--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Price of related good in elasticity of

    How the demand for one good alters while the price of an associated good is changed is measured through the: (w) relative ratios of the slopes of the respective demands and supplies. (x) price cross elasticity of demand. (y) ratios of the respective p

  • Q : Imposing the price floors A surplus of

    A surplus of papayas would involve when: (1) government set a price ceiling of P1. (2) growers expected prices to soar. (3) hurricanes vanished all Central American papaya plantations. (4) government imposed a price floor of P2. (5) seller's supp

  • Q : Feature of constant elasticity demand

    A constant elasticity demand curve as: (w) cannot be negatively sloped. (x) must be a straight line. (y) cannot be a negatively sloped straight line. (z) has a positive slope. I need a good answer on the topic of <

  • Q : Predation by charging a low price

    Predation by charging a low price is often a successful entry deterrent for all of the given reasons except the concept that low prices: (w) signal low profit. (x) make entry complicated while entry is costly. (y) may signal to a pote

  • Q : Example to illustrate non-tariff trade

    Imports and American cars are close nevertheless not ideal substitutes. When the U.S. government tried to boost American car sales through setting a price ceiling of P1 upon imported cars in that case: (w) the quantity of cars imported will

  • Q : Unionized construction workers The

    The passage of a considerably higher legal minimum wage would be most probable to advantage: (1) Philosophy majors. (2) American high-school drop-outs in their teens. (3) Foreign workers whose manufacture is exported to the United States. (4) Unionized construction wo

  • Q : Problem on marginal returns Select the

    Select the right ans wer of the question. Refer to the following data. Diminishing marginal returns become evident with the addition of the: A) sixth worker B) fourth worker. C) third worker. D) second worker.

    Q : Zero elasticity for demand curves When

    When any truly existed, then perfectly inelastic demand curves would include: (i) price elasticities of infinity and be horizontal. (ii) zero elasticity and be horizontal. (iii) a slope of one. (iv) price elasticities of infinity and would be vertical

  • Q : Income Distribution in Lorenz Curve

    When line 0D0' represents the 1929s U.S. income distribution and line 0B0'shows the 1975 income distribution, in that case the 2005 year’s income distribution would be signified by: (i) line 0A0'. (ii) line 0B0'. (iii) line 0C0'. (iv) line 0D0'.

  • Q : Federal agricultural subsidies Federal

    Federal agricultural subsidies tend to be rapidly: (w) spent because most farmers lack sufficient budgeting skills. (x) capitalized in higher prices for farm land. (y) slashed while pressure mounts to cut the federal deficit. (z) absorbed from rising