--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Disadvantages of mixed economy system

    Tell me what are the disadvantages of mixed economy system?

  • Q : Wage discrimination Wage discrimination

    Wage discrimination due to race or sex occurs while: (w) members of some groups are paid less for equal work than other groups. (x) certain groups are excluded from particular occupations. (y) housing conditions are inequitable between economic classe

  • Q : Adequate resources to escape a state of

    When individuals or families have adequate resources [for example, employment opportunities] to escape a state of destitution, although choose not to, they are experiencing as: (1) involuntary poverty. (2) relative poverty. (3) a vicious cycle of pove

  • Q : Definition of law of demand Definition

    Definition of law of demand: It is the claim that, other things equivalent, the quantity demanded of a good drops/falls whenever the price of the good increases.

  • Q : Economies of positive scale with

    When economies of scale are full time positive in an industry, in that case the industry will: (1) evolve into a natural monopoly. (2) become inefficient before it gets very huge. (3) be unregulated by government. (4) be not capable to compete along w

  • Q : Enhancing society economic efficiency

    Society-extensive economic efficiency is most probable to be improved by: (1) competitive advertising. (2) cooperation between firms in a cartel. (3) increases in asymmetric information. (4) informative advertising. (5) wage and price controls. <

  • Q : Prices decrement in price elasticity of

    When animal rights activists persuade several fur coat buyers to switch to micro-fiber jackets as well as pelt prices decrease from $150 to $50 each, resultant in the baby seal harvest decreasing from 18,000 to 6,000 yearly, in that case the price elasticity

  • Q : Cartel Select the right answer of the

    Select the right answer of the question. We would expect a cartel to achieve: A) both allocative efficiency and productive efficiency. B) allocative efficiency, but not productive efficiency. C) productive efficiency, but not allocative efficiency. D) neither allocati

  • Q : Union Strategies and the Taft-Hartley

    The union strategy made illegal through the Taft-Hartley Act of 1948 was: (1) Jurisdictional strikes centered on which the unions would symbolize a firm’s staff. (2) Contracts in which the firms agreed to preferentially encourage the union members. (3) ‘Ri

  • Q : Short-run supply curve and marginal

    Short-run supply curve of a purely competitive firm’s is the positively sloped part of the marginal cost curve which is above its: (w) average fixed cost curve. (x) resource demand curve. (y) average variable cost. (z) short-run