--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Characteristics of Entrepreneurship The

    The Characteristics common to most of the successful entrepreneurs do not comprise: (1) Vision and timing. (2) Conviction and action. (iii) Luck and the bureaucratic one-upmanship. (iv) Determination and workaholics. Can someone pl

  • Q : History of Industrial Unions I have a

    I have a problem in economics on History of Industrial Unions. Please help me in the following question. Industrial unions historically tried to systematize all the workers in: (i) A Specific Company or broad industry. (ii) The United States. (iii) A specific craft or

  • Q : Benefit of the market system One

    One political benefit of the market system over the majority of other economic systems is that: (1) The power to take decisions is comparatively decentralized. (2) Democratic decisions are steadier than individual selections (3) Centralized decisions

  • Q : Monopolist in an output market Can

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The labor monopsonist who is as well a monopolist in an output market: (1) Always makes huge profits. (2) Hires more units of the labor when

  • Q : Labor-Leisure Tradeoffs When leisure is

    When leisure is a normal good, then the demand for leisure: (i) Differs directly with the income. (ii) Has declined sharply as World War II. (iii) Is positively associated to the average age of population. (iii) Shifts left-ward as an outcome of technological advances

  • Q : Problem on price level-real domestic

    Refer to the below diagram. Give me answer of this question. If equilibrium real output is Q2, then: A) aggregate demand is AD1. B) the equilibrium price level is P1. C) producers will supply output level Q1. D) the equili

  • Q : Illustrations of Predatory Behavior

    Tactics as like [a] lowering prices, [b] expanding output beyond a short run profit maximizing level, and [c] aggressively advertising or redesigning existing products to make them incompatible along with rivals’ products are most likely to be interpreted as ill

  • Q : Distribution of income-inequitable

    Reliance on private demands and supplies to allocate resources and goods is least specific to yield an economically inefficient solution when: (i) producers have significant monopoly power. (ii) a good is nonrival and

  • Q : Ranges for the price elasticity of

    Economists can’t conceive of any resource or product for that the: (1) price elasticity of demand is zero and the demand curve is vertical. (2) price elasticity of supply is zero and the supply curve is vertical. (3) income elasticity of demand

  • Q : Price discrimination to increase

    A firm can practice price discrimination to increase its profitability when this: (w) confronts a perfectly elastic demand curve. (x) is a pure quantity adjuster. (y) has some market power and is able to separate its customers into various groups alon