--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Derived Demand Can someone help me in

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Demands for the productive resources are eventually ‘derived’ from the: (i) marginal utility they directly produce. (ii) Demands for the consumer services and goods. (iii) Disutili

  • Q : Price inelasticity of demand At a price

    At a price for $0, the demand for DVD games is around: (w) perfectly elastic. (x) perfectly inelastic. (y) unitarily elastic. (z) positively sloped.

    Q : Price floor for Whopper Slushees The

    The government price floor for Whopper Slushees at P3 would result a: (i) shortage of Q1 – Q3. (ii) Excess of Q3 - Q1. (iii) Supply price of P1. (iv) Quantity demanded of Q2. (v) Demand price of P2.

    Q : Demand for Complementary Goods Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Reductions in the price of tea are most probable to raise the demands for: (i) Lemons, ice cubes and sugar. (ii) Cola, coffee and hot cocoa. (iii) Mint juleps, Daiquiris and moonshine. (iv) Va

  • Q : Determine demands for relatively price

    When technological advances within agriculture generate bumper crops of farm products for that demands are relatively price inelastic, in that case the: (w) average income of farmers will decline relative to per capita income for the

  • Q : Intersections of supply and demand

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The prices beneath the intersections of supply and demand curves cause: (i) Shortages. (ii) Surpluses. (iii) Demands to expand. (iv) Inventories to grow. (v) Sc

  • Q : Perfect competition ‘In the real world

    ‘In the real world there is no industry which conforms precisely to the economist’s model of perfect competition. This means that the model is of little practical value

  • Q : Tacit collusion by oligopolists Tacit

    Tacit collusion through oligopolists is possible when: (w) agreed to by the government. (x) a price leader is visible. (y) the oligopolists succeed in forming a cartel. (z) very few firms control the market. How ca

  • Q : Operating the economy of production

    I have a problem in economics on the topic of Production. Please help me in the following question. The economy operating on its production possibilities frontier is as: (1) At full employment. (2) Technologically proficient. (3) Maximizing the output

  • Q : Ceteris Paribus assumption The ceteris

    The ceteris paribus (all as well constant) assumption is most obviously implicit in the statement of a tailor who states that, “We will vend more suits in the month of May of 2008: (i) Than we sold in the month of May 2003. (ii) Than we sold in