--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Problem regarding to tariffs and tax

    American buyers would bear a tax burden of ____ when there was a U.S. import tariff equivalent to distance ac, while Japanese sellers would bear a tax burden equivalent to ____. (w) ab and bc. (x) bc and ab. (y) ac and zero. (z) zero and ac.

    Q : Economic efficiency of purely

    Most economists favor purely competitive markets since they tend to as: (1) economies of scale. (2) large profits. (3) mutual interdependence. (4) corporate organizations. (5) economic efficiency. Hello guys I want

  • Q : Substitutes and Complements The

    The increase in the price of a good generally also rises the: (i) Demands for its substitutes. (ii) Supply of its complements. (iii) Purchasing power of the consumer incomes. (iv) Demand for its complements. Can someone please help

  • Q : Oligopoly market Elucidate why are

    Elucidate why are firms mutually interdependent in oligopoly market.

  • Q : Determine slope of demand for given

    For edcah $.10 per gallon hike within gasoline prices, Ima Driver cuts her monthly consumption of gasoline with 5 gallons. There slope of her demand for gasoline: (w) 1/2 when the change in price is expressed within cents, and 500 when the change in p

  • Q : Calculate of total variable in an area

    Total variable costs can be estimate as: (1) 0bcq1. (2) 0adq2. (3) 0Peq2. (4) aPed. (5) Cannot be measured within demonstrated figure.

    Q : Rational consumer-Relative Prices I

    I have a problem in economics on rational consumer-Relative Prices. Please help me in the following question. The rational consumer purchasing decisions depend mainly on: (1) Current market prices. (2) Absolute prices. (3) Nominal prices. (4) Monetary prices. (5) Rela

  • Q : Requirement of Production Possibilities

    Deriving a production possibilities frontier needs the supposition that: (1) Resources are variable in the supply. (2) There are limitless numbers of goods. (3) Economic growth takes place at a normal rate. (4) All scarce resources are proficiently em

  • Q : Long-run competitive pressures in

    When economic losses are widespread within a purely competitive industry, in that case long-run competitive pressures tend to cause: (i) accelerating economic losses. (ii) prices to fall while firms leave the industry. (iii) productio

  • Q : Income elasticity of demand when

    When diamond sales jump from 3 to 13 million carats yearly while a strong recovery increases national income from $12.0 trillion to $13.2 trillion, in that case the income elasticity of demand for diamonds is: (1) 0.76. (2) 1.52. (3)