--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Experience of mill for constant cost

    When generic lumber processing is a constant cost industry, within the long run this lumber mill is probable to experience a: (i) a severe shrinking of economic profit to zero. (ii) a decline within the price of 2×4s to about $2.40 apiece. (iii)

  • Q : Equilibrium GDP Provide solution of

    Provide solution of this question. If the MPC is .70 and gross investment increases by $3 billion, the equilibrium GDP will: A) increase by $10 billion. B) increase by $2.10 billion. C) decrease by $4.29 billion. D) increase by $4.29 billion.

  • Q : Economic cost Economic cost can best be

    Economic cost can best be defined as: A) any contractual obligation that results in a flow of money expenditures from an enterprise to resource suppliers. B) any contractual obligation to labor or material suppliers. C) compensations that must be received by resource owners to insure their continued

  • Q : Powerful firm confronted by powerful

    The model which examines the limits to bargaining among a powerful firm confronted by the powerful union is: (1) Bilateral monopoly model. (2) Pure monopsony model. (3) Convergence model. (4) Featherbedding model. (5) Keynesian cross model.

    Q : Purely-competitive market demand For

    For the purely-competitive cranberry market, as in below figure there Curve H is: (i) industry’s long-run supply curve. (ii) firm’s demand curve in the short run. (iii) industry’s marginal cost curve. (iv) firm’s long run margi

  • Q : Annual total costs of production When

    When Prohibition Corporation maximizes profit into its production of St. Valentine’s Day software, there annual total costs of it will be around: (1) $180 million. (2) $140 million. (3) $100 million. (4) $80 million. (5) $40 mil

  • Q : Hiring labor for Profit Maximization

    When the marginal revenue product of the very last worker hired is more than the marginal resource cost of the worker, then the firm: (1) Is experiencing rising returns to the scale. (2) Can raise its gains by hiring more labor. (3) Is maximizing the profit. (4) Must

  • Q : Output level on marginal revenue and

    When the firm produced at output level q2, this produced where: (w) MR = MC. (x) MR > MC. (y) MR < MC. (z) P < MC.

    Q : Example of perfectly price inelastic A

    A candy factory now produced 5.2 million packages of gummy worms as well as sold them for $1.27 each this annum. Last year this sold 4.7 million packages of gummy worms sold for $1.36 each. That firm’s gummy worms have demand which is: (1) perfe

  • Q : Problem on monetary prices In adding up

    In adding up to monetary prices, the costs of buying and selling comprise: (1) Wage payments. (2) Monopoly gains. (3) Social advantages. (4) Transaction costs. (5) Pecuniary externalities. Please someone suggest me