--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Efficiency of monopolistic competition

    Defenders of the efficiency of monopolistic competition are mainly persuasive when they insist which: (w) consumers benefit greatly from product differentiation. (x) any inefficiency is far less harmful than that of pure monopoly. (y) pure competition

  • Q : Oligopoly and Economic Welfare Assume

    Assume that P = MSB and the firms in an oligopoly are in equilibrium where P>MC. This follows that: (1) P=MSC. (2) MSB>MSC. (3) MSB<MSC. (4) oligopolists will gain zero economic profit. (5) the minimum point on the LRATC curve will achieved i

  • Q : Effect of minimum wage laws in

    The Minimum wage laws might efficiently raise employment: (i) When the set wage value surpasses labor market equilibrium. (ii) In industries of profoundly exercised monopsony power. (iii) In no condition; higher minimum wage floods the labor supply and lower minimum w

  • Q : Rate of Return onto Investment When

    When Henrietta Homeowner invests $100 to replace her old mechanical thermostat along with a new computerized “smart” thermostat, in that case her gas and electric bills will be decreased by $100 yearly all times. The rate of return onto this invest

  • Q : Rent controls fix rent in equilibrium

    Rent controls which fix rents below equilibrium will NOT: (w) maintain monetary rents down. (x) create shortages of rental housing. (y) stimulate non-market allocations of rental housing. (z) maintain the opportunity costs of housing down.

  • Q : Certainty and severity of punishment in

    Rising the certainty and severity of punishment decreases cheating on an examination. This statement signifies: (i) Unrealistic expectations regarding student honesty. (ii) Purely normative visions of behavior. (iii) Misplaced cynicism since this issu

  • Q : Risk and Uncertainty In word of Frank

    In word of Frank Knight, risk: (w) exists when the probability of any specified event can be predicted. (x) appeals to the gambler personalities of innovators who next in social progress. (y) is irrelevant to good calculates of the economic costs of p

  • Q : Problem on equal marginal utilities per

    Substitution takes place when prices change and hence demand curves are negatively-sloped since of the behavior of consumers which most directly underpins the law of: (1) Equivalent marginal utilities per dollar. (2) Diminishing net utility. (3) The income effect. (4)

  • Q : Question on lowering the supply The

    The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of whe

  • Q : Wage Discrimination problem Both level

    Both level of the employment by a firm and the average rate of monopsonistic exploitation of labor are raised when a firm is capable to: (1) Outsource by hiring low productive workers in the foreign countries. (2) Replace the workers with automation by an industrial r