--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Similarity of elasticities of demand

    When a price hike for regular gas from $2.00 to $2.20 reduces quantity demanded from 20 million gallons to 19 million gallons daily, and an raise in the price of premium gas from $3.00 to $3.20 decreases its quantity demanded daily from 20 million gal

  • Q : Example of Screening Nick answers ‘help

    Nick answers ‘help wanted’ ads through making phone calls and scheduling the interviews. Whenever a prospective employer asks for queries and resume Nick regarding his references and skills, then the firms are practicing an illustration of: (i) Signaling.

  • Q : Monopolistic competition in long run

    When this firm initially had important market power along with potential long-run economic profit, a likely cause of the firm finally being in a stable equilibrium of an $18 price and output of 5,000 units every day would be:  (1

  • Q : Market power at output market The

    The profit-maximizing firm which is perfectly competitive in the resource market however which consists of market power in the output market will hire the labor at a point where: (p) VMP = MRP = MFC = w. (q) VMP > MRP = MFC = w. (r) VMP = MRP = MFC > w. (s) VMP

  • Q : Total revenue raised by output

    A firm’s total revenue can definitely be raised by decreasing its output when: (1) its supply curve is perfectly price inelastic. (2) the demand curve for its output is relatively income inelastic. (3) this is currently losing money each period.

  • Q : Effect of total revenue on economic loss

    The economic loss occurs whenever total revenue: (i) Is equivalent to the total costs. (ii) Fails to cover the opportunity costs. (iii) Surpasses opportunity costs. (iv) Surpasses the explicit costs. Can someone please help me in f

  • Q : Competition-Social Welfare Only the

    Only the purely competitive firm which is as well a price taker in the labor market maximizes the profit by employing labor where: (1) Quantity of the labor employed is maximized. (2) Average wage rate equivalents labor's marginal revenue product. (3) Average wage rat

  • Q : Variable costs in short run A monopoly

    A monopoly tends to shut down within the short-run when: (i) price is less than the minimum of average total costs [ATC]. (ii) price cannot cover all overhead costs. (iii) variable costs are not covered. (iv) total costs exceed total revenues. (v) the

  • Q : Price charging equality to marginal cost

    Within the short run, a price-maker firm along with important market power but that cannot price discriminate is unable to concurrently maximize profit and: (i) charge a price equal to marginal cost. (ii) minimize average total cost. (iii) produce out

  • Q : Procedure of transforming predictable

    The procedure of transforming predictable income streams in wealth is termed as: (1) capitalization. (2) profiteering. (3) financial alchemy. (4) capitalism. (5) asset conversion. Can someone explain/help me with b