--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Successful strategy of product

    A successful strategy of product differentiation causes: (w) the demand curve to shrink and become more elastic. (x) the demand curve becomes perfectly elastic. (y) prices for close substitutes to equalize. (z) the marginal revenue curve to be below t

  • Q : Oligopolistic markets in equilibrium

    Oligopolistic markets in equilibrium are described by: (w) a large number of sellers of homogeneous output. (x) monopolistic sellers dealing along with only some buyers. (y) a small number of sellers of close substitutes. (z) socially optimal amounts

  • Q : Produce output by zero marginal reveune

    When LoCalLoCarbo, the favorite corporation of fad dieters,in that case produces output q* [that where is marginal revenue is zero] as: (1) LoCalLoCarbo’s total revenue is at its highest possible level. (2) expanding output to q4 would cause tot

  • Q : Low-income developing countries select

    select the right answer of the question. Which of the below nations are low-income developing countries (DVCs), according to the World Bank? 1) country A only  2) countries A, D, and E  3) countries A and E  4) countries A, B, D, and E

    Q : Describe economic perspective The

    The economic perspective refer as: 1) macroeconomic phenomena, but not microeconomic phenomena. 2) microeconomic phenomena, but not macroeconomic phenomena. 3) the making of purposeful decisions in a context of marginal costs and marginal benefits. 4) unlimited resour

  • Q : Complementary Goods-Purchasing goods

    Subsequent to Judith buys an American eagle shirt at the mall for 50 percent off, she purchases the matching purse, skirt and earrings. Such extra purchases are illustrations of: (i) Complementary goods. (ii) Substitute goods. (iii) Numbers and ages of the buyers. (iv

  • Q : Risk-Return-Diversification The below

    The below table presents the three possible states for stocks A and B returns. (a) De

  • Q : What is Oligopoly Oligopoly : This is a

    Oligopoly: This is a form of the market in which there are some big sellers of a commodity and a big number of buyers. There is a high degree of interdependence between the sellers regarding their price and output policy.

  • Q : Good theory It is frequently said that

    It is frequently said that a good theory is one which can in principle be refuted by an empirical, data-oriented study. Describe why a theory which cannot be evaluated empirically is not a good theory.In evaluating theory there are two steps: f

  • Q : Classification of firms Can someone

    Can someone please help me in finding out the precise answer from the following question. The summation of all the firms which produce a given product is categorized as: (1) Multinational. (2) An industry. (3) Cartel. (4) Monopoly. (5) Plant.