--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Comparative advantage of growing fruits

    The Oranges are grown-up in Florida and potatoes are grown up in Maine mainly as: (i) There is no orange-grower’s lobby in the Maine to save from harm and Maine oranges from the unfair competition. (ii) Potatoes are not eaten in the Florida. (iii) Maine consists

  • Q : Resolving principal-agent problems I

    I have a problem in economics on Resolving principal-agent problems. Please help me in the following question. Attempts to resolve the principal-agent problems among stockholders and top corporate managers (that is, CEOs) comprise: (i) Profit-sharing systems for the t

  • Q : Immunity of Corporate giants in market

    Can someone help me in finding out the most precise answer from the given options. The Corporate giants are not immune to the market pressures since: (i) They experience the diseconomies of scale. (ii) Advertising decreases the barriers to entry. (iii) Profits give an

  • Q : Moral Hazard-Unemployment compensation

    Jared does not care regarding his job as he is eligible for the unemployment compensation; therefore he frequently goofs off at work and exhibits up late. This is the trouble of: (i) Adverse selection. (ii) Efficiency salaries. (iii) Moral hazard. (iv) Symmetric infor

  • Q : Freedom of entry and exit Typical firms

    Typical firms in an industry can’t expect to produce economic profit in the long run when the industry has: (1) decreasing costs of production as the number of firms in the industry changes. (2) market demand exceeding the minimum average variab

  • Q : Capital to Labor Ratio When the

    When the capital-to-labor (K/L) ratio raises: (1) capital becomes more productive. (2) the interest payments to capital will raise. (3) the wages to labor will probably reduce. (4) labor productivity should rise. (5) the price of capital increases.

  • Q : Rates of Return below Investment When,

    When, relative to most another forms of business, farm incomes are tiny in comparison to farmers’ net wealth, in that case: (w) rates of return in agriculture are below those from other investments. (x) agriculture generates pos

  • Q : Problem on imperfect competition As MRP

    As MRP < VMP in imperfect competition if firms have market power as sellers: (1) MPPL = VMP. (2) The price of output surpasses MFC. (3) Monopolistic exploitation becomes essential to attain gain. (4) Imperfect competition can’t reach the equi

  • Q : Social welfare function what do you

    what do you mean by a social welfare function? if you assume that such a function exists, what properties of social optima would be considered by you? discuss such properties.

  • Q : Untrue of an oligopoly This is untrue

    This is untrue of an oligopoly which: (i) only a few firms dominate a market. (ii) entry barriers may be important. (iii) economic profit are possible in the long run. (iv) no close substitutes exist for the product of any firm. (v) market power is sh