--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Model of production possibilities

    Can someone help me in determining the right answer from the given options. The production possibilities frontier model can be employed to describe: (1) The scarcity. (2) Full employment, efficiency and limited resources. (3) The opportunity costs and

  • Q : Demand of consumers-supply of seller

    Consumers’ demand prices and sellers’ supply prices may be different in equilibrium due to: (w) arbitrage. (x) expectations about availability. (y) the invisible hand. (z) government subsidies or tax wedges.

  • Q : Limit Pricing Strategy When an

    When an incumbent firm uses an edge pricing strategy: (w) this can maximize short run profits and discourage entry in the market. (x) this may not be maximizing short run profits, but this can make positive economic profits over the long run. (y) the

  • Q : Prohibition in Economic Profit Economic

    Economic profits are not: (1) a surplus of revenues over opportunity costs. (2) quite similar to pure economic rents from society’s viewpoint. (3) zero in a purely competitive economy along with no uncertainty and zero transaction costs. (4) dif

  • Q : Charge price similar to marginal cost

    When a profit-maximizing monopolist who does not price discriminate charges a price equal to its marginal cost, this will: (w) minimize average cost and generate zero economic profit. (x) minimize average cost and gen

  • Q : Competition in output and resource

    The purely competitive model means that competition in both output and resource markets yields a distribution of income that is proportional to the: (w) numbers of people in specific households. (x) effort and leisure sacrificed throu

  • Q : Choosing a statistical Model Choosing a

    Choosing a statistical Model: A number of problems arise in determining whether the work is truly rigorous or not. It is important to determine whether the model chosen makes theoretical and intuitive sense. <

  • Q : Relationship between MPP and TPP If MPP

    If MPP is zero, what can you state regarding TPP? Answer: TPP is at its maximum.

  • Q : Market shifting while supply fallen and

    Specified the shifts demonstrated in the market for peanuts, there is the: (1) price will fall.(2)  quantity of output will rise slightly. (3) supply has fallen while demand has grown. (4) main adjustment happens in the quantity exchanged. (5) va

  • Q : Monopsonistic labor market-wage

    In the monopsonistic labor market in which wage discrimination is not possible, the raise in the minimum wage: (i) Essentially outcomes in less employment and higher wages. (ii) Might result in both the higher level of employment and the higher wage rate. (iii) Unifor