--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Determine Income Floor A marginal tax

    A marginal tax rate of 40% and an income floor of __________ give in a break-even level of income of $12,000 is: (1) $30,000 (2) $4,800 (3) $7,200 (4) $3,000 (5) $16,800 Hey friend

  • Q : Demand for Complementary Goods Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Reductions in the price of tea are most probable to raise the demands for: (i) Lemons, ice cubes and sugar. (ii) Cola, coffee and hot cocoa. (iii) Mint juleps, Daiquiris and moonshine. (iv) Va

  • Q : Good illustration of oligopoly The

    The tobacco industry within the United States is a good illustration of: (1) monopoly. (2) pure competition. (3) oligopoly. (4) corporate responsibility. (5) duopoly. I need a good answer on the topic of Economics

  • Q : Competitive industry widespread

    When a competitive industry experiences widespread economic profits into the short run, in that case in the long run: (w) new firms will enter and prices will fall. (x) entry barriers will be erected. (y) resource costs must fall. (z) dominant firms b

  • Q : Increment in quantity demanded by price

    A demand curve has a slope which would be expressed as like $5/ (1 extra ton demanded) when a: (w) 5 % price cut raises quantity demanded by 1 %. (x) $5 price cut increases quantity demanded by 2000 lbs. (y) $5 price hike boosts quantity supplied by 2

  • Q : Arising of natural monopolist Natural

    Natural monopolies arise due to: (w) artificial barriers to entry. (x) contestable markets. (y) price discrimination. (z) natural barriers to entry. I need a good answer on the topic of Economics p

  • Q : Problem regarding Hicks Model of

    The time period of union strikes and the equilibrium wage rate at conclusion of the strike are focus at: (i) Dept. of Labor’s Collective Bargaining Arbitration Division. (ii) Collective bargaining model made by Sir John Hicks. (iii) Bilateral monopoly model.(iv)

  • Q : Powerful firm confronted by powerful

    The model which examines the limits to bargaining among a powerful firm confronted by the powerful union is: (1) Bilateral monopoly model. (2) Pure monopsony model. (3) Convergence model. (4) Featherbedding model. (5) Keynesian cross model.

    Q : Low-income elasticities of demand

    Placing an excise tax upon goods along with low-income elasticities of demand will share out the tax burden as: (1) proportionally between high-income and low-income households. (2) disproportionately on high-income households. (3) disproportionately

  • Q : Profit margins Examine within your

    Examine within your answer the circumstances that will enable a company to pass on cost increases to customers and protect profit margins. For example- price sensitivity of demand, rising food prices, cotton prices, etc.