--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Law of demand in Ceteris Paribus Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The law of demand supposes that the income and tastes of the consumers are: (i) Strong determinants of the prices. (ii) Causes of movements all along the demand curve. (iii) C

  • Q : Students Rail Fares-Bransons good deed

    ‘Are rail companies being sympathetic to students in providing cheaper fares with young person’s rail-cards?’

  • Q : Screening and Credentialism The critics

    The critics of ‘credentialism’ suppose that firms making employment decisions tend to mainly rely too heavily on: (i) Personal contacts. (ii) Personality testing. (iii) Past experience. (iv) Job interviews. (v) Formal education and trainin

  • Q : Calculation of market demand To compute

    To compute the market demand for air-filled mattresses, add up the: (i) Amounts demanded at each and every price. (ii) Amounts supplied at each and every price. (iii) Demand prices at each and every quantity. (iv) Supply prices at each and every quant

  • Q : Law of Equal Marginal Advantage I have

    I have a problem in economics on Law of Equal Marginal Advantage. Please help me in the following question. The very last cents spent on each and every good should give up equivalent subjective profits according to the principle of: (i) Subjective pre

  • Q : Contestable Markets When consumers

    When consumers ultimately cannot distinguish one roasted chicken dinner from other, when roasted chicken dinners are produced within a constant cost industry, and when no barriers to entry or exit exist, in that case the long-

  • Q : Size Distribution of Income The degree

    The degree of inequality of income in between households and individuals is the: (w) marginal productivity theory of income distribution. (x) functional distribution of income. (y) distribution of wealth. (z) size distribution of income.

  • Q : Profit maximization of an output level

    Profit is maximized when this brickyard manufactures an output level of: (1) 6,000 generic bricks daily. (2) 7,000 generic bricks daily. (3) 15,000 generic bricks daily. (4) 17,000 generic bricks daily. (5) 20,000 generic bricks daily.

    Q : Characteristic of Vertical Integration

    Vertical integration is the characteristic of all firms which: (1) Control multiple features of the production of an output from raw materials to the retail sales. (2) Operate as international cartels, dealing mainly in non-renewable resources. (3) Mo

  • Q : Barriers prevent entry in monopoly

    Monopolists are more probable to generate economic profits within the long run than are pure competitors since: (w) monopolists are crooks. (x) monopolists are more interested in profits. (y) barriers prevent entry by new firms in a m