--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Higher price at slope of the demand

    When the slope of the demand for wheat is ten, we can predict now that a higher price of wheat will be as: (w) increase total expenditures on wheat. (x) reduce total expenditures on wheat. (y) not influence total expenditures on wheat. (z) More information is required

  • Q : Problem concerning Exploitation I have

    I have a problem in economics on Problem concerning Exploitation. Please help me in the given question. Whenever resource suppliers are salaried less than the values of their marginal products [or VMPs], then they are stated to be: (i) Monopsonistic.

  • Q : Horizontal Integration product Lauren

    Lauren launched Staplex developed in Staplex, Iowa 10 years ago. The Staplex has expanded and now produces similar staplers in all ten of its factories extend across three continents. Staplex is the: (1) Horizontally integrated firm. (2) Monopoly cartel. (3) Diagonall

  • Q : Long Run-Firm can vary all inputs I

    I have a problem in economics on Long Run-Firm can vary all inputs. Please help me in the following question. In long run: (1) Firm can vary all the inputs. (2) Firm can vary few inputs, however not all. (3) Capital starts to depreciate. (4) Output increases.

  • Q : Problem on Elasticity formula Whenever

    Whenever the price of plastic moose heads increase from $5 to $7, monthly sales fall from 2000 to 1000 units. By using the arc elasticity formula, the price elasticity of demand will be: (i) 3.0. (ii) 1/3. (iii) 2.0. (iv) 2.5.

    Q : Earning income within negative income

    Under the negative income tax system demonstrated in this figure, a family of four along with no earned income would have a net as after-tax, the income of: (1) $15,000 per year. (2) $10,000 per year. (3) $5,000 per year. (4) $2,500 per year. (5) $0 p

  • Q : Relation between Implicit Costs and

    I have a problem in economics on Relation between Implicit Costs and Opportunity costs. Please help me in the following question. The Implicit costs are: (1) Opportunity costs. (2) Always variable costs. (3) Similar as the accounting costs. (4) Similar as the explicit

  • Q : Define opportunity cost Opportunity

    Opportunity cost: The Opportunity cost refers to the cost of next best alternative inevitable.

  • Q : Problem based on GDP Assume nominal GDP

    Assume nominal GDP in the year of 2002 was $100 billion and in the year of 2003 it was $260 billion. The general price index in 2002 was 100 and in 2003 it was 180. Between 2002 and 2003 the real GDP rose by: A) 160 percent. B) 44 percent. C) 37 percent. D) 1

  • Q : Cut in prices of Complementary Goods

    The demand for gasoline would rise rapidly after a fifty percent: (i) Drop in the price of crude oil. (ii) Discovery of main latest oil supplies. (iii) Cut in public transportation fares. (iv) Cut in latest car prices.

    Discover Q & A

    Leading Solution Library
    Avail More Than 1438041 Solved problems, classrooms assignments, textbook's solutions, for quick Downloads
    No hassle, Instant Access
    Start Discovering

    18,76,764

    1947406
    Asked

    3,689

    Active Tutors

    1438041

    Questions
    Answered

    Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!

    Submit Assignment

    ©TutorsGlobe All rights reserved 2022-2023.