--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Profit Maximization in the Labor Markets

    I have a problem in economics on Profit Maximization in the Labor Markets. Please help me in the following question. All the profit maximizing firms will hire labor up to a point where: (1) MRP = MFC. (2) MRP = w. (3) VMP = w. (4) VMP = MFC.

  • Q : Illustration of Distribution of Income

    An illustration of distribution of income in accord along with the contribution standard occurs while: (1) the federal government relies on a very progressive income tax for most of its revenue. (2) production is produced, “from each, according

  • Q : Equilibrium moves market reduce in

    When equilibrium moves from point a to point b, the simple market experiencing a reduce in supply is demonstrated within: (w) Panel A. (x) Panel B. (y) Panel C. (z) Panel D.

    Q : Illustrates average variable cost curve

    LoCalLoCarbo has become the favorite of fad dieters. There in curve E shows: (1) LoCalLoCarbo’s marginal cost curve. (2) LoCalLoCarbo’s average variable cost curve. (3) LoCalLoCarbo’s average total cost curve. (4) the market demand curve facing LoCal

  • Q : Calculating opportunity cost The

    The economics professor is paid $90,000 yearly, however knows she could earn $140,000 when she began a consulting firm. The opportunity cost of her university place is: (a) zero. (b) – $90,000. (c) $140,000. (d) $90,000. Choo

  • Q : Workers volunteered to work in purely

    Even though workers volunteered to work as "for free", such purely competitive firm would never hire more than: (i) L2 workers. (ii) L3 workers. (iii) L4 workers. (iv) L5 workers. (v) L6 workers.<

  • Q : Product differentiation in market If

    If new soap operas that, although same to the previous ones, all are advertised as original and new, the TV networks are engaging within: (i) bait and switch. (ii) product differentiation. (iii) monopolistic competition. (iv) dynamic game theory. (v)

  • Q : Annuity of the Perpetuity Dividing the

    Dividing the annuity of the perpetuity by the interest rate gives in the perpetuity’s: (w) rate of return. (x) present value. (y) internal rate of discount. (z) capitalization rate. Can someo

  • Q : Constant cost industry of production

    When Del’s production function and costs are characteristic for wheat farmers and when wheat farming is a constant cost industry, in that case in the long run, there the price of wheat will be: (i) $4 per bushel. (ii) $6 per bushel. (iii) $8 per

  • Q : Lowest possibility for price elasticity

    The price elasticity of demand would possibly be lowest for: (1) Dasani. (2) Deer Park. (3) Aquafina. (4) bottled water. (5) Perrier. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding