--%>

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Problem on falling income causes

    I have a problem in economics on Problem on falling income causes increase in demand. Please help me in the following question. If falling income causes the demand for a good to rise, it is an: (1) Inferior good. (2) Costly biological necessity. (3) N

  • Q : Shifting in market demand curve The

    The expectations which proposed new tariffs will be enacted which will raise the future prices and accessibility of digital cameras will: (1) Not affect the present demand for cameras. (2) Cause consumers to move up all along their market demand curve. (3) Not influen

  • Q : Maximum negatively-sloped demand curve

    The total revenue of a firm which faces a negatively-sloped demand curve: (w) is at a maximum where marginal revenue is zero. (x) declines while average revenue falls as output grows. (y) rises at an increasing rate over the output range plagued throu

  • Q : When is total revenue maximized If a

    If a monopolist’s marginal revenue is zero, then: (1) total revenue is zero. (2) demand is perfectly inelastic. (3) the price of the product exceeds average cost. (4) economic profit is zero. (5) total revenue is maximized.

    Q : Economic of short-run shuts down firm

    When a firm shuts down within the short run, in that case it’s economic: (w) profit is zero. (x) resources have zero opportunity cost. (y) loss equals its fixed cost. (z) value to shareholders rises. Please guys help to solve

  • Q : Example of determining new equilibrium

    As per such supply and demand curves for peanuts, there is the: (w) demand for peanuts has fallen. (x) price rises to P1 due to better peanut technology. (y) production of peanuts was initially Q0. (z) new equilibrium price of pe

  • Q : Short-run equilibrium and long run

    When a purely competitive industry is within equilibrium as well as all firms in the industry are operating along with economies of scale, in that case the industry is in: (w) long-run and short-run equilibrium. (x) short-run equilibrium and long run

  • Q : Problem on Transaction Costs Higher

    Higher income families are far-off more probable to purchase automatic garage door openers than people with the lower incomes primarily as automatic garage door openers: (1) Save time and give convenience that wealthy people value relatively more. (2) Are status symbo

  • Q : Demand curve at the current market price

    The demand curve faced through a purely competitive firm at the current market price of: (i) negatively sloped. (ii) horizontal. (iii) perfectly inelastic. (iv) rectangularly hyperbolic. (v) positively sloped.

    Q : Question related to Gross domestic

    Proprietors' income $ 20, Compensation of employees 300, Consumption of fixed capital 15, Gross investment 80, Rents 10, Interest 20 ,Exports 30, Imports 50, Corporate profits 25, Taxes on production and imports 5 ,Net foreign factor income 0 ,Statistical discrepancy