--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Affects of costs and revenues in

    When the relative positions of all affects on costs and revenues are the same for all the several firms in this industry, in that case this firm is most likely operating in a: (w) differentiated oligopoly market in the short run. (x) monopolistically

  • Q : Price discriminate by monopoly firms

    Monopoly firms which can’t price discriminate: (a) are generally forced to shut down into the long run. (b) find this impossible to bar entry by new competitors within the long run. (c) by producing maximize profit where average

  • Q : Law of Supply Law of Supply : Supply

    Law of Supply: Supply means the goods provided for sale at a price throughout a particular period of time. This is the capacity and intention of the producers to gen

  • Q : Words of Johann H. von Thünen about

    The theory about land derives its value primarily by how much its location conserves on transaction costs is attributable to: (a) Johann H. von Thünen. (b) Adam Smith. (c) Richard Cantillon. (d) David Ricardo. (e) Reverend Thomas Robert (“B

  • Q : Facing a competitive firm more elastic

    The demand curve facing an unregulated non-discriminating monopolist is NOT: (w) similar as the industry's demand curve. (x) downward sloping. (y) more elastic than the demand curve facing a competitive firm. (z) various from its marg

  • Q : Close down a purely competitive firm in

    Within the short run, there a purely competitive firm will close down its plant(s) and manufacture nothing when: (i) this makes no pure economic profits. (ii) normal profits were unattainable. (iii) P < ATC at all output levels. (iv) accounting pro

  • Q : Output level of maximized profit Profit

    Profit is maximized in illustrated graph when this lumber mill produces an output level of: (1) 600 generic 2×4s daily. (2) 700 generic 2×4s daily. (3) 1500 generic 2×4s daily. (4) 1700 generic 2×4s daily. (5) 1800 generic 2&ti

  • Q : Long run equilibrium for purely

    When a purely competitive industry is into long run equilibrium, in that case for the typical firm: (a) P = FC = TC = MC = MR = AR = AC. (b) P = AR = MR = SRMC = SRAC = LRMC = LRAC. (c) pure economic profits reward especially effectiv

  • Q : Present value of winnings by free

    You win the Idaho state lottery as well as are entitled to two tax-free payments of $500,000 every. You get the first payment today and the next payment in precisely one year. Suppose the interest rate is a generally high 25 percent.

  • Q : Demand for product is most elastic at

    From these points in this figure, demand for cheesy fried grits is largely elastic at a price of: (w) P1 and quantity of Q3. (x) P2 and quantity of Q2. (y) P3 and quantity of Q1. (z) P4 and q