--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Competitive Prices for selling This

    This purely-competitive producer’s generic bricks presently sell for: (i) $60 per thousand. (ii) $70 per thousand. (iii) $80 per thousand. (iv) $90 per thousand. (v) $100 per thousand.

    Q : Labor Unions Strikes-Lockouts Can

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. Whenever unions and managements have failed to arrive at a collective bargaining agreement and management closes the production facilities to exert pressure on the union negotia

  • Q : Main cause of oligopolies A main cause

    A main cause of oligopolies is: (w) mergers. (x) economies of scale. (y) barriers to entry. (z) all of the above. Please choose the right answer from above...I want your suggestion for the same.

  • Q : Illustrations of monopoly power The

    The best illustrations of monopoly power in the United States are possibly: (w) local public utility companies. (x) state university systems. (y) the national TV networks. (z) national defense firms. Hey friends pl

  • Q : Elasticity of demand as price-total

    Increasing the price of a product definitely raises total revenue when the elasticity of demand is as: (w) infinity. (x) unitary. (y) relatively elastic. (z) relatively inelastic.

  • Q : Profit Maximization-total revenue-total

    The entire profit maximizing organization will hire more labor up to the point where: (i) Average physical product of labor equivalents the nominal wage. (ii) Last unit of labor adds uniformly to net revenue and net cost. (iii) Marginal product of the labor is at its

  • Q : Cartel Select the right answer of the

    Select the right answer of the question. We would expect a cartel to achieve: A) both allocative efficiency and productive efficiency. B) allocative efficiency, but not productive efficiency. C) productive efficiency, but not allocative efficiency. D) neither allocati

  • Q : Specific market price The difference

    The difference among maximum amount which consumers would willingly pay for a particular quantity of a good and the amount they really pay at a specific market price is termed as: (i) Discount rate. (ii) Mark-up factor. (iii) Familial gains. (iv) Hous

  • Q : Price consistent with profit-maximizing

    HoloIMAGine has patented a holographic technology which creates 3-D photography obtainable to consumers. So the price consistent along with HoloIMAGine's profit-maximizing output would be of: (1) price P1. (2) price P2. (3) price

  • Q : Equilibrium market price and quantity

    Equilibrium market price and quantity would definitely both falls when demand declines and supply will: (w) decreases. (x) increases. (y) is constant. (z) pulsates rhythmically. I need a good answer on the topic of