--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Transfer payments and progressive tax

    Transfer payments and progressive tax policies are being determinate to: (w) reduce disparities in the distributions of income and wealth. (x) shift the Lorenz curve toward a position of less income equality. (y) have no net effect on income equality

  • Q : Implication of freedom of entry and

    Describe the implication of freedom of entry and exit to the firms beneath perfect competition.

  • Q : Implicit Costs-Value of time

    Congratulations! You have made a fortune after establishing the firm which publishes bestselling books of the economic poetry. Your implicit costs comprise: (1) Salaries for your firm’s website designer. (2) The value of your time. (3) Fees for cleaning the serv

  • Q : Horizontal Integration product Lauren

    Lauren launched Staplex developed in Staplex, Iowa 10 years ago. The Staplex has expanded and now produces similar staplers in all ten of its factories extend across three continents. Staplex is the: (1) Horizontally integrated firm. (2) Monopoly cartel. (3) Diagonall

  • Q : Market form-product distinguishing In

    In which market form, the products are distinguished. Answer: In Monopolistic competition

  • Q : Negative marginal revenue Monopolies

    Monopolies will not function in the inelastic portion of the demand curves they face since: (w) marginal revenue is negative. (x) total revenues are negative. (y) total revenue falls as less is produced. (z) marginal revenue is always greater than mar

  • Q : Average Variable Cost-Average Total

    Describe the relationship among Average Variable Cost (AVC) Average, Total Cost (ATC) and marginal Cost (MC)? Answer: A) If MC

  • Q : Output level on marginal revenue and

    When the firm produced at output level q2, this produced where: (w) MR = MC. (x) MR > MC. (y) MR < MC. (z) P < MC.

    Q : Minimum Required Quantity Demand An

    An economic rent is earned when the owner of any resource as: (w) receives income greater than the minimum required to ensure that the quantity demanded is obtainable. (x) exerts control over the payment for the resource. (y) sells input services in a

  • Q : Types of market economies What are the

    What are the types of market economies?