--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Reform welfare mess Proposals to reform

    Proposals to reform the “welfare mess” comprises: (w) increasing education levels. (x) increasing job training programs. (y) enforcement of the Equal Pay Act. (z) negative income taxes. How can I solve

  • Q : Competitive industry widespread

    When a competitive industry experiences widespread economic profits into the short run, in that case in the long run: (w) new firms will enter and prices will fall. (x) entry barriers will be erected. (y) resource costs must fall. (z) dominant firms b

  • Q : Problem on production costs I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Problem on production costs. Please help me in the following question. From the viewpoint of sellers, the market demand for the good mainly based least on: (i) Consumer preferences and tastes. (ii) Income and its distr

  • Q : Variable costs in short run A monopoly

    A monopoly tends to shut down within the short-run when: (i) price is less than the minimum of average total costs [ATC]. (ii) price cannot cover all overhead costs. (iii) variable costs are not covered. (iv) total costs exceed total revenues. (v) the

  • Q : Provision of employment opportunities

    Government attempts to decrease poverty in the United States have comprised: (1) the provision of employment opportunities. (2) strong reliance on the negative income tax. (3) elimination of all taxes on the poor. (4) rising federal expenditures for m

  • Q : Dynamic Tit-for-Tat Carlos and Ivana

    Carlos and Ivana are friends and roommates. They eat together despite who cooks. But this cooking game is repeated mostly every evening, across time the probable result would be which: (1) neither Carlos nor Ivana cook, nor do they eat. (2) Carlos alone cooks for both

  • Q : Substitute goods in cross-elasticity of

    The cross-elasticity of demand among any pair of goods is positive when the goods are: (i) luxuries. (ii) necessities. (iii) complements. (iv) substitutes. Hey friends please give your opinion for the problem of

  • Q : Long-run purely competitive industry

    For a purely competitive industry in the long-run: (w) neither net entry nor net exit of firms will arise. (x) firms will experience significant economies of scale. (y) the typical firm’s economic profit will exceed its accounting profit. (z) th

  • Q : Increase revenues when price falls When

    When the price elasticity of demand for fried cheesy grits at Pixie’s Breakfast Grill is two, in that case a price cut of $2.80 to $2.00 per serving of grits would be most probably to: (1) reduce Pixie’s revenues from grits by roughly fort

  • Q : Long run for production theory Long run

    Long run for the production theory is a time period across which: (i) All production occurs. (ii) Firms can adjust all their costs and resources. (iii) Bigger firms absorb the smaller firms. (iv) Marginal costs become decreasingly significant. (iv) Im