--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Least probable resource for supply curve

    The resource least probable to conform to the supply curve demonstrated in this figure would be: (w) land. (x) capital. (y) labor. (z) entrepreneurship.

    Q : Price mechanism Write down the benefits

    Write down the benefits of leaving the allocation of countries resources to price mechanism?

  • Q : Rent controls fix rent in equilibrium

    Rent controls which fix rents below equilibrium will NOT: (w) maintain monetary rents down. (x) create shortages of rental housing. (y) stimulate non-market allocations of rental housing. (z) maintain the opportunity costs of housing down.

  • Q : In-Kind Transfer Payments Medicare,

    Medicare, rent subsidies, Medicaid, and food stamps are examples of: (w) transfers in-kind. (x) cash transfers. (y) human capital programs. (z) negative income taxes. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem

  • Q : Economic profit of purely-competitive

    This purely-competitive lumber mill experiences on the average day is an: (w) economic profit of about $340. (x) economic loss of roughly $150. (y) accounting profit of less than $300. (z) accounting loss of more than $100.

    Q : Intending negative income tax The

    The negative income tax suggestions: (w) are intended to simplify federal income taxes. (x) require the poor to pay taxes regardless of their incomes. (y) call for higher income taxes on transfer payments. (z) are attempts to balance the goals of equi

  • Q : Rises price elasticity of demand for a

    The price elasticity of demand for a good will tend to rise as the: (i) number of obtainable substitutes increases. (ii) consumer income level increases. (iii) good is a less significant budget item. (iv) time permitted for response decreases. (v) ela

  • Q : Profits of monopoly firm A monopoly

    A monopoly firm's profits: (w) equal only normal profits in long-run equilibrium. (x) may be whatever level the firm wishes. (y) are maximized where MC = MR. (z) tend to be lower than that of pure competitors. Hell

  • Q : Greatest total revenue at price In the

    In the demonstrated figure, total revenue is greatest for cheesy fried grits of Pixie at a price of as: (w) P1. (x) P2. (y) P3. (z) P4.

    Q : Duopoly for two sellers What is that

    What is that market termed in which there are just two sellers (or firms)? Answer: Duopoly terms to a market condition in which there are only two sellers.