--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Minimum average costs at production

    Nostalgia Corporation could accomplish minimum average costs for Silver Screen DVDs when this produced: (i) 4 million DVDs. (ii) 6 million DVDs. (iii) 8 million DVDs. (iv) 10 million DVDs. (v) 12 million DVDs.

  • Q : Patent new invention included in

    Predatory behavior would not comprise: (w) aggressive advertising. (x) monopolizing access to essential resources. (y) lowering prices. (z) getting a patent on a new invention which is likely to start a new industry.

    Q : Break-even level of income The

    The break-even level of income for four member of family under the negative income tax system demonstrated in this figure is: (1) $15,000 per year. (2) $30,000 per year. (3) $45,000 per year. (4) $60,000 per year. (5) $75,000 per year

  • Q : Maximizes profit at total economic of

    When the wholesale price P = $8 per bushel of peaches, it purely competitive peach orchard maximizes profit via producing ___ bushel of peaches at a total economic of profit or loss of $___. (i) zero; loss; -$4,000. (

  • Q : Determine income elasticity of demand

    An income elasticity of demand for mass transit of 0.6 implies that the demand for mass transit is/will: (1) a necessity. (2) a luxury. (3) rise at a slower rate than income. (4) fall when income rises. How can I s

  • Q : Requirement of production costs

    Decreasing average production costs needs raising the size of a firm when the raised production encounters economies of: (i) Growth. (ii) Coordination. (iii) Growth. (iv) Scale. (v) Scope. Find out the right answer from the above o

  • Q : Labor Force Participation Rates The

    The percentage of a specific population who is either unemployed or employed or is termed as the: (i) Labor force participation rate. (ii) Work-force proportion. (iii) Income-leisure loss curve. (iv) Substitution effect dominance rate. (v) Labor supply.

  • Q : Why production possibilities curve

    What is the reason that production possibilities curve concave? Elucidate.

  • Q : Income elasticity of demand computations

    When yearly per capita income increases from $13,500 to $26,500 and custom car sales increase from 100,000 to 200,000, by using the arc elasticity formula, then the income elasticity of demand is: (i) 0.50. (ii) 0.75. (iii) 1.00. (iv)

  • Q : Ranges for the price elasticity of

    Economists can’t conceive of any resource or product for that the: (1) price elasticity of demand is zero and the demand curve is vertical. (2) price elasticity of supply is zero and the supply curve is vertical. (3) income elasticity of demand