--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Time and opportunity cost in

    The time and other opportunity costs incurred in obtaining information regarding products and prices and in that case driving to and from markets are illustrations of: (1) mobilization costs. (2) contracting costs. (3) transactions co

  • Q : When are average and outputs prices of

    Average and Outputs prices for CDs and DVDs both rose throughout 1999 to 2000 (before the start of Napster and subsequent file-sharing software), which implying: (1) supply of prerecorded music should have grown. (2) law of demand doesn’t apply

  • Q : Unitarily price elastic supply for

    Supply is unitarily price elastic for all quantities and prices upon: (i) supply curve S1. (ii) supply curve S2. (iii) supply curve S3. (iv) supply curve S4. (v) supply curve S5.

    Q : Adjustments in demand When Mad Cow

    When Mad Cow Disease erupted internationally, so what would occur to the demand, price, supply and quantity of hamburgers: (w) demand = fall, price = ???, supply = fall and quantity = fall. (x) demand = fall, price = rise, supply = rise and quantity =

  • Q : Total economic of profit or loss at

    When the wholesale price P = $10 per bushel of peaches, it purely competitive peach orchard maximizes profit through producing ___ bushel of peaches at a total economic as profit or loss of $___. (i) zero; loss; -$4,000. (ii) 2000; lo

  • Q : Cross price elasticities of demand The

    The cross price elasticities of demand are possibly most positive for: (w) shoe repairs and new shoes. (x) syrup and waffles. (y) gasoline and limousines. (z) college tuitions and textbooks. How can I solve my

  • Q : Process of channeling funds from savers

    Financial intermediation is, largely, the process of: (1) lending money out at interest. (2) spending funds faster than revenues are obtained. (3) channeling funds from savers to dissavers, as well as to investors into economic capital. (4) buying and

  • Q : Negative marginal utility The economic

    The economic good becomes an economic bad whenever consumption is expanded into an area where: (1) Sellers experience the moral hazard.  (2) Marginal returns are diminishing. (3) Marginal utility is negative. (4) Buyers suffer from adverse choice. (5) Extreme cho

  • Q : Example of how marginal utility

    An illustration of how marginal utility diminishes takes place when: (1) Todd only requires 180 screws for his bike repair shop however purchases a box of 200 screws. (2) Amy Sue decides she would instead contain 150 hogs than 151 on her pig farm. (3)

  • Q : How changes in weather affect

    I have a problem in economics on how changes in weather affect agricultural output. Please help me in the following question. Economists consider how changes in the weather influence the agricultural output as: (i) Signs of ecological imbalances. (ii) Technological mo