--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Marginal revenue curve A monopolist

    A monopolist which does not price discriminate has a marginal revenue curve which slopes down faster than does the demand curve the monopolist faces since: (1) economies of scale are significant. (2) selling more requires lowering the

  • Q : Inconsistent of demand with standard

    The curve which is so inconsistent along with standard consumer theory which is based only on the substitution result, this could not possibly be a demand curve for any standard kind of consumer good is: (1) curve D1D1. (2) curve

  • Q : Meaning of Caveat emptor I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Meaning of Caveat emptor. Please help me in the following question. Caveat emptor signifies: (i) Let the seller beware! (ii) Everything else held steady. (iii) Let things modify if they should. (iv) Charge whatever the market will allo

  • Q : Cost and revenue assume the firm is a

    assume the firm is a price taker and faces a market price of €60 per unit. draw the AR and MR curves

  • Q : Problem on free market economy A) Using

    A) Using appropriate tables and diagrams explain how price and quantity is determined in a free market economy. B) Briefly explain using the diagrams in 4.1 the followings two scenarios C) When

  • Q : Substitution Effect-relative price of

    The substitution effect signifies to the change in consumption pattern as: (1) The absolute price of the good modifications. (2) Income changes. (3) The relative price of good changes. (4) The quality of good changes. Can someone p

  • Q : Market demands for automobiles The

    The market demands for automobiles are not rapidly and directly influenced by modifications in: (i) Income. (ii) Gasoline prices. (iii) Salaries paid to auto-workers. (iv) The number of legal drivers. (v) Preferences and tastes.

    Q : Determine probable price taker Of the

    Of the given firms, the probably to be a price taker would be: (1) Microsoft. (2) Wal-Mart. (3) Toyota. (4) the Los Angeles Lakers. (5) the biggest wheat farm in Canada. I need a good answer on the topic of

  • Q : Sum of Monopolistic Exploitation Sum of

    Sum of the monopolistic exploitation across all workers tends to rise however a firm as well functions at a more socially and economically proficient level of output and employment whenever the firm is capable to engage in: (1) Blacklisting in its dea

  • Q : Financial Capital-Monopoly power Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The corporation is least probable to secure funding for its operations by: (1) Acquiring its biggest competitor via a merger which consolidates its monopoly power. (2) Issuing the common stock