--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Break even and zero economic profit at

    Within the long run, after HoloIMAGine’s holographic technology patents lapsed moreover entry and exit became probable in this market, therefore HoloIMAGine would be expected to: (w) carry on to reap economic profits. (x) break even and experien

  • Q : Equilibrium quantity and price

    Elucidate the consequence of an increase in demand of a commodity on its equilibrium quantity and price? Answer: Increase in demand causes a rightward shift in the

  • Q : Non-discriminating firm with monopsony

    I have a problem in economics on Resources and Products Flow Model. Please help me in the following question. The non-discriminating firm with the monopsony power in labor market confronts a: (1) Wage rate which consistently surpasses the marginal rev

  • Q : Economies of scale in natural monopoly

    Economies of scale which are substantial relative to market demand result within the market evolving to a: (w) contestable market. (x) collusive oligopoly. (y) natural monopoly. (z) "high tech" industry.

    Q : Monopolists maximize profits Maximizing

    Maximizing the net social benefits from a specified stock of resources does NOT need that: (i) price equals marginal cost for all goods. (ii) marginal social benefit equals marginal social cost [MSB = MSC]. (iii) no one can be made better off unless s

  • Q : Business strategies in market Assume

    Assume that technological advances considerably lower costs for Honda. Hence which of the given statements is true: (w) when Honda lowers prices, rivals will rightfully accuse the firm of predatory pricing (x) when Honda raises prices, rivals will rightfully accuse th

  • Q : Problem on monetary prices In adding up

    In adding up to monetary prices, the costs of buying and selling comprise: (1) Wage payments. (2) Monopoly gains. (3) Social advantages. (4) Transaction costs. (5) Pecuniary externalities. Please someone suggest me

  • Q : Elastic industry What industry is

    What industry is perfectly elastic that is not agriculture?

  • Q : Economic profit generating purely

    In this illustrated figure in below the only purely competitive firm currently generating economic profit is in: (w) Firm A. (x) Firm B. (y) Firm C. (z) Firm D.

    Q : Problem regarding law of Diminishing

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. According to the law of diminishing marginal utility, the longer that Chris and Lee kiss: (i) The less invested each will be in enduring this relationship. (ii) The closer they are to arriving