--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Annual total revenue when profit

    When Nostalgia Corporation maximizes profit in its production of Silver Screen DVDs, in that case its annual total revenue will be roughly: (i) $40 million. (ii) $60 million. (iii) $80 million. (iv) $100 million. (v) $120 million.

  • Q : Relative Income Measurement by

    The Department of the Census explains low relative income as experienced while families: (w) lack sufficient income to buy the fundamental food clothing and shelter required for survival. (x) would like to improve the

  • Q : Demand for a poorer good Household’s

    Household’s demand for a poorer good tends to fall if: (1) Supplies of complementary goods increase. (2) Prices of alternate goods increase. (3) Family income rises. (4) Its own price drops/falls. Can someone

  • Q : Market shifting while supply fallen and

    Specified the shifts demonstrated in the market for peanuts, there is the: (1) price will fall.(2)  quantity of output will rise slightly. (3) supply has fallen while demand has grown. (4) main adjustment happens in the quantity exchanged. (5) va

  • Q : Reducing proportion of the work force

    The assertion which unions are more powerful nowadays than ever before is: (i) Supported by the consequences of the union contracts on an inflationary spirals. (ii) Reflected in the growing proportion of workers included in violent, protracted and costly strikes. (iii

  • Q : Profits predict by structure conduct

    When cost structures and market demands were identical for each of the given types of firms, in that case the structure-conduct-performance paradigm would predict the greatest profits for: (1) pure monopolist. (2) price-discriminating monopolist. (3)

  • Q : Lower price results in higher product

    When lower price outcomes in higher bread sales, this points out an: (i) Raise in the quantity of bread demanded. (ii) Raise in the quantity of bread supplied. (iii) Exception to the law of demand. (iv) Raised taste for bread. Can

  • Q : Relative Income Measures and

    After adjusting income for taxes and transfers, affects that would be least responsible for the reducing percentages of the U.S. population classified like “middle relative income” from 1976 is probably: (

  • Q : Economic losses driven down to zero

    Exit by a competitive industry will arise till economic: (1) profits are driven to zero. (2) profits counterbalance accounting losses. (3) incomes are equalized for comparable workers. (4) costs are sufficiently below accounting losses. (5) losses are driven down to z

  • Q : Specific market price The difference

    The difference among maximum amount which consumers would willingly pay for a particular quantity of a good and the amount they really pay at a specific market price is termed as: (i) Discount rate. (ii) Mark-up factor. (iii) Familial gains. (iv) Hous