--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Problem on hyperinflation In the year

    In the year 2015, people begin utilizing dollar bills to wipe up messes as hyperinflation has driven the price of ‘real’ paper towels to $7,000 a roll. This is an illustration of: (1) The income result. (2) Diminishing the marginal utility

  • Q : London Olympics-how will the economy be

    ‘Describe the influence of London Olympics on economy?’

  • Q : Graphical relationship depicted by

    Demand curves graphically depict the relationships which are: (i) Positive among the demand for a good and its relative price. (ii) Negative between the quantity demanded and the opportunity cost of a good. (iii) Positive between income and expenditures. (iv) A horizo

  • Q : Is binge drinking an economic trouble

    This binge drinking exercise observes why excessive drinking might be an economic trouble and the possible influences of government policy.

  • Q : Consistency of supply curve with

    The supply curve most consistent along with the inelastic supply of land into Antarctica is demonstrated in: (w) Panel A. (x) Panel B. (y) Panel C. (z) Panel D.

    Q : Firms in industry change When the firms

    When the firms are earning abnormal gains, how will the number of firms in industry change? Answer: The number of firms in industry will tend to rise.

  • Q : Effects of Imperfect information

    Imperfect information at times causes consumer’s attempts to make best use of their satisfaction to fail since: (1) Expectations are imperfectly realized and trial-and-error patterns can lead to the mistakes. (2) Sellers might misrepresent the c

  • Q : Problem on equal marginal utilities per

    Substitution takes place when prices change and hence demand curves are negatively-sloped since of the behavior of consumers which most directly underpins the law of: (1) Equivalent marginal utilities per dollar. (2) Diminishing net utility. (3) The income effect. (4)

  • Q : Marginal revenue with price discriminate

    For any firm along with some degree of market power but that cannot price discriminate, the price is: (w) constant along the demand curve. (x) identical with marginal revenue. (y) greater than marginal revenue. (z) less than marginal revenue.

  • Q : Advertising for higher prices Brand

    Brand name aspirin sells on higher prices than generic aspirin since: (w) higher prices mean higher quality. (x) they are chemically superior. (y) they cost more to produce. (z) advertising campaigns relate the brand name along with quality.