--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Supply law and it's factors State the

    State the Law of supply and explain the factors that affecting supply of commodity

  • Q : Typical pure competitor firm in industry

    When this firm is a typical pure competitor within this industry as in demonstrated figure, then the firm is: (i) making normal accounting profit. (ii) making zero economic profit. (iii) breaking even. (iv) into an industry within long run equilibrium

  • Q : Price elasticity of supply when demand

    When increased demand causes the price of main beluga caviar to climb from $2750 to $3250 per pound and consequently world production rises from 24 to 40 tons yearly, its caviar has a price elasticity of supply approx

  • Q : Political pressure on government

    When the government imposes a price floor upon a product, in that case there may be political pressure for the government: (1) to produce several of the good itself. (2) to restrict the demands of private buyers. (3) to buy and then store some surplus

  • Q : Total revenue of profit maximizing firm

    If this profit-maximizing firm as in given figure can’t price discriminate, in that case its total revenue will equal to: (w) $90,000 per month. (x) $112,000 per month. (y) $60,000 per month. (z) $120,0000 per m

  • Q : Break even and zero economic profit

    After Babble-On’s patents lapsed and entry and exit turned into possible in this illustrated figure of market, in the long run Babble-On would be expected to: (i) continue to reap economic profits. (ii) break even and experience zero economic pr

  • Q : Supply of good increment from the

    The supply of good increases from the perspective of buyers while: (1) the government subsidizes production of the good. (2) price ceilings limit rates of return on investment. (3) queuing replaces allocation based upon high prices. (

  • Q : Elasticity of supply when price hike

    When a $5 price hike raises the number of tanks of dehydrated water supplied in this market from point e to point f, the elasticity of supply: (i) 2.333. (ii) 2.000. (iii) 1.667. (iv) 1.333. (v) 0.600. How can I so

  • Q : Saving schedule Refer to the given

    Refer to the given figure.Choose the right answer from following. If the relevant saving schedule were constructed: A) saving would be minus $20 billion at the zero level of income. B) aggregate saving would be $60 at the $60 billion level of income. C) its slope woul

  • Q : Scope of spiral and waterfall approach

    Explain the difference in changing the scope between a spiral approach and a waterfall approach?