--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Decrease the burden of sales tax on low

    To decrease the burden of a sales tax upon low income households, in that case: (i) goods along with high income elasticities should be taxed. (ii) goods along with low income elasticities should be taxed. (iii) goods along with high income elasticities must be exempt

  • Q : Common type of firm among in monopolist

    The most common kind of competition in between firms within monopolistic competition is: (i) price competition. (ii) product differentiation. (iii) collusion. (iv) predatory pricing. (v) cutthroat competition. Hell

  • Q : Occurrence of economic profits in a

    Entry within a competitive industry will continue till: (w) accounting losses are driven to zero. (x) economic profits equal accounting losses. (y) bookkeeping profit approaches zero. (z) economic profits are driven to zero. Can an

  • Q : Dependency of prices due to transaction

    Economists frequently refer to “the price” as while each good has only one price. Conversely, prices frequently vary greatly, depending upon where you are, due to: (w) advertising. (x) transaction costs. (y) marketing overhead. (z) poor co

  • Q : Separation of the Economic Functions

    Separation of ownership or stockholders by control (management) into modern giant corporations tends to divide the economic functions of: (w) capitalists. (x) union leaders. (y) entrepreneurship. (z) bureaucrats. I

  • Q : Price elasticity of demand When a

    When a monopolist’s marginal costs of production are positive and the demand curve, this faces is a negatively sloped straight line, as of the subsequent possibilities the absolute value of the price elasticity of demand at a pr

  • Q : Definition if pure monopsonist Can

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The pure monopsonist: (1) Is the sole buyer of a specific good or resource in the given market. (2) Can adjust just quantity and therefore is a price-taker in input market. (3)

  • Q : When did marginal utility diminished

    The marginal utility most obviously diminished whenever: (1) Eric sang six songs rather than only one on karaoke night at local club. (2) Molly’s piano lessons absorbed 20 hrs last week she could have used up for studying. (3) Karen built 12 boxes however only 9

  • Q : Split roughly burden of tax The burden

    The burden of an excise (i.e., per unit) tax would be divide roughly fifty by fifty on consumers and suppliers of the taxed good within: (w) Panel A. (x) Panel B. (y) Panel C. (z) Panel D.

  • Q : Competitive theory of prices Normal 0

    Normal 0 false false