--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Long-run curve of a competitive industry

    Within a competitive industry into the long run: (w) economic profits are common. (x) existing firms wither in growing industries. (y) economic profits induce new firms to enter an industry. (z) accounting profits will be zero for all firms.

  • Q : Negative externalities in production

    Production which generates negative externalities: (w) would lead to underproduction and overpricing of goods. (x) increases producers’ costs of production. (y) increases consumers cost of purchasing the good. (z) would cause the market price of

    		•
  • Q : Price discriminating-monopoly A price

    A price discriminating-monopoly will NOT: (w) charge various prices for a good to various consumers. (x) charge various prices for a good without cost differential. (y) charge similar price to all consumers. (z) charge more for those consumers who hav

    		•
  • Q : Occurrence of Adverse Selection When an

    When an NFL football team obscures information regarding damage to a former all-pro linebacker’s knees prior to trading him to the other team, the team which receives that player loses since of: (1) Immoral hazard. (2) Malfeasance. (3) Perverse selection. (4) Ad

    		•
  • Q : Reducing proportion of the work force

    The assertion which unions are more powerful nowadays than ever before is: (i) Supported by the consequences of the union contracts on an inflationary spirals. (ii) Reflected in the growing proportion of workers included in violent, protracted and costly strikes. (iii

    		•
  • Q : Open Shops problems Can someone help me

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Firms which employ workers devoid of needing any form of either dues or union membership are: (i) Agency shops. (ii) Laissez-faire shops. (iii) Closed shops. (iv) Union shops. (v) Open shops.<

    		•
  • Q : Marginal revenue by maximizes total

    A monopolist maximizes its total revenue where marginal revenue: (1) is flat. (2) is rising. (3) is zero. (4) equals marginal cost. (5) is negative. Can someone explain/help me with best solution a

    		•
  • Q : Problem regarding Rational Ignorance

    Whenever decision makers select not to pursue further information as the expected reward for the searching for it does not surpass its expected cost, the outcome is: (1) Adverse choice. (2) Consumer exploitation. (3) Unintended effects. (4) Asymmetric information. (5)

    		•
  • Q : Quantity demanded vary inversely I have

    I have a problem in economics on Quantity demanded vary inversely. Please help me in the following question. The law of demand defines that price and: (1) Quantity demanded differ directly. (2) Quantity demanded differs inversely. (3) Demand differs d

    		•
  • Q : Price crosses elasticity of demand when

    When a 2% raise in the price of Kibbles causes a 1% raise in the quantity sold of Bits, in that case their price cross elasticity of demand is approximately _____ and such goods are _____. (w) -2; complements (x) 0.5; substitutes (y) 2; substitutes (z

    		•