--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Market power and excess capacity A

    A monopolist which does not price discriminate cannot concurrently maximize profit and: (w) charge a price equal to marginal cost. (x) minimize average cost. (y) charge a price equal to minimum average cost. (z) produce only zero econ

  • Q : Effects of less liquid assets on

    When households become more willing to hold less liquid assets, the: (w) interest rate rises. (x) present value of future income falls. (y) interest rate falls. (z) stock market will crash. How can I solve my

  • Q : Equilibrium rate of monopsony

    I have a problem in economics on Equilibrium rate of monopsony exploitation. Please help me in the following question. Equilibrium rate of the monopsony exploitation by a firm is a difference between: (i) MRP and VMP. (ii) VMP and w. (iii) MFC and w.

  • Q : Explain Production Possibility curve

    Elucidate Production Possibility curve with the help of a diagram? Answer: The Production Possibility Curve refers to a curve that shows various production possibil

  • Q : Economies of Scope-Firms using

    Firms which use similar production facility or groups of inputs to concurrently generate various kinds of products are taking benefit of: (1) Tax loop-holes. (2) Variegated production. (3) Economies of scope. (4) Economies of scale. (5) Monopoly power.

    Q : Attract aggressive competition by high

    There is substantial evidence which: (w) size alone protects modern corporations from competitive pressures. (x) big unions manipulate government more than big business does. (y) the marketplace serves business firms better than consumers. (z) high pr

  • Q : Reallocation of resources-Government

    Describe the Reallocation of resources objective of the government budget.

  • Q : Synonym of Word Inequity Of the given,

    Of the given, the closest synonym for the word inequity is: (w) inequality. (x) disproportional. (y) unfairness. (z) regressivity. Can someone explain/help me with best solution about problem of Economics

  • Q : Opponents of Contribution Standard

    Opponents of contribution standard for income distribution, the: (w) prefer a more efficient mechanism to distribute income. (x) accept marginal productivity theory. (y) question how well the market system measures productivity. (z) generally favor de

  • Q : Decrease transportation and transaction

    The value of land is attributable to the ways exactly sites decrease transportation and other transaction costs are termed as: (1) location rents. (2) transportation rents. (3) short term quasi rents. (4) parcel posts. (5) transaction