--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : When price elasticity rise Price

    Price elasticity of demand for a good will tend to rise as the: (i) Number of reasonably good replacements available rises. (ii) Consumer income level rises. (iii) Good is a less significant budget item. (iv) Time permitted for response reduces. (v) Elasticity of supp

  • Q : Facing a competitive firm more elastic

    The demand curve facing an unregulated non-discriminating monopolist is NOT: (w) similar as the industry's demand curve. (x) downward sloping. (y) more elastic than the demand curve facing a competitive firm. (z) various from its marg

  • Q : Moderately increasing costs When this

    When this purely competitive industry is described by moderately increasing costs, in that case line C would represent: (w) the demand curve facing the entire industry as a whole. (x) market-period supply. (y) long-run market supply. (z) short-run sup

  • Q : Greatest percentage rate of return The

    The greatest percentage rate of return would be generated through a financial investment which yielded: (w) annual income = $1,000; current price = $10,000. (x) monthly income = $100; current price = $24,000. (y) annual income = $1,200; current price = $10,800. (z) an

  • Q : Yellow Dog Contracts-non-union

    The worker who signed a yellow dog contract in the year 1920s agreed: (i) To support the union’s feather-bedding efforts. (ii) Not to work with the ‘scab’ non-union strike-breakers. (iii) To pay the union dues as protection from the violent union org

  • Q : Labor Contracts-Agreement of shops I

    I have a problem in economics on Labor Contracts-Shop Agreements. Please help me in the following question. The union leaders would tend to favor the contract clause needing: (1) A sweat shop. (2) An agency shop. (3) A union shop. (4) An open shop.

  • Q : Abolition of exploitation The removal

    The removal of exploitation of labor [that is, wage payments beneath the value to society of each and every individual worker’s productive contribution] is automatic when business decision makers: (v) Should set wages via collective bargaining agreements with th

  • Q : Chance for arbitrage Normal 0 false

    Normal 0 false false

  • Q : Problem on Rate of Exploitation The

    The difference among the value of marginal product of the labor and average wage rate will tend to be maximum when a firm: (i) Joins significant market power in output market and monopsony power in the labor market, however does not wage discriminate. (ii) Is a pure c

  • Q : Gaining more Consumer Surplus I have a

    I have a problem in economics on gaining more Consumer Surplus. Please help me in the following question. Sushi lovers would be most probable to gain more consumer surplus as an outcome of rises in the: (i) Price of the steamed rice. (ii) Supply of sushi. (iii) Income