--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Price elasticity and market power The

    The price elasticity of demand equals one when this firm produces where total revenue is: (i) $72,000 per period. (ii) $80,000 per period. (iii) $96,000 per period. (iv) $100,000 per period. (v) $144,000 per period.

    Q : Wage Differentials-occupational crowding

    The Disadvantaged groups have historically been pressured in the direction of low wage jobs in a process termed as: (i) Occupational crowding. (ii) Labor staggering. (iii) Systemic discrimination. (iv) Reverse favoritism. (v) Nepotism.

    Q : Define forward shifting of tax burden

    The greater the price elasticity of demand associate to the price elasticity of supply, then the: (i) greater the legal incidence of any tax burden. (ii) smaller the forward shifting of any tax burden. (iii) smaller the backward shift

  • Q : Labor Union History Can someone please

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. Preceding to the AFL-CIO merger in the year 1955: (i) AFL was an alliance of the industrial unions. (ii) The CIO was an alliance of the craft unions. (iii) Strikes over which un

  • Q : Economic what is the Production

    what is the Production possibility frontier

  • Q : Higher interest rate in saving and

    A higher interest rate shows a: (w) stronger preference for current income over future income. (x) weaker preference for current income over future income. (y) stronger preference for future income over current income. (z) wave of pessimism among inve

  • Q : Duopoly for two sellers What is that

    What is that market termed in which there are just two sellers (or firms)? Answer: Duopoly terms to a market condition in which there are only two sellers.

  • Q : Characteristic firms of purely

    At market price P0, this purely competitive industry’s characteristic firms will earn: (i) positive economic profit. (ii) negative economic profit. (iii) zero economic profit. (iv) negative accounting profit. (v) important dividends f

  • Q : Marginal Productivity Theory of Income

    The income distribution into a market economy is primarily found by differences within: (1) effort and sacrifice alone. (2) resource ownership and resource prices. (3) birth and social standing. (4) Lorenz coefficients. (5) political

  • Q : Formula for economic profit Can someone

    Can someone please help me in finding out the precise answer from the following question. The firm’s total revenue minus its net economic costs equivalents its: (1) Economic profit. (2) Taxable income. (3) Marginal income. (4) Accounting profit. (5) Psychic inco