--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Price elasticity of demand DVDs of games

    Moving from point c to point d beside demand curve D, the price elasticity of demand DVDs of video games equals: (1) 0.8. (2) one. (3) 1.10. (4) 1.25. (5) 2.50

    Q : Monopolist of profit maximizing When

    When this is feasible for total revenue to cover all variable costs, in that case a profit maximizing monopolist will generate: (w) where marginal revenue equals marginal costs [MR = MC]. (x) in the inelastic portion of the demand cur

  • Q : Product differentiation in gain

    Monopolistic competitors: (1) base decisions on the anticipated reactions of their many individual competitors. (2) can easily enter but not exit industries. (3) may sometimes act like monopolists and gain economic profits in the short run because of

  • Q : Determine constant slope of demanded

    The slope of this illustrated figure of demand curve for DVD games is: (w) constant. (x) greater at high prices than at low prices. (y) lower at low prices than at high prices (z) unitarily elastic.

    Q : Marginal revenue product-marginal

    When a monopolist maximizes the profit in a product market, it will: (w) Hire labor till the marginal revenue product equivalents marginal resource cost. (x) Hire labor till the value of marginal product equivalents marginal resource cost. (y) Pay a wage equivalent to

  • Q : Implicit Costs definition The Implicit

    The Implicit costs are: (i) The opportunity costs of resources contributed by the firm’s owner. (ii) Costs that need a cash outlay. (iii) Usually comprised in the computation of accounting profit. (iv) Fictional costs which do not influence the

  • Q : Opinion about kinked demand curve model

    George Stigler concluded which the kinked demand curve model is incorrect to the extent that this depends on: (w) marginal cost pricing. (x) pure competition. (y) interdependent decision making.  (z) sticky prices.

  • Q : Isoquants and isocost lines By using

    By using isoquants and isocost lines, illustrates graphically that rise in y will result in a decline in the quantity demanded of x1 and also illustrates that rise in the price of x1 will result in a reduction in the quantity demanded of x1<

  • Q : LEAST affected labor in short run The

    The short-run demand for labor would be LEAST affected by the: (w) productivity of the resource. (x) prices of substitute resources. (y) demand for goods produced by the resource. (z) fixed costs of a firm. Hey fri

  • Q : Substitution Effect-decreasing

    The substitution effect is negative since people react to a price raise by: (i) Reducing purchases of good. (ii) Generating more of good. (iii) Purchasing some substitute goods. (iv) Working less to sustain the existing purchasing patterns.

    Discover Q & A

    Leading Solution Library
    Avail More Than 1451004 Solved problems, classrooms assignments, textbook's solutions, for quick Downloads
    No hassle, Instant Access
    Start Discovering

    18,76,764

    1944069
    Asked

    3,689

    Active Tutors

    1451004

    Questions
    Answered

    Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!

    Submit Assignment

    ©TutorsGlobe All rights reserved 2022-2023.