--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Minimal Materials in Relative Poverty

    After the minimal materials essential for survival are attained, poverty becomes: (w) an absolute concept. (x) more prevalent in North America than elsewhere. (y) measured by the income level required to meet minimal psychological needs. (z) a relativ

  • Q : Minimum Wage Laws-unskilled workers I

    I have a problem in economics on Minimum Wage Laws-unskilled workers. Please help me in the following question. The Minimum wage legislation is unlikely to help: (i) Skilled workers who compete by unskilled workers. (ii) Unskilled workers who don&rsqu

  • Q : Imperfect competition-Firms having

    As MRP < VMP in imperfect competition whenever firms encompass market power as sellers then: (1) MPPL = VMP. (2) The price of output surpasses MFC. (3) Monopolistic exploitation becomes essential to get profit. (4) Imperfect competition can’t reach the equili

  • Q : NOT operating area of monopolistic firm

    Monopolistic competitors within long-run equilibrium do NOT operate where: is (1) MR = MC. (2) P = ATC. (3) P > MC. (4) MSB > MSC. (5) economic profits are realized. How can I solve my Economics

  • Q : Collective Bargaining-managers and

    The strikes tend to be resolved after worker’s savings trickle down to a discomfort region and there is an exhaustion of: (i) Public tolerance, causing government to set the fair settlement. (ii) Managers and inventories, causing the firms to increase their offe

  • Q : Short run expectations Can someone help

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. When Toyota expected the price at which it could sell its cars to increase in the near future, it’s very short-run response would possibly be to: (i) Raise its supply. (ii) Reduce its su

  • Q : Meaning of Caveat emptor I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Meaning of Caveat emptor. Please help me in the following question. Caveat emptor signifies: (i) Let the seller beware! (ii) Everything else held steady. (iii) Let things modify if they should. (iv) Charge whatever the market will allo

  • Q : Law of Demand and the Demand Curve

    Question: Describe the differences between shifts in demand and movements along the demand curve. What are the main factors which can shift the demand curve? Explain why they cause the demand curve to shift. Use e

  • Q : Marginal costs and marginal revenue in

    Can someone help me to solve this problem as given below: A profit maximizing firm will generate where: (w) MR > MC. (x) MC > MR. (y) MR = MC. (z) ATC > P > MC. How can I solve my

  • Q : Short-run supply curve for a

    For a competitive firm, the short-run supply curve is the portion of its: (w) AVC curve that lies above the ATC curve. (x) MC curve which rises above its AVC curve. (y) MC curve which is upward sloping. (z) AFC curve which lies above the MC curve.