--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Uy what is basic objects of bretton

    what is basic objects of bretton woods?

  • Q : When are price variation tendencies

    Price variation tendencies are indeterminate while we know simply that: (1) super star salaries make this hard for team owners to meet rising demands for sporting events. (2) more people main in music although demands for musicians are falling. (3) oi

  • Q : Changes in Household Demand The changes

    The changes in a household’s tastes most directly influence the families: (1) Number of members. (2) Demands for goods. (3) Total wealth. (4) Income constraint. Can someone please help me in finding out the a

  • Q : Ratio of percentage changes in quantity

    The ratio of the percentage change within the quantity of beef sold over the percentage change within the price of pork is: (1) price elasticity of demand for beef. (2) price elasticity of demand for pork. (3) income elasticity of dem

  • Q : Characteristics of a purely competitive

    NOT between characteristics of a purely competitive industry would be as: (w) large numbers of potential buyers and sellers. (x) long-run freedom of entry and exit. (y) modern technology that dictates large firms. (z) buyers have no influence on price

  • Q : Movement of Supply Curve towards up and

    The rise in the price of Pepsi will effect a: (1) Shift of the supply curve of Coke to left. (2) Shift of the supply curve of Pepsi to right. (3) Movement downwards all along the supply curve of Coke. (4) Movement up and to right all along the supply curve of Pepsi.

  • Q : Interdependent decisions of oligopolies

    Industries dominated by some large firms whose decisions are interdependent are: (1) oligopolies. (2) monopolies. (3) cartels. (4) monopsonies. Please choose the right answer from above...I want your suggestion for the same.

  • Q : Output and pricing performance of firms

    Contestable markets theory recommends that even though an industry has only one producer, in that case the output and pricing performance of which firm will resemble which of a competitive industry as long like: (1) there are numerous active buyers in

  • Q : Low-income elasticities of demand

    Placing an excise tax upon goods along with low-income elasticities of demand will share out the tax burden as: (1) proportionally between high-income and low-income households. (2) disproportionately on high-income households. (3) disproportionately

  • Q : Pure competition in product and

    When no goods generate external costs or benefits within their consumption or production and when the income distribution is deemed acceptable, in that case economic efficiency is promoted through: (w) government inte