--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Can GNP be more than GDP Can GNP be

    Can GNP be more than GDP? Answer: Yes, GNP can be greater or more than GDP if NFIA is positive.

  • Q : Demand curve for physical economic

    The demand curve for physical economic capital based most directly onto the: (w) extent of previous automation. (x) willingness of savers to create investment funds available. (y) marginal productivity of capital and the price of its output. (z) suppl

  • Q : Saving transaction costs by locations

    Economic rent by a parcel of land is positively associated to the: (w) savings in transaction costs yielded by its location. (x) amount of idle land adjacent to this. (y) time this has been held by the current landowner. (z) amount of natural flora an

  • Q : Quantity sold of total revenue of pure

    Total revenue of a pure competitor is its quantity sold that is multiplied by its: (w) profit per unit. (x) price per unit. (y) average variable cost. (z) overhead cost per unit. Can someone explain/help me with be

  • Q : Determine elasticity of demand for

    Moving beside the demand curve by Q=0, P4 to Q4, P=0, then elasticity of demand for Pixie’s cheesy fried grits as: (w) doesn't change. (x) falls, then rises. (y) rises, then falls. (z) falls.

    Q : Incentive to work and earn income The

    The incentive to work and earn income is likely to be least powerful if an individual who faces. (w) low income tax rates. making the cost of leisure high, and who possesses important amounts of valuable human capital. (x) high effect

  • Q : Perfectly price elastic demand For

    For Cournot’s Spring Water the demand is perfectly price elastic at:  (i) point a. (ii) point b. (iii) point c (iv) point d. (v) point e.

    Q : Illustration of perfectly price elastic

    A demand curve which is perfectly price elastic is demonstrated into: (w) Panel A. (x) Panel B. (y) Panel C. (z) Panel D. 914</span></p>
                                        </div>
                                        <!-- /comment-box -->
                                    </li>
   
   </td>
	</tr><tr>
		<td>
       
      <li>
                                        <div class=

    Q : Free Trade Agreement Tell me the answer

    Tell me the answer of this question. Critics of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) falsely feared that it would: A) increase the flow of illegal Mexican immigrants to the United States. B) cause the European Union and Japan to raise trade barriers against

  • Q : Price floors with government purchases

    Suppose the U.S. wheat market is primarily in a stable equilibrium upon S0D0. Assume now that the government institutes a legal price floor at P3 per bushel of wheat. When the government will buy and store any resulting surplus