--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Operating analytic Time of

    When this purely-competitive firm makes output level Q, this is operating within the: (i) technological long run. (ii) long run. (iii) short run. (iv) shut down period. (v) boom period of the business cycle.

  • Q : Examples of perishable goods I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Examples of perishable goods. Please help me in the following question. Illustrations of perishable goods comprise: (1) The book Carrie reads each and every night before brushing her teeth. (2) The computer Barry emplo

  • Q : Problem on Budget constraints James and

    James and Louisa each have an income of $30, which they each spend on tomatoes and all other goods.  They buy tomatoes at their local farmers market, which charges $3 per pound.  Define the units for all other goods so that their price is $1 per unit. 

  • Q : Inelastic demand over relevant price

    While rate hikes will boost a utility's total revenue, in that case the utility faces: (w) elastic demand over the relevant price range. (x) unitarily elastic demand over the relevant price range. (y) inelastic demand over the relevant price range. (z

  • Q : Define excess demand Excess demand : If

    Excess demand: If AD > AS at the full employment level. Then it is termed as Excess demand.

  • Q : Strikes and Lockouts Can someone please

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The outcomes of strikes do not comprise: (i) Losses of the perishable products. (ii) Shipping delays. (iii) Decreased production costs. (iv) Shortages.

  • Q : Problem regarding Utilitarianism Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. However the idea that people seek happiness and try to evade pain dates back to Epicurus and other ancient Greeks, the individual generally acknowledged as the founder of the ‘modern&rsq

  • Q : Liabilities for damages and penalties

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The Caveat venditor is an ancient legal doctrine which encourages: (i) Consumer exploitation. (ii) a ‘buyers beware’ approach. (iii) Enforcement of the seller’

  • Q : Goals of the Firm Most of the

    Most of the economists believe firms tend to proficiently maximize the profits since of: (i) Stockholder pressure. (ii) Competition for the management positions. (iii) Principal-agent conditions. (iv) The chance of corporate take-over.

    Q : Consumer behaviour Graphical

    Graphical representation of relationship between MPC and multiplier?