--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Market Power and Monopsony Power-

    Assume that a firm with market power in the output market wants to develop and that hiring more workers needs it to raise salaries 8 percent for all the workers. Output prices will most likely: (i) Increase 8 percent to cover the wage rise. (ii) Increase less than 8 p

  • Q : Value of the Marginal Product I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Value of the Marginal Product. Please help me in the following question. Value of the marginal product is stated as: (1) MPP × P. (2) MPP × MR. (3) MPP × MC. (4) MPP × MRC.

    Q : Exploiting the economies of Scope Bobby

    Bobby Lee’s dairy has gainfully expanded beyond butter, fresh milk and cheese, by providing Organizmic Fertilizer, guided by ATV tours for the visitors, and Granny Lee’s Exfoliating Body Yogurt. The Clyde County Business News trumpets that the Bobby Lee ha

  • Q : MOST Negative Liquidity An asset's

    An asset's liquidity is, by description, MOST negatively associated to the: (1) asset's suitability as a commodity money. (2) transaction costs incurred in its purchase or sale. (3) speed with which that can be sold. (4) certainty about its market pri

  • Q : Shutdown point of monopoly firm A

    A monopoly firm must shut down in the short run when: (w) P < minimum [average total costs [ATC]]. (x) P > minimum [average total costs [ATC]]. (y) this cannot cover all variable costs. (z) P does not equal marginal costs [MC].

    Q : Significant monopsony power-labor market

    The firm probable to have noteworthy monopsony power in its labor market would be the: (i) Big cotton farm in the Texas hiring migrant workers. (ii) Textile manufacturer in the Hong Kong hiring the factory workers. (iii) Janitorial service organization in London hirin

  • Q : Stable negatively-sloped demand curve

    Assume that a monopolist face a stable negatively-sloped demand curve. Making more sales needs the monopolist to: (1) advertise its product. (2) decrease the price of the product. (3) lower its marginal revenue. (4) improve its technology. (5) increas

  • Q : Increment in quantity demanded by price

    A demand curve has a slope which would be expressed as like $5/ (1 extra ton demanded) when a: (w) 5 % price cut raises quantity demanded by 1 %. (x) $5 price cut increases quantity demanded by 2000 lbs. (y) $5 price hike boosts quantity supplied by 2

  • Q : Decreasing price of Complementary Goods

    The increase in demand for tartar sauce would be a probable result of: (1) A reduction in the price of fish. (2) An raise in the price of tartar sauce. (3) A bumper crop of the tartar sauce. (4) A raise in the price of fish. (v) The reduction in price

  • Q : Vigorous competition in long run market

    Vigorous competition into a market depends in the long run most strongly upon the: (w) number of buyers and sellers presently in the market. (x) freedom to enter and exit the market. (y) sizes of the average firm within the market. (z) uniformity [hom