--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Economics like a social science Why is

    Why is economics seen like a social science?

  • Q : Costs of rate of return The rate of

    The rate of return for an asset which costs $1,500 today and pays $1,800 a year from now is: (1) 5 percent. (2) 10 percent. (3) 15 percent. (4) 17.5 percent. (5) 20 percent. Please choose the right answer from abov

  • Q : Constant cost industry in competitive

    When brick-making is a constant cost industry, during the long run this firm is probable to experience: (i) a severe shrinking of economic profit to zero. (ii) a decline in the price of bricks to approximately eight cents apiece. (iii) increased compe

  • Q : Problem regarding Substitution of goods

    When tuna fish ice cream and licorice gummy bears are substitutes, then: (1) Decline in the price of licorice gummy bears raises the demand for tuna fish ice-cream. (2) The demand for tuna fish ice-cream is independent of price of licorice gummy bears. (3) Consuming m

  • Q : Help In the quintile distribution of

    In the quintile distribution of income, the term "quintile" represents

  • Q : Sharing the characteristics of purely

    Purely competitive markets share the feature of: (i) collusive behavior among of large firms. (ii) freedom of entry and exit in the long run. (iii) extensive negotiations about prices in between buyers and sellers. (iv) widespread product differentiat

  • Q : Classified industries as oligopolistic

    Industries which would be classified as oligopolistic comprise: (w) public utilities. (x) postal service. (y) breakfast cereal. (z) retailing. Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some views for above

  • Q : Calculations of price elasticity of

    At a price of $50, the demand for DVD games is roughly: (w) perfectly elastic. (x) perfectly inelastic. (y) unitarily elastic. (z) relatively inelastic.

    Q : Output level at demand in a

    Babble-On maintains world-wide patents for software which translates any of 314 spoken languages within text, with automatic audio and text translations in any of the other three-hundred-thirteen languages. Babble-On will never intentionally produce as well as sell vo

  • Q : Political pressure on government

    When the government imposes a price floor upon a product, in that case there may be political pressure for the government: (1) to produce several of the good itself. (2) to restrict the demands of private buyers. (3) to buy and then store some surplus