--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Less equally distribution of wealth In

    In the United States, wealth appears to be: (1) more equitably distributed than income tax burdens. (2) less equally distributed than income. (3) distributed much more equally than in communist countries. (4) weak in generating income for wealthy indi

  • Q : Earn income and transfer benefits When

    When a family can earn income and transfer profits of $11,500 by working full time at the minimum wage, and also $12,500 in transfer benefits without working, the family’s net gain through working is: (1) zero. (2) $12,500. (3)

  • Q : Advantage of a partnership over

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. One of the advantages of a partnership over proprietorship is: (i) In a partnership just one partner is liable for the debt. (ii) Partnerships permit for more specialization in the management.

  • Q : What drives market towards their

    What drives market towards their equilibrium?

  • Q : Short-run Demand for Labor Short-run

    Short-run demand for the labor would be LEAST affected by the: (i) Productivity of resource. (ii) Prices of substitute resources. (iii) Demand for goods generated by the resource. (iv) Fixed costs of firm. Can someone please help m

  • Q : Price elasticity of demand and

    When the price elasticity of demand for Japanese cars is higher within Europe than into the U.S. and transportation costs are very similar, relative to the price charged in Europe, there the price a discriminating Japanese carmaker wo

  • Q : Negative price cross elasticities of

    When two goods have negative price cross elasticities of demand, in that case the goods are: (1) inferior goods. (2) luxury goods. (3) complementary goods: (4) substitute goods. (5) normal goods. Hey friends please

  • Q : General law of demand I have problem in

    I have problem in this question based on law of demand. Provide me correct answer of this. Described the circumstances in which the "general law of demand" not hold?

  • Q : When is minimum wage legislation LEAST

    Minimum wage legislation is LEAST probable to stimulate: (w) higher teenage unemployment. (x) raised racial discrimination. (y) surpluses of unskilled workers. (z) decreased wage incomes for unskilled workers who keep their jobs.

    Q : Market adjustments due to raised

    Normal 0 false false