--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Problem regarding market demand curve

    Hey friends I need your help for illustrated figure in below where for cranberries, the market demand curve is: (i) A. (ii) B. (iii) F. (iv) J. (v) E. 1579_</span></p>
                                        </div>
                                        <!-- /comment-box -->
                                    </li>
   
   </td>
	</tr><tr>
		<td>
       
      <li>
                                        <div class=

    Q : Creating externalities to spread costs

    In efforts to offset specific failures of the private sector, government policy within a mixed-capitalist economy would be least reasonably intended at an objective of: (1) creating externalities to spread the costs of various activities across all me

  • Q : Short run operation and long run

    When Presidio, Hybrid Roses and Texas boomed learned which its rent and utilities had soared upward by $9 per hour hence a new five-year lease would now cost $60 per hour, therefore this monopolist will: (w) continue to realize positive economic profi

  • Q : Lower costs of large oligopolists This

    This is possible that consumers could pay a lower price within an oligopoly market than a competitive market since large oligopolists: (w) can price below cost. (x) often give quantity discounts to loyal customers. (y

  • Q : Effect of percentage change in price

    Give the answer of following question. When the percentage change in price is greater than the resulting percentage change in quantity demanded: A) a decrease in price will increase total revenue. B) demand may be either elastic or inelastic. C) an increase in price

  • Q : Factors establishing elasticity of

    Factors establishing elasticity of supply: The factors below will persuade the elasticity of supply: 1. Modifications in cost of production. 2. Behavior pattern of producers. 3. Accessibility of faci

  • Q : Public Opinion Sampling Public Opinion

    Public Opinion Sampling: Increasingly trade policy debates and issues are being defined and driven by public polling and expert opinion. Mendellson and Wolfe (2004) offer an overview of the public policy debate in Canada and the roll of polling in def

  • Q : Implications of law of demand what are

    what are the implications of law of demand to the government,household and business

  • Q : Income and Inferior Goods problem I

    I have a problem in economics on Income and Inferior Goods problem. Please help me in the following question. For a non-vegetarian, Spam is to filet the mignon as: (1) Luxury goods are to requirements. (2) Complementary goods are to substitute goods.

  • Q : Cruise ship pollution-an economic

    This exercise inspects why ‘greywater’ dumped from cruise ships can be vision as an economic difficulty and the complexities of dealing with this.