--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Taft-Hartley Act and Closed Shops Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The Taft Hartley Act of 1946 made it illegal to encompass a: (1) Right-to-work law passed by the state legislature. (2) Conviction for the misdemeanor and serve as union officer. (3) Union for

  • Q : Determine least price elasticity in

    Of all of the known ranges on such supply curves, the supply of tanks of dehydrated water is least price elastic in between: (i) point a and point b. (ii) point b and point c. (iii) point c and point d. (iv) point e and point f. (v) point g and point

  • Q : Split roughly burden of tax The burden

    The burden of an excise (i.e., per unit) tax would be divide roughly fifty by fifty on consumers and suppliers of the taxed good within: (w) Panel A. (x) Panel B. (y) Panel C. (z) Panel D.

  • Q : Strategic barriers to entry Extensive

    Extensive national advertising can be a form of: (1) natural barrier. (2) strategic barrier. (3) regulatory barrier. (4) price discrimination. (5) moral hazard. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regard

  • Q : Process of channeling funds from savers

    Financial intermediation is, largely, the process of: (1) lending money out at interest. (2) spending funds faster than revenues are obtained. (3) channeling funds from savers to dissavers, as well as to investors into economic capital. (4) buying and

  • Q : Change in profit by producing an

    The change in profit by producing an extra unit of good equivalents: (w) marginal revenue [MR]. (x) marginal revenue minus marginal cost [MR – MC]. (y) MR = MC. (z) ATC - AVC. Hello guys I want your advice. P

  • Q : Illustration of Substitution Effect

    Sally is very rich that money hardly matters to her, although when the price of JIF chunky peanut butter doubled Sally switched to Peter Pan chunky peanut butter. This alters is an example of the: (1) Income effect. (2) Payback effect. (3) Substitution effect. (4) Pri

  • Q : Equilibrium interest rates on financial

    Equilibrium interest rates on different financial securities tend to be negatively associated to: (1) the time remaining until an asset matures. (2) default, exchange rate, and interest rate riskiness of an asset. (3) liquidity. (4) savers’ time

  • Q : Quantity of good supplied exceeds

    While the quantity of a good supplied exceeds the quantity demanded: (1) sellers are more likely to create concessions to buyers. (2) the current market price is below equilibrium. (3) consumers gain through buying before prices adjust upward. (4) the quality of outpu

  • Q : Monopsonistic Exploitation problem In

    In equilibrium for the firm with power to adjust the salary it pays, then the rate of monopsonistic exploitation equivalents any difference among: (i) VMP and MFC. (ii) MRP and MFC. (iii) P and MC. (iv) MRP and w. (v) MR and w. Fin