--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Question on tax payer

New agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program is introduced by the Reagan Administration, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program performed, consider the wheat market. Had the government not given the wheat back to the farmers, this would have stored or destroyed it. Do tax payers gain from the program? What potential problems does the program form?

Taxpayers gain since the government is not needed to store the wheat. Although everyone seems to gain from the PIK program, it can only last while there are government wheat reserves. The PIK program supposed that the land removed from production may be restored to production when stockpiles are exhausted. If it cannot be done, consumers may eventually pay more for wheat-based products. At last, farmers are taxpayers too. As producing the wheat ought to have cost something, the program offers them a windfall profit.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Model of production possibilities

    Can someone help me in determining the right answer from the given options. The production possibilities frontier model can be employed to describe: (1) The scarcity. (2) Full employment, efficiency and limited resources. (3) The opportunity costs and

    		•
  • Q : Rule of thumb for office rent Is there

    Is there any rule of thumb for office rent or on lease per gross income? If yes, then explain?

    		•
  • Q : Plans of savers and investors This

    This capital market is within a closed private economy. Primary plans of savers and investors are demonstrated as curves S0 and I0. There Market equilibrium will exist at: (1) point a. (2) point b. (3) point c. (4) point d. (5) point

    		•
  • Q : Economic efficiency of purely

    Most economists favor purely competitive markets since they tend to as: (1) economies of scale. (2) large profits. (3) mutual interdependence. (4) corporate organizations. (5) economic efficiency. Hello guys I want

    		•
  • Q : Break-even level of income under

    For a family of four the break-even level of income under the negative income tax system demonstrated in this figure is: (1) $15,000 per year. (2) $30,000 per year. (3) $45,000 per year. (4) $60,000 per year. (5) $75,000 per year.

    		•
  • Q : Illustration of zero Consumer Surpluses

    Clark pays $99.95 for the latest fishing rod. When Clark was willing to pay just a maximum of $99.95 for that fishing rod, his consumer surplus equivalents: (1) zero. (2) Clark would not be willing to buy the fishing rod at $99.95. (3) $99.95. (4) Clark would be bette

    		•
  • Q : Relative price and income inelasticity

    Technological advances have raised agricultural productivity enormously among 1800 and nowadays, and therefore, the relative incomes of family farmers declined dramatically. There hardships endured through American farm families throughout this period

    		•
  • Q : Shifting of left to right demand curve

    Shifting from left to right all along demand curve D, the price elasticity of demand for Pixie’s cheesy fried grits will be: (i) Positive, then unitary, and then negative. (ii) Constant and equivalent to one. (iii) More at high prices than at low prices. (iv) Lo

    		•
  • Q : Substantial market power Any firm which

    Any firm which has substantial market power that: (i) confronts a perfectly elastic demand curve. (ii) can sell as much as this wants at the price that chooses. (iii) strongly affects the price of its output. (iv) is one of several firms in an industr

    		•
  • Q : Enhancing society economic efficiency

    Society-extensive economic efficiency is most probable to be improved by: (1) competitive advertising. (2) cooperation between firms in a cartel. (3) increases in asymmetric information. (4) informative advertising. (5) wage and price controls. <

    		•