--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Positively-sloped supply curve

    A straight-line, which positively-sloped supply curve which starts from the quantity axis is: (w) elastic for all prices and quantities. (x) inelastic for all prices and quantities. (y) unitarily elastic for all prices and quantities. (z) a sign that

  • Q : Equilibrium price in the short run The

    The equilibrium price for Christmas trees in the short run is: (w) P1. (x) P2. (y) P3. (z) P4.

    Q : Problem regarding analyzing persistent

    In analyzing persistent shortages within the U.S. market for adoptable children: (w) children are most reasonably considered investment goods. (x) children might reasonably be functioned as consumer goods. (y) lower prices charged adopting families would result within

  • Q : Components of capital account Elucidate

    Elucidate the components of capital account? Answer: It records are international transactions which occupy a resident of the domestic country changing his assets wi

  • Q : Marginal revenue-product of the labor

    The monopsonist will hire labor till labor's marginal resource cost equivalents the: (p) The value of average product of labor. (q) Price of labor. (r) Marginal revenue product of labor. (s) Marginal physical product. Choose the ri

  • Q : Influence of discount on Income Effect

    Jay saved $200 to purchase a Zowie digital camera following her friend showed Jay the Zowie she purchased for $200 at a close by camera store. Fortunately the camera was on sale for $150 all through a one-hour ‘Manager’s Special’ sale when Jay ultima

  • Q : Difference among change in

    The difference between change in supply and change in quantity supplied is as follows: (1) The change in quantity supplied is caused just by the change in the price of good, whereas a change in supply takes place whenever the ceteris paribus suppositi

  • Q : In-Kind Transfer Payments Medicare,

    Medicare, rent subsidies, Medicaid, and food stamps are examples of: (w) transfers in-kind. (x) cash transfers. (y) human capital programs. (z) negative income taxes. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem

  • Q : Private demands and supplies to assign

    Reliance on private demands and supplies to assign goods and resources is least certain to outcome an economically ineffective solution just because: (i) Producers encompass monopoly power. (ii) A good is non-rival and non-exclusive. (iii) Consumption

  • Q : Problem on Decisions at the Marginal

    The least clear illustration of how decisions are generally at the margin would be: (i) A floral shop hiring an additional clerk and opening earlier in hopes of increasing revenues by half. (ii) Eating less whenever the menu is a-la-carte than at an ‘all-you-can