--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Reason of existence of firms Can

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The primary reasons for the existence of firms would not comprise: (1) Collecting sales taxes for government. (2) Entrepreneurial drives for the potential gains. (3) Cutting tra

  • Q : Market Power and Monopsony Power-

    Assume that a firm with market power in the output market wants to develop and that hiring more workers needs it to raise salaries 8 percent for all the workers. Output prices will most likely: (i) Increase 8 percent to cover the wage rise. (ii) Increase less than 8 p

  • Q : Transitivity Please provide me answer

    Please provide me answer of this question. What will be the implications for consumer's preferences and her indifference curves if the axiom of transitivity does not hold?

  • Q : A legal price floor and revenues Assume

    Assume that the U.S. wheat market is firstly into equilibrium on S0D0. Now assume the government institutes a legal price floor at P3 per bushel of wheat. When the government does nothing else, one outcome will be such

  • Q : Buyers and sellers as in price-takers

    Price-takers comprise buyers or sellers who are not capable to: (w) resist monopolistic exploitation. (x) influence the prevailing market price. (y) adjust the amounts they buy or sell. (z) make short-run economic profits.

    Q : Total variable costs in monopolistic

    When this firm produces 5,000 units of output monthly in this demonstrated figure, in that case its total variable costs equal as: (w) $75,000 per month. (x) $15,000 per month. (y) $18,000 per month. (z) $3,000 per month.

    Q : Problem regarding to First Mover

    Carlos and Ivana both are roommates and friends. Carlos and Ivana eat together regardless of who cooks. When this game is repeated almost daily, and on Thursday, Ivana is permitted to pick first, the probable result is that: (w) neither Carlos nor Ivana cook, nor do t

  • Q : Effective price discrimination

    Effective price discrimination does NOT need a firm to: (w) segment the market into groups along with various demand elasticities.  (x) be a monopoly. (y) prevent trading among customers who are charged different prices. (z) possess some market p

  • Q : Causes of Increase in demand Describe

    Describe the causes of Increase in demand?Answer: 1) Increase in income of the consumer.2) Price of substitute goods increase.3)

  • Q : Short run in Substitution process In

    In the short run, simple and cheap new cures for cancer and heart disease would most likely decrease the: (i) Gains of tobacco companies. (ii) Absentee rates of nearly all young workers. (iii) Demands for the hospital beds in intensive care units. (iv) Supplies of doc