--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Horizontal sum of the quantities in

    The short-run supply curve for a purely competitive industry is the horizontal total of the: (a) quantities demanded by consumers at each price. (b) prices charged by individual firms for each quantity supplied. (c) quantities supplied by established

  • Q : Relatively price elastic when supply

    Even though a drought decreases supply from S1 to S0, at each point along both of such supply curves, the supply of tanks of dehydrated water: (i) perfectly price elastic. (ii) relatively price elastic. (iii) unitarily price elastic. (iv) relativ

  • Q : Managerial economics and good business

    please find the attached file (project) and qoute for it. minimus 7 pages required.

  • Q : Effect of reducing prices on

    Can someone help me in finding out the accurate answer from the given options. People tend to recognize more ways to employ a good if the: (1) The prices of substitute goods drop. (2) Good is poorer and their incomes increase. (3) Complements of good become more costl

  • Q : High fashion at low prices-too good a

    The influence of high street chains selling very limited editions of designer clothes at much below equilibrium prices.

  • Q : Normative Criteria for Income

    The most compatible along with capitalism of the normative criteria for income distribution, which is the: (1) contribution standard. (2) gold standard. (3) needs standard. (4) balanced standard. (5) equality standard.

    Q : Inefficient economic monopolists

    Monopolists are frequently considered inefficient since they set: (w) MR = MC to maximize profits. (x) P > MSC. (y) MSR < MSC. (z) output where average revenue equals price [AR = P] as well as marginal revenue equals marginal cost [MR = MC].

  • Q : Negatively-sloped demand curve for

    A firm which cannot price discriminate although which faces a negatively-sloped demand curve for output: (1) has a marginal revenue curve which is always below which demand curve. (2) will never knowingly produce at a level of output where the price e

  • Q : Rates of Return of Cash Flow Assume

    Assume that an apartment complex is predicted to produce a consistent net $800,000 cash flow yearly in rent, after deducting all recurring variable costs (for example, taxes, utilities, and maintenance). When its current price is $10

  • Q : Perfect competition ‘In the real world

    ‘In the real world there is no industry which conforms precisely to the economist’s model of perfect competition. This means that the model is of little practical value