--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Law of Equal Marginal Advantage I have

    I have a problem in economics on Law of Equal Marginal Advantage. Please help me in the following question. The very last cents spent on each and every good should give up equivalent subjective profits according to the principle of: (i) Subjective pre

  • Q : Problem on Jurisdictional Strikes The

    The Taft-Hartley Act prohibited strikes against the firm over the issue of which of two or more competing unions would symbolize the firm’s employees. These strikes are termed as: (i) Jurisdictional strikes. (ii) Strategic representation strikes

  • Q : Important of economies of scale to

    Karl Marx's prediction which competition ultimately leads to monopoly is most likely to be valid while: (w) diseconomies of scale discourage competition. (x) there are always constant returns to scale. (y) economies of scale are important relative to

  • Q : Elasticity of demand changes with price

    Calculating the price elasticity of demand for DVD games for a price variation from $50 to zero in such demand curve is: (w) 0. (x) infinity. (y) mostly meaningless since elasticity changes continuously over such range. (z) 1.5.

    Q : Expectations about future housing prices

    The market demand curve for latest houses would shift in response to a modification in: (i) Housing prices. (ii) The costs of lumber. (iii) Construction technology. (iv) Expectations regarding future housing prices.

    Q : Economic efficiency for pure competition

    Pure competition yields economic efficiency through: (w) punishing profit maximizing behavior. (x) forcing firms to adopt the least costly technologies available. (y) generating high profits as incentives. (z) rewarding entrepreneurs

  • Q : Problem on opportunity cost of consumer

    Refer to the given table. If the economy is producing at production alternative C, the opportunity cost of the tenth unit of consumer goods will be:

  • Q : Statement of Demand Prices I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Statement of Demand Prices. Please help me in the following question. Demand prices are stated as the relative: (1) Prices sellers charge for goods whether we purchase or not. (2) Values that individual subjectively put on having a bit

  • Q : Imposing the price floors A surplus of

    A surplus of papayas would involve when: (1) government set a price ceiling of P1. (2) growers expected prices to soar. (3) hurricanes vanished all Central American papaya plantations. (4) government imposed a price floor of P2. (5) seller's supp

  • Q : Problem on coefficient of income

    Refer to the following diagrams give the answer of following question. In which case would the coefficient of income elasticity be positive? 1) A 2) B  3) C  4) D    

    Discover Q & A

    Leading Solution Library
    Avail More Than 1423507 Solved problems, classrooms assignments, textbook's solutions, for quick Downloads
    No hassle, Instant Access
    Start Discovering

    18,76,764

    1925065
    Asked

    3,689

    Active Tutors

    1423507

    Questions
    Answered

    Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!

    Submit Assignment

    ©TutorsGlobe All rights reserved 2022-2023.