--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Problem on cost curve The following

    The following diagram illustrates the short-run average total cost curves for five different plant sizes of any firm. The shape of each curve reflects: 1) increasing returns, followed by diminishing returns. 2) economies of scale, followed by diseconomies of scale. 3)

  • Q : Total revenue raised by output

    A firm’s total revenue can definitely be raised by decreasing its output when: (1) its supply curve is perfectly price inelastic. (2) the demand curve for its output is relatively income inelastic. (3) this is currently losing money each period.

  • Q : Heterodox perspective One of my friend

    One of my friend can't find the answer of this question.Give me answer of this question. From a heterodox perspective, the household is rarely indifferent while considering the profit of two bundles of goods.Why?

  • Q : Assumption of economic model-financial

    Most of the economic models suppose that the financial goal of a corporation is the maximization of the value of: (1) Firm’s net revenue. (2) Accounting gains to the firm. (3) Firm to its shareholders. (4) Progress of the sales revenues. (5) Monetary advantages

  • Q : Marginal cost by price discriminate

    When a monopolist which does not price discriminate maximizes profit and charges a price equal to marginal cost, this will: (i) minimize average cost and generate zero economic profit. (ii) minimize average cost and generate a positiv

  • Q : Objectives of Microeconomic policy

    Widely accepted objectives for microeconomic policy comprise: (w) full employment. (x) general price stability. (y) economic development. (z) efficiency, freedom and equity. Hey friends please give your opinion for

  • Q : Monopsony Power and Immobility of Labor

    Immobility of the labor is significant economically as: (1) Most of the people like to move, however cannot. (2) People in high salary occupations won't be completely compensated for the costs and difficulties related with their occupations. (3) It we

  • Q : Illustration of Economic Capital An

    An illustration of economic capital would be: (1) loanable funds in banks. (2) factory buildings. (3) gold held through price speculators. (4) labor’s productive skills. (5) corporate stocks. How can I solve

  • Q : Lower costs of large oligopolists This

    This is possible that consumers could pay a lower price within an oligopoly market than a competitive market since large oligopolists: (w) can price below cost. (x) often give quantity discounts to loyal customers. (y

  • Q : Managerial slack or X-inefficiency

    X-inefficiency (also termed as managerial slack): (1) tends to drive up fixed costs. (2) commonly results from firms not being hard pressed through competitors. (3) can absorb much of a monopoly’s potential profit. (4) is a prob