--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Interest rates of business investors in

    The interest rates business investors into economic capital should pay on a loan: (w) reflect the opportunity costs to society of funding one investment in place of another. (x) are relatively trivial investment costs by investors&rsq

    		•
  • Q : Individual Welfare Recipients If an

    If an individual receives benefits from the government, associate to the benefits everyone else receives, which exceed the individual’s taxes like a proportion of total tax payments by all citizens, which individual can reasonably be viewed like

    		•
  • Q : Determine price and quantity when

    When the demand and supply for a good both raise, price: (w) and quantity both rise. (x) and quantity both fall. (y) falls but quantity increases. (z) changes need more information, when quantity rises.

    Q : Evidence for Diminishing Marginal

    Evidence that may potentially be cited as conflicting with the law of diminishing marginal utility would comprise: (i) Della’s enthusiasm for all-you-can-eat buffet diminishes subsequent to her fifth plate of lasagna. (ii) Jethro trades in his 1981 Gremlin on th

    		•
  • Q : Marginal Resource Costs The word

    The word ‘marginal resource costs’ or ‘marginal factor costs’ signifies to the: (1) Additional cost included in generating an additional resource. (2) Additional cost included in generating an additional unit of the resource. (3) Additional cos

    		•
  • Q : Arc elasticity of demand between two

    The arc elasticity of demand Ajax for labor in between point a and point b is about: (i) 0.25. (ii) 0.50. (iii) 0.75. (iv) one. (v) two.

    Q : Risk and Uncertainty In word of Frank

    In word of Frank Knight, risk: (w) exists when the probability of any specified event can be predicted. (x) appeals to the gambler personalities of innovators who next in social progress. (y) is irrelevant to good calculates of the economic costs of p

    		•
  • Q : Problem on Elasticity formula Whenever

    Whenever the price of plastic moose heads increase from $5 to $7, monthly sales fall from 2000 to 1000 units. By using the arc elasticity formula, the price elasticity of demand will be: (i) 3.0. (ii) 1/3. (iii) 2.0. (iv) 2.5.

    Q : Increase in Income Tax Progressivity

    When this figure demonstrated Lorenz curves for distribution of income after taxes and transfers, in that case it is UNTRUE of the Lorenz curves demonstrated in this demonstrated figure that: (1) line 0E0' represents a Lorenz curve of

    		•
  • Q : Upwardly sloping supplies of resources

    When supplies of some resources are upwardly sloping to an industry, in that case increasing the industry’s output results within: (w) higher output due to increased profits from falling input prices. (x) reductions of output because of increase

    		•