--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Determine income elasticity of demand

    An income elasticity of demand for mass transit of 0.6 implies that the demand for mass transit is/will: (1) a necessity. (2) a luxury. (3) rise at a slower rate than income. (4) fall when income rises. How can I s

  • Q : Graphical Production Possibilities

    Can someone please help me in determining the right answer from the following question. The production possibilities frontier is a graphical device exhibiting the: (i) Alternative allocation methods accessible to society. (ii) Combinations of goods wh

  • Q : Lowering price of units selling A

    A monopolist which does not price discriminate faces a marginal revenue curve which slopes down quicker than its demand curve since: (w) economies of scale are significant. (x) selling more needs lowering the price of

  • Q : Market demand function The market  for

    The market  for good X consists  of 2 consumers. consumer  1',s demand  for good X is: X1 :  15 - 3Px + 0.5PY + .02I1I1 and I2 a

  • Q : Problem regarding Collective Bargaining

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The union strategy which probably outcomes the maximum wages for both the union members and other workers over long run is: (1) Limiting ent

  • Q : Cartel Select the right answer of the

    Select the right answer of the question. We would expect a cartel to achieve: A) both allocative efficiency and productive efficiency. B) allocative efficiency, but not productive efficiency. C) productive efficiency, but not allocative efficiency. D) neither allocati

  • Q : Tariffs and Tax Revenues An import

    An import tariff on Japanese cars of ac generates government revenue equivalent to: (w) trapezoid bcde. (x) rectangle P1to P2ca. (y) distance Q0   to Q1. (z) rectangle 0P2dQ2.

    Q : Marginal revenue and monopoly For a

    For a nondiscriminating monopolist, the marginal revenue is: (w) identical to price. (x) always positive. (y) always less than price. (z) always greater than price. Hello guys I want your advice. P

  • Q : Example of bilateral monopoly The most

    The most excellent example of bilateral monopoly from the given list would be the condition of negotiations among: (i) U.S. Immigration Service and undocumented workers from Mexico. (ii) Fast food franchises and workers who are high-school dropouts. (

  • Q : Costs of rate of return The rate of

    The rate of return for an asset which costs $1,500 today and pays $1,800 a year from now is: (1) 5 percent. (2) 10 percent. (3) 15 percent. (4) 17.5 percent. (5) 20 percent. Please choose the right answer from abov