--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Monopsonistic firms-Pay lower wages I

    I have a problem in economics on Monopsonistic firms-Pay lower wages. Please help me in the following question. Relative to the firms hiring in a competitive labor market, the monopsonistic firms tend to: (1) Hire more workers. (2) Hire labor up to a

  • Q : Persistence of Economic profits in long

    I have a problem in economics on Persistence of Economic profits in long run. Please help me in the following question. Economic profits will continue in long run only when: (i) There are barriers to the entry and exit. (ii) Markets are much competitive. (iii) There a

  • Q : Complementary Goods-Purchasing goods

    Subsequent to Judith buys an American eagle shirt at the mall for 50 percent off, she purchases the matching purse, skirt and earrings. Such extra purchases are illustrations of: (i) Complementary goods. (ii) Substitute goods. (iii) Numbers and ages of the buyers. (iv

  • Q : Affects in Great Depression State what

    State what affect the most in Great Depression?

  • Q : Differentiate pure competition and

    The difference among pure competition and monopolistic competition is which: (w) monopolistic competitors generate more profit in the long run. (x) monopolistic competitors always ignore short term losses. (y) long run entry and exit is probable in pu

  • Q : Import car market in equilibrium before

    While the import car market is in equilibrium before the government restricts car imports to Q1, the price which buyers will pay for an import as: (1) falls from P0 to P1. (2) is stable, although dealer profits fall by

  • Q : Define consumption function Consumption

    Consumption function: The relationship among income and consumption is termed as consumption function.

  • Q : Problem on buying a used car You desire

    You desire to purchase a used car. The dealer knows accurately how well the car works and how much it must cost, although you are not sure of its value. This is an illustration of: (i) Asymmetric information. (ii) Dealer rights. (iii) Predatory pricing. (iv) First mov

  • Q : Demand curve for Complementary Goods

    The ban on assault weapons enacted in the year 1994 lapsed in the year 2004. Prices for assault weapons fell in year 2004 since the only way to get such guns throughout the ban was via the black market. This modify in the law in year 2004 is most probable to shift the

  • Q : Cost of inputs in Determinants of demand

    I have a problem in economics on Cost of inputs in Determinants of demand. Please help me in the following question. The entire given are determinants of demand apart from. (i) Taxes and preferences. (ii) The cost of inputs. (iii) Price expectations.