--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Financial investments-traceable by most

    Most of the U.S. capital investment is traceable to the financial investments by households, that is one way that private individuals: (i) Turn into capitalists. (ii) Save. (iii) Evade taxes. (iv) Avoid the circular flow of resources and income.

    Q : Value of Marginal Product The social

    The social value of additional output from the additional units of labor is as: (1) Marginal revenue product [or MRP] of labor. (2) Wage rate or price of the labor. (3) Average revenue product [or ARP] of labor. (4) Value of marginal product [or VMP] of labor. (5) Mar

  • Q : Theory of microeconomic game in market

    The theory of market structure which several microeconomic game theorists were ready to toss within the dustbin of intellectual history into the 1970 year but that, in the early 1980s, turned into a foundation for the “new&rdquo

  • Q : Price elasticity of supply while the

    If John Whittler can sell totem poles for $1,800 at all, he markets 60 yearly, but while the price falls to $600 apiece; in that case he is willing to sell only 24 yearly. His price elasticity of supply is: (w) 0.43. (x) 0.86. (y) 1.62. (z) 2.48.

  • Q : Define budget line Budget line : Budget

    Budget line: Budget line exhibits all combinations of two goods which a consumer can purchase with his income at a specified price.

  • Q : Falling probably interest rate The

    The interest rate will probably fall when households decide to: (w) consume more currently, shrinking the loanable funds obtainable for business investments. (x) buy new homes in place of restoring their old ones. (y) increase the liquidity of their a

  • Q : Total costs by charges

    When LoCalLoCarbo produces the profit-maximizing quantity and charges the profit-maximizing price, in that case its total costs equal the area of the rectangle as: (i) 0P3cq2. (ii) bdP4P1. (iii) 0P4

  • Q : Equilibrium rate of monopsony

    I have a problem in economics on Equilibrium rate of monopsony exploitation. Please help me in the following question. Equilibrium rate of the monopsony exploitation by a firm is a difference between: (i) MRP and VMP. (ii) VMP and w. (iii) MFC and w.

  • Q : Effects of price controls for a price

    The consequences of price controls would be least discernible for a price ceiling set: (1) above the price equilibrium. (2) below the price equilibrium. (3) in a region of diminishing returns. (4) unfavorable to market companies. (5)

  • Q : Existence of purely competitive farm in

    This purely competitive rose farm would most likely exit in this industry with the long run when the wholesale price per dozen roses fell below: (i) $4.50 per dozen roses. (ii) $5.00 per dozen roses. (iii) $5.50 per dozen roses. (iv) $6.00 per dozen r