--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Find out marginal cost curve

    LoCalLoCarbo has turn into the favorite of fad dieters. Therefore in illustrated figure there curve C shows: (1) LoCalLoCarbo’s marginal cost curve. (2) LoCalLoCarbo’s average variable cost curve. (3) LoCalLoCarbo’s average total cost curve. (4) the

  • Q : Increase total revenue by increasing

    A monopolist can raise total revenue by increasing output when: (w) demand is elastic. (x) demand is inelastic. (y) demand is unitarily elastic. (z) supply is perfectly elastic. Can someone explain

  • Q : Define autonomous investment Autonomous

    Autonomous investment: Investment that is made up without depending on the gain of the enterprise.

  • Q : Problem on Analysis Paralysis Consumers

    Consumers confronting huge arrays of choices whenever they contemplate choosing one brand of toothpaste out of 50, or whether to purchase pulp-free, not-from-concentrate orange juice, calcium-fortified, or the extra-pulp, non-calcified, from-concentrate version, frequ

  • Q : Jeremy Bentham utilitarianism Possible

    Possible utilization of a ‘felicific calculation’ to recognize punishments for the crimes was derived from: (1) Medieval scholasticism. (2) Say’s Law. (3) Gresham’s Law. (4) Marshall’s Maxim. (5) Jeremy Bentham&r

  • Q : Objective of firm in price

    The firm's objective within price discrimination is to: (w) make the community better off economically. (x) make several consumers better off economically. (y) increase revenue and profit. (z) minimize average cost.

    Q : Wage discrimination Wage discrimination

    Wage discrimination due to race or sex occurs while: (w) members of some groups are paid less for equal work than other groups. (x) certain groups are excluded from particular occupations. (y) housing conditions are inequitable between economic classe

  • Q : Problem on Elasticity formula Whenever

    Whenever the price of plastic moose heads increase from $5 to $7, monthly sales fall from 2000 to 1000 units. By using the arc elasticity formula, the price elasticity of demand will be: (i) 3.0. (ii) 1/3. (iii) 2.0. (iv) 2.5.

    Q : Influence of drought in market price

    Severe drought outcomes in a drastic fall in the output of wheat. Examine how will it influence the market price of wheat? Answer: As an outcome of severe drought,

  • Q : Measurement of cross-elasticity of

    The cross-elasticity of demand measures as: (1) the changes in quantities sold when the price of related good changes. (2) changes within the prices of substitute goods. (3) changes within the prices of complementary goods. (4) how quantities sold cha