--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Condition for deficit in balance of

    What is the condition when there is a deficit in balance of trade? Answer: When import > export

  • Q : Meaning of Caveat emptor I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Meaning of Caveat emptor. Please help me in the following question. Caveat emptor signifies: (i) Let the seller beware! (ii) Everything else held steady. (iii) Let things modify if they should. (iv) Charge whatever the market will allo

  • Q : Characteristic of a purely competitive

    A purely competitive firm: (w) faces a perfectly inelastic demand curve. (x) sets its own price. (y) is a price taker. (z) sells a differentiated product. Can someone explain/help me with best solution about proble

  • Q : Quantity demanded of good What cause do

    What cause do heterodox economists employ to argue that the quantity demanded of good is a not a function of its price but of the family’s (consumer’s) income? And also discuss, For heterodox economists, household choice is not regarding maximizing utility

  • Q : Determine unitarily elastic demand of

    Assume that many students have fixed “pizza budgets.” When the price per slice falls by $10 to $1 along such demand curve for pizza weekly near a college campus, then the price elasticity of demand for pizza: (w) rises towards infinity. (x

  • Q : Market structure in barriers of entry A

    A market structure in that barriers of entry tend to be important, with sales being dominated by some large firms is: (w) a monopoly market. (x) a monopolistically competitive market. (y) an oligopoly. (z) perfectly competitive market.

    Q : Product markets and labor markets

    Relative to firms which are price takers in both the product markets and labor markets, firms through market power in both the product markets and labor markets tend to. (1) Hire fewer workers and pay them less. (2) Rely more heavily on the screening and signaling thr

  • Q : Illustration of complementary goods

    Prices cross elasticity of demand of two between cable TV and VCRs entails that such goods are: (1) complementary goods. (2) substitute goods. (3) negatively associated goods. (4) a luxury and a need, respectively. (5) both inferior goods.

  • Q : Effective price discrimination to

    Effective price discrimination to maximize profit does NOT needs the firm to be capable to: (w) separate the market within different groups along with different demand elasticities. (x) erect entry barriers to defend a monopoly position. (y) prevent t

  • Q : Split roughly burden of tax The burden

    The burden of an excise (i.e., per unit) tax would be divide roughly fifty by fifty on consumers and suppliers of the taxed good within: (w) Panel A. (x) Panel B. (y) Panel C. (z) Panel D.