--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Perfect competition and monopoly I have

    I have difficulty in this question. Provide me correct solution of this economy question. Compare & contrast the supposition of monopolistic competition along with perfect competition & monopoly.

  • Q : Type of model used by economists Which

    Which type of model is used by the economists to analyze competitive market?

  • Q : Supply of labor in perfectly

    Supply of labor in perfectly competitive market

  • Q : Psychic Income problem Assume that a

    Assume that a few years after graduating, life as an investment banker became very frustrating that you switched careers to work as the professional cat walker, and were happier even although your annual income fell much than 80 percent. Your decreased money income is

  • Q : Predation by charging a low price

    Predation by charging a low price is often a successful entry deterrent for all of the given reasons except the concept that low prices: (w) signal low profit. (x) make entry complicated while entry is costly. (y) may signal to a pote

  • Q : Examples of pairs of substitutes goods

    Illustrations of pairs of goods which are close substitutes comprise: (i) Bow ties and tuxedoes. (ii) Glasses and contact lenses. (iii) Power boats and water skis. (iv) Baby food and diapers. (v) Camping trailers and large SUVs.

    Q : Characterization of markets Each and

    Each and every market is characterized by: (i) Widespread advertising, marketing, and sales promotions. (ii) Demands from each and every individual for all products. (iii) Potential buyers ready to pay and potential sellers ready to supply. (iv) Government licenses pr

  • Q : Graphical shift of supply curve When

    When market supply and demand curves for Velcro shoelaces were projected into a screen at the front of this room, a raise in the supply of Velcro shoelaces would be illustrated graphically by a shift of supply curve: (1) Towards the center of Earth. (2) To the left. (

  • Q : Total economic of profit or loss at

    When the wholesale price P = $10 per bushel of peaches, it purely competitive peach orchard maximizes profit through producing ___ bushel of peaches at a total economic as profit or loss of $___. (i) zero; loss; -$4,000. (ii) 2000; lo

  • Q : Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility

    The law of diminishing marginal utility might be evidenced by the person: (i) Smoking more however enjoying it less. (ii) Purchasing a new car subsequent to getting an increase. (iii) Distributing excess food to starving children. (iv) Who studies muc