--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Words of Joseph A. Schumpeter about

    According to Joseph A. Schumpeter as: (1) refined and popularized the idea that profits derive by innovation. (2) perceived profits as rewards for bearing uncertainty. (3) believed which monopoly firms are so inefficient which none fully realize their

  • Q : Collective Bargaining and Monopsonistic

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Assume that sales of generic beds are highly competitive and Deluxe Beds is just significant employer in Nowhere, Nevada. When deluxe workers unionize and

  • Q : Breaking natural monopoly Breaking a

    Breaking a natural monopoly within a number of competing firms would probably: (w) increase output and lower price to consumers. (x) reduce output and raise price to consumers. (y) reduce efficiency but lower price. (z) have no effect on output or pri

  • Q : Labor Union-union membership The basic

    The basic idea that unions are more influential than ever before is: (i) Supported by the consequences of unions on inflationary spirals. (ii) Reflected in the growing numbers of violent and expensive strikes. (iii) Contrary to the fact that union membership is refusi

  • Q : Price elasticity beside horizontal

    Hey FRIEND I need your help for query as given below: The price elasticity beside a horizontal demand curve is constant at: (w) zero. (x) infinity. (y) 1. (z) -1. Can someone ex

  • Q : Consequence of successful product

    Maggie thinks there are main differences among Crest, Colgate, Aquafresh and Rembrandt toothpastes, and eventually chooses Crest. Therefore her perception is mainly a consequence of: (1) successful product differentiation. (2) monopolistic competition. (3) informative

  • Q : Individual demand and market demand

    Individual demand and market demand schedules: Individual demand schedule states the quantities required by an individual consumer at various prices.

    Q : Additional Funds for Breaking Invention

    If Bank of America helps link an inventor in require of additional funds to develop a ground breaking invention along with a retired school teacher along with excess savings, in that case they are performing: (1) love connections. (2) financial interm

  • Q : Marginal resource cost of labor For a

    For a gain maximizing competitive firm operating in the competitive labor market, the: (1) Marginal resource cost of the labor is similar to the wage rate. (2) Supply of the labor is perfectly inelastic. (3) Production quota is precisely proportional to the labor hire

  • Q : Vigorous competition in long run market

    Vigorous competition into a market depends in the long run most strongly upon the: (w) number of buyers and sellers presently in the market. (x) freedom to enter and exit the market. (y) sizes of the average firm within the market. (z) uniformity [hom