--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Implications of law of demand what are

    what are the implications of law of demand to the government,household and business

  • Q : Reduce total revenue when demand is

    Boosting the price for Pixie’s cheesy fried grits by P2 to P3 will: (w) increases total revenue since demand within inelastic. (x) increase total revenue since demand is elastic. (y) reduce total revenue since demand is inelastic. (z) reduce total revenue since demand

  • Q : Monopolistic competition firm in

    firm in monopolistic competition maximizes its profit by producing where its price is equal to its marginal cost." Is this statement correct or incorrect? Explain.

  • Q : Pure economic profit on rate of return

    Owners of corporate stock obtain pure economic profit only to the extent which the rates of return realized by owning the stock exceed the: (1) interest rate that would have been produced by other investments entailin

  • Q : Estimate profit-maximizing price The

    The profit-maximizing price for RoboMaids is: (1) $24,000 per robot. (2) $20,000 per robot. (3) $16,000 per robot. (4) $12,000 per robot. (5) $10,000 per robot.

    Q : Substitution Effect-decreasing

    The substitution effect is negative since people react to a price raise by: (i) Reducing purchases of good. (ii) Generating more of good. (iii) Purchasing some substitute goods. (iv) Working less to sustain the existing purchasing patterns.

    Q : Demand when price of good or resource

    When the price of a good or resource drops, the demands for: (i) That good or resource raise. (ii) Complementary goods or resources reduce. (iii) Substitute goods or resources reduce. (iv) Luxury goods and inferior resources drop.

  • Q : Problem regarding law of Diminishing

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. According to the law of diminishing marginal utility, the longer that Chris and Lee kiss: (i) The less invested each will be in enduring this relationship. (ii) The closer they are to arriving

  • Q : Classification of Surveys as

    Surveys can be classified as probabilistic sampling: • Simple random sampling: If you have a relatively small, self-contained, or clearly stated population, suc

  • Q : Price increment in elasticity A price

    A price hike $4 to $5 per slice of pizza because of total revenue to: (w) fall. (x) remain constant. (y) rise. (z) this is not possible to tell from such data.

    Discover Q & A

    Leading Solution Library
    Avail More Than 1424159 Solved problems, classrooms assignments, textbook's solutions, for quick Downloads
    No hassle, Instant Access
    Start Discovering

    18,76,764

    1922780
    Asked

    3,689

    Active Tutors

    1424159

    Questions
    Answered

    Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!

    Submit Assignment

    ©TutorsGlobe All rights reserved 2022-2023.