--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Hypothetical demands for perfect price

    In this figure demonstrating hypothetical demands for socket sets, there demand curve: (1) D1D1 is perfectly price-inelastic. (2) D2D2 is perfectly price elastic. (3) D3D3

  • Q : Problem on demand for Inferior Goods I

    I have a problem in economics on demand for Inferior Goods. Please help me in the following question. When income rises, demands for: (1) Substitute goods reduce. (2) Inferior goods reduction. (3) Normal goods reduction. (4) Complementary goods rise.<

  • Q : Determine price elasticity of demand

    When a $9.98 sale on regular $19.95 watch fobs increases a store's sales from 30 to 300 weekly, the price elasticity of the demand faced through the store is approximately: (w) 2.46. (x) 1.23. (y) 4.92. (z) 0.62. C

  • Q : Tastes and Preferences in travel

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Raised ‘love boat’ ticket sales in response to a sequence of stunning travel commercials point out a raise in the: (i) Quantity of romantic vacations demanded. (ii) Demand for the

  • Q : Problem on double taxation The word ‘

    The word ‘double taxation’ signifies to: (i) The Corporation paying both the federal and state taxes. (ii) Corporations paying the corporate income tax and shareholders paying the personal income tax on dividends. (iii) Both partners in pa

  • Q : Profit Maximization-Labor Markets If,

    If, after hiring the very last worker, the firm's profit is similar as it was before the last worker was hired, then the firm must: (1) Hire more workers to raise gain. (2) Layoff certain workers to raise the gain. (3) Not hire any more workers. (4) Shut down in short

  • Q : Case study on Microeconomics Hello, I

    Hello, I did attach case study on Microeconomics. Regards,

  • Q : Economic good becomes an economic bad

    Economic good becomes an economic bad whenever consumption is expanded into an area where: (1) Marginal returns are reducing. (2) Sellers experience an honest hazard. (3) Marginal utility is negative. (4) Buyers suffer from unfavorable choice. (5) Exc

  • Q : Effect on tax burdens by price

    When the price elasticity of demand for wine as 2.5, in that case rise in the excise tax which raises its price will be: (w) increase total spending upon wine. (x) reduce total spending upon wine. (y) not influence wine consumption. (

  • Q : Wage Discrimination-Monopsonistic

    Whenever an organization’s wage structure reflects the keenness of individual staff to work, terms which are most applicable comprise: (i) Monopsonistic exploitation & wage discrimination. (ii) Monopolistic exploitation and the separation of possession and c