--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Maximizing consumer and adjusts consumer

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Zeus got one million dollars for winning every event in current Olympics. In past, he would have frivolously exhausted his winnings on the lightning bolts, however after studying economics, he

  • Q : Labor Contracts of Check-off Provisions

    When a collective bargaining contract comprises a ‘check-off provision’: (1) Union workers can be fired when they don’t meet the production quotas. (2) Firms gather the union dues through deducting them from the paychecks. (3) Workers are needed to d

  • Q : Problem on monopolistically competitive

    Refer to the given diagram for a monopolistically competitive firm give the answer of following question. Long-run equilibrium price will be: 1) above A. 2) EF. 3) A. 4) B.

    Q : Money functions Give me answer of this

    Give me answer of this question. Money functions as: A) a store of value. B) a unit of account. C) a medium of exchange. D) all of the above.

  • Q : Elasticity of demand curve In which

    In which form of market, the demand curve is more elastic and why? Answer: Demand curve is more elastic under monopolistic since of the availability of close substitute.

  • Q : Quantity demanded to exceed quantity

    I have a problem in economics on Quantity demanded to exceed quantity supplied. Please help me in the following question. A shortage takes place whenever the current market price causes: (1) Quantity demanded to surpass quantity supplied. (2) Quantity

  • Q : Creating externalities to spread costs

    In efforts to offset specific failures of the private sector, government policy within a mixed-capitalist economy would be least reasonably intended at an objective of: (1) creating externalities to spread the costs of various activities across all me

  • Q : Supply law and it's factors State the

    State the Law of supply and explain the factors that affecting supply of commodity

  • Q : Quantity demanded grows with price cut

    A price elasticity of demand coefficient of 2.5 approximately implies that: (1) quantity demanded rises 1 percent while price rises 2.5 percent. (2) quantity demanded grows 2.5 percent along with a 1 percent price cut. (3) price rises 2.5 percent whil

  • Q : Law of diminishing returns for a good

    The point is inevitably reached where an individual derives less extra enjoyment from the extra units of any good. This is mainly well-suited with: (i) Supply curves that slope-up and to right. (ii) Concave (or bowed out) production possibilities frontiers. (iii) The