--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Labor Union Goals-Minimum employment

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. When a union achieved the maximum possible hourly wage: (i) All of the members would be pleased. (ii) Employment would as well be maximized. (iii) Employment would be at minimum

  • Q : Division of labor advantages for workers

    The advantages from the division of labor are improved as workers: (1) Are protected by the barriers which limit the international trade. (2) Who each recognize all facets of production gain an enhanced understanding of the whole project. (3) Constant

  • Q : Words of Joseph A. Schumpeter about

    According to Joseph A. Schumpeter as: (1) refined and popularized the idea that profits derive by innovation. (2) perceived profits as rewards for bearing uncertainty. (3) believed which monopoly firms are so inefficient which none fully realize their

  • Q : Demand for a poorer good Household’s

    Household’s demand for a poorer good tends to fall if: (1) Supplies of complementary goods increase. (2) Prices of alternate goods increase. (3) Family income rises. (4) Its own price drops/falls. Can someone

  • Q : Negative externalities in production

    Production which generates negative externalities: (w) would lead to underproduction and overpricing of goods. (x) increases producers’ costs of production. (y) increases consumers cost of purchasing the good. (z) would cause the market price of

  • Q : Competitive Markets and Labor unions I

    I have a problem in economics on Competitive Markets-Labor unions. Please help me in the following question. The purely competitive labor markets are not characterized through: (1) Most of the individual buyers and sellers of the labor services. (2) S

  • Q : Purely competitive market demand of

    When the income distribution is acceptable and no externalities survive, purely competitive market demand curves as: (w) also marginal social benefits curves. (x) inverted marginal social cost curves. (y) horizontal at the market pric

  • Q : Zero economic profit in long run When

    When the best a monopolist can do to produce an economic profit of zero, this will: (w) shut down in the long run. (x) shut down in the short run. (y) remain in operation in the long run. (z) raise its price to raise profit.

    Q : Short run expectations Can someone help

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. When Toyota expected the price at which it could sell its cars to increase in the near future, it’s very short-run response would possibly be to: (i) Raise its supply. (ii) Reduce its su

  • Q : Case study on Microeconomics Hello, I

    Hello, I did attach case study on Microeconomics. Regards,