--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Perfect competition ‘In the real world

    ‘In the real world there is no industry which conforms precisely to the economist’s model of perfect competition. This means that the model is of little practical value

    		•
  • Q : Total revenue minus total cost An

    An unregulated monopoly which does not price discriminate maximizes profit at the output level which maximizes: (w) P minus marginal costs [MC]. (x) total revenue minus total cost. (y) marginal revenue [MR] minus marginal costs [MC]. (z) price minus a

    		•
  • Q : Law of demand in Ceteris Paribus Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The law of demand supposes that the income and tastes of the consumers are: (i) Strong determinants of the prices. (ii) Causes of movements all along the demand curve. (iii) C

    		•
  • Q : Problem on Substitution Effect The cost

    The cost of cashmere plummets and most of the people start employing this once costly material as pillow covers and to knit sweaters for their pets. This is an illustration of: (i) The income effect. (ii) The change in preferences and taste. (iii) The law of diminishi

    		•
  • Q : Limitation of price elasticities of

    Price elasticities of supply and demand do NOT: (w) reflect desperation for goods and customers by buyers and sellers, respectively. (x) rise as the time period considered is expanded. (y) find out the economic incidence of a tax. (z) find out the leg

    		•
  • Q : Measure Liquidity An asset’s associate

    An asset’s associate “liquidity” is inversely measured through the: (w) transaction costs in dealing within the asset as a proportion of the market price of the asset. (x) time it takes to convert this to cash. (y) “backing&rdq

    		•
  • Q : Charging price in short run for profit

    Now Roast chicken dinners replace fried chicken in popularity in this given demonstrated figure. In the short run that profit maximizing firm will charge a price equal to: (w) $12.00. (x) $11.00. (y) $10.00. (y) $9.00. (z) $6.50.

    Q : Exploitation problem If the resource

    If the resource suppliers are paid less than the values of their marginal products [VMPs], then they are stated to be: (i) In equilibrium. (ii) Exploited. (iii) Monopolistic. (iv) Monopsonistic. Can someone please help me in findin

    		•
  • Q : Profit-maximizing firms with monopsony

    Unlike the competitive employers, profit-maximizing firms with the monopsony power will: (1) Set any salary they want and hire as lots of workers as they want. (2) Make any amount and charge any price they desire for output. (3) Be expected to try to make the most of

    		•
  • Q : Relative concept about poverty A

    A predictable reluctance through modern welfare recipients to trade all they own for the material possessions of a rich person by a much earlier period would be evidence which poverty is: (w) easily solved by income redistribution pro

    		•