--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Total costs of profit-maximizing lumber

    This profit-maximizing lumber mill incurs total costs of approximately: (a) $2200 per day. (b) $3300 per day. (c) $4200 per day. (d) $5200 per day (e) $6200 per day.

    Q : Price taker in perfect competition

    State how is a single buyer a price taker in the perfect competition? Answer: A single buyer’s share in total market demand is too significant that the buyer

  • Q : Problem on diminishing returns I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Problem on diminishing returns. Please help me in the following question. The principle of diminishing marginal utility is a contrast of the law of: (1) Comparative consumer benefit. (2) Diminishing returns. (3) Effective explanation.

  • Q : Price crosses elasticity of demand when

    When a 2% raise in the price of Kibbles causes a 1% raise in the quantity sold of Bits, in that case their price cross elasticity of demand is approximately _____ and such goods are _____. (w) -2; complements (x) 0.5; substitutes (y) 2; substitutes (z

  • Q : Current consumption over future

    When households’ start increasingly to prefer current consumption over future consumption, in that case the: (w) interest rate rises. (x) interest rate falls. (y) present value of future income rises. (z) equilibrium rate of investment within hu

  • Q : Normal accounting profit with zero

    Accounting profits are normal along with zero economic profits while there is: (1) monopoly power which has not yet been capitalized. (2) unpredicted short run surges within demand for a good. (3) uncertainty therefore unpredictable e

  • Q : Greater inequality in income

    Greater inequality within the income distribution tends to give in greater: (1) social stability and harmony. (2) disincentives against productive efforts. (3) disparities between a Lorenz curve and a 45 degree reference line. (4) maturity of the mark

  • Q : Illustration of Rational Ignorance I

    I have a problem in economics on Illustration of Rational Ignorance. Please help me in the following question. Supposing that the meat you purchase from a grocery store is good devoid of inspecting its quality yourself with the microscope is an illustration of: (1) Be

  • Q : Problem on Blacklisting The

    The Blacklisting was once common however now illegal in the labor market practice of: (i) Boycotting the products of firms whose workers are on strike. (ii) Forcing the workers to sign agreements not to join the unions. (iii) Paying the union officers to systematize u

  • Q : Economic profits with average total

    A monopolist can produce economic profits while: (w) average fixed costs [AFC] are very high. (x) average total costs [ATC] lies above the demand curve. (y) at least some portion of the average total costs [ATC] curve lies below the d