--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Characteristics of pure monopoly This

    This is untrue that a firm which is a pure monopoly: (1) commonly engages in extensive advertising to differentiate its products. (2) produces a level of output which is closer to socially optimal when this price discriminates. (3) is the sole produce

  • Q : Cross price elasticities of demand The

    The cross price elasticities of demand are possibly most positive for: (w) shoe repairs and new shoes. (x) syrup and waffles. (y) gasoline and limousines. (z) college tuitions and textbooks. How can I solve my

  • Q : Functional Distribution of Income

    Computing the relative shares of national income accounted for by wages, interest, rent, and profit, yields, respectively measures called the: (1) market distribution of income. (2) functional distribution of income. (3) objective distribution of inco

  • Q : Constant cost industry in competitive

    When brick-making is a constant cost industry, during the long run this firm is probable to experience: (i) a severe shrinking of economic profit to zero. (ii) a decline in the price of bricks to approximately eight cents apiece. (iii) increased compe

  • Q : Tourist’s use of natural resources What

    What are your views about tourist’s use of natural resources?

  • Q : Emergence and development of common

    The economist most intimately identified along with the emergence and early development of common equilibrium analysis was: (w) Adam Smith. (x) Leon Walras. (y) Alfred Marshall. (z) William Stanley Jevons. Can some

  • Q : Bargaining model settlement range

    settlement range between management and the trade union

  • Q : Problem on Agency Shop Agreements Can

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. Needs for all the workers to pay union dues or the equivalent are features of collective bargaining agreements that firms will function: (1) An open shop. (2) A closed shop. (3)

  • Q : Principle of equal marginal utilities

    The thought that, in equilibrium, the more you pay for the good, more it is worth (that is, at the margin) to you is most intimately associated to the: (1) Law of diminishing returns. (2) Equivalent satisfaction corollary. (3) Veblen effect. (4) Rising cost hypothesis

  • Q : Consuming a grouping of goods problem A

    A household utmost it’s utility by consuming a grouping of goods which exhausts income when, for each and every good, the: (i) Marginal utilities are equivalent. (ii) Prices are equivalent. (iii) Ratios of marginal utility or price are equivalen