--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Income in Lorenz curve of welfare When

    When you were unconcerned regarding the welfare of other people and your income placed you into the bottom five percent of the population, in that case you would be happiest when the Lorenz curve for your country resembled as: (1) line 0A0'. (2) line

  • Q : Circular flow of Income Elucidate the

    Elucidate the circular flow of Income in two sector model. Answer: There are just two sectors namely: Firms and households. Households give factor services to the fi

  • Q : Consuming a grouping of goods problem A

    A household utmost it’s utility by consuming a grouping of goods which exhausts income when, for each and every good, the: (i) Marginal utilities are equivalent. (ii) Prices are equivalent. (iii) Ratios of marginal utility or price are equivalen

  • Q : Problem on Substitution Effect The cost

    The cost of cashmere plummets and most of the people start employing this once costly material as pillow covers and to knit sweaters for their pets. This is an illustration of: (i) The income effect. (ii) The change in preferences and taste. (iii) The law of diminishi

  • Q : Profit-maximizing output to maximizes

    HoloIMAGine has patented a holographic technology which creates 3-D photography obtainable to consumers. So HoloIMAGine’s: (w) lowest possible average total cost arises at precisely the output where profit is maximized. (x) market supply curve is the same to its

  • Q : Pay annual income by perpetuities bonds

    When all bonds are perpetuities which pay annual income of $50, at an interest rate of 5% the price of bonds is: (w) $1,000. (x) $500. (y) $100. (z) $750. Can someone explain/help

  • Q : Scope of Economies I have a problem in

    I have a problem in economics on Scope of Economies. Please help me in the following question. Whenever the production of one good (example: milk) decreases the production costs of complementary products (that is, butter and cheese), a firm is capable

  • Q : Managerial slack or X-inefficiency

    X-inefficiency (also termed as managerial slack): (1) tends to drive up fixed costs. (2) commonly results from firms not being hard pressed through competitors. (3) can absorb much of a monopoly’s potential profit. (4) is a prob

  • Q : Tendencies of price floors creating

    Price floors create tendencies for: (1) shortages since buyers demand more than firms produce. (2) lobbying through sellers for their elimination. (3) net increases within the satisfactions of consumers. (4) surpluses since firms creates more when hou

  • Q : Satisfaction gained from consuming

    The Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility defines that the: (i) Satisfaction gained from consuming additional units of a good ultimately decline. (ii) Extra cost of energy from the public utility will ultimately decline. (iii) MUa/Pa = MUb/Pb = ... = MUz/Pz. (iv) Ux/X =