--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Goals of the Firm Most of the

    Most of the economists believe firms tend to proficiently maximize the profits since of: (i) Stockholder pressure. (ii) Competition for the management positions. (iii) Principal-agent conditions. (iv) The chance of corporate take-over.

    Q : Income Elasticities of Demand Question:

    Question: (a)  Suppose the income elasticity of demand for pre-recorded music compact disks is +4 and the income elasticity of demand for a cabinet maker's work is +0.4.  Compare the impact on pre-recorde

  • Q : Annual total costs of production When

    When Prohibition Corporation maximizes profit into its production of St. Valentine’s Day software, there annual total costs of it will be around: (1) $180 million. (2) $140 million. (3) $100 million. (4) $80 million. (5) $40 mil

  • Q : Lower price results in higher product

    When lower price outcomes in higher bread sales, this points out an: (i) Raise in the quantity of bread demanded. (ii) Raise in the quantity of bread supplied. (iii) Exception to the law of demand. (iv) Raised taste for bread. Can

  • Q : Short-run equilibrium and long run

    When a purely competitive industry is within equilibrium as well as all firms in the industry are operating along with economies of scale, in that case the industry is in: (w) long-run and short-run equilibrium. (x) short-run equilibrium and long run

  • Q : Income-Satisfaction boundaries Demand

    The maximum amounts of a good that people are willing and capable to buy at different market prices during a specific period are depicted by: (1) Horizontal summations. (2) Income or satisfaction boundaries. (3) Demand curves. (4) Consumption possibilities frontiers.<

  • Q : Labor Contracts-Featherbedding The

    The Restrictive work rules which need firms to employ more workers than essential are termed as: (i) Feather-bedding. (ii) Seniority contracts. (iii) Blacklisting regulations. (iv) Agency shop provisions. (v) Yellow dog contracts.

  • Q : Problem on utility-maximizing bundle

    Jane consumes only apples and chocolate.  She is always willing to trade 1piece of chocolate for exactly 3 apples. Her income is $200.  She can buy apples for $1 each and chocolate for $2 per piece.a. To Jane, apples and chocolate are (circle 1):

  • Q : Normal accounting profit with zero

    Accounting profits are normal along with zero economic profits while there is: (1) monopoly power which has not yet been capitalized. (2) unpredicted short run surges within demand for a good. (3) uncertainty therefore unpredictable e

  • Q : Economic of short-run shuts down firm

    When a firm shuts down within the short run, in that case it’s economic: (w) profit is zero. (x) resources have zero opportunity cost. (y) loss equals its fixed cost. (z) value to shareholders rises. Please guys help to solve