--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Riskiness of an Investment When the

    When the riskiness of an investment into an apartment complex warrants a 12.5% annual rate of return and the complicated is expected to generate net cash flow (as after utilities, preservation and other costs) of $2 million per year,

  • Q : What is Complements Complements : The

    Complements: The two goods for which a rise in the price of one good leads to a reduction in the demand for other.

  • Q : Differentiate project feasibility study

    Differentiate between project feasibility study and project proposal?

  • Q : Marginal resource cost for a monopsonist

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The marginal resource cost for the monopsonist in labor market which can’t wage discriminate: (i) Is perfectly elastic. (ii) Lies above the market supply of labor. (iii) Is perfectly ine

  • Q : Price elasticity beside horizontal

    Hey FRIEND I need your help for query as given below: The price elasticity beside a horizontal demand curve is constant at: (w) zero. (x) infinity. (y) 1. (z) -1. Can someone ex

  • Q : Explicit Costs of business The Explicit

    The Explicit costs of doing the business would comprise: (i) The value of owner’s time (ii) Depreciation on the company owned truck (iii) The interest that the owner could earn when her savings were not tied up in firm. (iv) Salaries paid to the

  • Q : Total revenue and total cost for firm

    Total revenue for the firm in illustrated figure is __________ __________ total cost.: (w) greater than (x) less than (y) equal to (z) Cannot be determined by the information given.

    Q : Demand of various vegetable why demand

    why demand change of onion in during one week due to change in it's price

  • Q : Restrictive monetary policy Select the

    Select the right answer of the question. A restrictive monetary policy is designed to shift the: A) aggregate demand curve rightward. B) aggregate demand curve leftward. C) aggregate supply curve rightward. D) aggregate supply curve leftward

  • Q : Effect of Increase in per capita income

    Rises in per capita income in the United States would be most probable to reduce the: (i) Demands for lard, pinto beans, and utilized tires. (ii) Excesses in the federal govt. budget. (iii) Supply of untrained labor relative to skilled labor. (iv) Tot