--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Short Run-input of firms cannot be

    I have a problem in economics on Short Run-input of firms cannot be changed. Please help me in the following question. In short run, the firm: (i) Can change any input. (ii) Can’t change any input. (iii) Cannot change the output. (iv) Has at lea

  • Q : Problem on Agency Shop The union

    The union strategy which prevents the non-union employees of the firm from being free riders is to negotiate a contract which needs the firm to be a/an: (i) Agency shop. (ii) Open shop. (iii) Collective bargaining shop. (iv) Closed shop. (v) Union shop.

  • Q : Defined Welfare Recipients By

    By description, a family of four receives welfare when it: (1) pays a smaller share of taxes than its share of benefits from government. (2) lives below the poverty line. (3) includes a student attending college on an academic scholar

  • Q : Charge price similar to marginal cost

    When a profit-maximizing monopolist who does not price discriminate charges a price equal to its marginal cost, this will: (w) minimize average cost and generate zero economic profit. (x) minimize average cost and gen

  • Q : Relative value of additional unit of a

    In equilibrium, the relative value of an additional unit of a good to a specified consumer is approximately proportional to the: (w) marginal revenue to the firm that sold the good. (x) marginal production cost of the good. (y) relative market price of the good. (z) a

  • Q : Substantial market power Any firm which

    Any firm which has substantial market power that: (i) confronts a perfectly elastic demand curve. (ii) can sell as much as this wants at the price that chooses. (iii) strongly affects the price of its output. (iv) is one of several firms in an industr

  • Q : Interest Rate Reinvestment Risk Explain

    Explain the term Interest Rate Reinvestment Risk in detail?

  • Q : Short-run supply curve for a

    For a competitive firm, the short-run supply curve is the portion of its: (w) AVC curve that lies above the ATC curve. (x) MC curve which rises above its AVC curve. (y) MC curve which is upward sloping. (z) AFC curve which lies above the MC curve.

  • Q : Price elasticity of demand I have a

    I have a problem related to price elasticity of demand. The question is illustrated as "After the price of movie tickets rose, I spent less money on movie tickets." What can you infer regarding my price elasticity of demand? 

  • Q : Problem on Substitution Effect The cost

    The cost of cashmere plummets and most of the people start employing this once costly material as pillow covers and to knit sweaters for their pets. This is an illustration of: (i) The income effect. (ii) The change in preferences and taste. (iii) The law of diminishi