--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Complementary of cross-price elasticity

    The most complementary of the given pairs of goods are: (1) organic vegetables and French fries. (2) polyester fabrics and cotton cloth. (3) transistor radios and televisions. (4) jogging shoes and bicycles. (5) pencils and erasers.

    Q : Shut down by drastically raise price in

    Mom and Pop Ping-Pong Balls is an established table tennis supply store within a small city. You are the owner of Ping-Pong Megastore as well and you have just opened up a location in their small city. When you set prices so low which Mom and Pop is forced to shut dow

  • Q : Problem regarding to trade restrictions

    When the U.S. imposes quotas which restrict imports of textiles from China, this decrease the: (w) demand for textiles within the U.S. (x) supply of Chinese textiles to Europeans. (y) supply of textiles in the U.S. (z) incomes of U.S. textile makers.

    Q : Kinked demand curves and sticky prices

    Sticky prices within oligopoly markets are: (w) predicted by the kinked demand curve model. (x) substantiated by many statistical studies. (y) most common for highly differentiated products. (z) a result of price discrimination.

    Q : Applied Writing must use graphs to

    must use graphs to demonstrate/support answers where available. Submission is to be made tonight, so needs to be finished urgently

  • Q : Shutdown point of monopoly firm A

    A monopoly firm must shut down in the short run when: (w) P < minimum [average total costs [ATC]]. (x) P > minimum [average total costs [ATC]]. (y) this cannot cover all variable costs. (z) P does not equal marginal costs [MC].

    Q : Long run supply Illustrate and explain

    Illustrate and explain using diagrams, the difference between long run supply in a constant cost individual firm and industry and an increasing cost firm and industry.

  • Q : Formula for economic profit Can someone

    Can someone please help me in finding out the precise answer from the following question. The firm’s total revenue minus its net economic costs equivalents its: (1) Economic profit. (2) Taxable income. (3) Marginal income. (4) Accounting profit. (5) Psychic inco

  • Q : Reduce average total costs by

    Individual pure competitive firms as well as firms along with market power may each be capable to: (i) reduce average total costs by increasing the size of its operations or economies of scale else decreasing the size of its operations [as diseconomie

  • Q : Problem on Resource Costs Can someone

    Can someone help me in finding out the precise answer from the given options. A raise in the cost of resource inputs would lead to the: (1) Shift of the supply curve to right. (2) Shift of the supply curve to left. (3) Movement upward all along the su