--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Powerful negative externalities in

    Potentially powerful negative externalities are mainly overwhelmingly a decisive argument against permitting laissez faire policies and supplies to govern the production and market demands and distribution of: (1) avian flu antivirus shots. (2) public

  • Q : Relation between average and marginal

    Describe the relation between average revenue and marginal revenue. whenever a firm can sell an extra unit or a good by lowering price.

  • Q : Determine demand and supply when

    If, throughout a period while video iPods are gaining popularity, the technology to create them enhances, in that case demand: (w) and supply would both decrease. (x) and supply would both increase.  (y) increases when supply decreases. (z) decreases when supply

  • Q : Normal accounting profits I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Normal accounting profits. Please help me in the following question. The normal accounting profits are considered by the economists to be: (i) Exploitation of the consumer. (ii) Evidence of monopoly power. (iii) Economic costs of the p

  • Q : Competitive theory of prices Normal 0

    Normal 0 false false

  • Q : Purely competitive industry in market

    Within a purely competitive industry: (w) firm faces a perfectly elastic demand for its product. (x) market demand is completely elastic. (y) individual firms set prices for their output. (z) supply curve is based on fixed costs.

    Q : General law of demand I have problem in

    I have problem in this question based on law of demand. Provide me correct answer of this. Described the circumstances in which the "general law of demand" not hold?

  • Q : Which of the following lists includes

    Which of the following lists includes only capital resources (and therefore no labor or land resources)?

  • Q : Enter or exit the market in

    A mix of heterogeneous goods and many potential buyers and sellers which are free to enter or exit the market within the long run are among essential conditions for an industry to be: (1) a monopoly. (2) purely competitive. (3) an oli

  • Q : Problem regarding analyzing persistent

    In analyzing persistent shortages within the U.S. market for adoptable children: (w) children are most reasonably considered investment goods. (x) children might reasonably be functioned as consumer goods. (y) lower prices charged adopting families would result within