--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Monopoly and competition theory The

    The theorist who set the stage for much of the “new” theory of international trade through blending theories of monopoly and competition to suit the case of several sellers offering differentiated products was: (1) Leon Walras. (2) Vilfred

  • Q : Problem on zero bond price You are

    You are provided a bond which will pay no interest however will return the par value of $1,000 20 years from now. When your needed return for this bond is 7.35%, what are you willing to reimburse or pay?

  • Q : Effect of decreases price ceiling on a

    A government decrease of the price ceiling upon a good will: (w) result in a decrease into the excess demand for the good. (x) result within an increase in the excess demand for the good. (y) lead to a greater quantity supplied. (z) cause a reduction

  • Q : Differentiate pure competition and

    The difference among pure competition and monopolistic competition is which: (w) monopolistic competitors generate more profit in the long run. (x) monopolistic competitors always ignore short term losses. (y) long run entry and exit is probable in pu

  • Q : Income Distribution and Satisfaction

    Some researchers have determined that citizens of some prosperous countries [for example, Japan] explain themselves as “happy” far less frequently, onto average, than citizens of a few poorer nations [for example, Indonesia]. Nevertheless, almost all studi

  • Q : Exploiting the economies of Scope Bobby

    Bobby Lee’s dairy has gainfully expanded beyond butter, fresh milk and cheese, by providing Organizmic Fertilizer, guided by ATV tours for the visitors, and Granny Lee’s Exfoliating Body Yogurt. The Clyde County Business News trumpets that the Bobby Lee ha

  • Q : The Demand for Loanable Funds An

    An increase during the demand for loanable funds will be mirrored through: (1) an increase in the supply of bonds. (2) a decrease into the interest rate. (3) a lower subjective internal rate of discount through typical savers. (4) a reduction in the f

  • Q : Comparative statics and consumer demand

    Explain the methodological procedure called comparative statics.  What does this procedure imply regarding the nature of the consumer demand curve?

  • Q : Unit of Account function of money Unit

    Unit of Account function of money: The Unit of Account function of money is also termed as the measure of value function. Money as a unit of account signifies a standard unit for quoting the prices. This makes money a powerful medium of comparing the

  • Q : Short-run equilibrium of purely

    At the price P1, the given figure of purely competitive cranberry industry is within: (w) long-run equilibrium. (x) short-run equilibrium. (y) market period disequilibrium. (z) short-run disequilibrium. <