--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Shifts in the Demand Curve What are the

    What are the conditions that shifts the Demand Curve?

  • Q : Practicing for predatory pricing A firm

    A firm which practices predatory pricing as: (w) tends to incur short-run losses greater than its rival. (x) lowers its price to drive out its rival and then keeps the price low to discourage extra entry. (y) will sell similar amount of output as when

  • Q : Effect of purchasing goods to

    Most of the people can’t modify relative market prices however have a little control over the relative subjective prices of the goods they consume. They are most probable to make market prices and subjective prices compatible when they: (i) Raise purchases of go

  • Q : Reduce average total costs by

    Individual pure competitive firms as well as firms along with market power may each be capable to: (i) reduce average total costs by increasing the size of its operations or economies of scale else decreasing the size of its operations [as diseconomie

  • Q : Development and Distribution of Income

    Compared to other relatively prosperous developed nations, the United States: (w) has greater inequality in the distribution of its wealth and national income. (x) enjoys the lowest cost medical care and the best average public health. (y) has been the most aggressive

  • Q : Problem regarding Craft Unions Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The craft unions historically tried to systematize all the workers in: (1) A specific company, in spite of size. (2) The United States. (3) The specific broad industry. (4) Relatively highly s

  • Q : Linear demand curves and elasticity

    When price falls and quantity rises along a negatively-sloped linear demand curve: (1) total revenues fall till elasticity equals zero, then this rises. (2) demand is decreasingly price elastic. (3) there is a contrad

  • Q : Increase total revenue and exceeds

    When a firm along with market power raises the price of a good a little, total revenue as: (w) falls in the inelastic range of the demand curve. (x) rises over the elastic range of the demand curve. (y) stays close to zero in the unit

  • Q : Yellow dog contracts-collective

    The summation of monopolistic exploitation across all the workers tends to raise however a firm as well operates at a more communally and economically proficient level of output and employment whenever the firm is capable to engage in: (i) Black-listing in its dealing

  • Q : Problem on implicit belief in a moral

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. Assume that when faced with the Faustian option [that is, a deal with the devil] of torturing an naive child in the interest of securing world peace and an end to global hunger,