--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Changes in market prices and conditions

    The model of pure competitive is intended to produce insights within how: (w) asymmetric information influences the efficiency of exchange. (x) buyers and sellers negotiate to reach contracts for goods and services. (y) markets determine equitable dis

  • Q : Price elasticity of demand when price

    When diet faddists gulp 205 million unsweetened as “No-Carb” milkshakes of $2.30 apiece, if cut back to 155 million per week while the price rises to $3.70 every, the price elasticity of their demand for shakes equivalents

  • Q : Operation of profit maximizing pure

    This profit-maximizing pure competitor would stop operating within this market into the long run when the price was expected to be persistently less than the price consequent to: (i) point c. (ii) point d. (iii) point e. (iv) point f. (v) point g.

  • Q : Marginal social benefit and costs under

    Under pure competition, there is marginal social benefit will equivalent marginal social cost unless: (w) “hit and run” entrepreneurs prosper. (x) economic profits are zero. (y) there are externalities. (z) entrepreneurs a

  • Q : Price inelasticity of supply The price

    The price elasticity of supply is zero therefore supply is perfectly price inelastic within: (w) Panel A. (x) Panel B. (y) Panel C. (z) Panel D.

    Q : Demand curve The law of demand is

    The law of demand is graphically demonstrated by:

  • Q : Problem on volatility of prices Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. In long run, the activities of successful speculators tend to: (i) Decrease the volatility of prices. (ii) Attract legal attention resultant in imprisonment. (iii) Raise the level and volatili

  • Q : Produce output by zero marginal reveune

    When LoCalLoCarbo, the favorite corporation of fad dieters,in that case produces output q* [that where is marginal revenue is zero] as: (1) LoCalLoCarbo’s total revenue is at its highest possible level. (2) expanding output to q4 would cause tot

  • Q : Cost of inputs in Determinants of demand

    I have a problem in economics on Cost of inputs in Determinants of demand. Please help me in the following question. The entire given are determinants of demand apart from. (i) Taxes and preferences. (ii) The cost of inputs. (iii) Price expectations.

  • Q : What is fiscal deficit Fiscal deficit :

    Fiscal deficit: When the total government expenses are more than total government receipts exclusive of borrowing it is termed as fiscal deficit. Fiscal deficit = Total Government Expenditure – Tot