--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Bookkeeper problem regarding Moral

    I have a problem in economics on Bookkeeper problem regarding Moral Hazard. Please help me in the following question. When a bookkeeper embezzles $1 million and flees to the Brazil after 22 years on the job, there is a trouble of: (i) Fugitive derelic

  • Q : Production Costs in generating goods

    Production possibilities frontiers be inclined to concave (or bowed out) from the origin as: (1) goods differ in their capacities to gratify individual needs. (2) A land, labor and capital mix is needed for all the production. (3) People vary in their

  • Q : Exploitation and Competitive Markets

    The removal of exploitation of labor (or wage payments beneath the value to the society of each and every individual worker’s productive contribution) is automatic when business decision makers: (1) Should set wages via collective bargaining agreements by labor

  • Q : Help!! Why does a marginal benefit

    Why does a marginal benefit curve slope downwards?

  • Q : Profits predict by structure conduct

    When cost structures and market demands were identical for each of the given types of firms, in that case the structure-conduct-performance paradigm would predict the greatest profits for: (1) pure monopolist. (2) price-discriminating monopolist. (3)

  • Q : Problem on double taxation The word ‘

    The word ‘double taxation’ signifies to: (i) The Corporation paying both the federal and state taxes. (ii) Corporations paying the corporate income tax and shareholders paying the personal income tax on dividends. (iii) Both partners in pa

  • Q : Resource market in equilibrium demand

    When the resource market shown in this illustrated figure is initially within equilibrium along with demand curve D0: (w) owners of these resources currently receive no economic rents. (x) economic rent is specified by area

  • Q : Unstable Cartel Agreement Cartel

    Cartel agreements tend to be unstable since: (1) outputs are homogenous. (2) cooperation replaces competition. (3) all governments oppose cartels. (4) members have incentives to cheat. (5) All of the above. Hello g

  • Q : Goals of the Firm-Profit Maximization

    The supposition that firms try to maximize the profits: (i) Is the beginning point for most of the economic analyses of how firms function. (ii) Can be wrong for the cases in which the professional corporate managers maximize their own self interests rather than the i

  • Q : Example of bilateral monopoly The most

    The most excellent example of bilateral monopoly from the given list would be the condition of negotiations among: (i) U.S. Immigration Service and undocumented workers from Mexico. (ii) Fast food franchises and workers who are high-school dropouts. (