--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Break-even level of income The

    The break-even level of income for four member of family under the negative income tax system demonstrated in this figure is: (1) $15,000 per year. (2) $30,000 per year. (3) $45,000 per year. (4) $60,000 per year. (5) $75,000 per year

  • Q : Monopsonist-Wage discriminate Compared

    Compared with the price taker in labor market, the monopsonist which can’t wage discriminate will: (i) Hire more labor at any specified wage. (ii) Hire less labor at any wage. (iii) Pay a higher wage for any specified quantity of labor. (iv) Hire more prolific l

  • Q : Law of Income Distribution by Pareto

    The theorist who asserted as, “When you redistributed the world’s income and wealth equally across the whole population, eighty percent of this would be back within the hands of the population’s top 20% in twenty years,” which

  • Q : Occurrence of price discrimination

    Price discrimination arises whenever: (1) prices are exactly proportional to average variable costs. (2) customers who refuse to pay the market price must go without. (3) a good is sold at different prices not reflecting differences in costs. (4) perf

  • Q : Price elasticity of supply while the

    If John Whittler can sell totem poles for $1,800 at all, he markets 60 yearly, but while the price falls to $600 apiece; in that case he is willing to sell only 24 yearly. His price elasticity of supply is: (w) 0.43. (x) 0.86. (y) 1.62. (z) 2.48.

  • Q : Unitary price elasticity demand For

    For Cournot’s Spring Water the demand has unitary price elasticity at: (i) point a. (ii) point b. (iii) point c (iv) point d. (v) point e.

    Q : Abandonment of perfect competition This

    This needs to be identified that general abandonment of supposition of perfect competition, universal adoption of supposition of monopoly, need to have extremely destructive consequences for economic theory.” 

  • Q : Closed Shops and union members Firms

    Firms which agreed to hire only workers who were already the union members would be operating: (1) Agency shops. (2) Bilateral monopolies. (3) Monopsonistic shops. (4) Union shops. (5) Closed shops. Choose the right answer from the

  • Q : Measures of Poverty Line The poverty

    The poverty line is: (1) about $15000/year for a family of two in 2006. (2) an index which varies depending on family characteristics. (3) dependent only on the size and income of a family. (4) about $12500/year for a family of four in 2006. (5) the p

  • Q : Prevent operating in long run by

    A monopolist will prevent operating within the long run unless its economic profit is: (i) zero. (ii) positive. (iii) greater than accounting profit. (iv) zero or greater. (v) zero or less. I need a good answer on