--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Wage Discrimination-Monopsonistic

    Whenever an organization’s wage structure reflects the keenness of individual staff to work, terms which are most applicable comprise: (i) Monopsonistic exploitation & wage discrimination. (ii) Monopolistic exploitation and the separation of possession and c

  • Q : Expectations about future housing prices

    The market demand curve for latest houses would shift in response to a modification in: (i) Housing prices. (ii) The costs of lumber. (iii) Construction technology. (iv) Expectations regarding future housing prices.

    Q : Problem on competitive equilibrium of

    The economy consists of two consumers, A and B. Both consumers are endowed with one unit of good 1 and one unit of good 2. Consumer A is entirely indifferent between all consumption plans. Consumer B has the utility function u(xB1 ; xB

  • Q : Hire labor at any amount in purely

    When this purely competitive firm can hire any amount of labor at pre hour wage of $9 per worker, in this given figure, as it will hire: (1) L2 workers. (2) L3 workers. (3) L4 workers. (4) L5 workers. (5) L<

  • Q : Site value of a piece of land The site

    The site value of a piece of land taken as to the: (w) costs incurred by the landowners. (x) value of buildings on the land. (y) value of the land’s location. (z) appearance of the land. Hello guys I want you

  • Q : Limitation of price elasticities of

    Price elasticities of supply and demand do NOT: (w) reflect desperation for goods and customers by buyers and sellers, respectively. (x) rise as the time period considered is expanded. (y) find out the economic incidence of a tax. (z) find out the leg

  • Q : Determine profit per unit of output

    Price minus average total cost i.e., P - ATC equals: (w) total profit. (x) marginal cost. (y) marginal revenue. (z) profit per unit of output. Please choose the right answer from above...I want you

  • Q : Income elasticity of inferior goods

    Negative income elasticities of demand entail those goods are: (1) luxuries. (2) necessities. (3) inferior. (4) substitutes. (5) expensive. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding

  • Q : Formula for the marginal utility I have

    I have a problem in economics on Formula for the marginal utility. Please help me in the following question. The formula for marginal utility of good X is as: (1) MU = change in U/ change in X. (2) MU = U/X. (3) MU = U1 U2. (4) MU = change in X/change in U.

  • Q : Illustrations of homogeneous goods

    Illustrations of homogeneous goods would not comprise: (i) wheat. (ii) athletic shoes. (iii) penicillin. (iv) generic bleach. (v) reams of generic printer paper. I need a good answer on the topic of Economi