--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Increase profits of quantity selling by

    When a monopolist was selling a quantity which marginal revenue [MR] is greater than marginal costs [marginal costs [MC] in that case this could increase profits by: (w) raising price. (x) increasing output. (y) raisi

  • Q : Average variable costs of pure

    Average variable costs per generic brick of this pure competitor equal approximately: (i) $.02 (2 cents per brick). (ii) $.04 (4 cents per brick). (iii) $.07 (7 cents per brick). (iv) $.09 (9 cents per brick).

  • Q : Price elasticity of supply when demand

    When increased demand causes the price of main beluga caviar to climb from $2750 to $3250 per pound and consequently world production rises from 24 to 40 tons yearly, its caviar has a price elasticity of supply approx

  • Q : LEAST affected market interest rate

    Market interest rates are LEAST affected through: (w) people’s willingness to defer consumption when they are rewarded for doing so. (x) people’s desires for liquidity. (y) the marginal productivity of new capital relative to its price. (z

  • Q : Constant shortages of a good problem

    Constant shortages of a good are nearly always attributable to: (1) legal ceiling prices which are set beneath equilibrium. (2) Recessions which yield maximum unemployment rates. (3) Price gouging by firms through monopoly power. (4) Legal price floor

  • Q : Break-even levels of output for a firm

    Break-even levels of output for a firm happen where is: (w) total revenue equals total economic cost. (x) accounting profits are zero. (y) total variable cost equals total fixed costs. (z) competitive firms will shut down within the short run.

  • Q : Short-run equilibrium of

    A purely-competitive, short-run equilibrium does NOT need which each firm: (w) produces where MC = MR = P > min(AVC). (x) experiences no excess demand or excess supply. (y) earns only zero economic profit. (z) adjust output hence m

  • Q : Price takers in product market I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Price takers in product market. Please help me in the following question. Relative to firms which are price takers in product market, and then firms with market power tend to. (1) Hire some workers (2) Pay a lower wage

  • Q : Labor Unions and Antitrust The legality

    The legality of trade unions as the labor monopolies and illegality of the monopolies in product markets is most rationally described by the: (i) Trade union’s interest in the social welfare and firm’s interest only in gains. (ii) Number of people who adva

  • Q : Poverty by throughout lives Which of

    Which of the given statements is not correct? (w) Wealth is less equally distributed than income. (x) U.S. tax and transfer programs tend to make income more evenly distributed. (y) Some disincentives for work plague even the most efficient of proposed welfare reforms