--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Consumer Equilibrium-Utility

    Assume that you are an avid golfer and profit $36 worth of pleasure from the first golf hole played on any specific day, however the additional pleasure you profit from playing succeeding holes falls by $2 per extra hole. The $40 greens fee is needed to begin golfing

  • Q : Intersection of demand and supply curves

    What determines the intersection of demand and supply curves?

  • Q : Problem on Decisions at the Marginal

    The least clear illustration of how decisions are generally at the margin would be: (i) A floral shop hiring an additional clerk and opening earlier in hopes of increasing revenues by half. (ii) Eating less whenever the menu is a-la-carte than at an ‘all-you-can

  • Q : Effects of price controls for a price

    The consequences of price controls would be least discernible for a price ceiling set: (1) above the price equilibrium. (2) below the price equilibrium. (3) in a region of diminishing returns. (4) unfavorable to market companies. (5)

  • Q : Price floors with government purchases

    Suppose the U.S. wheat market is primarily in a stable equilibrium upon S0D0. Assume now that the government institutes a legal price floor at P3 per bushel of wheat. When the government will buy and store any resulting surplus

  • Q : When did marginal utility diminished

    The marginal utility most obviously diminished whenever: (1) Eric sang six songs rather than only one on karaoke night at local club. (2) Molly’s piano lessons absorbed 20 hrs last week she could have used up for studying. (3) Karen built 12 boxes however only 9

  • Q : Short-run equilibrium of purely

    At the price P1, the given figure of purely competitive cranberry industry is within: (w) long-run equilibrium. (x) short-run equilibrium. (y) market period disequilibrium. (z) short-run disequilibrium. <

  • Q : Probable quantity of the good by price

    Price discrimination which successfully increases profit does NOT needs the firm to be capable to: (1) separate the market within different groups along with different demand elasticities. (2) maintain entry barriers which defend a firm’s market

  • Q : Monopsonistic Exploitation-MRP and w

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. In the equilibrium for an organization with power to adjust the wage it pays, the rate of monopsonistic exploitation equivalents any differe

  • Q : Goods of negative income elasticity of

    When the income elasticity of market demand is negative, in that case most consumers view the good as: (w) a luxury good. (x) having several imperfect substitutes. (y) an inferior good. (z) a normal good. Hey frien