--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Domestic production possibilities curve

    Refer to the following domestic production possibilities curve for Karalex. The gain to Karalex from specialization and international trade is represented by a move from: 1) A to B. 2) C to A. 3) C to D. 4) B to E.

    Q : Purely competitive firms in increasing

    When purely competitive firms operate within increasing cost industries, several: (1) individual firms’ supply curves should be horizontal. (2) firms should experience decreasing returns to scale at low output levels. (3) specia

  • Q : Break Even Income A marginal tax rate

    A marginal tax rate of 50 percent and an income floor of $6,500 yield a break even income of: (w) $3,250. (x) $6,500. (y) $9,750. (z) $13,000. I need a good answer on the topic of Economics

  • Q : Cost conditions and market demand curve

    The fact that a firm along with market power adjusts output depending upon both cost conditions and the features of the market demand curve means that: (w) the amount which a monopolist produces tends to be more volatile than the outp

  • Q : Income Effects-Inferior Goods I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Income Effects-Inferior Goods. Please help me in the following question. When monetary prices drop and the quantity of a good your family purchases reduces as the purchasing power of your family income has risen, the good is a/an: (1)

  • Q : Founder of modern general equilibrium

    The founder of modern general equilibrium analysis was: (w) Leon Walras. (x) Adam Smith. (y) Alfred Marshall. (z) John Maynard Keynes. Please choose the right answer from above...I want your suggestion for the same

  • Q : Determine equality of marginal revenue

    Marginal revenue equals the change within total: (w) profit as output expands slightly. (x) output from hiring an additional worker. (y) revenue from selling an extra unit of output. (z) tax rates while tax revenue increases a bit.

    Q : Rational Investments and Sunk Costs

    Decisions are most obviously less than perfectly rational while: (1) you take a shortcut through a dark alley at 3:00 am to get home faster. (2) a brilliant student majors into art history in place of economics. (3) prisoners on death row in Texas know that tobacco ca

  • Q : Problem on Substitution Effect The cost

    The cost of cashmere plummets and most of the people start employing this once costly material as pillow covers and to knit sweaters for their pets. This is an illustration of: (i) The income effect. (ii) The change in preferences and taste. (iii) The law of diminishi

  • Q : Examples of pairs of substitutes goods

    Illustrations of pairs of goods which are close substitutes comprise: (i) Bow ties and tuxedoes. (ii) Glasses and contact lenses. (iii) Power boats and water skis. (iv) Baby food and diapers. (v) Camping trailers and large SUVs.

    Discover Q & A

    Leading Solution Library
    Avail More Than 1415588 Solved problems, classrooms assignments, textbook's solutions, for quick Downloads
    No hassle, Instant Access
    Start Discovering

    18,76,764

    1952704
    Asked

    3,689

    Active Tutors

    1415588

    Questions
    Answered

    Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!

    Submit Assignment

    ©TutorsGlobe All rights reserved 2022-2023.