--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Price crosses elasticity of demand for

    When each 1 percent hike in the price of pencils causes a 2 percent decline within the quantity of erasers sold, the price crosses elasticity of demand for such complementary goods is about: (1) -2.0. (2) -1.0. (3) -4.0. (4) 2.0. (5) 1.0.

  • Q : Pure economic profit in the short run

    Monopolistically competitive firms: (w) profit by erecting durable barriers to entry and exit. (x) may realize pure economic profit in the short run, but not in the long run. (y) supply homogenous goods. (z) produce where marginal cost is at its minim

  • Q : Pure competition or monopoly with

    Compared along with pure competition or monopoly, not perfect competition is: (w) far more common in Europe than in the United States. (x) much more common in markets during the world. (y) much less common in advanced nations than in underdeveloped na

  • Q : Quality and safety in Adverse Selection

    The popular sporting goods magazine publishes a report on quality and safety of different brands of ski equipment. This report would be most probable to determine a problem consumer’s face since of: (i) Adverse selection. (ii) Brand-name bias. (iii) High priced

  • Q : Saving transaction costs by locations

    Economic rent by a parcel of land is positively associated to the: (w) savings in transaction costs yielded by its location. (x) amount of idle land adjacent to this. (y) time this has been held by the current landowner. (z) amount of natural flora an

  • Q : Human Capital-Specific Training Can

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The costs of investing human capital are most probable to be borne by the employer if the human capital is as: (1) General. (2) Marginal. (3) Generic. (4) Precise. (5) Specific.

  • Q : Demand for Labor and Monopsony Power

    When wage discrimination is not likely for the first 40 workers this profit-maximizing firm hires, however it can wage discriminate absolutely whenever hiring all the subsequent workers, it hires a net of: (1) 40 workers at average wage of $700 per week per worker. (2

  • Q : Needs Standard for Income Distribution

    The needs standard for income distribution would certainly involve: (w) difficulty in the measurement of productivity. (x) an enormous bureaucracy. (y) greater incentives for production than the contribution standard. (z) economic ef

  • Q : Short run supply of an industry The

    The cranberry industry’s short-run supply is demonstrated as: (i) curve A. (ii) curve B. (iii) curve E. (iv) curve F. (v) curve G.

    Q : Present Value of Future Income The

    The present value of future income is: (w) higher, the higher the interest rate. (x) lower, the higher the interest rate. (y) unaffected by the interest rate. (z) purely objective, and not subjective at all. Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some views for above Economics pr