--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility

    The law of diminishing marginal utility might be evidenced by the person: (i) Smoking more however enjoying it less. (ii) Purchasing a new car subsequent to getting an increase. (iii) Distributing excess food to starving children. (iv) Who studies muc

  • Q : Contribution standard of income

    The contribution standard of income distribution: (w) sets the least efficient incentives for production. (x) is the distribution standard most compatible along with pure capitalism. (y) minimizes individual economic freedom. (z) is very complimented

  • Q : Demand of various vegetable why demand

    why demand change of onion in during one week due to change in it's price

  • Q : Demand Curve when price is cut I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Demand Curve when price is cut. Please help me in the following question. When the price of Snapple is cut, then: (1) The lower quantity of Snapple is demanded. (2) A bigger quantity of Snapple is demanded. (3) Demand for the Snapple r

  • Q : Controlling political processes to

    Can someone please help me in finding out the precise answer from the following question. John Kenneth Galbraith states that the big corporations: (i) Affects economic activity merely trivially. (ii) Have rigorously curbed the market competition. (iii) Employ resource

  • Q : Distribution of middle relative income

    From roughly 1975 year, the proportion of the U.S. population into the Bureau of the Census category that is “middle relative income” where the “middle class’ has: (1) grown since many former u

  • Q : Reduced effectiveness by pressure The

    The increased pace of globalization and the steady development of worldwide demands for petroleum-based products from 2002 have tended to decrease the: (w) derived demand for petroleum. (x) prices of gasoline and electricity. (y) pressures which had reduced OPEC's eff

  • Q : Average variable costs of pure

    Average variable costs per generic brick of this pure competitor equal approximately: (i) $.02 (2 cents per brick). (ii) $.04 (4 cents per brick). (iii) $.07 (7 cents per brick). (iv) $.09 (9 cents per brick).

  • Q : Contribution Standard for Income

    Staunch defenders of the contribution standard for income distribution would not argue that: (w) people must receive income at least commensurate along with survival needs. (x) equity requires people to be rewarded as per their marginal productivity.

  • Q : Charting of past prices Can the

    Can the charting of past prices be used to predict future prices?