--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Economic foundations of the single tax

    The economic foundations of the single-tax progress were first presented through: (1) British Prime Minister Lloyd George. (2) John Stuart Mill. (3) Henry George. (4) David Ricardo. (5) George Stigler. How can I so

  • Q : Negatively-related measure of the

    The proportion you would lose when you bought an asset and instantly sold it is a negatively-related measure of the assets: (1) net present value. (2) liquidity. (3) par value. (4) abandonment cost. (5) transactions ratio. Hey frie

  • Q : LEAST dependency Demands for labor

    Demands for labor depend LEAST upon the levels of: (w) labor productivity. (x) technology as well as amounts of other resources employed. (y) demand for final products. (z) trade off among work (creating income) and leisure.

    Q : What will occur when government taxes a

    When the government taxes a good, the price consumers currently face is most probably: (w) higher than before the tax. (x) below the price the seller receives. (y) less than average production cost. (z) justified through welfare payments to taxpayers.

    Q : Cross-elasticity coefficient When the

    When the number of textbooks sold falls/drops 10 percent whenever college tuitions double, textbooks and college enrollments are _____ goods and their cross-elasticity coefficient is mainly _____. (i) Superior; 5.0. (ii) Inferior;   10.0. (i

  • Q : Goals of the Firm Most of the

    Most of the economists believe firms tend to proficiently maximize the profits since of: (i) Stockholder pressure. (ii) Competition for the management positions. (iii) Principal-agent conditions. (iv) The chance of corporate take-over.

    Q : Problem on law of Diminishing Returns

    Can someone help me in determining the right answer from the given options. Ozzy Osbourne consists of a weird obsession with the manner live birds taste. Though, the more birds he bites, the harder Ozzy determines it to gain more satisfaction. Ozzy’s reaction ap

  • Q : Prohibition in Pure Economic Profits

    Pure economic profits are NOT: (w) normal costs of production. (x) reduced to “normal” levels in long-run pure competition. (y) zero in long run monopolistic competition. (z) possible under pure competition in the short-run.

  • Q : Negative GDP gap A large negative GDP

    A large negative GDP gap implies: A) an excess of imports over exports. B) a low rate of unemployment. C) a high rate of unemployment. D) a sharply rising price level.

  • Q : Marginal cost by price discriminate

    When a monopolist which does not price discriminate maximizes profit and charges a price equal to marginal cost, this will: (i) minimize average cost and generate zero economic profit. (ii) minimize average cost and generate a positiv