--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Price charging by minimizing average

    See a monopolist which cannot price discriminate but that maximizes profit. When this firm produces the level of output where is average cost at its minimum that will charge a price: (i) equal to marginal cost and generate zero economic profit. (ii) e

  • Q : Competitive equilibrium in competitive

    I have a problem in economics on Competitive equilibrium in competitive labor markets. Please help me in the following question. The Competitive equilibrium in competitive labor markets need: (1) P = MR = AVC. (2) VMP - P is maximized. (3) MPP = P. (4

  • Q : NOT operating area of monopolistic firm

    Monopolistic competitors within long-run equilibrium do NOT operate where: is (1) MR = MC. (2) P = ATC. (3) P > MC. (4) MSB > MSC. (5) economic profits are realized. How can I solve my Economics

  • Q : Problem on Horizontal Integration I

    I have a problem in economics on Horizontal Integration. Please help me in the following question. McDonalds makes hamburgers at a number of various locations. This is an illustration of a: (i) Horizontally integrated firm. (ii) Monopoly. (iii) Vertic

  • Q : Illustrate progressive tax rates The

    The burden of taxation would become additional progressive when federal taxes were reformed in that case: (1) fewer business firms were capable to evade corporate profit taxes. (2) steeper taxes were levied on that harmful goods as alcohol and tobacco. (3) the proport

  • Q : Lacking of competition in the product

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options? The lack of competition in the product market outcomes in: (1) Less labor being appointed than if the markets were competitive. (2) More labor being hired than if the markets were competitive.

  • Q : Purely competitive firm maximizing

    A purely competitive firm maximizes profit through producing where is: (w) P = ATC. (x) P = MR = MC. (y) PQ = TC. (z) AFC = AVC. I need a good answer on the topic of Economics problems. Please give

  • Q : Labor Unions-jurisdictional strikes

    Preceding to the merger of the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations to the AFL CIO merger in year 1955: (1) The AFL was an alliance of the industrial unions. (2) The CIO was an alliance of the craft unions. (3) Jurisdictional strikes o

  • Q : Heterodox perspective One of my friend

    One of my friend can't find the answer of this question.Give me answer of this question. From a heterodox perspective, the household is rarely indifferent while considering the profit of two bundles of goods.Why?

  • Q : Monopsonist-Wage discriminate Compared

    Compared with the price taker in labor market, the monopsonist which can’t wage discriminate will: (i) Hire more labor at any specified wage. (ii) Hire less labor at any wage. (iii) Pay a higher wage for any specified quantity of labor. (iv) Hire more prolific l