--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Problem Bilateral Monopoly The word

    The word economists employ to explain a condition where a powerful seller confronts the powerful buyer is: (1) Reciprocal exploitation. (2) Strategic bloc management. (3) Dialectical bargaining. (4) Ancillary reciprocity. (5) Bilateral monopoly.

    Q : Question based on production

    In drawing the production possibilities curve we assume that: 1) technology is fixed. 2) unemployment exists. 3) economic resources are unlimited. 4) wants are limited.

  • Q : Absolute value of price elasticity of

    The absolute value of price elasticity of demand is generally greater when there: (w) are fewer uses for the good. (x) is more time permitted for buyers to adjust. (y) are fewer substitutes for the good. (z) is a lower elasticity of s

  • Q : Influence of short run supply In short

    In short run, the supply of Pinot Noir from the viewpoints of oenophiles who fancy it would be influenced least by: (i) The offspring of late baby boomers arriving the legal age to buy alcohol. (ii) Imposition of a maximum tax for each and every bottle of wine generat

  • Q : Illustration of Substitution Effect

    Sally is very rich that money hardly matters to her, although when the price of JIF chunky peanut butter doubled Sally switched to Peter Pan chunky peanut butter. This alters is an example of the: (1) Income effect. (2) Payback effect. (3) Substitution effect. (4) Pri

  • Q : Interest rate risk premium What is

    What is Interest rate risk premium? Briefly explain it.

  • Q : Economic profits for most firms I have

    I have a problem in economics on Economic profits for most firms. Please help me in the following question. Economic profits for most of the firms will generally be: (1) The similar as their accounting profits. (2) Bigger than their accounting gains. (3) Less than the

  • Q : Problem on Explicit Costs Can someone

    Can someone help me in finding out the precise answer from the given options. The explicit costs of the firm would not comprise: (1) Salaries paid to the employees. (2) The value of owner’s effort and time. (3) Electric bills automatically paid as the drafts on

  • Q : Problem on Normal and Inferior Goods

    Lobster is a normal good and peanut butter is a poorer good. When your income increases, you will most likely consume: (1) More of both the goods. (2) More lobster and less peanut butter. (3) More peanut butter and less lobster. (4) Less of both goods.

    Q : Illustration of arbitrage in financial

    Darlene thinks as the “cowboy look” will rebound sharply subsequent spring. Then she travels to Mexico and buys ten-thousand pairs of primo cowboy boots at $35 every, and after that waits, expecting to sell them for $350 a pair in Chicago within the spring