--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Pricing strategy In a competitive

    In a competitive pricing strategy how does one can arrive for a multi-service practice where there are no specific products in question?

  • Q : Decreasing marginal returns and

    What is the difference between decreasing marginal returns and negative marginal returns?

  • Q : Problem regarding Substitution of goods

    When tuna fish ice cream and licorice gummy bears are substitutes, then: (1) Decline in the price of licorice gummy bears raises the demand for tuna fish ice-cream. (2) The demand for tuna fish ice-cream is independent of price of licorice gummy bears. (3) Consuming m

  • Q : Unambiguously Poverty Poverty is most

    Poverty is most unambiguously: (w) an absolute concept that is easily and precisely defined. (x) more prevalent in North America than elsewhere. (y) the absence of income sufficient to survive in reasonable comfort. (z) a relative concept when poverty

  • Q : Negative marginal utility The economic

    The economic good becomes an economic bad whenever consumption is expanded into an area where: (1) Sellers experience the moral hazard.  (2) Marginal returns are diminishing. (3) Marginal utility is negative. (4) Buyers suffer from adverse choice. (5) Extreme cho

  • Q : Monopsonistic exploitation-Labor union

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. Labor union contracts, a comparable significance rule, or minimum wage laws might boost equilibrium employment when a firm has been practicing: (i) Blacklisting

  • Q : Screening devices problem The Screening

    The Screening devices employed whenever employers try to save adverse selection by the applicants for place do not comprise: (i) review resumes to recognize applicant’s qualifications. (ii) Needing non-compete clauses which prevent latest employees from working

  • Q : Pure competitors or perfect competitors

    The price makers in a purely competitive market are: (i) pure competitors or perfect competitors. (ii) producers of capital goods. (iii) pure oligopolies. (iv) monopolistic competitors.  (v) pure monopolies. H

  • Q : Less present value by given price When

    When the market interest rate exceeds the rate of return you compute on an asset: (i) competition for profit must make its price rise quickly. (ii) its present value is less than its price. (iii) the market is in long term equilibrium

  • Q : Price hike in short run I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Price hike in short run. Please help me in the following question. In short run, the demand curve for the potatoes will not be influenced by price hikes for: (i) Potatoes. (ii) Bread. (iii) Rice. (iv) Steak.

    Discover Q & A

    Leading Solution Library
    Avail More Than 1431180 Solved problems, classrooms assignments, textbook's solutions, for quick Downloads
    No hassle, Instant Access
    Start Discovering

    18,76,764

    1932545
    Asked

    3,689

    Active Tutors

    1431180

    Questions
    Answered

    Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!

    Submit Assignment

    ©TutorsGlobe All rights reserved 2022-2023.