--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Economic Capital verses Financial

    Your construction company currently bought a bulldozer on credit. By the perspective of your lender, and your firm’s IOU for this bulldozer is an illustration of: (1) a liability. (2) economic capital. (3) total variable cost. (4) capitalization. (5) financial c

  • Q : Influence of Demand in the market price

    I have a problem in economics on Influence of Demand in the market price of good. Please help me in the following question. In short run, a demand curve would not shift the following a change in: (i) The size and distribution of national income. (ii)

  • Q : Problem on least monopsony power The

    The Firms which have at least some monopsony power will never: (i) Practice wage discrimination. (ii) Find out wage rates in portion by the number of workers it hires. (iii) Pay higher wages than would a firm hiring from the competitive labor market. (iv) Raise the em

  • Q : Determine probable price taker Of the

    Of the given firms, the probably to be a price taker would be: (1) Microsoft. (2) Wal-Mart. (3) Toyota. (4) the Los Angeles Lakers. (5) the biggest wheat farm in Canada. I need a good answer on the topic of

  • Q : Consumer Surplus-Difference in amounts

    Kiley pays $1.00 for the cold Pepsi on a hot afternoon, however would be willing to pay $5.00. The $4.00 difference in such amounts is her: (i) Consumer surplus. (ii) Income effect. (iii) Economic gain. (iv) Marginal utility. (v) Pleasure coefficient.

    Q : Resolving principal-agent problems I

    I have a problem in economics on Resolving principal-agent problems. Please help me in the following question. Attempts to resolve the principal-agent problems among stockholders and top corporate managers (that is, CEOs) comprise: (i) Profit-sharing systems for the t

  • Q : Changes in market prices and conditions

    The model of pure competitive is intended to produce insights within how: (w) asymmetric information influences the efficiency of exchange. (x) buyers and sellers negotiate to reach contracts for goods and services. (y) markets determine equitable dis

  • Q : Low marginal tax with basic income In a

    In a negative income tax system, where a combining fundamental income floor with low marginal tax rates gives in: (w) reduced incentives for “voluntary poverty.” (x) higher minimal standards of living for the poor. (y) an

  • Q : Total revenue exceed total variable

    A firm within a purely competitive industry: (w) will produce only as long as its marginal revenue is greater than its marginal cost. (x) decides what level of output to produce based upon an analysis of total revenues and total costs. (y) produces th

  • Q : Determine marginal revenue and marginal

    While this firm maximizes economic profits, in that case marginal revenue and marginal costs would be: (1) $4 per unit. (2) $6 per unit. (3) $8 per unit. (4) $10 per unit. (5) $12 per unit.