--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Price signalling reallocations in use

    An illustration of prices signalling desirable reallocations would happen while rising product demand leads to rising: (w) levels of investment during the economy. (x) employment of resources producing such good. (y) shifts of resources within other outputs. (z) quick

  • Q : Computing economic profit To compute

    To compute the economic profit, it is essential to know the opportunity cost of: (i) Capital. (ii) Land. (iii) Labor. (iv) All the productive resources. Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the above o

  • Q : Pure competition in modern U.S. economy

    Within the modern U.S. economy, there pure competition is: (w) characteristic of all resource markets. (x) rare in product markets. (y) most common for public utilities. (z) strictly regulated throguh government. I

  • Q : Typical production possibilities curve

    Evaluate which one is not correct? A typical production possibilities curve: A) indicates how much of two products a society can produce. B) reveals how much each additional unit of one product will cost in terms of the other product. C) specifies how much of each pro

  • Q : Lowest possible price in transaction

    Is the assertion such that "Everyone all the time buys everything at the lowest possible price" right? Have you paid more than you had to for any good yet, after permitting for all transaction costs?

  • Q : Agency Shop Agreements-Labor contracts

    I have a problem in economics on Agency Shop Agreements-Labor contracts. Please help me in the following question. The labor contracts having agency shop arrangements need: (1) Staff of the firm to pay dues to union. (2) The firm to hire just union me

  • Q : Reducing proportion of the work force

    The assertion which unions are more powerful nowadays than ever before is: (i) Supported by the consequences of the union contracts on an inflationary spirals. (ii) Reflected in the growing proportion of workers included in violent, protracted and costly strikes. (iii

  • Q : Supply of labor in perfectly

    Supply of labor in perfectly competitive market

  • Q : Meaning of price taker To be a price

    To be a price taker implies: (w) the larger firm in the industry will set the price for all other firms. (x) the entire market (industry) sets the price for all firms to take. (y) each firm takes the price as specified by the government. (z) firms tak

  • Q : Consumer Equilibrium-Utility

    Assume that you are an avid golfer and profit $36 worth of pleasure from the first golf hole played on any specific day, however the additional pleasure you profit from playing succeeding holes falls by $2 per extra hole. The $40 greens fee is needed to begin golfing