--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Marginal revenue for purely competitive

    For a purely competitive firm and for a nondiscriminating unregulated monopolist, the marginal revenue is: (1) identical to the price per unit of output. (2) equal to marginal cost when profit is maximized. (3) greate

  • Q : New cost-saving technologies adopting

    Firms are under greater pressure to rapidly adopt any new cost-saving technologies when an industry is: (i) closely regulated by government. (ii) controlled by professional managers instead of owners. (iii) dominated by a vast monopoly. (iv) highly co

  • Q : Absolute value of demand slope Since

    Since the price drop/falls and quantity demanded rises all along this demand curve for pizza, the absolute value of slope will be: (1) Is constant and elasticity falls. (2) Elasticity are constant. (3) Drop/falls and elasticity is constant. (4) Elasti

  • Q : Alfred Marshall categorization of

    If Alfred Marshall categorized the analytical periods of time, he supposed that in short run it is: (i) Not possible to vary technology and at least one resource is fixed and hence at least one kind of cost is as well fixed. (ii) Possible to move the resources from on

  • Q : Question on supply-and-demand diagrams

    Normal 0 false false

  • Q : Competition in Labor Markets The

    The horizontal labor supply curve signifies that: (i) The supply of labor is perfectly inelastic. (ii) The firm can hire as much labor as it requires at going wage rate. (iii) Labor and capital are in the fixed supply. (iv) Marginal physical product of the labor is co

  • Q : Difference among change in

    The difference between change in supply and change in quantity supplied is as follows: (1) The change in quantity supplied is caused just by the change in the price of good, whereas a change in supply takes place whenever the ceteris paribus suppositi

  • Q : Loss efficiency to society from

    When the equilibrium price of wheat is $50 per ton and the marginal cost of the last ton of wheat generated is $70, there is: (w) an efficiency loss to society from over-production. (x) an efficiency loss to society from underproducti

  • Q : Labor markets gain maximization When,

    When, after hiring the very last worker, the organization’s profit is similar as it was before the last worker was hired, then the firm must: (p) Hire more workers to raise the profit. (q) Layoff some workers to raise the profit. (r) Not appoint any more workers

  • Q : Hike within the minimum legal wage

    Labor market advises that a hike within the minimum legal wage from $5 per hour to $8 per hour will decrease: (1) the crime rate by 3,000. (2) national unemployment rates. (3) employment among unskilled workers by approximately 1,500 positions. (4) th