--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Maximize profit by marginal revenue and

    Prohibition Corporation’s very famous St. Valentine’s Day software is going within version 6. The very first point Prohibition requires to classify in its quest to maximize profit is the: (1) point e. (2) point f. (3) point g. (4) point h.

  • Q : Lower costs of large oligopolists This

    This is possible that consumers could pay a lower price within an oligopoly market than a competitive market since large oligopolists: (w) can price below cost. (x) often give quantity discounts to loyal customers. (y

  • Q : When are average and outputs prices of

    Average and Outputs prices for CDs and DVDs both rose throughout 1999 to 2000 (before the start of Napster and subsequent file-sharing software), which implying: (1) supply of prerecorded music should have grown. (2) law of demand doesn’t apply

  • Q : Prohibition in Pure Economic Profits

    Pure economic profits are NOT: (w) normal costs of production. (x) reduced to “normal” levels in long-run pure competition. (y) zero in long run monopolistic competition. (z) possible under pure competition in the short-run.

  • Q : Practicing predatory pricing by a

    This is difficult to convict a company for practicing predatory pricing since: (w) the degree of economic analysis needed is beyond the understanding of most lawyers. (x) this is not illegal to practice predatory pricing. (y) this is frequently hard t

  • Q : Public Goods and Service Why does a

    Why does a good or service become a public good or service?

  • Q : Illustration of Substitution Effect

    Sally is very rich that money hardly matters to her, although when the price of JIF chunky peanut butter doubled Sally switched to Peter Pan chunky peanut butter. This alters is an example of the: (1) Income effect. (2) Payback effect. (3) Substitution effect. (4) Pri

  • Q : Market shifting while supply fallen and

    Specified the shifts demonstrated in the market for peanuts, there is the: (1) price will fall.(2)  quantity of output will rise slightly. (3) supply has fallen while demand has grown. (4) main adjustment happens in the quantity exchanged. (5) va

  • Q : Illustration of perfectly price elastic

    A demand curve which is perfectly price elastic is demonstrated into: (w) Panel A. (x) Panel B. (y) Panel C. (z) Panel D. 914</span></p>
                                        </div>
                                        <!-- /comment-box -->
                                    </li>
   
   </td>
	</tr><tr>
		<td>
       
      <li>
                                        <div class=

    Q : Resource demands from purely

    Relative to the resource demands from purely competitive sellers, demands through imperfectly competitive firms for resources tend to: (1) Perfectly price elastic. (2) Upward sloping. (3) Backward bending. (4) Less price elastic. (5) Perfectly price inelastic.