--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Instance of Adverse Selection Nutcake

    Nutcake Products hires new staffs devoid of revealing that the rising demand for nutcakes and partial staffing make it not possible for staffs to take their guaranteed 2-week vacations. Nut cake’s shortage of candor is most unambiguously an instance of: (1) Symm

  • Q : Examples of adverse selection Which of

    Which of the given below statement is not an illustration of the adverse selection? (i) You agree on a price for utilized car; however the dealer did not tell you it requires a new clutch. (ii) You send in money to a mail order company, however do not

  • Q : Price elasticity of demand coefficient

    Select the right ans wer of the question. The price elasticity of demand coefficient measures: 1) buyer responsiveness to price changes. 2) the extent to which a demand curve shifts as incomes change. 3) the slope of the demand curve. 4) how far business executives ca

  • Q : Effect of Increase in per capita income

    Rises in per capita income in the United States would be most probable to reduce the: (i) Demands for lard, pinto beans, and utilized tires. (ii) Excesses in the federal govt. budget. (iii) Supply of untrained labor relative to skilled labor. (iv) Tot

  • Q : Public Policy and the Distribution of

    The two policies that most likely account for most of the trend toward greater income equality during 1929 and 1975 are: (w) improved educational opportunities, and tax and transfer policies. (x) reduced sex discrimination and public availability of b

  • Q : Problem on certainty of punishment

    Raising the severity and certainty of punishment decreases the cheating on examinations. This statement imitates: (1) Misplaced cynicism as this issue is ethical, not economic. (2) Purely normative views of the behavior. (3) Unrealistic expectations regarding student

  • Q : Demand for product when its sales fall

    When a 10% hike in the price of paisley socks causes sales to fall with 20%, the demand for such socks is: (1) perfectly inelastic. (2) relatively inelastic. (3) unitarily elastic. (4) relatively elastic. (5) perfectly elastic. <

  • Q : Effects of technology advances in

    The market prices for big plasma screen TVs are most probable to fall as an effect of: (1) Strikes by unionized workers in the electronics factories in Korea, Japan and China. (2) Seller expectations of Scarcities of plasma screen TVs. (3) Best Buy running competitors

  • Q : Price elasticity when total revenue

    Total revenue grows while the price of a good is cut when the price elasticity of: (w) demand exceeds the price elasticity of supply. (x) substitute goods is less than one. (y) supply is into a relatively elastic range. (z) demand is

  • Q : Monopolistic competitor in market When

    When this monopolistic competitor makes Q units: (1) P > MC. (2) MR = MC. (3) total revenue total cost is maximized. (4) MSB > MSC. (5) All of the above.

    Discover Q & A

    Leading Solution Library
    Avail More Than 1456558 Solved problems, classrooms assignments, textbook's solutions, for quick Downloads
    No hassle, Instant Access
    Start Discovering

    18,76,764

    1932548
    Asked

    3,689

    Active Tutors

    1456558

    Questions
    Answered

    Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!

    Submit Assignment

    ©TutorsGlobe All rights reserved 2022-2023.