--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Economic Efficiency in Financial

    Financial institutions make possible economic efficiency primarily since: (w) laissez faire markets handle asymmetric information poorly. (x) corporate ownership must be stabilized. (y) they channel funds from agents along with surplu

  • Q : Determine price elasticity of demand

    Moving from point b to point c beside demand curve D, in that case the price elasticity of demand for video games upon DVDs equivalent: (1) 0.8. (2) one. (3) 1.10. (4) 1.25. (5) 2.50

    Q : Labor Unions Strikes-Lockouts Can

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. Whenever unions and managements have failed to arrive at a collective bargaining agreement and management closes the production facilities to exert pressure on the union negotia

  • Q : Laws and Regulations-Seller of the good

    The Caveat venditor is an ancient legal doctrine which, when the products are defective or fraudulently symbolized, imposes legal liabilities on: (1) Seller of the good. (2) Government, for failing to save consumers. (3) Resource owner. (4) Buyer, for failing to use d

  • Q : Income effect of a small change in wage

    The income effect of a small change within wage rate is approximately identical to the substitution consequence for Glynn at: (i) point a. (ii) point b. (ii) point c. (iv) point d. (v) point e.

    Q : Experiencing the economies of Scale Let

    Let assume that an auto manufacturer which can produce 10 cars at an average cost of $8000 per car. When the manufacturer enlarges output to 100 cars, then the average cost of production falls to $5000 per car. This firm is experiencing the: (1) Raised demand. (2) Eco

  • Q : Price and output combination by demand

    Not like a purely competitive firm, here a profit-maximizing monopolist can: (w) charge any price it finds advantageous and be assured of selling all this produces. (x) select a price and output combination by a downward-sloping demand curve. (y) spen

  • Q : Powerful negative externalities in

    Potentially powerful negative externalities are mainly overwhelmingly a decisive argument against permitting laissez faire policies and supplies to govern the production and market demands and distribution of: (1) avian flu antivirus shots. (2) public

  • Q : Perfectly Competitive market condition

    In which market condition, the effect of an individual seller is (0) zero? Answer: In Perfectly Competitive market condition.

  • Q : Markets which are relevant for human

    All markets which are really relevant for human beings are exemplified by: (1) Extensive advertising, sales promotions and marketing. (2) Demands from each and every individual for all products. (3) Potential buyers willing to reimburse and potential