--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Intermediaries earn income to help

    In the long run within a market system, all intermediaries earn income only when they help sellers and buyers: (w) raise surpluses. (x) by innovating new products. (y) reduce transaction costs. (z) ga

  • Q : Thought of economists for law of equal

    Explain different thought of economists for law of equivalent marginal advantage.

  • Q : Problem on diminishing returns I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Problem on diminishing returns. Please help me in the following question. The principle of diminishing marginal utility is a contrast of the law of: (1) Comparative consumer benefit. (2) Diminishing returns. (3) Effective explanation.

  • Q : Oligopoly and economic welfare in long

    In an oligopoly, as opposite to monopolistic or pure competition, industry output within the long run is probable to be: (1) lower along with reduced prices. (2) about similar but with higher prices. (3) lower and with higher prices.

  • Q : Problem on short run demand I have a

    I have a problem in economics on short run demand. Please help me in the following question. In short run, the demand mainly depends most on: (1) Supply. (2) Costs of production. (3) Consumer tastes and preferences. (4) Technology. (5) Resource access

  • Q : Emerge natural monopoly by economics of

    A monopoly might emerge naturally while economies of scale: (w) are small relative to market demand. (x) do not exist. (y) are large relative to market demand for output. (z) and average costs are rising over the market output range.

    Q : Economic cost Economic cost can best be

    Economic cost can best be defined as: A) any contractual obligation that results in a flow of money expenditures from an enterprise to resource suppliers. B) any contractual obligation to labor or material suppliers. C) compensations that must be received by resource

  • Q : Objective of Price Controls Price

    Price controls are intended to: (w) eliminate arbitrage and speculation. (x) stabilize prices. (y) make sure laissez-faire policies. (z) ignore shortages and surpluses. How can I solve my economics problem? Please

  • Q : Problem on decline of demand The

    The automakers slashed prices and gave ‘zero percent financing’ throughout the year 2001-2003 recession. An expected outcome was: (1) The decline in the demand for utilized cars. (2) enhanced maintenance of older cars by their owners. (3) Buyers purchasing

  • Q : Labor union monopoly I have a problem

    I have a problem in economics on Labor union monopoly. Please help me in the following question. As compared to pure competition, beneath a pure labor union monopoly, the wage will tend to: (1) Higher and employment will also be higher. (2) Lower and