--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Relatively price inelastic demand in

    When a firm possesses some market power, in that case the firm’s marginal revenue is negative inside the range of output where demand is: (i) price elastic. (ii) unitarily elastic. (iii) relatively price inelastic. (iv) perfectl

  • Q : Determine infinity price elasticity

    When the demand for cheesy fried grits of Pixie is relatively price elastic, then its price elasticity is: (i) zero. (ii) greater than zero but less than one. (iii) one (unitary.) (iv) greater than one but less than infinity. (v) infi

  • Q : Fixed input in short run I have a

    I have a problem in economics on fixed input in short run. Please help me in the following question. Which of the given below is most likely to be the fixed input in short run for General Motors? (i) An assembly line worker. (ii) Paint for cars. (iii)

  • Q : Monopsony Power-Demand for Labor Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. After adjusting for the inflation, Alex Rodriquez’s salary with NY Yankees was very higher in 2006 than Henry Aaron's salary with Atlanta Braves in the year 1970s that implies that: (i)

  • Q : Determine inferior good by income

    As in below figure demonstrates how consumption of goods A, B, C, and D varies like a family’s income changes. Of such goods, the only inferior good: (w) good A. (x) good B  (y) good C. (z) good D.

  • Q : For luxury items absolute value of

    The absolute value of price elasticity of demand tends to be lower when: (w) the greater the number of substitutes available. (x) the more important the product is in classical budgets. (y) for necessities than for luxury items. (z) when more time is

  • Q : Profit-maximizing monopolistically

    A profit-maximizing monopolistically competitive firm will operate where is: (w) MR > MC. (x) MR = MC. (y) P < MR. (z) P < MC. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding

  • Q : Strategic Barriers to Entry in

    Extravagant and costly marketing through established firms in an oligopoly is probable to: (w) encourage entry by other profit maximizing firms. (x) raise the minimum efficient scale of production for new entrants. (y) act as a regulatory barrier of entry. (z) increas

  • Q : Stable Competitive Economy Into a

    Into a stable competitive economy without innovation, transaction, or uncertainty costs, all accounting profits would be: (w) pure economic profits. (x) payments required to secure owner-provided resources. (y) pure e

  • Q : Average cost per unit of production

    When Prohibition Corporation maximizes profit within its production of St. Valentine’s Day software, there average cost per unit of it produced will be roughly: (i) $4 per copy. (ii) $10 per copy. (iii) $18 per copy. (iv) $24 per copy. (v) $32 per copy.