--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Conscious interdependence of oligopoly

    Firms that should contemplate the potential reactions of rival firms while adjusting their pricing and output to maximize long run profit are operating within an industry which is: (1) perfectly competitive. (2) purely competitive. (3) monopolisticall

  • Q : Benefit of the market system One

    One political benefit of the market system over the majority of other economic systems is that: (1) The power to take decisions is comparatively decentralized. (2) Democratic decisions are steadier than individual selections (3) Centralized decisions

  • Q : Capital markets efficiency What is

    What is capital markets efficiency?

  • Q : Demand of goods people willing to buy

    The amount of goods which people are willing and capable to buy is termed as their: (i) Desires. (ii) Demands. (iii) Requirements. (iv) Needs. (v) Wants. Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answe

  • Q : Involvement of price makers firms

    Price-maker firms would most likely comprise: (1) a tomato farmer in California. (2) a sheep herder who produces wool in a remote part of New Zealand. (3) a stock broker who contacts customers through the internet. (4) a rural grocery store. (5) the b

  • Q : Cross-elasticity of demand Interpret

    Interpret the following Cross-Price Elasticities of Demand (XED) and explain the relationship between these goods. (3 marks total, 1.5 marks per part) XED= + 0.64 and XED= -2.6

  • Q : Economy in Bulgaria What is the economy

    What is the economy in Bulgaria like?

  • Q : Price ceiling If the government puts a

    If the government puts a rent ceiling of $650 a month, what is the rent paid and how many rooms are rented? Explain why?

  • Q : Explaination of balance of payment

    explaination of balance of payment identity

  • Q : Quantity of products in market power

    For a monopolist to raise the quantity of its products sold needs the monopolist to as: (i) raise the price of its product. (ii) charge a constant price. (iii) invest heavily in a distribution network. (iv) lower the price of its product. (v) advertis