--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Profit from predatory pricing In order

    In order for a firm to profit from predatory pricing: (w) the incumbent must fulfill the entire industry demand at a price below costs. (x) the cost of predation should be less than the profits incurred through driving out one’s rivals from the

  • Q : Objectives of Microeconomic policy

    Widely accepted objectives for microeconomic policy comprise: (w) full employment. (x) general price stability. (y) economic development. (z) efficiency, freedom and equity. Hey friends please give your opinion for

  • Q : Calculation of total fixed cost of a

    Hello friends I need your help to solve the problem that is given below: This firm's total fixed cost (TFC) can be calculated as area: (a) 0PeQ. (b) bPec. (c) aPed. (d) 0bcQ. (e) abcd.

    Q : When is the DVD sale increased most

    DVD sales are most probably to rise over the long run when the: (w) supply of live entertainment rises. (x) government imposes stiff taxes upon video tapes. (y) technology carries on to advance. (z) prices of theater tickets fall.

  • Q : In value planning what matter in

    In the value of planning what still matters in strategic management lies?

  • Q : Stages of production One of my friends

    One of my friends can't succeed to get the answer of this question. Give solution of this question. Described the stages of production and in which stage will production occur and why?

  • Q : Asymmetic Infomation The problem of

    The problem of asymmetric information is that: A. neither health care buyers nor providers are well-informed. B. health care providers are well-informed, but buyers are not. C. the outcomes of many complex medical procedures cannot be predicted. D. insurance companies are well-informed but poli

  • Q : Present consumption and future

    When interest rate increases, the cost of future consumption decreases?

  • Q : History-AFL-CIO The amalgamation of

    The amalgamation of American Federation of Labor, representing the craft unions and the Congress of Industrial Unions, representing the industrial unions, happened in: (i) 1955. (ii) 1960. (iii) 1970. (iv) 1965. (v) 1975. Find out

  • Q : When would transaction cost be zero All

    All transaction costs would be zero when: (1) Congress required current prices to be cut by eighteen percent. (2) market information and transportation were both costless. (3) market prices were legally restricted to production costs. (4) inflation we