--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Relatively price elastic when supply

    Even though a drought decreases supply from S1 to S0, at each point along both of such supply curves, the supply of tanks of dehydrated water: (i) perfectly price elastic. (ii) relatively price elastic. (iii) unitarily price elastic. (iv) relativ

  • Q : Elasticity and profit maximization A

    A nondiscriminating monopolist cannot maximize profits through producing where demand: (w) price elastic. (x) price inelastic. (y) above marginal cost. (z) above marginal revenue. Can someone explain/help me with b

  • Q : Determine infinity price elasticity

    When the demand for cheesy fried grits of Pixie is relatively price elastic, then its price elasticity is: (i) zero. (ii) greater than zero but less than one. (iii) one (unitary.) (iv) greater than one but less than infinity. (v) infi

  • Q : Excess of good in market problem The

    The excess of papayas would appear when: (1) seller’s supply prices increase to P1. (2) Govt. set a price ceiling of P1. (3) Growers predicted prices to soar. (4) Hurricane destroyed all Central American papaya plantations. (5) Government obliged a price floor o

  • Q : Meaning of term competition in Economic

    Economists generally use the word “competition” to refer to: (w) negotiations among buyers and sellers. (x) a type of market structure in that competitors are price takers and, occasionally, to rivalrous processes among firms. (y) how pric

  • Q : Net income under the negative income tax

    Under the negative income tax system demonstrated in this given figure, a family of four along with earned income of $75,000 per year would have a net as [after-tax] income of: (i) $15,000 per year. (ii) $30,000 per y

  • Q : Marginal revenue in kinked-demand model

    Into this "kinked-demand" model, such firm views the marginal revenue curve this faces as the: (1) linear curve acD2 for all prices. (2) linear curve deMR1 for all prices. (3) nonlinear curve adeMR1. (

  • Q : Profits and Losses in firms Of all the

    Of all the profits made by the U.S. firms, corporations account for regarding: (1) Less than 10 percent. (2) Between 10 percent and 20 percent. (3) Between 20 percent and 40 percent. (4) More than 40 percent. Can someone please hel

  • Q : Competition in output and resource

    The purely competitive model means that competition in both output and resource markets yields a distribution of income that is proportional to the: (w) numbers of people in specific households. (x) effort and leisure sacrificed throu

  • Q : Decreasing Marginal Utility Can someone

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The diminishing marginal utility law defines that: (i) Net utility rises up to a point and then reduces as more units of good are consumed. (ii) Net utility reaches a negative value if the goo