--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Occurrence of natural barriers to entry

    Natural barriers to entry within a market arise primarily by: (w) strategies by existing firms to discourage the entry of new firms. (x) perfectly inelastic demands for products. (y) the declining cost structure inherent in producing specific goods. (

  • Q : Define Marginal rate of Substitution or

    Marginal rate of Substitution (MRS): It is the rate at which a consumer is prepared to give up one good to get the other good.

  • Q : State Statutory liquidity ratio or SLR

    State SLR (or Statutory liquidity ratio): It is the ratio of net or total demand and time deposits of commercial bank that, it has to keep in the form of specified liquid assets.

  • Q : Selling price by price elasticity of

    At the point upon the demand curve for Silver Screen Classic DVDs, here the price elasticity of demand is unitary, the price would be approximately: (i) $10, resulting in roughly 8 million DVDs being sold. (ii) $13, resulting in appro

  • Q : Monopolistic competition in the long run

    In the past 4 decades, the still increasing globalization of trade has caused the United State automobile market to evolve by: (i) highly concentrated oligopoly towards monopolistic competition. (ii) pure monopoly to pure competition. (iii) a cartel t

  • Q : Differences in the arc elasticities of

    The dissimilarities in the arc elasticities of demands for labor among the Ajax Corporation and Bosun Limited are consistent along with an inference which Bosun: (1) is a more profitable firm than Ajax. (2) hires more highly skilled workers than Ajax

  • Q : Match price cuts but avoid price hikes

    A firm’s perception which competitors will match price cuts but avoid price hikes yields: (w) price leadership behavior. (x) limit pricing structures. (y) kinked demand curves. (z) monopolistic competition. Can anybody sugges

  • Q : Analytic time in the market period In

    In the market period: (w) price is constant. (x) output is constant. (y) supply is horizontal. (z) supply is completely elastic. Please guys help to solve this problem of Economics with some explan

  • Q : Entry and exit of purely competitive

    Pure competition is described by freedom of entry and exit by firms which are: (i) price discriminators and quality adjusters. (ii) price takers and quantity adjusters. (iii) owned and operated by entrepreneurs. (iv) arbitrators and p

  • Q : Relationship between MPP and TPP If MPP

    If MPP is zero, what can you state regarding TPP? Answer: TPP is at its maximum.