--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Deadweight Losses and Taxation Whenever

    Whenever a tax on a good outcome less government revenue than the sum of the losses of producer and consumer surpluses due to tax, economists state that the tax has caused a/an: (1) Administrative loss. (2) Market failure. (3) Economic loss. (4) Bureaucratic loss. (5)

  • Q : Monopsony power in the labor market The

    The firm with monopsony power in labor market: (1) Can hire any significant amount of labor devoid of affecting the wage. (2) Can pay any wage it wishes. (3) Must pay a higher wage when it hires more labor. (4) Must pay a lower wage when it hires more

  • Q : Demand and supply problem Assume that

    Assume that the demand for jeans rises. At similar time, since of an increase in price of cotton, the supply of jeans reduces. How will it influence the price and amount sold of jeans?

    Q : Market Power-Demand for Labor I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Market Power and the Demand for Labor. Please help me in the given question. The lack of competition in product market outcomes in: (1) Less labor being hired than when the markets were competitive. (2) Many labor bein

  • Q : Assumption of Ceteris paribus Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Suppose that everything except the variables we are studying remains constant or steady is termed as the: (1) Ceteris paribus assumption. (2) Ex-ante assumption. (3) Ex-post assumption. (4) Po

  • Q : Econ Give the answer of following

    Give the answer of following question. In the quintile distribution of income, the term "quintile" represents: A) 5 percent of the income receivers. B) 10 percent of the income receivers. C) 20 percent of the income receivers. D) 25 percent of the income receivers.

  • Q : Goals of the Firm Most of the

    Most of the economists believe firms tend to proficiently maximize the profits since of: (i) Stockholder pressure. (ii) Competition for the management positions. (iii) Principal-agent conditions. (iv) The chance of corporate take-over.

    Q : Problem on implicit belief in a moral

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. Assume that when faced with the Faustian option [that is, a deal with the devil] of torturing an naive child in the interest of securing world peace and an end to global hunger,

  • Q : Minimum Wage Laws and Monopsony Power

    The Minimum wage laws potentially raise both employment and wages if firms: (i) Have monopsony power in the labor market and don’t wage discriminate. (ii) Practice outsourcing across the international borders as labor costs abroad are lower. (iii) Are pure compe

  • Q : Define Product Differentiation Product

    Product Differentiation: The Product differentitation is a condition when various producers under monopolistic competition, try to differentiate their product in terms of its size, shape, packaging, trade-mark and brand name. This is accomplish to att