--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Problem on positive quantity Supply The

    The law of supply defines that, other things equivalent: (1) Quantity supplied differs inversely with price. (2) A good’s supply is positively associated to its demand. (3) Quantity supplied is positively associated to price. (4) Prices and cost

  • Q : Net income under the negative income tax

    Under the negative income tax system demonstrated in this given figure, a family of four along with earned income of $75,000 per year would have a net as [after-tax] income of: (i) $15,000 per year. (ii) $30,000 per y

  • Q : Produce a natural monopoly by market

    Market forces tend to produce a natural monopoly while: (1) decreasing costs are small relative to market demand for output. (2) diseconomies of scale are substantial at low levels of output. (3) economies of scale are substantial relative to market d

  • Q : Tax on a good tends to make The tax on

    The tax on a good tends to make: (i) Inflationary pressure the govt. can disperse by cutting its spending. (ii) The wedge among prices buyers pay and the prices sellers obtain. (iii) Rises in supply from the viewpoint of buyers. (iv) More quick transa

  • Q : What is Complements Complements : The

    Complements: The two goods for which a rise in the price of one good leads to a reduction in the demand for other.

  • Q : Statistical perspective of Inferior

    On an average, American families with more income tend to contain fewer children than families with less income. This fact recommends that, at least from a purely statistical perspective, the American children are: (1) Inferior goods. (2) Substitute goods for the cats

  • Q : Point of hiring labor for profit

    The entire profit maximizing firm will hire additional labor up to the point where the: (i) Average physical product of the labor equivalents the nominal wage. (ii) Last unit of labor adds equally to net revenue and net cost. (iii) Marginal product of the labor is at

  • Q : Problem based on shift of the

    Technological advance in producing both capital goods and consumer goods is illustrated by the shift of the production possibilities curve from AB to: 1) CD. 2) EB. 3) AF. 4) GH.

    Q : When would transaction cost be zero All

    All transaction costs would be zero when: (1) Congress required current prices to be cut by eighteen percent. (2) market information and transportation were both costless. (3) market prices were legally restricted to production costs. (4) inflation we

  • Q : Total revenue in profit-maximizing

    Total revenue (i.e., TR=PQ) for such profit-maximizing competitive firm equals area as: (a) 0P1gq5. (b) 0P1dq4. (c) 0P2cq3. (d) P2