve of Coke. (4) Movement up and to right all along the supply curve of Pepsi.

    		•