--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Effects of Moral Hazard When you pay a

    When you pay a straight A student in advance to write your term-paper and that person spends money on the party and then decides not to do a fine job and hence you wind-up with an F for submitting sloppily written gibberish, you have just suffered since of: (i) Advers

  • Q : Equilibrium price in short run The

    The equilibrium prices for cranberries within the short run of: (w) P1. (x) P2. (y) P3. (z) P4.

    Q : Average variable costs per generic of

    Average variable costs per generic 2×4 of this pure competitor’s equal roughly: (w) $0.20 (20¢ per 2×4). (x) $1.00 per 2×4. (y) $1.70 per 2×4. (z) $2.10 per 2×4.

    Q : Separable utility function One of my

    One of my friends can't find the answer of this question. Give answer of following economic based question. Tell me about strongly separable utility function?

  • Q : Malthusian theory on population What do

    What do you mean by the Malthusian theory on population?

  • Q : Pure competition and monopolistic

    Monopolistically competitive and purely competitive industries tend to be described by: (i) important economies of scale in production. (ii) many potential buyers and sellers. (iii) horizontal demand curves facing each firm. (iv) conscious interdepend

  • Q : Demands possibly the least income

    Demands are possibly the least income elastic for very poor Americans for: (i) automobile services. (ii) Big Macs. (iii) lard. (iv) housing. (v) health care. Can anybody suggest me the proper expla

  • Q : Gini Coefficient in Loren Curve A Gini

    A Gini coefficient for this demonstrated figure can be computed as: (w) area A minus area B. (x) area A × area B.  (y) area C minus [area A + area B]. (z) [area A] / [area A + area B].

    Q : Average standard of living in Africa

    Elucidate briefly the average standard of living in Africa?

  • Q : Sunk cost Give the answer of following

    Give the answer of following question. Which of the following sayings associate most closely to the idea of sunk costs? 1) Don't cry over spilt milk. 2) A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. 3) He who hesitates is lost. 4) Show me the money.