--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Nondiscriminating monopolists in short

    Within short run equilibrium, there nondiscriminating monopolists will: (w) charge prices greater than their marginal costs. (x) produce outputs which maximize social welfare. (y) produce where their total revenues are maximized. (z)

  • Q : Average cost per unit of production

    When Prohibition Corporation maximizes profit within its production of St. Valentine’s Day software, there average cost per unit of it produced will be roughly: (i) $4 per copy. (ii) $10 per copy. (iii) $18 per copy. (iv) $24 per copy. (v) $32 per copy.

  • Q : Natural barriers to entry technology

    Natural barriers to entry would include: (w) long established brand loyalty. (x) enforcement of existing antitrust laws. (y) technology which dictates large plant size. (z) patents and copyright laws. Can anybody s

  • Q : Collapse of Cartels A purpose NOT often

    A purpose NOT often cited for the collapse of cartels would be: (w) price cheating. (x) inability to deter entry. (y) government prosecution. (z) merger into monopoly. Hey friends please give your opinion for the p

  • Q : Substitution Effect-decreasing

    The substitution effect is negative since people react to a price raise by: (i) Reducing purchases of good. (ii) Generating more of good. (iii) Purchasing some substitute goods. (iv) Working less to sustain the existing purchasing patterns.

    Q : Problem on Monopolistic Competition

    When fifty fast-food restaurants belonging to fourteen various chains are strung along an eight mile stretch of highway, it is an illustration of: (1) a primitive cartel. (2) pure competition. (3) monopolistic competition. (4) an oligopoly.

    Q : Constant price elasticity plausible for

    Constant price elasticity equivalent to one for socket sets would be mainly plausible for demand curve as: (1) D1D1. (2) D2D2.  (3) D3D3. (4) D4D4. (5) D

  • Q : Rate of return by perpetuity price A

    A perpetuity currently priced at $5000 which will pay $200 annually all times generates a rate of return of: (w) 4%. (x) 4.8%. (y) 5%. (z) 3.5%. Hey friends please give your opinion for the problem

  • Q : Excise tax at highest average rate At

    At the highest average rate an excise tax will tax low incomes while: (1) only luxuries are taxed. (2) goods along with the highest income elasticity of demand are exempt. (3) goods along with the lowest income elasticity of demand are exempt. (4) no

  • Q : Explain who is arbitrageur One who buys

    One who buys gold into London and after that sells that instantly in Boston for a higher price is: (1) monopolist. (2) capitalist. (3) speculator. (4) auctioneer. (5) arbitrageur. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for g