--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Surety of good market information for

    The assumption about buyers and sellers has good market information makes sure that they: (w) know everything. (x) never make errors. (y) can foretell the future. (z) won’t pay more than they have to, or sell for less than the market price.

  • Q : Why is the ATC bigger than AVC Why is

    Why is the ATC bigger than AVC? Answer: ATC is bigger than AVC since ATC comprises AVC and AFC

  • Q : Utility Analysis problem The marginal

    The marginal utility curve can much loosely be translated into the demand curve by: (1) Measuring its declining part in dollars. (2) Transforming utils into the prices. (3) Horizontally summing up everyone’s MUs at each and every price. (4) Setting MUa/Pa = MUb/

  • Q : Example of how marginal utility

    An illustration of how marginal utility diminishes takes place when: (1) Todd only requires 180 screws for his bike repair shop however purchases a box of 200 screws. (2) Amy Sue decides she would instead contain 150 hogs than 151 on her pig farm. (3)

  • Q : Unitarily price elastic supply for

    Supply is unitarily price elastic for all quantities and prices upon: (i) supply curve S1. (ii) supply curve S2. (iii) supply curve S3. (iv) supply curve S4. (v) supply curve S5.

    Q : Price elasticity on straight line curve

    Find out the price elasticity of supply at any point on a straight line curve when A) supply curve intersects ox axis in its negative range B) supply curve intersects ox axis in its positive range. C) Supply curve passes via the origin?

  • Q : Problem regarding monopsonistic

    I have a problem in economics on monopsonistic exploitation. Please help me in the following question. The Labor union contracts, an analogous worth rule or the minimum wage laws might boost equilibrium employment when a firm has been practicing: (1)

  • Q : Horizontal individual demand curves The

    The market demand curve is recognized by: (i) Vertically summing up individual demand curves. (ii) Graphing intersections of demand and supply over time. (iii) Holding quantity constant while summing up each price on demand curve. (iv) Horizontally summing up individu

  • Q : Making price and output decisions by

    Of the given, the firm probably to consider possible reactions through rival firms while making price and output decisions would be as: (w) a family-owned and operated dairy farm in Wisconsin. (x) your local electric utility. (y) the biggest independe

  • Q : Price floor for Whopper Slushees The

    The government price floor for Whopper Slushees at P3 would result a: (i) shortage of Q1 – Q3. (ii) Excess of Q3 - Q1. (iii) Supply price of P1. (iv) Quantity demanded of Q2. (v) Demand price of P2.

    Discover Q & A

    Leading Solution Library
    Avail More Than 1453860 Solved problems, classrooms assignments, textbook's solutions, for quick Downloads
    No hassle, Instant Access
    Start Discovering

    18,76,764

    1926559
    Asked

    3,689

    Active Tutors

    1453860

    Questions
    Answered

    Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!

    Submit Assignment

    ©TutorsGlobe All rights reserved 2022-2023.