--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Reliablity with standard economic

    Which of the given behaviors is least reliable with standard economic suppositions regarding consumer behavior? (i) Gustav cannot decide which of three distinct combinations of goods he favors. (ii) Lynn hates pickled herring; however Chris is willing

  • Q : Determine possibly accurate order of

    Which of the given in lists of taxes or taxed goods is possibly in accurate order from most backward-shifted to most forward: (w) Tobacco, property, general sales and payroll. (x) Land, payroll, tobacco and property. (y) Tobacco, payroll, corporate in

  • Q : Decreasing cost industries When average

    When average production cost for Plastibristle Inc. falls like market demand increases and more firms go into the industry, Plastibristle is within:  (1) an economically efficient industry. (2) a purely competiti

  • Q : Separable utility function One of my

    One of my friends can't find the answer of this question. Give answer of following economic based question. Tell me about strongly separable utility function?

  • Q : Slope of indifference Curve State the

    State the slope of indifference Curve? Answer: Slope of indifference curve is equivalent to MRS, that is, Marginal Rate of Substitution.

  • Q : Perfectly competitive monopolized

    When a perfectly competitive industry is monopolized along with no effect on costs in that case the result will be: (w) higher prices and greater output. (x) lower prices and greater output. (y) higher prices and lower output. (z) lower prices and low

  • Q : Requirement of Production Possibilities

    Deriving a production possibilities frontier needs the supposition that: (1) Resources are variable in the supply. (2) There are limitless numbers of goods. (3) Economic growth takes place at a normal rate. (4) All scarce resources are proficiently em

  • Q : Demand of consumers-supply of seller

    Consumers’ demand prices and sellers’ supply prices may be different in equilibrium due to: (w) arbitrage. (x) expectations about availability. (y) the invisible hand. (z) government subsidies or tax wedges.

  • Q : Can the value of APS be negative Can

    Can the value of APS be negative:Yes, the value of APS is negative; when there are dissavings.

  • Q : Break even and zero economic profit at

    Within the long run, after HoloIMAGine’s holographic technology patents lapsed moreover entry and exit became probable in this market, therefore HoloIMAGine would be expected to: (w) carry on to reap economic profits. (x) break even and experien