--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Perfectly demand elasticity On a

    On a horizontal demand curve, there: (w) demand is perfectly elastic. (x) demand is perfectly inelastic. (y) the elasticity of demand varies. (z) demand is unitarily elastic. Can someone explain/help me with best s

  • Q : Positive values of marginal utility

    The Positive values of marginal utility curve are related with: (i) Reducing values of net utility. (ii) The highest point on a net utility function. (iii) Negative values of a net utility function. (iv) Rising values of total utility.

    Q : Reducing prices due to a commodity

    Which of the given would NOT be taken as predatory behaviour: (w) Rapid technological innovation. (x) Reducing prices due to a commodity surplus. (y) Duplicative products intended to absorb shelf space. (z) Introduction of close substitutes for rivals

  • Q : Competitive Resource of Market Supply

    Because resources should be hired away through other uses, the resource supply curves facing a huge and expanding competitive industry are classically: (1) horizontal. (2) U shaped. (3) upward sloping. (4) downward sloping. (5) vertical.Can anyb

  • Q : Psychological Pricing Define the term

    Define the term Psychological Pricing and what are their aspects?

  • Q : Changing effects of price of a product

    Increasing the price of a product will raise total revenue proportionally into the unlikely event which demand was: (1) perfectly price elastic. (2) relatively price elastic. (3) unitarily price elastic. (4) relatively price inelastic (5) perfectly price inelastic.

  • Q : Profit-maximizing firm-perfectly

    The profit-maximizing firm which is perfectly competitive in resource market however that consists of market power in output market will hire labor at the point where: (1) VMP=MRP=MFC>w. (2) VMP>MRP=MFC=w. (3) VMP = MRP = MFC = w. (4) VMP>MRP

  • Q : Inverse relationship in Law of Demand

    The law of demand signifies to: (i) The direct relationship accessible between quantity and prices demanded. (ii) The inverse relationship accessible between quantity demanded and opportunity cost. (iii) How demand shifts due to modifications in price

  • Q : Value of the Average Product Hulk is

    Hulk is the fitness counselor who coaches 5 clients at a time in the exercise groups at Beefcake Body Builders. His hourly salary is $17, and Beefcake charges Hulk’s clients $20 for each and every hour-long conditioning session. Average value of the product Hulk

  • Q : Critics of the simple limit pricing

    Critics of the straightforward limit pricing strategy argue about that: (w) sunk costs are not important in deterring entry. (x) for limit pricing to work, there should be a credible threat to keep old output levels. (y) this is rational to expect the