--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Demand for loanable funds An increase

    An increase in the demand for loanable funds is reflected within an increase in the: (1) term structure of interest rates. (2) demand for money. (3) supply of bonds. (4) supply of money. (5) demand for bonds. I nee

  • Q : Characteristics of a purely competitive

    NOT between characteristics of a purely competitive industry would be as: (w) large numbers of potential buyers and sellers. (x) long-run freedom of entry and exit. (y) modern technology that dictates large firms. (z) buyers have no influence on price

  • Q : Evalute clothing market Evalute the

    Evalute the statement. Generally People buy clothing in the city where they live. Therefore there is a clothing market in, say, Atlanta that is distinct from the clothing market in Los Angeles. This statement is tr

  • Q : Substitution of goods for buyers Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The market demand curves slope downward as: (i) Supply curves are positively sloped. (ii) Each and every buyer has similar preferences and incomes. (iii) Buyers replace towards goods as their

  • Q : Illustration of limit pricing strategy

    An illustration of limit pricing strategy occurs while the incumbent firm: (w) sets a price below costs to drive its competitor out of the market. (x) redesigns its product lines to create components incompatible along with rivals. (y) which has a cos

  • Q : Define utility Utility : The wants

    Utility: The wants satisfying power of a commodity is termed as utility.

  • Q : Determine area of maximum profit For

    For LoCalLoCarbo maximum profit equals the area of the rectangle as: (1) 0P1bq2. (2) bdP4P1. (3) 0P4dq2. (4) bcP3P1. (5) 0P2fq4.

    Q : Implicit Costs definition The Implicit

    The Implicit costs are: (i) The opportunity costs of resources contributed by the firm’s owner. (ii) Costs that need a cash outlay. (iii) Usually comprised in the computation of accounting profit. (iv) Fictional costs which do not influence the

  • Q : Graphical Production Possibilities

    Can someone please help me in determining the right answer from the following question. The production possibilities frontier is a graphical device exhibiting the: (i) Alternative allocation methods accessible to society. (ii) Combinations of goods wh

  • Q : Problem on utility-maximizing bundle

    Jane consumes only apples and chocolate.  She is always willing to trade 1piece of chocolate for exactly 3 apples. Her income is $200.  She can buy apples for $1 each and chocolate for $2 per piece.a. To Jane, apples and chocolate are (circle 1):