--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Substitution effect on supply curves

    One of the reasons for positive relationship among relative price and quantity supplied is the: (1) Technology effect, whereby bigger firms generate at lower average costs than the smaller firms. (2) Substitution effect, whereby firms switch among for

  • Q : Funding crisis The Social Security

    The Social Security program in the United States faces a long-term funding crisis because: 1) the Social Security trust fund was exhausted in the year of 2002. 2) the number of retirees receiving benefits is rising more rapidly than the number of workers paying payrol

  • Q : Explain Subsidiary function Elucidate

    Elucidate the Secondary or Subsidiary function? Answer: 1) Standard of deferred payments: Money is executing as deferred Payment

  • Q : Example of acquisitions of merger The

    The Overpriced Petroleum Extraction Company (or OPEC) has just declared its acquisition of some small firms with facilities which will permit OPEC to process oil via the whole refining procedure, from oil field recovery via transporting and then trading the refined pe

  • Q : Labor Contracts-Featherbedding The

    The Restrictive work rules which need firms to employ more workers than essential are termed as: (i) Feather-bedding. (ii) Seniority contracts. (iii) Blacklisting regulations. (iv) Agency shop provisions. (v) Yellow dog contracts.

  • Q : Profit-maximizing price The

    The profit-maximizing price for “Silver Screen Classic” of Nostalgia DVDs is: (i) $6 per copy. (ii) $10 per copy. (iii) $12 per copy. (iv) $16 per copy. (v) $20 per copy.

    Q : Market Form-price taker In which market

    In which market form, the firm is a price taker? Answer: In Perfect competition

  • Q : Existence of Economies of Scale I have

    I have a problem in economics on Existence of Economies of Scale. Please help me in the following question. Economies of the scale exist whenever, as output is raised: (i) Average costs increase. (ii) Explicit costs increase relative to the value of output. (iii) Aver

  • Q : Market adjustments due to raised

    Normal 0 false false

  • Q : Increase revenues when price falls When

    When the price elasticity of demand for fried cheesy grits at Pixie’s Breakfast Grill is two, in that case a price cut of $2.80 to $2.00 per serving of grits would be most probably to: (1) reduce Pixie’s revenues from grits by roughly fort