--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : What Determinants of Supply include

    Determinants of supply do not comprise: (1) Government regulations. (2) Technology. (3) Resource prices. (4) Prices for other producible goods. (5) Tastes and preferences. Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answ

  • Q : Marginal factor Costs problem I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Marginal factor Costs. Please help me in the given question. The synonymous words marginal factor costs or marginal resource costs signify to the: (i) Cost incurred in generating an additional unit of the capital. (ii)

  • Q : Problem on Transaction Costs Higher

    Higher income families are far-off more probable to purchase automatic garage door openers than people with the lower incomes primarily as automatic garage door openers: (1) Save time and give convenience that wealthy people value relatively more. (2) Are status symbo

  • Q : Why are buyers and sellers forced to be

    Several buyers and sellers are forced to be price-takers since: (w) vigorous competition maintains individuals from noticeably influencing the market. (x) only monopoly firms adjust quantities. (y) markets adjust slowly. (z) quantity adjustment is not

  • Q : Market Adjustments in outputs and

    Outputs and average prices for CDs and DVDs both rose throughout 1999 to 2000 (just before file sharing became ordinary), implying such that: (1) supply of prerecorded music should have grown. (2) law of demand does not apply to music. (3) demand for

  • Q : Estimate Gini index Computing the

    Computing the proportion of the area above a Lorenz curve although below the 45-degree reference line relative to the whole area below the reference line yields a numeric measure of inequality termed as a/an: (w) Gini index. (x) inequality coefficient

  • Q : Price elasticity of demand coefficient

    In this demonstrated figure, there the price elasticity of demand coefficient is: (1) one at the midpoint. (2) greater than one in range a. (3) less than one in range b. (4) falling along with movements down along the demand curve. (5) All of the abov

  • Q : Determine the equilibrium prises When

    When both sellers and potential buyers suppose prices for rider lawn mowers to raise as summer approaches, in that case throughout March and April (in the short run), the equilibrium: (w) price falls but quantity changes are ambiguous. (x) price rises

  • Q : Price elasticity of demand coefficient

    A price elasticity of demand coefficient of infinity implies that: (w) the demand curve is horizontal. (x) each 1 percent price hike elicits a 1 percent increase in revenue. (y) total revenue increases proportionally as a firm increases its price. (z)

  • Q : Minimizes average cost of output When a

    When a monopolist maximizes profit and charges a price equivalent to average cost, in that case the firm: (i) is producing at the minimum point on its marginal cost curve. (ii) also charges a price equal to marginal cost. (iii) is pro