--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Define Average Variable Cost Define

    Define Average Variable Cost. And also state its formula.

  • Q : Purely and monopolistically competitive

    Purely competitive markets and monopolistically competitive markets have in general: (1) the collusive tendencies of large rival firms. (2) extensive negotiations about prices among buyers and sellers. (3) freedom of entry and exit wi

  • Q : Define break-even price Break-even

    Break-even price: This is the price at which firms form zero normal profit.

  • Q : Zero economic profits in long-run

    In long-run equilibrium, a monopolistically competitive firm is making: (a) economic profits. (b) zero economic profits. (c) negative economic profits. (d) revenues that exceed total costs. Can anybody suggest me t

  • Q : Income related to positive demand I

    I have a problem in economics on Income related to positive demand. Please help me in the following question. The goods for which the demands are positively related to income are termed as: (i) Normal goods. (ii) Inferior goods. (iii) Substitute neces

  • Q : Characterized purely-competitive markets

    Purely-competitive markets are NOT characterized through: (i) substantial barriers to entry and exit. (ii) many small potential buyers. (iii) many small potential sellers. (iv) homogeneous products. (v) zero long-run economic profits.

    Q : Technology and resource costs I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Technology and resource costs. Please help me in the following question. The short-run supply of macadamia nuts is considerably recognized by: (1) Preferences and tastes. (2) Technology and resource costs. (3) The number of consumers.

  • Q : Costs of rate of return The rate of

    The rate of return for an asset which costs $1,500 today and pays $1,800 a year from now is: (1) 5 percent. (2) 10 percent. (3) 15 percent. (4) 17.5 percent. (5) 20 percent. Please choose the right answer from abov

  • Q : Price elasticity beside horizontal

    Hey FRIEND I need your help for query as given below: The price elasticity beside a horizontal demand curve is constant at: (w) zero. (x) infinity. (y) 1. (z) -1. Can someone ex

  • Q : Unite to form cartels and share

    Oligopolies which unite to form cartels and share monopoly profits give an illustration of: (i) collusive behavior. (ii) territorial imperatives. (iii) mergers and acquisitions. (iv) non-collusive strategy. (v) corporate raiding.