--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Marginal utility of Goods and Bads When

    When Joe Glutton’s final bite of a burger yielded no profit in total utility, then Joe: (i) Don’t like hamburgers. (ii) Has reached the minimum utility from eating the burgers. (iii) Has reached the point where marginal utility of hamburgers is 0 (zero). (

  • Q : Cut in prices of Complementary Goods

    The demand for gasoline would rise rapidly after a fifty percent: (i) Drop in the price of crude oil. (ii) Discovery of main latest oil supplies. (iii) Cut in public transportation fares. (iv) Cut in latest car prices.

    Q : Quality of government in income

    Concern regarding the quality of government is income elastic for mainly people that imply that higher incomes and prosperity tend to: (w) increase people’s participation in political processes. (x) reduce efforts to solve political problems. (y

  • Q : Profit-maximizing pure competitor in

    For a profit-maximizing pure competitor in the short-run equilibrium: (w) P = MC = MR. (x) MC = minimum AC. (y) MR > P. (z) only normal profits will be earned. Hey friends please give your opini

  • Q : Total costs by charges

    When LoCalLoCarbo produces the profit-maximizing quantity and charges the profit-maximizing price, in that case its total costs equal the area of the rectangle as: (i) 0P3cq2. (ii) bdP4P1. (iii) 0P4

  • Q : Relative Income Measurement by

    The Department of the Census explains low relative income as experienced while families: (w) lack sufficient income to buy the fundamental food clothing and shelter required for survival. (x) would like to improve the

  • Q : Another name of micro economics What is

    What is another name of micro economics? Answer: Price theory

  • Q : Exceeds marginal revenue curve by

    That this firm can’t successfully price discriminate is most strongly indicated through the fact that: (1) the linear demand curve exceeds the marginal revenue curve for all outputs shown. (2) MR = MC maximizes profit. (3) total revenue total co

  • Q : Long-run equilibrium output of

    This monopolistic competitor produces Q0 units and is demonstrated: (w) earning total profit equal to 0PbQ. (x) as a price taker. (y) setting price equal to marginal revenue. (z) in long-run equilibrium.

  • Q : Characteristic of a purely competitive

    A purely competitive firm: (w) faces a perfectly inelastic demand curve. (x) sets its own price. (y) is a price taker. (z) sells a differentiated product. Can someone explain/help me with best solution about proble