--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Problem on Fair labor standards act Can

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The Fair Labor Standards Act initially: (1) Was performed in the year 1858. (2) Outlawed minimum salaries. (3) Established a low minimum salary in a limited number of divisions

  • Q : Additional Funds for Breaking Invention

    If Bank of America helps link an inventor in require of additional funds to develop a ground breaking invention along with a retired school teacher along with excess savings, in that case they are performing: (1) love connections. (2) financial interm

  • Q : Competitive Markets-Labor unions The

    The Purely competitive labor markets are not characterized through: (1) Most of the individual sellers and buyers of labor services. (2) Wages equivalent to the marginal resource costs. (3) Labor unions. (4) Price taking sellers and buyers of the labo

  • Q : Prices and outputs in short run All

    All output markets which are less than purely competitive are characterized through: (1) domination of the market by some large firms. (2) individual firms that are very small to affect their prices. (3) freedom of entry and exit in the long run. (4)

  • Q : Problem of Moral Hazard by an individual

    The problem of moral hazard is finest explained by the behavior of an individual who: (1) Dates two distinct people on the sly. (2) Doesn’t lock up her car since theft is covered by the insurance. (3) Steals to support the serious drug habit. (4) Understates the

  • Q : Increasing-cost industries average

    Within increasing-cost industries average there are: (w) production costs fall as output increases. (x) production costs rise as the number of firms in the industry grows. (y) production costs rise when the number of firms into the industry falls. (z)

  • Q : Price elasticity of demand coefficient

    In this demonstrated figure, there the price elasticity of demand coefficient is: (1) one at the midpoint. (2) greater than one in range a. (3) less than one in range b. (4) falling along with movements down along the demand curve. (5) All of the abov

  • Q : Loss in social welfare with quantity

    When pharmaceutical manufacturers conspire to generate only Q1 penicillin, in that case the: (i) purely-competitive firms which produced penicillin would experience economic losses. (ii) resulting excessive antibiotic treatments would produce strains of dru

  • Q : Traditional transfer in kind assistance

    Most traditional transfer in kind helps programs: (w) increased benefits for every dollar earned. (x) reduced benefits by $1 for every dollar earned. (y) reduced benefits by less than $1 for each dollar earned. (z) reduced benefits by more than $1 for

  • Q : Problem Regarding to Contestable Markets

    Even though the concentration ratio for an oligopoly is close to hundred, firms may operate rather efficiently when the market: (1) price conforms to a limit pricing model. (2) is contestable since entry and exit are easy. (3) demand curve is unitaril