--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Theory of mercantilism Explain what was

    Explain what was the theory of mercantilism?

  • Q : Define fixed cost Fixed cost : Fixed

    Fixed cost: Fixed costs refer to cost that remains constant as output modifies. For example: rent

  • Q : Short-run Demand for Labor Short-run

    Short-run demand for the labor would be LEAST affected by the: (i) Productivity of resource. (ii) Prices of substitute resources. (iii) Demand for goods generated by the resource. (iv) Fixed costs of firm. Can someone please help m

  • Q : Structure conduct performance paradigm

    From about 1890 till 1970 year, the “structure-conduct-performance paradigm” dominated theories regarding how firms behave in various types of markets. The term here “performance” in this context refers to those things as: (i)

  • Q : When would transaction cost be zero All

    All transaction costs would be zero when: (1) Congress required current prices to be cut by eighteen percent. (2) market information and transportation were both costless. (3) market prices were legally restricted to production costs. (4) inflation we

  • Q : Describe inferior goods in economics

    Inferior goods in economics: Inferior goods refer to such goods whose demand reduces with the rise in income of consumer.

  • Q : Analysis deregulation caused the

    Choose the right answer of the following problem. "The government deregulated the electricity industry in California and a shortage of electricity occurred soon . It is clear that the deregulation caused the shortage." This statement requires careful analysis becau

  • Q : Market demand of purely competitive

    How purely competitive industries respond to raises in market demand depends upon: (w) the time period considered. (x) immediate quantity adjustments and longer run price adjustments. (y) each firm’s average total costs. (z) the slope of the mar

  • Q : Effect of average expected lifespan on

    When new medical technology raised the average expected lifespan through 10 years and people responded along with increases in their desires to have hefty “nest eggs” while they retire, it would be least probable to result into: (1) an inc

  • Q : Negative income tax in welfare system

    Relation to the current U.S. welfare system, a suitable negative income tax plan would: (1) be much more difficult and more expensive to administer. (2) reduce some of the current disincentives for work. (3) result in a substantial de