--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Total revenue maximize by profit

    A profit maximizing monopoly which does not price discriminate will not: (w) produce in the elastic portion of the market demand curve. (x) experience raised total revenue when it reduces the price. (y) equate marginal revenue and mar

  • Q : Purchasing power of Income Effects

    Whenever the price increases for a good that you enjoy extremely and purchase regularly: (i) The purchasing power of your income is reduced. (2) You adjust more rapidly than when the good was insignificant to you. (3) Your substitution effect is over-powered by an inc

  • Q : Production and distribution of income

    When the distributions of income were suitable, when there were no externalities, and when the economy was purely competitive, in that case market forces would yield production and distribution of penicillin consequent to: (i) point a. (ii) point b. (

  • Q : Problem on Budget constraints James and

    James and Louisa each have an income of $30, which they each spend on tomatoes and all other goods.  They buy tomatoes at their local farmers market, which charges $3 per pound.  Define the units for all other goods so that their price is $1 per unit. 

  • Q : Engage market power in price

    If this is possible, firms along with market power engage in price discrimination to: (i) defy civil rights legislation. (ii) help consumers. (iii) help the community. (iv) increase their profits. (v) reduce production costs.

  • Q : Maximum profit by equilibrium When a

    When a monopolist reaches equilibrium: (1) its profits are at a maximum. (2) price equals marginal cost. (3) average cost is at its minimum. (4) marginal cost is at a minimum. Can someone explain/help me with best solution about pr

  • Q : Efficient price of a good by vantage

    The allocatively efficient price of a good by the vantage point of society is the price which equals the: (w) average social cost of producing this. (x) average variable cost of producing this. (y) total social cost of producing this. (z) marginal soc

  • Q : Facing a competitive firm more elastic

    The demand curve facing an unregulated non-discriminating monopolist is NOT: (w) similar as the industry's demand curve. (x) downward sloping. (y) more elastic than the demand curve facing a competitive firm. (z) various from its marg

  • Q : Annual total revenue of production When

    When Prohibition Corporation maximizes profit in its production of St. Valentine’s Day software, so annual total revenue of it will be around: (1) $140 million. (2) $250 million. (3) $320 million. (4) $420 million. (5) $1 billio

  • Q : Competitive Prices for selling This

    This purely-competitive producer’s generic bricks presently sell for: (i) $60 per thousand. (ii) $70 per thousand. (iii) $80 per thousand. (iv) $90 per thousand. (v) $100 per thousand.

    Discover Q & A

    Leading Solution Library
    Avail More Than 1446234 Solved problems, classrooms assignments, textbook's solutions, for quick Downloads
    No hassle, Instant Access
    Start Discovering

    18,76,764

    1921750
    Asked

    3,689

    Active Tutors

    1446234

    Questions
    Answered

    Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!

    Submit Assignment

    ©TutorsGlobe All rights reserved 2022-2023.