--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Policies for overall demanding labor

    Policies which raise the overall demand for labor and maintain unemployment rates low are: (w) significant for the success of any other programs to reduce poverty. (x) sufficient measures to reduce the incidence of poverty. (y) not relevant to the suc

  • Q : Competition between the producers in

    Is there competition between the producers in Canada?

  • Q : Differences in the arc elasticities of

    The dissimilarities in the arc elasticities of demands for labor among the Ajax Corporation and Bosun Limited are consistent along with an inference which Bosun: (1) is a more profitable firm than Ajax. (2) hires more highly skilled workers than Ajax

  • Q : Economies of scale If there are

    If there are significant economies of scale in an industry, then: A) a firm that is large may be able to produce at a lower unit cost than can a small firm. B) a firm that is large will have to charge a higher price than will a small firm. C) entry to that industry wi

  • Q : Relatively elasticity in supply curve

    At point a, in below figure the supply curve into this graph: (w) perfectly elastic. (x) relatively elastic. (y) unitarily elastic. (z) relatively inelastic.

    Q : How is TVC derived from MC How is TVC

    How is TVC derived from MC? Answer: TVC = Sigma MC

  • Q : Illustrations of homogeneous goods

    Illustrations of homogeneous goods would not comprise: (i) wheat. (ii) athletic shoes. (iii) penicillin. (iv) generic bleach. (v) reams of generic printer paper. I need a good answer on the topic of Economi

  • Q : Elasticity of Demand Elasticity of

    Elasticity of Demand: The law of demand elucidates that demand will change due to a change in the price of the commodity. However it does not elucidate the rate at w

  • Q : Define Marginal rate of transformation

    Marginal rate of transformation: This is the amount of one good which should be given to generate one additional unit of a second good. This is also termed as marginal opportunity cost.

  • Q : Consumer behaviour Graphical

    Graphical representation of relationship between MPC and multiplier?