--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Preference current consumption over

    When the preference for current consumption over future consumption weakens, in that case the: (w) interest rate rises. (x) interest rate falls. (y) present value of future income falls. (z) equilibrium level of investment falls.

  • Q : Marginal utility of Goods and Bads When

    When Joe Glutton’s final bite of a burger yielded no profit in total utility, then Joe: (i) Don’t like hamburgers. (ii) Has reached the minimum utility from eating the burgers. (iii) Has reached the point where marginal utility of hamburgers is 0 (zero). (

  • Q : Words of Economic Rent about David

    David Ricardo: (w) was the originator of the theory of pure economic rent onto land. (x) believed that land rent was earned since land would not be available at a zero price. (y) observed that marginal land which is just barely helpful commands positi

  • Q : Expectations of short run effect Most

    Most of the consumers and investors have learned via experience that ‘new’ high-tech equipment becomes outdated quickly, and that prices drop by roughly half annually. They adjust by delaying purchases, waiting for estimated higher quality and lower prices

  • Q : Market Demand versus Individual Demand

    What is the difference between Market Demand and Individual Demand?

  • Q : Human Capital-Specific Training Can

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The costs of investing human capital are most probable to be borne by the employer if the human capital is as: (1) General. (2) Marginal. (3) Generic. (4) Precise. (5) Specific.

  • Q : Competition and exploitation of the

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The capability to exploit the labor is minimal if a firm consists of: (1) Monopoly power. (2) Government contracts to accomplish. (3) Monopsony power. (4) Labor union contracts that terminate

  • Q : Long-run supply in constant cost

    Within a constant-cost industry: (w) short-run supply is totally elastic. (x) long-run supply is completely elastic. (y) short-run supply is fully inelastic. (z) long-run supply is wholly inelastic. I need a good a

  • Q : Illustration of kinked demand curve

    Sarah, Courtney, Carly and Lisa sell shell necklaces. As Lisa lowers her price, Carly, Sarah as well as Courtney lower their price. If Lisa raises her price, Carly, Courtney and Sarah remain their price similar. This interaction is an

  • Q : Total revenue when output exceeds When

    When output is expanded, then a firm's total revenues: (1) are maximized where marginal revenue is zero. (2) decline whenever average revenue falls. (3) rise more quickly the faster marginal returns diminish. (4) are maximized where profit is maximize