--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Perfectly elastic supply problem When

    When will a rise in demand entail an increase in the quantity demanded however no change in the price?

  • Q : Utilitarianism-Peoples happiness The

    The social goal of providing the biggest happiness to the most people is intent to practice the: (i) Precautionary discretion. (ii) Classical theory. (iii) Utilitarianism. (iv) Speculative balances. (v) Arbitrage. Can someone pleas

  • Q : Unemployment among skilled workers

    Rises in the legal minimum wage rate have not been blamed for rising: (i) Unemployment among the teenagers. (ii) Racial discrimination in the employment. (iii) Unemployment among trained workers who have lost their jobs since of competition from the cheaper imports. (

  • Q : Industrial Unions-organizing workers

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Industrial unions are proposed to organize all the workers in: (i) A specific company. (ii) The United States. (iii) Particular skill or the craft. (iv) Particular occupation. (v) Specific ind

  • Q : Condition for long-run equilibrium

    Which of the given is NOT a condition for long-run equilibrium into a purely competitive market: (w) P = MC (x) MR = MC (y) P = LRAC (z) TFC = TC Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem rega

  • Q : Problem on Profit Maximization in Labor

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. In the marginality, profit-maximizing model of firm, a firm which can’t wage discriminate maximizes profit if labor is hired at a point where: (1) Price = MFC. (2) MRP = VMP. (3) MRP = M

  • Q : Effect of purchasing goods to

    Most of the people can’t modify relative market prices however have a little control over the relative subjective prices of the goods they consume. They are most probable to make market prices and subjective prices compatible when they: (i) Raise purchases of go

  • Q : Capital or current account Is import of

    Is import of machinery recorded in capital or current account? Answer: It is recorded in current account since it deals as the purchase of goods.

  • Q : Income elasticity of demand computations

    When yearly per capita income increases from $13,500 to $26,500 and custom car sales increase from 100,000 to 200,000, by using the arc elasticity formula, then the income elasticity of demand is: (i) 0.50. (ii) 0.75. (iii) 1.00. (iv)

  • Q : Distribution of income in a purely

    For a specified distribution of income within a purely competitive economy, marginal social benefit will the same marginal social cost unless: (w) “hit and run” entrepreneurs prosper. (x) economic profits