--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Problem on positive quantity Supply The

    The law of supply defines that, other things equivalent: (1) Quantity supplied differs inversely with price. (2) A good’s supply is positively associated to its demand. (3) Quantity supplied is positively associated to price. (4) Prices and cost

  • Q : Law of Diminishing marginal utility

    Describe the Law of Diminishing marginal utility? Answer: Law of Diminishing marginal utility: As a consumer goes on consuming more and more units of a commodity th

  • Q : Production Costs of goods problem I

    I have a problem in economics on Production Costs of goods problem. Please help me in the following question. In order to provide more goods on the market, firms increase prices to cover: (1) Rising opportunity costs in the production. (2) Technologic

  • Q : Functional Distribution of Income

    Computing the relative shares of national income accounted for by wages, interest, rent, and profit, yields, respectively measures called the: (1) market distribution of income. (2) functional distribution of income. (3) objective distribution of inco

  • Q : For the firm For the firm, the major

    For the firm, the major goal of profit sharing plans is to: force workers to incur some of the business risk. overcome the monopsony problem of having to pay higher wages to attract additional workers. overcome the principal-agent problem by better aligning the workers' interests with

  • Q : Problem on rational ignorance An

    An illustration of rational ignorance is demonstrated when you: (1) Are elected to a political office. (2) Settle for an other half who is not your "ideal" mate. (3) Eat a steak which increases your cholesterol level. (4) Were suspended from high scho

  • Q : Law of diminishing returns for a good

    The point is inevitably reached where an individual derives less extra enjoyment from the extra units of any good. This is mainly well-suited with: (i) Supply curves that slope-up and to right. (ii) Concave (or bowed out) production possibilities frontiers. (iii) The

  • Q : Burden of tax reduce on suppliers of

    Most of the burden of an excise (i.e., per unit) tax would be borne through consumers of the taxed good, although some of the tax burden would reduce on suppliers of the good demonstrated in: (w) Panel A. (x) Panel B. (y) Panel C. (z)

  • Q : Tourism effects How tourism effects in

    How tourism effects in an upcoming industry?

  • Q : Problem on Complementary Goods From the

    From the viewpoints of auto makers, the weakening of OPEC oil cartel in the year 1990s resulted in a/an: (1) Rise in demand for cars. (2) Reduction in demand for cars. (3) Rise in the supply of cars. (4) Reduction in supply of cars.

    Discover Q & A

    Leading Solution Library
    Avail More Than 1444594 Solved problems, classrooms assignments, textbook's solutions, for quick Downloads
    No hassle, Instant Access
    Start Discovering

    18,76,764

    1931706
    Asked

    3,689

    Active Tutors

    1444594

    Questions
    Answered

    Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!

    Submit Assignment

    ©TutorsGlobe All rights reserved 2022-2023.