--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Slope of ray by origin in price

    The slope of the ray by the origin which is tangent to point b equivalents to: (w) the reciprocal of the price elasticity of demand. (x) P / Q. (y) 0a / 0c. (z) the price elasticity of supply.

    Q : Output and pricing performance of firms

    Contestable markets theory recommends that even though an industry has only one producer, in that case the output and pricing performance of which firm will resemble which of a competitive industry as long like: (1) there are numerous active buyers in

  • Q : Labor Unions and Inflation Even

    Even although less than 12 percent of labor in the U.S. is unionized, numerous argue that unions are the primary cause of inflation as union wage hikes: (i) Cause unemployment that is inflationary. (ii) Frequently serve as the goals in recognizing non-union wage. (iii

  • Q : Cost of inputs in Determinants of demand

    I have a problem in economics on Cost of inputs in Determinants of demand. Please help me in the following question. The entire given are determinants of demand apart from. (i) Taxes and preferences. (ii) The cost of inputs. (iii) Price expectations.

  • Q : Demand curve for Complementary Goods

    The ban on assault weapons enacted in the year 1994 lapsed in the year 2004. Prices for assault weapons fell in year 2004 since the only way to get such guns throughout the ban was via the black market. This modify in the law in year 2004 is most probable to shift the

  • Q : Characterized purely-competitive markets

    Purely-competitive markets are NOT characterized through: (i) substantial barriers to entry and exit. (ii) many small potential buyers. (iii) many small potential sellers. (iv) homogeneous products. (v) zero long-run economic profits.

    Q : Weekly economic profit of profit

    The profit maximizing firm currently here in illustrated graph can generate a weekly economic profit of approximately: (1) $29,000. (2) $31,500. (3) $34,000. (4) $36,500. (5) $39,000.

    Q : Determine total cost of

    This profit-maximizing competitive firm's total cost as TC=TFC+TVC, as in demonstrated figure can be calculated as area: (i) 0P3fq4. (ii) P2P1de. (iii) P3P2ef. (iv) 0P<

  • Q : Consumer behaviour Graphical

    Graphical representation of relationship between MPC and multiplier?

  • Q : When price elasticity rise Price

    Price elasticity of demand for a good will tend to rise as the: (i) Number of reasonably good replacements available rises. (ii) Consumer income level rises. (iii) Good is a less significant budget item. (iv) Time permitted for response reduces. (v) Elasticity of supp