--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Relative utility-Consumer Equilibrium

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The relative utility from the last dollar used up on food is the ratio: (i) Marginal utility of food or production cost of food. (ii) The Price of food or net grocery bill. (iii

  • Q : Problem on competitive equilibrium

    The economy consists of an equal number of smokers (S-types) and asthma sufferers (A-types). Good 1 is cigarettes, good 2 is “other stuff.” S-types have the utility function: xS1 + xS

  • Q : Lowest possible price in transaction

    Is the assertion such that "Everyone all the time buys everything at the lowest possible price" right? Have you paid more than you had to for any good yet, after permitting for all transaction costs?

  • Q : Probable quantity of the good by price

    Price discrimination which successfully increases profit does NOT needs the firm to be capable to: (1) separate the market within different groups along with different demand elasticities. (2) maintain entry barriers which defend a firm’s market

  • Q : Functions of Profits and Losses The

    The functions of profits into a market economy do NOT comprise: (1) stimulation for firms to be innovative and efficient. (2) compensating savers for delays of consumption. (3) signaling changing business conditions. (4) inducing mimi

  • Q : Levels of recent interest rate When

    When households become ever more willing to sacrifice future consumption therefore that they can enjoy greater levels of recent consumption, in that case the: (w) interest rate rises. (x) interest rate falls. (y) present value of future income rises. (z) equilibrium r

  • Q : Marginal Utility-Consuming extra unit

    The satisfaction gained from consuming an additional unit of the good is: (1) Always diminishing. (2) Its marginal utility. (3) Objectively measurable. (4) Equivalent to one util. Choose the right answer from the above options.

  • Q : International market for auto industry

    The international market for the auto industry in the 21st century is probably best described as a blend of: (1) pure and monopolistic competition. (2) monopolistic competition and oligopoly. (3) oligopoly and cartel. (4) technological obso

  • Q : Profit for purely competitive firms in

    Profit for purely competitive firms tends in the direction of zero in the long run since: (w) managers resist charging more than a fair price. (x) firms collude to charge prices which barely cover average costs. (y) profit attracts entry, whereas loss

  • Q : Short-run supply curve of the firm For

    For a competitive firm the short-run supply curve is the: (w) marginal cost curve which is above the average total cost curve. (x) marginal cost curve which is above the average variable cost curve. (y) upward sloping part of the marginal cost curve.