--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Monopsonistic Exploitation and Wage

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. If a firm's wage structure reflects the keenness of individual employees to work, terms which are most applicable comprise: (i) Monopsonistic exploitation and the wage discrimin

  • Q : Definition if pure monopsonist Can

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The pure monopsonist: (1) Is the sole buyer of a specific good or resource in the given market. (2) Can adjust just quantity and therefore is a price-taker in input market. (3)

  • Q : Problem on equilibrium market price I

    I have a problem in economics on equilibrium market price. Please help me in the following question. The equilibrium market price subsists only if: (1) Quantity demanded equivalents the quantity supplied. (2) Surpluses exceed the shortages. (3) Expert

  • Q : Nominal wages If the nominal wages of

    If the nominal wages of carpenters rose by 5 percent in the year of 2000 and the price level increased by 3 percent, then the real wages of carpenters: A) decreased by 2 percent. B) increased by 2 percent. C) increased by 3 percent. D) increased by 8 percent.

  • Q : Relatively price elastic demand for

    If a change in the supply of a good results within a percentage change into quantity demanded which exceeds within absolute value the percentage change within price, in that case demand is relatively: (i) price elastic. (ii) inferior. (iii) normal. (i

  • Q : Labor Force Participation Rates The

    The percentage of a specified population who are either unemployed or employed is termed as the: (1) labor force participation rate. (2) work-force proportion. (3) labor supply. (4) substitution effect dominance rate. (5) income-leisure loss curve.

    Q : Signals of economic profits to

    Economic profits are: (1) signals which, for efficiency, more resources must be moved into an industry. (2) rewards to successful innovators. (3) capitalized as wealth when they can be expected over time. (4) a residual to a firm's owners for bearing

  • Q : Problem regarding Principal Agent The

    The baseball manager, whose players decline to bunt occasionally, rather always swinging for the homeruns, faces a: (i) Second-mover drawback. (ii) Prisoner’s dilemma. (iii) Principal-agent problem. (iv) Grim strategy. Can so

  • Q : Advantage of a partnership over

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. One of the advantages of a partnership over proprietorship is: (i) In a partnership just one partner is liable for the debt. (ii) Partnerships permit for more specialization in the management.

  • Q : Coefficient of cross-elasticity of

    When a price hike from $15 to $20 for DVD disks causes sales of DVD players to reduce from 100 to 50 units, in that case the coefficient of cross-elasticity of demand among these goods is approximately: (w) 1/10. (x)  10. (y)  7/3. (z)