--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Economics expectations of price hike

    expectations of price hike for durable goods tend to:

  • Q : Present Value and Rates of Return When

    When the rate of return you calculate on an asset exceeds the interest rate: (1) competition for profit must make its price fall rapidly. (2) the price must fall rapidly. (3) the market is in long term equilibrium. (4) you should igno

  • Q : Markets which are relevant for human

    All markets which are really relevant for human beings are exemplified by: (1) Extensive advertising, sales promotions and marketing. (2) Demands from each and every individual for all products. (3) Potential buyers willing to reimburse and potential

  • Q : Shortages and surpluses in the market A

    A shortage as in below graph, during this market for papayas would match up to line: (1) ab. (2) cd. (3) ac. (4) bd. (5) ae. 1802_example</span></p>
                                        </div>
                                        <!-- /comment-box -->
                                    </li>
   
   </td>
	</tr><tr>
		<td>
       
      <li>
                                        <div class=

    Q : Relative Income to Measures and

    From 1976 year, after adjusting income for taxes and transfers, the relative income group which, according to the Department of the Census, which has decreased most markedly like a percentage of the U.S. population ha

  • Q : Normative Standards for Distribution

    Relative to a requirements standard for distributing income, in that case the adoption of an equality standard would most likely tend to be: (w) unarguably fairer. (x) less bureaucratic. (y) more harmful to work incentives. (z) clearly less fair.

  • Q : More unit gains marginal revenue by

    A firm which can sell each and every unit of its production at a price of $200 and that sells 500 more units gains marginal revenue by the additional units of: (w) $500,000. (x) $100,000. (y) $200. (z) $10,000. I n

  • Q : Unitarily price elastic supply for

    Supply is unitarily price elastic for all quantities and prices upon: (i) supply curve S1. (ii) supply curve S2. (iii) supply curve S3. (iv) supply curve S4. (v) supply curve S5.

    Q : Values of the Marginal Product and

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Hourly salaries as reflected in take-home pay are probable to be less than the values of worker’s marginal product (or VMP) in part since of: (1) Monopsonistic exploitation which causes

  • Q : Problem regarding law of Diminishing

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. According to the law of diminishing marginal utility, the longer that Chris and Lee kiss: (i) The less invested each will be in enduring this relationship. (ii) The closer they are to arriving