--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Business Principal-Agent Problems Can

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The business vice president employs company money to furnish an excessively plush office. This is an illustration of: (1) Corporate surplus in America. (2) The principal-agent p

  • Q : Problem on Arbitrage Costs Purchasing

    Purchasing low in one market and at the same time selling high in the other market is termed as: (1) Gambling. (2) Speculation. (3) Arbitrage. (4) Optioning. (5) Hedging. Find out the right answer from the above options.

  • Q : Changes in Bonds and Interest Rates

    When you buy a bond if the interest rate is 10% and sell this while the interest rate is 15%, in that case you will receive: (w) less than you paid for the bond. (x) more than you paid for the bond. (y) the same amount which you paid for the bond. (z)

  • Q : Capital Goods In the above diagram, the

    In the above diagram, the elimination of discrimination is best represented by

  • Q : Consideration of positive statement

    Choose the right answer . A positive statement is concerned with: A) some goal that is desirable to society. B) what should be. C) what is. D) the formulation of economic policy.

  • Q : Maximum possible economic profit of firm

    This firm’s maximum possible economic profit equals: (i) $12,000 per period. (ii) $16,000 per period. (iii) $20,000 per period. (iv) $24,000 per period. (v) $28,000 per period.

    Q : Seller in a monopoly market structure A

    A monopoly is a type of market structure in that one: (w) seller makes up the industry. (x) giant firm is a price taker. (y) barrier to entry exists. (z) giant firm is the particular buyer of resources.

    Q : Inferior Goods used in American family

    The most probable of the following to be an inferior good for most of the American families who buy some of each of such products would be: (i) Spam, that is a canned meat product. (ii) Plastic surgery. (iii) Concert tickets. (iv) Gasoline. (v) College textbooks.

  • Q : What is involuntary unemployment What

    What is involuntary unemployment: The people who are willing to work at given wage rate do not obtain work.

  • Q : Sufficient general theory of oligopoly

    A sufficient general theory of oligopoly would: (w) merely blend elements from competitive and monopolistic models. (x) qualitatively account for interdependence in decision making in broad terms. (y) closely fit all types of oligopoly markets. (z) de