--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : State normal good Normal good : It is a

    Normal good: It is a good for which, other things equivalent, a rise in income leads to a rise in demand.

  • Q : Close down a purely competitive firm in

    Within the short run, there a purely competitive firm will close down its plant(s) and manufacture nothing when: (i) this makes no pure economic profits. (ii) normal profits were unattainable. (iii) P < ATC at all output levels. (iv) accounting pro

  • Q : Shut down by drastically raise price in

    Mom and Pop Ping-Pong Balls is an established table tennis supply store within a small city. You are the owner of Ping-Pong Megastore as well and you have just opened up a location in their small city. When you set prices so low which Mom and Pop is forced to shut dow

  • Q : Intersection of demand and supply curves

    What determines the intersection of demand and supply curves?

  • Q : Lowering price of units selling A

    A monopolist which does not price discriminate faces a marginal revenue curve which slopes down quicker than its demand curve since: (w) economies of scale are significant. (x) selling more needs lowering the price of

  • Q : Production possibility history of World

    Can someone help me in determining the right answer from the given options. Through the onset of World War-II, the United States: (i) Expanded the military output just by increases taxes rigorously. (ii) Moved in the direction of its production possibilities frontier.

  • Q : Imperfectly competitive market A firm

    A firm within an imperfectly competitive market is: (w) more likely to advertise than a purely competitive firm. (x) less probable to advertise than a purely competitive firm. (y) neither more nor less probable to advertise than a pure competitor. (z)

  • Q : Problem on Value in Use Can someone

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The value in use of your favorite Frisbee is described whenever you: (1) Play Frisbee with dog. (2) Sell it for $100 to your elder brother. (3) Auction it off at the Frisbee convention. (4) Tr

  • Q : Excise tax at highest average rate At

    At the highest average rate an excise tax will tax low incomes while: (1) only luxuries are taxed. (2) goods along with the highest income elasticity of demand are exempt. (3) goods along with the lowest income elasticity of demand are exempt. (4) no

  • Q : Absolute and Complete Inequality

    Absolute and complete inequality into the distribution of income or wealth would be reflected within the Lorenz curve demonstrated as: (i) line 0A0'. (ii) line 0B0'. (iii) line 0C0'. (iv) line 0D0'. (v) line 0F0'.

    Discover Q & A

    Leading Solution Library
    Avail More Than 1412000 Solved problems, classrooms assignments, textbook's solutions, for quick Downloads
    No hassle, Instant Access
    Start Discovering

    18,76,764

    1956495
    Asked

    3,689

    Active Tutors

    1412000

    Questions
    Answered

    Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!

    Submit Assignment

    ©TutorsGlobe All rights reserved 2022-2023.