--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Relationship between Total Revenue and

    What is the relationship among Total Revenue (TR) and Marginal Revenue (MR)? Answer: A) If MR is positive, TR rises although at

  • Q : Comparative advantage in making food

    When Wilma can make a brontosaurus burger in 10 min and a cactus cooler in 5, whereas Betty can make the burger in 8 min and the cactus cooler in 3. Then find out the right option from the above: (1) Betty consists of a comparative disadvantage in the coolers and a co

  • Q : Theory of production and cost in long

    In the theory of cost and production, the long run is the period: (i) Of 1-year or longer. (ii) Of 5-years or longer. (iii) In which we all are dead. (iv) Permitting the capacity to wholly adjust. Can someone pleas

  • Q : Wage Discrimination and Social Welfare

    The sum up of monopsonistic exploitation by the firm raises however the firm as well operates at a more socially and economically proficient level of output and employment whenever the firm is capable to engage in: (i) Blacklisting in its hiring of the labor. (ii) Yel

  • Q : Rate of return by perpetuity price A

    A perpetuity currently priced at $5000 which will pay $200 annually all times generates a rate of return of: (w) 4%. (x) 4.8%. (y) 5%. (z) 3.5%. Hey friends please give your opinion for the problem

  • Q : Problem on Categories of Goods I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Problem on Categories of Goods. Please help me in the following question. The produced tangible good is termed as a: (i) Consumable. (ii) Service. (iii) Commodity. (iv) Utility. Sel

  • Q : Problem regarding Hicks Model of

    The time period of union strikes and the equilibrium wage rate at conclusion of the strike are focus at: (i) Dept. of Labor’s Collective Bargaining Arbitration Division. (ii) Collective bargaining model made by Sir John Hicks. (iii) Bilateral monopoly model.(iv)

  • Q : Illustrates the Loren curve by total

    When 40 percent of total personal income was received by 20 % of the highest income families, in that case the: (w) income distribution would be perfectly equal. (x) income pattern would be foreign to the U.S. (y) Lorenz curve would be the 45 degree r

  • Q : Value of Marginal Product Can someone

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The value of marginal product of the variable resource is its marginal product multiplied by: (1) The marginal revenue from sale of its addition to the output. (2) The price of

  • Q : Laws and regulations for competitive

    Government regulation intends at certain potentially competitive prices or transactions frequently induce private adjustments through firms and individual therefore unexpected results comprise: (w) increased rates of growth of tax revenues. (x) rapid