--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Determine price elasticity of demand An

    An approximate estimate of the price elasticity of demand is best computed by the absolute value of the formula: (1) change in P / change within Q. (2) % change in Q / % change in P. (3) % change in Q / % change in income. (4) % chang

  • Q : Optimal market solution of marginal

    From society’s point of view, an optimal market solution is attained while: (w) everyone’s income is equal. (x) all goods are given in the economy. (y) marginal social costs only equal marginal social benefits. (z) consumer surplus equals

  • Q : Increasing equality in distribution of

    Increasing equality within the distribution of income or wealth is generally related with: (1) decreases in the population’s total amount of income or wealth. (2) lower values for the Gini coefficient. (3) greater overall curvat

  • Q : Change of tastes and preferences in

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. Most of the mass advertising is intended to influence market demand primarily by: (1) Providing full detailed information regarding products. (2) Decreasing pro

  • Q : Horizontally summing the short-run

    For a competitive industry the short-run supply curve is derived through summing the short-run supply curves of all firms within the industry: (w) vertically. (x) horizontally. (y) diagonally. (z) and computing their arithmetic average.

  • Q : Difference between opportunity cost and

    Differences among the opportunity cost of a purchase through a consumer and the seller’s price are increased through: (w) taxes. (x) intermediaries. (y) competition. (z) speculators. Can anyb

  • Q : Competitive firm shuts down in short run

    A competitive firm shuts down within the short run when: (w) this suffers a loss. (x) normal profit = 0. (y) ATC > P. (z) the minimum AVC > P. Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some views for above Econo

  • Q : Freedom of entry-exit in long run

    Contestable markets and purely competitive markets share the feature of: (w) collusive behavior of huge firms. (x) freedom of entry and exit into the long run. (y) widespread product differentiation. (z) persistent economic profits.

    Q : Vigorously competitive market

    Economic rents which can be capitalized are least possible to arise by: (1) production cost advantages. (2) proprietary knowledge. (3) being first to market a differentiable new product or to innovate a new production technology. (4) a vigorously comp

  • Q : Financial Capital-Monopoly power Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The corporation is least probable to secure funding for its operations by: (1) Acquiring its biggest competitor via a merger which consolidates its monopoly power. (2) Issuing the common stock