--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Changes in dollar receipts from sales

    The change within a firm’s dollar receipts from sales when this produces and sells one additional unit of output is termed as: (w) price. (x) marginal revenue. (y) average revenue. (z) contribution to overhead. Can anybody su

  • Q : Consumer Equilibrium-Utility

    Assume that you are an avid golfer and profit $36 worth of pleasure from the first golf hole played on any specific day, however the additional pleasure you profit from playing succeeding holes falls by $2 per extra hole. The $40 greens fee is needed to begin golfing

  • Q : Economically inefficient level of output

    A monopolist produces an economically inefficient level of output since: (i) the difference among marginal revenue [MR] and marginal costs [marginal costs [MC] is maximized. (ii) P > average total costs [ATC], therefore MSB < MSC. (iii) all cons

  • Q : Formation of a cartel This would be

    This would be easiest to form a cartel between: (w) retail grocers. (x) aluminum producers. (y) dairy farmers. (z) domestic marijuana producers. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regar

  • Q : Determine price when quantity demand

    If the demand for a good is price elastic, in that case the percentage change in quantity demanded into response to a specified change within price is: (1) greater than the percentage change in price. (2) positively related to the cha

  • Q : Total fixed cost Total fixed cost: 1.

    Total fixed cost: 1. Fixed cost remains constant at each level of output ie it do not change with change in quantity.2. It can not be zero when output is zero.3. Its curve is parallel to X-aixs4.

  • Q : Illustration of Conglomerates I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Illustration of Conglomerates. Please help me in the following question. Prudential Insurance owns big farms in addition to its insurance operations, and is an illustration of: (1) Conglomerate. (2) Insurance fraud. (3) Monopoly. (4) H

  • Q : Legal barriers to entry Patents are

    Patents are illustrations of: (a) legal economies of substitution. (b) legal barriers to entry. (c) natural barriers to entry. (d) marginal diseconomies of scale. Can someone explain/help me with best solution about problem of

  • Q : Arising of perfect price discrimination

    Perfect price discrimination would arise when a firm: (1) extracted full consumer surpluses from its customers. (2) permitted monopolistic customers quantity discounts. (3) redistributed real income among consumers. (4) inefficiently allocated its res

  • Q : More willing to hold less cash and more

    When households become more willing to hold less cash and more stocks or bonds, in that case the: (1) level of Aggregate Demand increases. (2) present value of future income falls. (3) interest rate falls. (4) stock market will crash.