--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Pure economic profit on rate of return

    Owners of corporate stock obtain pure economic profit only to the extent which the rates of return realized by owning the stock exceed the: (1) interest rate that would have been produced by other investments entailin

  • Q : Positive economic analysis and normative

    Which of the given two statements involves positive economic analysis and which normative? How do the two type of analysis differ?a. Gasoline rationing (allocating to each year to each individual an annual maximum amount of gasoline whi

  • Q : Perfectly Competitive market condition

    In which market condition, the effect of an individual seller is (0) zero? Answer: In Perfectly Competitive market condition.

  • Q : Automation and Wage Rates When physical

    When physical capital becomes cheaper, in that case: (w) some workers may be displaced but worker productivity usually rises. (x) automation will make jobs for more workers. (y) workers will supply more labor services. (z) labor supply curves will move in backward ben

  • Q : Unstable Cartel Agreement Cartel

    Cartel agreements tend to be unstable since: (1) outputs are homogenous. (2) cooperation replaces competition. (3) all governments oppose cartels. (4) members have incentives to cheat. (5) All of the above. Hello g

  • Q : Difference between voluntary and

    Difference between voluntary and involuntry employment: Voluntary unemployment is that portion of working force not willing to engage itself is a gainful occupation. An Involuntary unemployment is that portion of labour force that is willing and capab

  • Q : Features of Indifference Curve Describe

    Describe the features of Indifference Curve? Answer: A) Indifference curves slopes downward from left to right.B) Indifference curves are Convex to origin. C) Two Indifference curve not at all intersect

  • Q : Describe price elasticity of demand

    Price elasticity of demand: The Price elasticity of demand refers to the degree of responsiveness of the quantity demanded to modifications in price. Ed = (ΔQ/Δ P) x (P/Q)

  • Q : Income of consumer-consequence on

    Income of consumer: In case of normal good - Increase in income leads to rise in quantity demanded of a normal good and reduce in income leads to reduction in quanti

  • Q : Effective price discrimination to

    Effective price discrimination to maximize profit does NOT needs the firm to be capable to: (w) separate the market within different groups along with different demand elasticities. (x) erect entry barriers to defend a monopoly position. (y) prevent t