--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Competition in the long run Economic

    Economic profits produce competitive pressures which raise the industries: (w) price for output. (x) output and number of firms. (y) exit rate for established firms. (z) monopoly power in its largest firms. Hey fri

  • Q : Right-to-Work Laws problem Can someone

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The provisions of Taft Hartley Act did not proscribe: (i) Secondary boycotts. (ii) Closed shops. (iii) Jurisdictional strikes. (iv) Right-to-work laws.

  • Q : Public Policy and the Distribution of

    The two policies that most likely account for most of the trend toward greater income equality during 1929 and 1975 are: (w) improved educational opportunities, and tax and transfer policies. (x) reduced sex discrimination and public availability of b

  • Q : High prices elasticities of demand

    Taxing private auto travel as well as subsidizing mass transit will most effectively limit auto travel and raise the use of mass transit when the price elasticities of demand for auto travel: (1) and mass transit are low, and the cross-elasticity of d

  • Q : Relative Income Measurement Relative

    Relative income as given by the Bureau of the Census reflects a try to measure: (1) a nation’s wealth. (2) economic development in a country. (3) the value of nonhuman wealth. (4) how far a person’s income diverges from th

  • Q : Additional Funds for Breaking Invention

    If Bank of America helps link an inventor in require of additional funds to develop a ground breaking invention along with a retired school teacher along with excess savings, in that case they are performing: (1) love connections. (2) financial interm

  • Q : Simple circular flow model The simple

    The simple circular flow model illustrates that: A) households are on the buying side of both product and resource markets. B) businesses are on the selling side of both product and resource markets. C) households are on the selling side of the resource market and on

  • Q : Weekly economic profit of profit

    The profit maximizing firm currently here in illustrated graph can generate a weekly economic profit of approximately: (1) $29,000. (2) $31,500. (3) $34,000. (4) $36,500. (5) $39,000.

    Q : Consumers arrival at a point-law of

    According to law of diminishing marginal utility, the consumer inevitably arrives a point where: (i) Net satisfaction derived from good declines. (ii) Consumer suffers from total satiation from some good. (iii) Extra satisfaction outcome by extra unit

  • Q : Price taker market for

    The “kinked-demand-curve” model is an effort to model the behavior of firms within: (1) a cartel. (2) a monopoly. (3) price leadership. (4) an oligopoly. (5) a price taker market. Hello guys I want your