--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Characterized monopolistic competition

    Monopolistic competition is NOT described by: (1) P = MSC. (2) large numbers of sellers. (3) P = LRATC. (4) MR = MC. (5) differentiated products. Hey friends please give your opinion for the problem of Econ

  • Q : Relative utility-Consumer Equilibrium

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The relative utility from the last dollar used up on food is the ratio: (i) Marginal utility of food or production cost of food. (ii) The Price of food or net grocery bill. (iii

  • Q : Burden of tax decrement The burden of

    The burden of an excise (i.e., per unit) tax would reduce solely upon consumers of the taxed good within: (w) Panel A. (x) Panel B. (y) Panel C. (z) Panel D.

    Q : Firms and Transaction Costs An

    An individual or organization which simultaneously purchases low and sells high in various markets is a/an: (i) Angel duster. (ii) Escalator. (iii) Arbitrageur. (iv) Finagler.  (v) Optimizer. Can someone please help me in find

  • Q : Problem on Economic Capital Your

    Your construction company just bought a bulldozer on credit. From the viewpoint of your company, this bulldozer is an illustration of: (i) Liability. (ii) Fixed costs. (iii) Net variable cost. (iv) Capitalization. (v) Economic capital.

    Q : How changes in weather affect

    I have a problem in economics on how changes in weather affect agricultural output. Please help me in the following question. Economists consider how changes in the weather influence the agricultural output as: (i) Signs of ecological imbalances. (ii) Technological mo

  • Q : Theory of mercantilism Explain what was

    Explain what was the theory of mercantilism?

  • Q : Consumers arrival at a point-law of

    According to law of diminishing marginal utility, the consumer inevitably arrives a point where: (i) Net satisfaction derived from good declines. (ii) Consumer suffers from total satiation from some good. (iii) Extra satisfaction outcome by extra unit

  • Q : Managerial Economics-Error of omission

    Can someone please help me in finding out the precise answer from the following question. The ‘error of omission’ takes place when: (1) Managers pursue policies which outcome in layoffs. (2) Corporations vend more stock than is really available. (3) Manage

  • Q : Interest rate of annual income When

    When perpetuity pays annual income of $50, in that case at an interest rate of 4 percent its price is: (w) $1000. (x) $1250. (y) $1400. (z) $1800. Hello guys I want your advice. Pl