--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Output and equilibrium price Hybrid

    Hybrid Roses is the merely florist in 60 miles of Presidio, Texas. Often, lots of Texans are romantics at heart. Total cost curve of Hybrid is below the demand curve this faces. At its output and equilibrium price, Hybrid will produce

  • Q : Process of Capitalization

    Capitalization is a process: (a) that converts fixed cost into variable cost. (b) by which predictable income flows are translated into wealth. (c) of financial intermediation by bankers. (d) of exploiting unskilled workers.

    Q : Effect of total revenue on economic loss

    The economic loss occurs whenever total revenue: (i) Is equivalent to the total costs. (ii) Fails to cover the opportunity costs. (iii) Surpasses opportunity costs. (iv) Surpasses the explicit costs. Can someone please help me in f

  • Q : Tacit collusion by oligopolists Tacit

    Tacit collusion through oligopolists is possible when: (w) agreed to by the government. (x) a price leader is visible. (y) the oligopolists succeed in forming a cartel. (z) very few firms control the market. How ca

  • Q : Demand when total revenue uninfluenced

    When total revenue to a firm is uninfluenced by small price changes, in that case demand is: (1) relatively price elastic. (2) relatively price inelastic. (3) unitarily price elastic. (4) vertical. (5) horizontal.

  • Q : Relevant demand of Kinked Demand by

    In this demonstrated figure kinked demand curve model, when a firm at point a raises or lowers its price and the rest of the firms in the industry do similar thing, in that case the relevant demand curve for the firm is: (w) demand curve D0

  • Q : Assumption of Ceteris paribus Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Suppose that everything except the variables we are studying remains constant or steady is termed as the: (1) Ceteris paribus assumption. (2) Ex-ante assumption. (3) Ex-post assumption. (4) Po

  • Q : Monopolistic competition in long run

    When this firm initially had important market power along with potential long-run economic profit, a likely cause of the firm finally being in a stable equilibrium of an $18 price and output of 5,000 units every day would be:  (1

  • Q : Break even and zero economic profit at

    Within the long run, after HoloIMAGine’s holographic technology patents lapsed moreover entry and exit became probable in this market, therefore HoloIMAGine would be expected to: (w) carry on to reap economic profits. (x) break even and experien

  • Q : Break Even Income A marginal tax rate

    A marginal tax rate of 50 percent and an income floor of $6,500 yield a break even income of: (w) $3,250. (x) $6,500. (y) $9,750. (z) $13,000. I need a good answer on the topic of Economics