--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Demand curve for physical capital The

    The demand curve for physical capital: (1) does not depend on the amount of labor available. (2) generates a supply of loanable funds to finance new investment. (3) depends onto the marginal productivity of capital. (4) is exactly parallel to the amou

  • Q : Problem on Horizontal Integration I

    I have a problem in economics on Horizontal Integration. Please help me in the following question. McDonalds makes hamburgers at a number of various locations. This is an illustration of a: (i) Horizontally integrated firm. (ii) Monopoly. (iii) Vertic

  • Q : Operation of profit maximizing pure

    This profit-maximizing pure competitor would stop operating within this market into the long run when the price was expected to be persistently less than the price consequent to: (i) point c. (ii) point d. (iii) point e. (iv) point f. (v) point g.

  • Q : Total revenue on profit-maximizing

    Total revenue roughly for the profit-maximizing lumber mill equivalents: (i) $1700 daily. (ii) $2500 daily. (iii) $3500 daily. (iv) $4590 daily. (v) $6000 daily.

    Q : Capital receipts Why borrowing is

    Why borrowing is treated as capital receipts? Answer: Because it rises the liability of government.

  • Q : Compute Gini Index The areas

    The areas illustrates in this Lorenz diagram can be used to compute a Gini index as: (i) (cow + pig)/cow. (ii) cow2/(cow + pig).  (iii) pig2/(cow + pig). (iv) cow/(cow + pig) (v) (cow + horse)/pig.

    Q : Define revenue deficit Revenue deficit:

    Revenue deficit: Whenever revenue expenses are greater than revenue receipts, it is termed as revenue deficit.

  • Q : Microeconomics Assignment Please give

    Please give me a quote for this uploaded assignment. I need it by the 10th of may 2013. Thank You

  • Q : Supply geomeric method to measure

    geomeric method to measure elasticity of supply

  • Q : Price discriminate maximizes joint

    When a successful cartel which cannot price discriminate maximizes the joint profits of its members: (1) the marginal social benefits of additional output exceed the marginal social costs of output. (2) this is impossible for any consumer to gain with