--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Operations of monopolistically

    This monopolistically competitive firm as illustrated below produces Q units and its operations are demonstrated: (w) for the market period only. (x) as imposing economic losses of dcbe in the long run. (y) as generating short-run economic profits equ

  • Q : Constant cost industries In

    In constant-cost, the purely competitive industries: (w) total cost is constant at every output. (x) marginal cost is constant at each output. (y) number of firms is constant at every output. (z) long-run supply price is uninfluenced by output. <

  • Q : Organizing business to maximize the

    I have a problem in economics on organizing business to maximize the funds. Please help me in the following question. The entrepreneur who wants to maximize her firm’s admittance to funds from investors or banks must organize the business as a: (1) Proprietorshi

  • Q : Levels of recent interest rate When

    When households become ever more willing to sacrifice future consumption therefore that they can enjoy greater levels of recent consumption, in that case the: (w) interest rate rises. (x) interest rate falls. (y) present value of future income rises. (z) equilibrium r

  • Q : Tax burden distribution of relatively

    Demands for alcoholic and tobacco beverages tend to be relatively price inelastic and income inelastic. There per unit “sin taxes” upon these products will share out the tax burden: (i) proportionally among high-income and

  • Q : Marginal revenue at possible output

    At each possible output level, there a purely competitive firm’s marginal revenue curve is: (w) above its demand curve. (x) below its demand curve. (y) identical along with its demand curve. (z) steeper than its demand curve.

    Q : Problem regarding to tax wedges in

    In equilibrium, a tax upon a good tends to because of the: (1) supply to exceed the demand. (2) quantity supplied to exceed the quantity demanded. (3) demand prices of consumers to exceed the supply prices of sellers. (4) competitive

  • Q : Break-even level of income under

    For a family of four the break-even level of income under the negative income tax system demonstrated in this figure is: (1) $15,000 per year. (2) $30,000 per year. (3) $45,000 per year. (4) $60,000 per year. (5) $75,000 per year.

  • Q : Opinion about kinked demand curve model

    George Stigler concluded which the kinked demand curve model is incorrect to the extent that this depends on: (w) marginal cost pricing. (x) pure competition. (y) interdependent decision making.  (z) sticky prices.

  • Q : Competitive Prices for selling This

    This purely-competitive producer’s generic bricks presently sell for: (i) $60 per thousand. (ii) $70 per thousand. (iii) $80 per thousand. (iv) $90 per thousand. (v) $100 per thousand.

    Discover Q & A

    Leading Solution Library
    Avail More Than 1452137 Solved problems, classrooms assignments, textbook's solutions, for quick Downloads
    No hassle, Instant Access
    Start Discovering

    18,76,764

    1955960
    Asked

    3,689

    Active Tutors

    1452137

    Questions
    Answered

    Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!

    Submit Assignment

    ©TutorsGlobe All rights reserved 2022-2023.