--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Perfectly price discrimination

    Babble-On holds world-extensive patents for software which translates any of 314 spoken languages within text, along with automatic audio and text translations within any of the other three-hundred-thirteen languages. This figure illustrates that Babble-On as: (1) is

  • Q : What will happen when a supply of curve

    When a supply curve is positively sloped, a raise in demand will increase the equilibrium price as well as: (w) raise the quantity supplied. (x) raise supply. (y) decrease the quantity supplied. (z) decrease supply.

  • Q : Price elasticity of demand for pizza

    Since the price drops/falls from $8 to 1 all along this demand curve, the price elasticity of demand for pizza: (1) increases towards infinity. (2) Drops/Falls towards zero. (3) Increases, then drop/falls. (4) Always equivalents 1 and demand is unitar

  • Q : Labor Unions and Aggregate salary Income

    The least probable outcome when unions succeed in increasing their member’s salaries is that: (1) Wages in non-union sectors will drop. (2) Employment will produce in non-union sectors. (3) Barriers will be building up to limit the entry to unions. (4) Labor's s

  • Q : Equilibrium price of a quantity I have

    I have a problem in economics on Equilibrium price of a quantity. Please help me in the following question. The equilibrium price is a price at which the quantity: (1) Bought equivalents the quantity sold. (2) Demanded equivalents the quantity supplie

  • Q : Diagonal line in perfect equality of

    The ratio of the area among the diagonal line of perfect equality and the Lorenz curve to the total area in the diagonal is the: (1) poverty index. (2) human capital coefficient. (3) needs coefficient. (4) negative-tax index. (5) Gini index.

  • Q : Demand curve of an oligopolist The

    The demand curve an oligopolist faces is kinked at the current price when other firms into the industry: (1) face unitary elasticity of demand at their current output levels.(2) will match any price cuts although not price hikes. (3)

  • Q : Estimate total fixed costs for

    Total fixed costs for such profit-maximizing firm equivalent: (1) 0bcq1. (2) 0adq2. (3) 0Peq2. (4) aPed. (5) Can't be measured in illustrated figure.

    Q : Most effective excise taxes during

    Excise taxes upon cigarettes are most effective during reducing: (1) smokers' discretionary income for other goods. (2) cigarette production. (3) cigarette companies' profits. (4) consumption of snuff and chewing tobacco.

    Q : Purely competition demand for labor A

    A purely competitive demand of industry for labor is: (1) less elastic than the horizontal summation of the individual firm’s demands. (2) perfectly elastic. (3) upward sloping because of diminishing marginal returns to labor. (4) equal to the h