--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Problem on opportunity cost of consumer

    Refer to the given table. If the economy is producing at production alternative C, the opportunity cost of the tenth unit of consumer goods will be:

  • Q : Competitive equilibrium in competitive

    I have a problem in economics on Competitive equilibrium in competitive labor markets. Please help me in the following question. The Competitive equilibrium in competitive labor markets need: (1) P = MR = AVC. (2) VMP - P is maximized. (3) MPP = P. (4

  • Q : Interest rates on financial instruments

    Interest rates on specified financial instruments tend to be lower the: (1) shorter the period to maturity. (2) greater the risk of default. (3) less liquid is the asset. (4) greater the expected rate of inflation. (5) greater the face value is relati

  • Q : Prices of resources in constant cost

    When industry expansion or contraction does not influence the prices of resources used through its firms, then the industry tends to experience: (w) increasing costs. (x) constant costs. (y) decreasing costs. (z) diseconomies of scale.

    Q : Lower costs of large oligopolists This

    This is possible that consumers could pay a lower price within an oligopoly market than a competitive market since large oligopolists: (w) can price below cost. (x) often give quantity discounts to loyal customers. (y

  • Q : Monopsony Power and Demand for Labor

    When wage discrimination is not possible for first 40 workers then this profit-maximizing firm hires, however it can wage discriminate perfectly whenever hiring all the subsequent workers, it hires a net of: (i) Forty workers at an average wage of the

  • Q : Find linear demand curve by quantity

    Along this illustrated linear demand curve, there is: (1) inelastic portion is range a. (2) elastic portion is range b. (3) midpoint is unitarily price elastic. (4) elasticity is constant in each and every ranges. (5) midpoint elasticity becomes infin

  • Q : Hypothetical demands for perfect price

    In this figure demonstrating hypothetical demands for socket sets, there demand curve: (1) D1D1 is perfectly price-inelastic. (2) D2D2 is perfectly price elastic. (3) D3D3

  • Q : Enhancing society economic efficiency

    Society-extensive economic efficiency is most probable to be improved by: (1) competitive advertising. (2) cooperation between firms in a cartel. (3) increases in asymmetric information. (4) informative advertising. (5) wage and price controls. <

  • Q : Define macroeconomics Define

    Define macroeconomics?