--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Illustration of most complete monopoly

    The most complete monopoly by the given list would be: (1) McDonald’s dominance in marketing fast food burgers. (2) the Federal Reserve System [i.e., an arm of the government] issuing all US currency. (3) limiting subsidized low tuitions at stat

  • Q : Competition and Rivalry When new firms

    When new firms enter an imperfectly competitive market, in that case the demand curves of the firms previously in the market will: (w) shift to the left. (x) shift to the right. (y) become vertical. (z) become horizontal.

    Q : Wage differentials-union and nonunion

    I have a problem in economics on Wage differentials-union and nonunion workers. Please help me in the following question. The wage differentials among union and nonunion workers encompass historically averaged roughly: (i) 10% to 15 %. (ii) 5% to 10%.

  • Q : Quantity demanded vary inversely I have

    I have a problem in economics on Quantity demanded vary inversely. Please help me in the following question. The law of demand defines that price and: (1) Quantity demanded differ directly. (2) Quantity demanded differs inversely. (3) Demand differs d

  • Q : Transactions increment and moves in

    Transactions increase and demand prices move below supply prices while a good turns into: (w) subsidized by the government. (x) subject to a high sales tax. (y) more technologically advanced. (z) a complementary by pr

  • Q : Burden of tax reduce solely on

    The burden of an excise (i.e., per unit) tax would reduce solely upon suppliers of the taxed good within: (w) Panel A. (x) Panel B. (y) Panel C. (z) Panel D.

    Q : Kinked Demand by increasing price In

    In this kinked demand curve model as in demonstrated, when this firm operates at point a and increases its price from P2 to P3 and its rival firms respond by increasing their prices, in that case this firm will move from point a

  • Q : Production costs-Consumer Sovereignty I

    I have a problem in economics on Production costs-Consumer Sovereignty. Please help me in the following question. In the market economy, output patterns mainly reflect: (i) Individual votes by each and every consumer. (ii) The requirements of majority

  • Q : Quantity of good supplied-Law of supply

    The law of supply states that the amount of a good supplied is: (i) Legally governed by the production regulations. (ii) Inversely related to its absolute price. (iii) Recognized by the consumer tastes in the free market economy. (iv) Positively relat

  • Q : Funding crisis The Social Security

    The Social Security program in the United States faces a long-term funding crisis because: 1) the Social Security trust fund was exhausted in the year of 2002. 2) the number of retirees receiving benefits is rising more rapidly than the number of workers paying payrol