--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Competitive firm shuts down in short run

    A competitive firm shuts down within the short run when: (w) this suffers a loss. (x) normal profit = 0. (y) ATC > P. (z) the minimum AVC > P. Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some views for above Econo

  • Q : Characteristics of pure monopoly This

    This is untrue that a firm which is a pure monopoly: (1) commonly engages in extensive advertising to differentiate its products. (2) produces a level of output which is closer to socially optimal when this price discriminates. (3) is the sole produce

  • Q : Problem on Elasticity formula Whenever

    Whenever the price of plastic moose heads increase from $5 to $7, monthly sales fall from 2000 to 1000 units. By using the arc elasticity formula, the price elasticity of demand will be: (i) 3.0. (ii) 1/3. (iii) 2.0. (iv) 2.5.

    Q : Relatively price inelasticity of demand

    When cuts into the price of cowboy hats drive down total revenues to hat makers, in that case demand: (1) relatively price elastic. (2) relatively price inelastic. (3) unitarily price elastic. (4) infinitely price elastic. (5) zero pr

  • Q : Ceteris Paribus assumption The ceteris

    The ceteris paribus (all as well constant) assumption is most obviously implicit in the statement of a tailor who states that, “We will vend more suits in the month of May of 2008: (i) Than we sold in the month of May 2003. (ii) Than we sold in

  • Q : Help economics !! The market system's

    The market system's answer to the fundamental question "Who will get the goods and services?" is essentially: 1) "Those willing and able to pay for them." 2) "Those who physically produced them." 3) "Those who most need them." 4) "Those who get utility from them."

  • Q : Bookkeeper problem regarding Moral

    I have a problem in economics on Bookkeeper problem regarding Moral Hazard. Please help me in the following question. When a bookkeeper embezzles $1 million and flees to the Brazil after 22 years on the job, there is a trouble of: (i) Fugitive derelic

  • Q : Rolls of Intermediaries Upon the

    Upon the average, all intermediaries do NOT: (w) decrease the opportunity costs of goods to consumers. (x) raise the incomes of producers. (y) reduce transaction costs. (z) increase the cost of living. Hey friends

  • Q : What is Complements Complements : The

    Complements: The two goods for which a rise in the price of one good leads to a reduction in the demand for other.

  • Q : Neoclassical and heterodox One of my

    One of my friends can't succeed to get the answer of this question. Provide answer of this question. Economists of neoclassical argue that goods contain just subjective (or personal) use-value dimension; heterodox economists argue that goods contain use-value and soci