--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Output and pricing performance of firms

    Contestable markets theory recommends that even though an industry has only one producer, in that case the output and pricing performance of which firm will resemble which of a competitive industry as long like: (1) there are numerous active buyers in

  • Q : Complementary Goods-Increasing prices

    When the price of hot dogs rises, you would suppose the demand for: (i) mustard to rise. (ii) Hot dogs to reduce. (iii) Buns to rise. (iv) Hot dogs to rise. (v) Buns to reduce. Find out the right answer from the above options.

  • Q : Average variable costs and average

    Both average variable costs and average total costs are demonstrated for this profit-maximizing firm, therefore this given figure depicts information for: (i) an oligopoly firm. (ii) operations in the short run since fixed costs are present, although

  • Q : Computing economic profit To compute

    To compute the economic profit, it is essential to know the opportunity cost of: (i) Capital. (ii) Land. (iii) Labor. (iv) All the productive resources. Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the above o

  • Q : Marginal revenue of purely competitive

    When boosting output by hundred units raises total revenue by $1200, in that case a purely competitive firm’s marginal revenue the same as: (w) $1,200. (x) $120. (y) $12. (z) $120,000. I need a good answer on

  • Q : Explain about term market failure The

    The phrase "market failure" refers to: (w) the failure of market economies to deal with social problems. (x) the Stock Market Crash of 1929. (y) cases where supplies and demands within private markets yield inefficiency, excessive or inequity instabil

  • Q : Minimize losses of purely competitive

    The wholesale price per dozen roses below that such purely competitive rose farm would minimize losses through closing their operation is: (1) $3.00 per dozen roses. (2) $3.83 per dozen roses. (3) $4.00 per dozen roses. (4) $4.30 per

  • Q : Estimate price by price elasticity of

    At the point on the demand curve for RoboMaids where the price elasticity of demand is unitary, the price would be roughly: (i) $10,000, resulting in sales of roughly 16,000 robots monthly. (ii) $13,000, resulting in sales of approxim

  • Q : Monopsony Power and Immobility of Labor

    Immobility of the labor is significant economically as: (1) Most of the people like to move, however cannot. (2) People in high salary occupations won't be completely compensated for the costs and difficulties related with their occupations. (3) It we

  • Q : Canada’s top three trading partners

    Name the Canada’s top three trading partners?