--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Minimize losses of purely competitive

    The wholesale price per dozen roses below that such purely competitive rose farm would minimize losses through closing their operation is: (1) $3.00 per dozen roses. (2) $3.83 per dozen roses. (3) $4.00 per dozen roses. (4) $4.30 per

  • Q : Influence of war in prices Assume that

    Assume that the War in Iraq start to engulf other Middle-Eastern countries in hostilities. The least probable outcome of gasoline prices therefore increasing to, state, $10 per gallon in the United States, would be that: (i) Hummer sales would fall as a percentage of

  • Q : Excessively high production costs to

    The merely fast food restaurant conveniently located close to a fast-growing suburb may be rather profitable despite sloppy management and poor quality control. There market power can enable several firms along with excessively high production

  • Q : Prohibition in Pure Economic Profits

    Pure economic profits are NOT: (w) normal costs of production. (x) reduced to “normal” levels in long-run pure competition. (y) zero in long run monopolistic competition. (z) possible under pure competition in the short-run.

  • Q : Consequence of foreign exchange rate

    What are consequence of foreign exchange rate risk and how do this risk be mitigated?

  • Q : Implicitly weigh marginal cost and

    implicitly weigh marginal cost and marginal benefit

  • Q : Demand curve for Complementary Goods

    The ban on assault weapons enacted in the year 1994 lapsed in the year 2004. Prices for assault weapons fell in year 2004 since the only way to get such guns throughout the ban was via the black market. This modify in the law in year 2004 is most probable to shift the

  • Q : Problem on Monopsonistic exploitation I

    I have a problem in economics on Monopsonistic exploitation. Please help me in the following question. The Monopsonistic exploitation of labor signifies that the: (i) Influenced workers receive much low wages. (ii) Firm reaps big economic gains by exploiting the worke

  • Q : Right-to-Work Laws-Union membership Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. When it is illegal to need a union membership as the condition of employment for a firm, then the firm: (1) Needs all the employees to sign yellow dog contracts. (2) Can’t sign an agency

  • Q : Explain about the minimum legal price

    Please help me to solve the problem that is given below. A minimum legal price is a price: (1) foundation. (2) umbrella. (3) ceiling. (4) cut.  (5) floor. I need a good ans