--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Marginalism and characteristics Explain

    Explain about Marginalism and characteristics.

  • Q : Illustration of Rational Ignorance I

    I have a problem in economics on Illustration of Rational Ignorance. Please help me in the following question. Supposing that the meat you purchase from a grocery store is good devoid of inspecting its quality yourself with the microscope is an illustration of: (1) Be

  • Q : Negative relationship in Law of Demand

    The law of demand declares that the negative relationship exists among: (1) The purchases of poorer goods and the level of national income. (2) Unlimited demands and restricted resources. (3) A good’s price and the quantity of good people will b

  • Q : Capital Labor Ratios and Income Assume

    Assume that half of the world population, randomly certain, was magically vaporized through space aliens, although no other aspect of life onto Earth was influenced. Ignoring any psychological trauma that calamity might entail, upon average, the economic

  • Q : Exploitation and the Wage Rate Assume a

    Assume a neither firm possessing both the monopsony power as an employer and the market power in its output market, however which can neither wage discriminate nor price discriminate. In the equilibrium in its labor market for workers, of the given va

  • Q : Law of supply regarding firms I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Law of supply regarding firms. Please help me in the following question. The law of supply signifies that: (i) Firms provide less for sale at lower prices. (ii) Purchases and prices differ inversely. (iii) Minimum inve

  • Q : Freedom of entry and exit Typical firms

    Typical firms in an industry can’t expect to produce economic profit in the long run when the industry has: (1) decreasing costs of production as the number of firms in the industry changes. (2) market demand exceeding the minimum average variab

  • Q : Profit-maximizing unregulated monopoly

    No profit-maximizing unregulated monopoly will function in the inelastic portion of the demand curve this faces since: (w) marginal revenue is negative. (x) total revenues are negative. (y) total revenue falls as less is produced. (z) marginal revenue

  • Q : Consumption expenditure In an economy

    In an economy 75% of increase in income is spent on the consumption. Investment raised by Rs. 1000 Crore. Compute: (A) Total increase in income(B) Total increase in consumption expenditure

  • Q : Individual Welfare Recipients If an

    If an individual receives benefits from the government, associate to the benefits everyone else receives, which exceed the individual’s taxes like a proportion of total tax payments by all citizens, which individual can reasonably be viewed like