--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Monopsony power without wage

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The Minimum wage laws are most probable to increase the equilibrium employment when a firm has been exercising: (1) Monopoly power and price discrimination. (2) Employee choice in markets for

  • Q : Floating exchange rates Provide

    Provide solution of this question. In saying that the present system of floating exchange rates is managed we mean that: A) countries which allow their exchange rate to move freely will lose their borrowing privileges with the IMF.  B) the value of any IMF member

  • Q : Oligopoly market Elucidate why are

    Elucidate why are firms mutually interdependent in oligopoly market.

  • Q : Influence of war in prices Assume that

    Assume that the War in Iraq start to engulf other Middle-Eastern countries in hostilities. The least probable outcome of gasoline prices therefore increasing to, state, $10 per gallon in the United States, would be that: (i) Hummer sales would fall as a percentage of

  • Q : Long run economic growth When people

    When people become optimistic about living longer and accordingly save more for their retirement years, in that case the decline into interest rates will tend to: (w) raise capital costs for business firms. (x) decrease investment expenditures. (y) di

  • Q : Define revenue Revenue : This refers to

    Revenue: This refers to total money income from the sale of output.

  • Q : History-AFL-CIO The amalgamation of

    The amalgamation of American Federation of Labor, representing the craft unions and the Congress of Industrial Unions, representing the industrial unions, happened in: (i) 1955. (ii) 1960. (iii) 1970. (iv) 1965. (v) 1975. Find out

  • Q : Chance for arbitrage Normal 0 false

    Normal 0 false false

  • Q : Consumer behaviour Graphical

    Graphical representation of relationship between MPC and multiplier?

  • Q : Define deficient demand Deficient

    Deficient demand: If AD < AS at full employment level, then it is defined as deficient demand.