--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Competitive Profit Maximization-average

    The purely competitive firm which hires more workers if the value of marginal product of labor increases above the competitively set wage rate will certainly experience rises in its: (1) Overhead costs. (2) Profit per unit. (3) Average variable cost. (4) Marginal reve

  • Q : Relationship between MPP and TPP If MPP

    If MPP is zero, what can you state regarding TPP? Answer: TPP is at its maximum.

  • Q : Wise and efficient use of grocery in

    I have a problem in economics on Wise and efficient use of grocery in Consumer Surplus. Please help me in the following question. The consumer surplus is most probable to be raised by: (i) Wise and proficient use of grocery store coupons. (ii) Rises in the production

  • Q : Estimate elasticity of supply When a 20

    When a 20 percent price hike causes quantity supplied to develop 50 percent, elasticity of supply is just about: (w) 5/2. (x) 2/5. (y) 2. (z) 1/2. Please choose the right answer from above...I want your suggestion

  • Q : Monopsonist-Wage discriminate Compared

    Compared with the price taker in labor market, the monopsonist which can’t wage discriminate will: (i) Hire more labor at any specified wage. (ii) Hire less labor at any wage. (iii) Pay a higher wage for any specified quantity of labor. (iv) Hire more prolific l

  • Q : Minor Inefficiencies in Monopolistic

    Minor inefficiencies generated since monopolistic competitors differentiate their products may be more than offset through the: (w) increase in economic equity. (x) expansion of the psychologically-meaningful choices obtainable to consumers. (y) reduc

  • Q : Ratio of percentage changes in quantity

    The ratio of the percentage change within the quantity of beef sold over the percentage change within the price of pork is: (1) price elasticity of demand for beef. (2) price elasticity of demand for pork. (3) income elasticity of dem

  • Q : Differences in site values An acre of

    An acre of Manhattan is worth additional than an acre of prime Iowa farm land due to differences in: (1) perpetuities. (2) time preferences. (3) site values. (4) interest rates. (5) taxes. Can someone explain/help me with best solu

  • Q : Horizontal summation of individual

    The market demand curves for most of the goods are as: (i) Cross-multiplied products of the individual demand curves. (ii) Insignificant for most of the analytical aims. (iii) The horizontal summation of the individual demand curves. (iv) Irrelevant for business decis

  • Q : Problem on buyers and sellers

    The supply and demand are affected by the time in sense that the longer the time interval considered, the: (1) Less sensitive sellers and buyers are to price changes. (2) Much sensitive sellers and buyers are to price changes. (3) Bigger is supply and