--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Average cost minimization at level of

    HoloIMAGine has patented a holographic technology which makes 3-D photography obtainable to consumers. There level of sales and production at that HoloIMAGine would minimize its average cost [ATC] of production corresponds to as: (1)

  • Q : Explain about price-taker The purely

    The purely competitive firm: (w) is a price-taker. (x) confronts an inelastic demand curve. (y) should decide what price to charge. (z) maximizes total revenue. How can I solve my Economics problem

  • Q : Price equality with marginal costs It

    It is not possible for a nondiscriminating, that profit maximizing monopolist to attain equilibrium where MR = MC as well as: (w) economic profit = 0. (x) economic profit is negative. (yz marginal costs are at the minimum of average costs [MC = ATC].

  • Q : Determine total revenue with formula

    Please help me to solve the problem of total revenue that is given below: Total revenue can be computed by the formula as: (w) P + Q. (x) P * Q. (y) ep * P. (z) ep * Q. Hello gu

  • Q : Minimum Wage Laws-Unemployment Rises in

    Rises in the legal minimum wage rate have not been answerable for rising: (i) Unemployment among the teenagers. (ii) Racial discrimination in the employment. (iii) Unemployment between skilled workers who have lost their jobs since of competition from the cheaper impo

  • Q : Profit-maximizing competitor in short

    This profit-maximizing pure competitor would close down within the short run when the price fell below the price resultant to: (i) point c. (ii) point d. (iii) point e. (iv) point f. (v) point g.

    Q : Difference between opportunity cost and

    Differences among the opportunity cost of a purchase through a consumer and the seller’s price are increased through: (w) taxes. (x) intermediaries. (y) competition. (z) speculators. Can anyb

  • Q : Greater economics loss than fixed costs

    Within the short run, there a monopolistically competitive firm will NOT operate at: (w) an economic loss that is less than fixed costs. (x) an economic loss that is greater than fixed costs. (y) making a normal profit. (z) making economic profits.

  • Q : Problem on long run competitive

    The technology is such that LAC is minimized at firm’s output equivalent to 10 and minimum LAC is Rs. 15. Assume that the demand schedule for the product is given as shown:

    Q : Stable negatively-sloped demand curve

    Assume that a monopolist face a stable negatively-sloped demand curve. Making more sales needs the monopolist to: (1) advertise its product. (2) decrease the price of the product. (3) lower its marginal revenue. (4) improve its technology. (5) increas