--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Profits or losses at wholesale price on

    When the wholesale price per bushel of peaches is $9, Cling Peach Orchards would be probably to break even when its peach orchard produced approximately: (i) 2000 bushels of peaches. (ii) 2500 bushels of peaches. (iii) 3000 bushels of

  • Q : Determine total revenue when prices fall

    As the price falls by P4 to P3 to P2 to P1 beside such demand curve for Pixie's cheesy fried grits, then total revenue: (w) always rises. (x) always falls. (y) rises then falls. (z) falls then rises.

    Q : Average retail price and Consumer Price

    Answer the question based on given table of average retail price of milk and the Consumer Price Index from the year 1980 to 1998.

    Q : Monopolistically competition A

    A monopolistically competitive firm: (w) confronts a perfectly elastic demand curve. (x) is a price taker. (y) faces stiff competition from many competitors producing close substitutes for its product. (z) consciously considers potential responses by

  • Q : Advertising for higher prices Brand

    Brand name aspirin sells on higher prices than generic aspirin since: (w) higher prices mean higher quality. (x) they are chemically superior. (y) they cost more to produce. (z) advertising campaigns relate the brand name along with quality.

  • Q : Area above supply curve of resource The

    The area above a resource’s supply curve although below its price is a pure: (w) economic rent. (x) consumer surplus. (y) capitalization. (z) monopoly profit. Please choose the right answer from above...I wan

  • Q : International demand or supply affected

    Sixty Chinese manufacturers have started producing generic staplers. Since each factory is very small to noticeably influence the international demand or supply for staplers, every firm is: (1) a cartelized seller. (2) a price taker. (3) a primary goo

  • Q : Propensity to consume Propensity to

    Propensity to consume: This exhibits the level of consumption at various levels of income in the economy.

  • Q : Price ceiling If the government puts a

    If the government puts a rent ceiling of $650 a month, what is the rent paid and how many rooms are rented? Explain why?

  • Q : Income sufficient to physical survival

    The view about all people is entitled to income sufficient to comfortably sustain their physical survival is termed as the: (1) survival standard. (2) contribution standard. (3) needs standard. (4) standard deduction. (5) equality standard.