--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Differentiate perfect and monopoly

    Differentiate between perfect competition and monopoly competition?

  • Q : Economically inefficient level of output

    A monopolist produces an economically inefficient level of output since: (i) the difference among marginal revenue [MR] and marginal costs [marginal costs [MC] is maximized. (ii) P > average total costs [ATC], therefore MSB < MSC. (iii) all cons

  • Q : Ranges for the price elasticity of

    Economists can’t conceive of any resource or product for that the: (1) price elasticity of demand is zero and the demand curve is vertical. (2) price elasticity of supply is zero and the supply curve is vertical. (3) income elasticity of demand

  • Q : Greatest percentage rate of return The

    The greatest percentage rate of return would be generated through a financial investment which yielded: (w) annual income = $1,000; current price = $10,000. (x) monthly income = $100; current price = $24,000. (y) annual income = $1,200; current price = $10,800. (z) an

  • Q : Utilitarianism-Peoples happiness The

    The social goal of providing the biggest happiness to the most people is intent to practice the: (i) Precautionary discretion. (ii) Classical theory. (iii) Utilitarianism. (iv) Speculative balances. (v) Arbitrage. Can someone pleas

  • Q : Stages of production One of my friends

    One of my friends can't succeed to get the answer of this question. Give solution of this question. Described the stages of production and in which stage will production occur and why?

  • Q : Corporations stockholders not liable

    The corporation’s stockholders are not personally liable for the debts of firm since: (1) The Corporation is considered as a legal person, separate from its owner. (2) Usually there are too many stockholders to try to hold them all accountable. (3) In a corporat

  • Q : Unionized construction workers The

    The passage of a considerably higher legal minimum wage would be most probable to advantage: (1) Philosophy majors. (2) American high-school drop-outs in their teens. (3) Foreign workers whose manufacture is exported to the United States. (4) Unionized construction wo

  • Q : Expectations about future housing prices

    The market demand curve for latest houses would shift in response to a modification in: (i) Housing prices. (ii) The costs of lumber. (iii) Construction technology. (iv) Expectations regarding future housing prices.

    Q : Responsiveness of relative prices of

    Price cross elasticity of demand measures the responsiveness of: (1) quantity of a good sold to changes within its price. (2) quantity sold to changes within income. (3) price of one good to changes within the sales of other. (4) amount demanded of on