--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Positive economic loss Can someone help

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Sara left her high strain job at hospital as the neurosurgeon making $250,000 yearly to launch ‘Flowers-to-Go’, a new firm. Sara still feels similar quantity of stress; therefore s

  • Q : Define market supply Market supply: It

    Market supply: It refers to the sum of all outputs of all producers of a good at a price throughout a given time period.

  • Q : Total revenue for profit-maximizing

    TR (total revenue) for this profit-maximizing pure competitor equivalents area: (i) 0PeQ. (ii) bPec. (iii) aPed. (iv) 0bcQ. (v) 0Pec.

    Q : Specific market price The difference

    The difference among maximum amount which consumers would willingly pay for a particular quantity of a good and the amount they really pay at a specific market price is termed as: (i) Discount rate. (ii) Mark-up factor. (iii) Familial gains. (iv) Hous

  • Q : Quantity demanded grows with price cut

    A price elasticity of demand coefficient of 2.5 approximately implies that: (1) quantity demanded rises 1 percent while price rises 2.5 percent. (2) quantity demanded grows 2.5 percent along with a 1 percent price cut. (3) price rises 2.5 percent whil

  • Q : Exploitation of Labor I have a problem

    I have a problem in economics on Exploitation of Labor Please help me in the following question. The exploitation might not exist even when wage a worker is paid is less than the worker’s: (1) average revenue product. (2) The value of marginal p

  • Q : Restricting output below competitive

    Below the competitive equilibrium output, restricting output will: (w) raise price above the competitive equilibrium price. (x) raise price above the marginal cost of the last unit produced. (y) generate a deadweight efficiency loss from underproducti

  • Q : Operates a profit-maximizing firm When

    When this profit-maximizing firm as in illustrated graph can’t price discriminate in that case this will operate where is: (1) accounting profit is positive but economic profit is zero. (2) the demand curve facing the firm is th

  • Q : Simulated demand A department store

    A department store faces a decision for a seasonal product for which demand can be high, medium or low. The purchaser can order 1, 2 or 3 lots of this product before the season begins but cannot reorder later. Profit projections (in thousands of euro) are shown below:

  • Q : Economic of short-run shuts down firm

    When a firm shuts down within the short run, in that case it’s economic: (w) profit is zero. (x) resources have zero opportunity cost. (y) loss equals its fixed cost. (z) value to shareholders rises. Please guys help to solve