--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Problem on volatility of prices Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. In long run, the activities of successful speculators tend to: (i) Decrease the volatility of prices. (ii) Attract legal attention resultant in imprisonment. (iii) Raise the level and volatili

  • Q : Specific market price The difference

    The difference among maximum amount which consumers would willingly pay for a particular quantity of a good and the amount they really pay at a specific market price is termed as: (i) Discount rate. (ii) Mark-up factor. (iii) Familial gains. (iv) Hous

  • Q : Long-run economic losses in a

    Expectations of long-run economic losses within a competitive industry as: (1) inevitably follow “cut throat” pricing policies. (2) cause firms to leave the industry. (3) increase each firm’s long-run fixed costs. (4) create pressure

  • Q : Quantity of good supplied exceeds

    While the quantity of a good supplied exceeds the quantity demanded: (1) sellers are more likely to create concessions to buyers. (2) the current market price is below equilibrium. (3) consumers gain through buying before prices adjust upward. (4) the quality of outpu

  • Q : Typical pure competitor firm in industry

    When this firm is a typical pure competitor within this industry as in demonstrated figure, then the firm is: (i) making normal accounting profit. (ii) making zero economic profit. (iii) breaking even. (iv) into an industry within long run equilibrium

  • Q : Efficiency Wages-Expected losses

    Expected losses to the workers from shirking are raised when a firm accepts a policy of: (1) Dividing the productive tasks and hence the division of labor is optimal. (2) Paying the efficiency wages which surpass market-clearing wages. (3) Avoiding the legal liability

  • Q : Assignment hi tutor, I sent you the new

    hi tutor, I sent you the new one assignment, Can you solve it for me , please. I want to receive the solution on this Saturday (11/1/2014) . Is that ok? Thank you so much.

  • Q : Long run problem In long run , the

    In long run, the actions of successful speculators tend to rise: (i) Gains and raise consumer’s costs. (ii) Output and decrease the volatility of prices. (iii) Corruption and Bribery in government. (iv) The volatility of both prices and outputs.

  • Q : Question based on production

    In drawing the production possibilities curve we assume that: 1) technology is fixed. 2) unemployment exists. 3) economic resources are unlimited. 4) wants are limited.

  • Q : Selling footballers-the economic

    State economic arguments on whether a football club must sell a significant player?