--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Illustration of a strategic barrier An

    An illustration of a strategic barrier would be a: (w) high-technology firm registering a patent on their newly-designed time machine. (x) law establishing the USPS as the only mail service in the United States. (y) set of costly advertising campaigns

  • Q : Relationship between MPP and APP If MPP

    If MPP equivalent to APP, what will you state regarding APP? Answer: APP is at its maximum and steady or constant.

  • Q : Marginal revenue-product of labor The

    The monopsonist will hire labor till labor's marginal resource cost equivalents the: (1) The value of average product of labor. (2) Price of labor. (3) Marginal revenue product of labor. (4) Marginal physical product. Choose the ri

  • Q : Complementary of cross-price elasticity

    The most complementary of the given pairs of goods are: (1) organic vegetables and French fries. (2) polyester fabrics and cotton cloth. (3) transistor radios and televisions. (4) jogging shoes and bicycles. (5) pencils and erasers.

    Q : Marginal productivity theory about

    John Bates Clark's marginal productivity theory gives details that the marginal productivity of resources finds out: (w) the true value of human life. (x) an equitable distribution of tax burdens. (y) the income distr

  • Q : Right-to-Work Laws-agency shop I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Right-to-Work Laws-agency shop. Please help me in the given question. In states with right-to-work laws, non-union members can’t ‘free-ride’ when the union negotiates a/an: (1) Closed shop. (2) Open shop. (3) Union sh

  • Q : Reduce average total costs by

    Individual pure competitive firms as well as firms along with market power may each be capable to: (i) reduce average total costs by increasing the size of its operations or economies of scale else decreasing the size of its operations [as diseconomie

  • Q : Economic losses generate competitive

    Economic losses in an industry generate competitive pressures which cause: (1) industry output to fall. (2) market price to decrease. (3) each firm’s short-run output to increase. (4) rising costs for industry inputs. (5) firms to expand product

  • Q : Elasticity of demand curve In which

    In which form of market, the demand curve is more elastic and why? Answer: Demand curve is more elastic under monopolistic since of the availability of close substitute.

  • Q : Purely-competitive and constant-cost

    When this firm is typical into this purely-competitive of constant-cost industry, as in demonstrated figure in long-run equilibrium for cranberries will be attained at a market price of: (i) P1. (ii) P2. (iii) P<