--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Problem on Vertical Integration Can

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. When an aluminum producer as well mined bauxite ore (employed in aluminum production) and manufactured beer cans, it will be: (i) The diagonal partnership. (ii) Vertically integ

  • Q : Monopsonist problem I have a problem in

    I have a problem in economics on Resources and Products Flow Model. Please help me in the following question. The firm which is the sole buyer of a specific good or resource is the: (i) Monopsonist. (ii) Conglomerate. (iii) Price discriminator. (iv) P

  • Q : Monopolistic competition firm in

    firm in monopolistic competition maximizes its profit by producing where its price is equal to its marginal cost." Is this statement correct or incorrect? Explain.

  • Q : Biography-Thorstein Veblen The thought

    The thought that the desire of people to purchase goods is culturally recognized as opposed to the price determined is the vision of: (i) Irving Fisher. (ii) Karl Marx. (iii) Thorstein Veblen. (iv) Ludwig von Mises. (v) Antoine Augustin.

    Q : Economies of Scope-Firms using

    Firms which use similar production facility or groups of inputs to concurrently generate various kinds of products are taking benefit of: (1) Tax loop-holes. (2) Variegated production. (3) Economies of scope. (4) Economies of scale. (5) Monopoly power.

    Q : Horizontally summing the short-run

    For a competitive industry the short-run supply curve is derived through summing the short-run supply curves of all firms within the industry: (w) vertically. (x) horizontally. (y) diagonally. (z) and computing their arithmetic average.

  • Q : Monopsonistic exploitation- contracts

    The labor union contracts, a comparable worth rule, or minimum salary laws might boost up equilibrium employment when a firm has been practicing: (v) Price discrimination. (w) Monopolistic exploitation. (x) Feather-bedding. (y) Blacklisting. (z) Monopsonistic exploita

  • Q : Diminishing Marginal Utility of a good

    Whenever eating a whole pizza and realizing that the last piece didn’t taste almost as good as the first, you are experiencing is: (1) Diminishing the marginal utility. (2) Law of comparative advantage. (3) Law of income effect. (4) Law of supply.

  • Q : Objectives of Microeconomic policy

    Widely accepted objectives for microeconomic policy comprise: (w) full employment. (x) general price stability. (y) economic development. (z) efficiency, freedom and equity. Hey friends please give your opinion for

  • Q : Demand curve of an oligopolist The

    The demand curve an oligopolist faces is kinked at the current price when other firms into the industry: (1) face unitary elasticity of demand at their current output levels.(2) will match any price cuts although not price hikes. (3)