--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Minimize losses of purely competitive

    The wholesale price per dozen roses below that such purely competitive rose farm would minimize losses through closing their operation is: (1) $3.00 per dozen roses. (2) $3.83 per dozen roses. (3) $4.00 per dozen roses. (4) $4.30 per

  • Q : Problem on quantity of Whopper Slushees

    When Adam Smith’s invisible hand executed with no government intervention, this market would be in equilibrium and quantity of Whopper Slushees demanded the quantity supplied would be equivalent at: (i) Price P1. (ii) Quantity Q1. (iii) Price P3. (iv) Quantity Q

  • Q : Price of a Long-Term Bond When the

    When the interest rate falls, in that case the price of a long-term bond: (w) falls faster than a perpetuity bond. (x) rises. (y) does not change. (z) falls relatively less than a short term bond. I need a good ans

  • Q : Functions of price mechanism What are

    What are the various functions of price mechanism in a free market economy?

  • Q : Tastes and Preferences in travel

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Raised ‘love boat’ ticket sales in response to a sequence of stunning travel commercials point out a raise in the: (i) Quantity of romantic vacations demanded. (ii) Demand for the

  • Q : Profit-maximizing pure competitor at

    The break-even point as illustrated below for that profit-maximizing pure competitor happens at the price consequent to: (w) point f. (x) point h. (y) point j. (z) point k.

    Q : Illustration of Economic Capital An

    An illustration of economic capital would be: (1) loanable funds in banks. (2) factory buildings. (3) gold held through price speculators. (4) labor’s productive skills. (5) corporate stocks. How can I solve

  • Q : Economic profit at average total cost

    When a monopolist maximizes profit with producing where average total cost is on its minimum, this: (w) should generate an economic profit. (x) should sell at a price equal to marginal cost. (y) will incur an economic loss. (z) will p

  • Q : Earning zero economic profit Within a

    Within a monopolistically competitive industry along with no barriers to entry, long run equilibrium will be reached along with the firms into the industry: (1) maximizing total revenue. (2) producing their most efficient outputs. (3)

  • Q : Lowest possibility for price elasticity

    The price elasticity of demand would possibly be lowest for: (1) Dasani. (2) Deer Park. (3) Aquafina. (4) bottled water. (5) Perrier. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding