--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Define revenue Revenue : This refers to

    Revenue: This refers to total money income from the sale of output.

  • Q : Pure economic profit on rate of return

    Owners of corporate stock obtain pure economic profit only to the extent which the rates of return realized by owning the stock exceed the: (1) interest rate that would have been produced by other investments entailin

  • Q : Problem based on ATC-MR and MC If $4 is

    If $4 is Firm B's profit-maximizing price, its: A) ATC must be $4. B) MC must be $4. C) MR must be $4.  D) MC must be zero. Help me to get

  • Q : Opinion about kinked demand curve model

    George Stigler concluded which the kinked demand curve model is incorrect to the extent that this depends on: (w) marginal cost pricing. (x) pure competition. (y) interdependent decision making.  (z) sticky prices.

  • Q : Reform National Welfare Before the

    Before the national welfare reform of 1996s, where Aid to Families with Dependent Children [AFDC]: (w) was the principal government program intended to alleviate poverty. (x) was exempt from any form of taxation. (y) generated pressur

  • Q : Neoclassical production theory I am

    I am facing difficulty in this question .Provide me correct answer of this question to complete my assignment. Why? Neoclassical production theory contains marginal products and heterodox production theory does not.

  • Q : Elucidate GNI per capita Elucidate GNI

    Elucidate GNI per capita?

  • Q : Making purely competitive firm A purely

    A purely competitive firm will produce where is: (w) MC is rising. (x) MC = P. (y) MC = MR. (z) All of the above. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding Economics

  • Q : Best society according to Utilitarianism

    Utilitarianism states that the best society is one which gives the: (1) Essential goods to meet people’s requirements. (2) Biggest happiness for the greatest number of people. (3) Precise measurement of disutility and utility. (4) Highest guaran

  • Q : Economy-efficiency while transaction

    Transaction costs tend to be decreased, consumer prices tend to be lower and additionally stable and economy-wide efficiency is enhanced if: (1) rigid wage and price controls are imposed. (2) central planning fosters