--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Long-run equilibrium price and output

    Long-run output and equilibrium price combinations describe a purely competitive industry’s: (w) demand curve. (x) long-run supply curve. (y) expansion path. (z) contract curve. I need a good answer on the to

  • Q : Operates a profit-maximizing firm When

    When this profit-maximizing firm as in illustrated graph can’t price discriminate in that case this will operate where is: (1) accounting profit is positive but economic profit is zero. (2) the demand curve facing the firm is th

  • Q : Example of predatory behavior Assume

    Assume that a new Wal-Mart is built just outside a small town, and also Wal-Mart aggressively cuts prices therefore much that the rivals close their doors. In that case, once its rivals exit the market, the Wal-Mart raises prices significantly. Wal-Ma

  • Q : Uncertainty and Decision-making I have

    I have a problem in economics on Uncertainty and Decision-making. Please help me in the following question. The error of omission would be: (i) The failure of an individual to invest in Microsoft 20 years ago. (ii) Individual cheating on a test. (iii)

  • Q : Profit-maximizing to make economic

    This profit-maximizing brickyard of below illustrated figure on the average is, about: (i) making an economic profit of $8 per thousand bricks. (ii) incurring variable costs of $90 per thousand bricks. (iii) suffering an accounting loss of $2 per thou

  • Q : Decreasing price of Complementary Goods

    The increase in demand for tartar sauce would be a probable result of: (1) A reduction in the price of fish. (2) An raise in the price of tartar sauce. (3) A bumper crop of the tartar sauce. (4) A raise in the price of fish. (v) The reduction in price

  • Q : Economic profit generating purely

    In this illustrated figure in below the only purely competitive firm currently generating economic profit is in: (w) Firm A. (x) Firm B. (y) Firm C. (z) Firm D.

    Q : Formula for economic profit Can someone

    Can someone please help me in finding out the precise answer from the following question. The firm’s total revenue minus its net economic costs equivalents its: (1) Economic profit. (2) Taxable income. (3) Marginal income. (4) Accounting profit. (5) Psychic inco

  • Q : Market Power and Monopsony Power-

    Assume that a firm with market power in the output market wants to develop and that hiring more workers needs it to raise salaries 8 percent for all the workers. Output prices will most likely: (i) Increase 8 percent to cover the wage rise. (ii) Increase less than 8 p

  • Q : Relationship between MPC and MPS

    Determine relationship between MPC and MPS? Answer: MPC + MPS = 1