--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Elasticity and profit maximization A

    A nondiscriminating monopolist cannot maximize profits through producing where demand: (w) price elastic. (x) price inelastic. (y) above marginal cost. (z) above marginal revenue. Can someone explain/help me with b

  • Q : Why demand curve is more elastic Why

    Why demand curve is more elastic under monopolistic competition as compare to monopoly.

  • Q : Illustrate an example of arbitrage

    Purchasing oil into Kuwait for $22 per barrel and selling that you purchased for $30 per barrel into Sao Paolo is an illustration of: (w) speculation. (x) bifurcation. (y) a subsidy. (z) arbitrage. I need a good answer on the topic

  • Q : Income effect on leisure Can someone

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The individual’s labor supply curve is negatively sloped [that is, backward-bending] in the range of wages if the: (i) Demand for goods exceed the demand for leisure. (ii)

  • Q : Oligopolistic nature of industries The

    The oligopolistic nature of several industries is probably to be attributable to: (1) overly expansionary macroeconomic policies. (2) corporate instability. (3) economies of scale. (4) cooperative gaming. (5) unstable Nash equilibrium.

    Q : Competitive resource markets and low

    When resource markets are competitive and transaction costs are low, in that case landowners: (1) pass forward completely any land tax. (2) can drive up the rental rate of land by changing its supply. (3) bear the full burden of any t

  • Q : Changes in price influencing supply

    Describe how changes in the prices of other products influence the supply of a specific product.

  • Q : Determine total revenue when maximizes

    Total revenue when this firm maximizes economic profits would be: (w) $72,000 per period. (x) $80,000 per period. (y) $96,000 per period. (z) $100,000 per period.

    Q : Problem on utility-maximizing bundle

    Jane consumes only apples and chocolate.  She is always willing to trade 1piece of chocolate for exactly 3 apples. Her income is $200.  She can buy apples for $1 each and chocolate for $2 per piece.a. To Jane, apples and chocolate are (circle 1):

  • Q : Emerging natural monopoly A monopoly

    A monopoly will come out naturally when: (w) the government relaxes antitrust laws. (x) economies of scale are large relative to market demand. (y) variable costs are huge relative to fixed costs. (z) variable costs rise as output expands.