--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Responding higher prices for heating

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Canadians would ultimately be likely to respond to higher prices for heating oil and natural gas through (i) Turning up their electric blankets and insulating their houses more carefully. (ii)

  • Q : Capital Goods In the above diagram, the

    In the above diagram, the elimination of discrimination is best represented by

  • Q : Labor Unions Strikes-Picket Lines I

    I have a problem in economics on Labor Unions Strikes-Picket Lines. Please help me in the following question. The striking workers who parade in front of the firm’s facilities carrying signs influence potential customers to boycott the firm&rsqu

  • Q : Good illustration of oligopoly The

    The tobacco industry within the United States is a good illustration of: (1) monopoly. (2) pure competition. (3) oligopoly. (4) corporate responsibility. (5) duopoly. I need a good answer on the topic of Economics

  • Q : Negative externalities in production

    Production which generates negative externalities: (w) would lead to underproduction and overpricing of goods. (x) increases producers’ costs of production. (y) increases consumers cost of purchasing the good. (z) would cause the market price of

  • Q : Price taking and price making The price

    The price makers within a purely competitive market are: (i) auctioneers (ii) buyers. (iii) sellers. (iv) both buyers and sellers. (v) nobody. I need a good answer on the topic of Economics problem

  • Q : Production by a strategy of extensive

    Fakery is a pretentious start-up firm within the monopolistically-competitive costume jewellery industry. But Fakery is most probable to try to gain control over pricing whereas limiting its production by a strategy of: (1) lobbying C

  • Q : Economic profits in the long run In

    In this illustrated figure in below the firm probably to have economic profits in the long run would be as: (w) Firm A. (x) Firm B. (y) Firm C. (z) Firm D.

    Q : Potential inefficiencies and inequities

    Whenever someone paying for the service can’t completely monitor the behavior or aims of the person offering the service, there are potential inequities and inefficiencies caused by the: (1) Moral hazard. (2) Adverse selection. (3) Utilitarianism. (4) Principal-

  • Q : Shift in demand in the price of auto

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The price per mile of mass transit has increases much rapid since the year 1980 than the price of private auto travel. This has contributed to the shift in demand