--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Featherbedding related problem Assume

    Assume that no job vacancies exist for the taxidermists, which students lack any interest in taxidermy, and that taxidermy produces no externalities. When lobbyists persuaded college Boards of Trustees to need taxidermy courses and to set up Departments of Taxidermy s

  • Q : Demand prices exceeds supply prices

    When only Q0 papayas reached the market in that case: (1) desperate buyers would be willing to pay only P1 per papaya. (2) production costs would exceed P2 per papaya. (3) buyers would be indifferent regarding getting additional papaya

  • Q : Market Power-Monopsony Power-Demand for

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. Siberian Software vends custom programs to multinational corporations. Its programs are coded in a remote region. In equilibrium, the Siberi

  • Q : Minimum Supply Amounts of Resources

    Payments for a resource into excess of the minimum needed to supply specified amounts of the resource are termed as: (1) economic rents. (2) wage premiums. (3) excess profits. (4) surplus values. (5) capitalization.

    Q : Taxes on pure land rent Taxes on pure

    Taxes on pure land rents: (1) especially distort economic behavior. (2) are forward shifted to consumers. (3) transfer income from the public treasury to private landowners. (4) are allocatively neutral relative to most alternative taxes. (5) are over

  • Q : Derived Demand Can someone help me in

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Demands for the productive resources are eventually ‘derived’ from the: (i) marginal utility they directly produce. (ii) Demands for the consumer services and goods. (iii) Disutili

  • Q : Agricultural demand The demand for

    The demand for agricultural products is: A) relatively elastic with respect to price. B) relatively inelastic with respect to price. C) relatively elastic with respect to income. D) downward sloping to the individual farmer, but perfectly elastic to farmers as a group.

  • Q : Help The problem of asymmetric

    The problem of asymmetric information is that

  • Q : Higher interest rate in current

    For current consumption growing preferences over future consumption would be evidenced from a: (w) higher interest rate. (x) more quick rate of investment. (y) larger government budget surplus. (z) surplus into the balance of trade.

  • Q : Present value of future payments When

    When interest rates rise, in that case the present value of future payments will: (w) fall. (x) rise. (y) remain the same. (z) depend onto the transactions demand for money. How can I solve my Economics