--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Problem regarding Principal Agent The

    The baseball manager, whose players decline to bunt occasionally, rather always swinging for the homeruns, faces a: (i) Second-mover drawback. (ii) Prisoner’s dilemma. (iii) Principal-agent problem. (iv) Grim strategy. Can so

  • Q : Equilibrium rate of monopsony

    I have a problem in economics on Equilibrium rate of monopsony exploitation. Please help me in the following question. Equilibrium rate of the monopsony exploitation by a firm is a difference between: (i) MRP and VMP. (ii) VMP and w. (iii) MFC and w.

  • Q : Variation in price elasticity as price

    The only supply curve which has price elasticity which varies as the price of output increases is within: (w) Panel A. (x) Panel B. (y) Panel C. (z) Panel D.

    Q : Firms in purely competitive markets

    Firms within purely competitive markets as: (1) practice price discrimination more often than do firms along with market power. (2) do not price discriminate since they are more interested in their customers than are monopolists. (3) cannot price disc

  • Q : Curing scarcities of good Curing

    Curing scarcities in the market for ice cream needs: (i) Rises in the price of ice cream. (ii) Reduces in the supply of ice cream. (iii) Rises in the demand for ice cream. (iv) Reduction in the price of ice cream. (v) Burden of a price floor.

  • Q : Preference current consumption over

    When the preference for current consumption over future consumption weakens, in that case the: (w) interest rate rises. (x) interest rate falls. (y) present value of future income falls. (z) equilibrium level of investment falls.

  • Q : Comparison between supply curves

    Comparing supply curves S2 and S3, supply is: (w) more price elastic along S2 than along S3. (x) more price elastic along S3 than S2. (y) equally elastic along both when they have simil

  • Q : Needs Standard for Income Distribution

    The needs standard for income distribution would certainly involve: (w) difficulty in the measurement of productivity. (x) an enormous bureaucracy. (y) greater incentives for production than the contribution standard. (z) economic ef

  • Q : Economic Efficiency in Financial

    Financial institutions make possible economic efficiency primarily since: (w) laissez faire markets handle asymmetric information poorly. (x) corporate ownership must be stabilized. (y) they channel funds from agents along with surplu

  • Q : Selling price by price elasticity of

    At the point upon the demand curve for Silver Screen Classic DVDs, here the price elasticity of demand is unitary, the price would be approximately: (i) $10, resulting in roughly 8 million DVDs being sold. (ii) $13, resulting in appro