--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Define marginal revenue Marginal

    Marginal revenue: This is the change in total revenue by selling one more or a lesser amount of unit of commodity.

    		•
  • Q : Monopolistic exploitation of workers

    When a firm hires workers to a point where VMP > MRP = MFC = W then: (1) There is a bilateral monopoly condition. (2) Wage discrimination is being exercised. (3) There is monopolistic exploitation of the workers. (4) The firm consists of monopsony power.

  • Q : Freedom of entry-exit in long run

    Contestable markets and purely competitive markets share the feature of: (w) collusive behavior of huge firms. (x) freedom of entry and exit into the long run. (y) widespread product differentiation. (z) persistent economic profits.

    Q : Gaining more Consumer Surplus I have a

    I have a problem in economics on gaining more Consumer Surplus. Please help me in the following question. Sushi lovers would be most probable to gain more consumer surplus as an outcome of rises in the: (i) Price of the steamed rice. (ii) Supply of sushi. (iii) Income

    		•
  • Q : Screening and Credentialism The critics

    The critics of ‘credentialism’ suppose that firms making employment decisions tend to mainly rely too heavily on: (i) Personal contacts. (ii) Personality testing. (iii) Past experience. (iv) Job interviews. (v) Formal education and trainin

    		•
  • Q : Horizontal summation of individual

    The market demand curves for most of the goods are as: (i) Cross-multiplied products of the individual demand curves. (ii) Insignificant for most of the analytical aims. (iii) The horizontal summation of the individual demand curves. (iv) Irrelevant for business decis

    		•
  • Q : Purely competitive seller in demand

    The demand curve facing a purely competitive seller is: (a) negatively sloped. (b) horizontal at the market price. (c) vertical at the market quantity. (d) the horizontal summation of all potential buyers’ individual demand curves. (e) market de

    		•
  • Q : Monopolist in the long run Within the

    Within the long run, here a monopolist: (w) will produce a positive economic profit. (x) will produce an economic profit of zero. (y) may incur an economic loss. (z) will produce an economic profit of zero or greater.

    Q : Economic profits to entrepreneurs

    Economic profits are NOT recompenses to entrepreneurs who: (1) endure business uncertainty. (2) provide society along with economic capital. (3) innovate new goods and technologies. (4) exercise monopoly power or monopsony power. (5)

    		•
  • Q : Maximizing utility from consumption of

    Given that a MU of French fries of 35 utils and a MU for serving of potato chips at 25 utils, when their respective prices are $1.50 and $.80, the person who wants to maximize utility from the consumption of both of such goods would consume: (i) The similar amount of

    		•