--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Market demand with market power

    LoCalLoCarbo has turn into the favorite of fad dieters. There in illustrated graph curve B shows: (i) LoCalLoCarbo’s marginal cost curve. (ii) LoCalLoCarbo’s average variable cost curve. (iii) LoCalLoCarbo’s average total cost curve. (iv) the market

  • Q : Pure competition in product and

    When no goods generate external costs or benefits within their consumption or production and when the income distribution is deemed acceptable, in that case economic efficiency is promoted through: (w) government inte

  • Q : Unitarily elastic demand by fixing all

    A monopolist who does not price discriminate, that is: (w) cannot maximize profit by producing where demand is unitarily elastic. (x) will maximize profit where demand is unitarily elastic when all costs are fixed. (y) will maximize profit where deman

  • Q : Problem on Analytic Time-Long Run Can

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The length of time needed for a firm to reach the long run is: (i) One year. (ii) Five years. (iii) Ten years. (iv) Variable and depend on the easiness of purchasing or selling

  • Q : Backward Bending Labor Supplies Graph

    Graph for the supply of labor might be backward bending since: (i) The substitution effect overtakes the income effect at some wages. (ii) Overtime workers get pay for time and a half. (iii) The substitution effect. (iv) The income effect is much powerful than substit

  • Q : Rule of thumb for office rent Is there

    Is there any rule of thumb for office rent or on lease per gross income? If yes, then explain?

  • Q : Monopsony Power and Demand for Labor

    When wage discrimination is not possible for first 40 workers then this profit-maximizing firm hires, however it can wage discriminate perfectly whenever hiring all the subsequent workers, it hires a net of: (i) Forty workers at an average wage of the

  • Q : Labor Unions and Aggregate salary Income

    The least probable outcome when unions succeed in increasing their member’s salaries is that: (1) Wages in non-union sectors will drop. (2) Employment will produce in non-union sectors. (3) Barriers will be building up to limit the entry to unions. (4) Labor's s

  • Q : Question on production possibilities

    Refer to the given diagram. Which of the following positions relative to PP1 would be the most likely to result in a future production possibilities curve of PP3, rather than PP2 ?  1) A. 2) B. 3) C.  4) D.

    Q : Problem on financial Intermediation The

    The main reason for the existence of financial intermediaries is as: (1) Direct flows of savings from the individuals to firms would necessitate higher transaction costs. (2) That just wealthy individuals can afford to invest in the stocks and bonds. (3) The habits of