--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : What supply curve illustrates What

    What supply curve illustrates?

  • Q : Critics of contestability theory

    Critics of contestability theory argue which: (i) easy entry and exit isn't enough to make sure competitive prices. (ii) even though the firms charged a competitive price for their goods, that they would not have the incentive to make the competitive

  • Q : Intending negative income tax The

    The negative income tax suggestions: (w) are intended to simplify federal income taxes. (x) require the poor to pay taxes regardless of their incomes. (y) call for higher income taxes on transfer payments. (z) are attempts to balance the goals of equi

  • Q : Economies of Scale problem Can someone

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. When average production costs reduce as the total production of a firm rises, the firm is experiencing: (i) Economies of the scale. (ii) Economies of scope. (iii) Diseconomies o

  • Q : Minimum Wage Laws-unskilled workers I

    I have a problem in economics on Minimum Wage Laws-unskilled workers. Please help me in the following question. The Minimum wage legislation is unlikely to help: (i) Skilled workers who compete by unskilled workers. (ii) Unskilled workers who don&rsqu

  • Q : Problem on Substitution Market demand

    Market demand curve for the Hormel’s canned Spam [that is, a processed pork product which is an inferior good for most of the people], would shift rightward as the effect of major increases in: (i) Publicity regarding high correlations among hea

  • Q : Shutdown point of purely competitive

    A purely competitive firm will shut down while: (w) marginal costs exceed marginal revenues. (x) this cannot cover its fixed costs. (y) marginal revenue falls below average total costs (z) this can’t cover its variable costs.

    Q : Classified industries as oligopolistic

    Industries which would be classified as oligopolistic comprise: (w) public utilities. (x) postal service. (y) breakfast cereal. (z) retailing. Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some views for above

  • Q : Indication of Lorenz Curves The Lorenz

    The Lorenz curve gives an indication of: (w) the poverty rate. (x) dead end poverty. (y) relative poverty. (z) post-transfer poverty. Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some views for above Eco

  • Q : Revenue expenditure Why payment of

    Why payment of interest is treated as revenue expenditure? Answer: Since it does not cause any decrease in the liability of government.