--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Market demand curve Market demand curve

    Market demand curve: The market demand also rises with a fall in price and vice-versa. In figure below the quantity demanded by

  • Q : Consequences of the price floor

    Consequences of the price floor: The consequences of price floor might be: (A) Surplus of the commodity (B) The government might resort to buffer stocks to absorb the excess in the market at the support price and sells the products to consumers beneat

  • Q : When is minimum wage legislation LEAST

    Minimum wage legislation is LEAST probable to stimulate: (w) higher teenage unemployment. (x) raised racial discrimination. (y) surpluses of unskilled workers. (z) decreased wage incomes for unskilled workers who keep their jobs.

    Q : Price elasticity of demand coefficient

    In this demonstrated figure, there the price elasticity of demand coefficient is: (1) one at the midpoint. (2) greater than one in range a. (3) less than one in range b. (4) falling along with movements down along the demand curve. (5) All of the abov

  • Q : Market price below equilibrium price

    When the market price is beneath the equilibrium price then: (i) The market will clear. (ii) An excess exists. (iii) Consumers will not invest. (iv) The shortage exists. (v) Each and every consumer will be satisfied. Find out the r

  • Q : Marginal social costs exceed the

    When governments compelled pharmaceutical producers to manufacture and sell at least Q3 penicillin, in that case the: (1) purely-competitive firms which produced penicillin would experience persistent economic profits. (2) resulting inadequate antibiotic tr

  • Q : Individual firm in purely competitive

    In a purely competitive industry, the individual firm: (i) can raise the quantity demanded by lowering the price of its product. (ii) experiences substantial economies of scale. (iii) faces a completely inelastic demand curve. (iv) cannot influence th

  • Q : Plans of buyers and sellers I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Plans of buyers and sellers. Please help me in the following question. The equilibrium price for the good is a price at which: (1) The plans of both sellers and buyers are realized. (2) Subjective prices merely offset

  • Q : Monopsony Power definition Can someone

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The monopsony is a: (1) Market with just one seller. (2) Sole buyer of a specific good or resource. (3) Market with just one product. (4) Firm which employs just one resource.

  • Q : Problem on Analytic Time-Long Run Can

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The length of time needed for a firm to reach the long run is: (i) One year. (ii) Five years. (iii) Ten years. (iv) Variable and depend on the easiness of purchasing or selling