--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Elucidate business cycles Elucidate

    Elucidate briefly business cycles and what role do the Federal Government and Federal Reserve has in trying to manage them?

  • Q : Changing effects of price of a product

    Increasing the price of a product will raise total revenue proportionally into the unlikely event which demand was: (1) perfectly price elastic. (2) relatively price elastic. (3) unitarily price elastic. (4) relatively price inelastic (5) perfectly price inelastic.

  • Q : Levels of the Poverty Line In 2005

    In 2005 year, the proportion of people along with family incomes below the official poverty line into the United States was around: (w) one in eight. (x) one in ten. (y) two in twenty five. (z) one in twenty.

    Q : Characteristics of pure monopoly This

    This is untrue that a firm which is a pure monopoly: (1) commonly engages in extensive advertising to differentiate its products. (2) produces a level of output which is closer to socially optimal when this price discriminates. (3) is the sole produce

  • Q : Relatively inelastic supply curve in

    Marginal revenue is below average revenue as [TR/Q] for a firm along with market power since: (w) the demand curve this faces is negatively sloped. (x) its supply curve is relatively inelastic. (y) marginal cost is be

  • Q : Requirement of production costs

    Decreasing average production costs needs raising the size of a firm when the raised production encounters economies of: (i) Growth. (ii) Coordination. (iii) Growth. (iv) Scale. (v) Scope. Find out the right answer from the above o

  • Q : Good taxed revenue of price inelastic

    Government tax revenue would raise most from a specified tax when the good taxed contain a relatively: (w) price elastic demand. (x) price inelastic demand. (y) unitary price elastic demand. (z) flatter demand curve.

    Q : Externalities or public goods in purely

    A purely competitive economy along with no externalities or public goods tends to be efficient since: (1) firms try to act socially responsible. (2) government planners specify the best allocation. (3) all prices approximate marginal social benefits a

  • Q : Problem regarding law of Diminishing

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. According to the law of diminishing marginal utility, the longer that Chris and Lee kiss: (i) The less invested each will be in enduring this relationship. (ii) The closer they are to arriving

  • Q : Problem on harvesting-Production Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The speculator who purchases wheat at harvest time throughout the late falls or early on winter, contracts for its storage, and then vends the wheat afterward in the winter, spring or in summe