--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Total variable costs in pure competition

    This profit-maximizing, as in demonstrated graph, of brickyard’s total variable costs are about: (i) $200 per day. (ii) $600 per day. (iii) $750 per day. (iv) $900 per day. (v) $1200 per day.

  • Q : Price elasticity of supply while the

    If John Whittler can sell totem poles for $1,800 at all, he markets 60 yearly, but while the price falls to $600 apiece; in that case he is willing to sell only 24 yearly. His price elasticity of supply is: (w) 0.43. (x) 0.86. (y) 1.62. (z) 2.48.

  • Q : Defined Welfare Recipients By

    By description, a family of four receives welfare when it: (1) pays a smaller share of taxes than its share of benefits from government. (2) lives below the poverty line. (3) includes a student attending college on an academic scholar

  • Q : What is the equilibrium price For each

    For each case listed below, first state whether the change results in an increase or a decrease in demand, or in an increase or a decrease in supply.  Second, determine the direction of change in both the equilibrium price and the equilibrium quantity. a.     

  • Q : Tastes and Preferences in travel

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Raised ‘love boat’ ticket sales in response to a sequence of stunning travel commercials point out a raise in the: (i) Quantity of romantic vacations demanded. (ii) Demand for the

  • Q : Another name of micro economics What is

    What is another name of micro economics? Answer: Price theory

  • Q : Relatively price elastic when supply

    Even though a drought decreases supply from S1 to S0, at each point along both of such supply curves, the supply of tanks of dehydrated water: (i) perfectly price elastic. (ii) relatively price elastic. (iii) unitarily price elastic. (iv) relativ

  • Q : Entry of new firm in monopolistic

    Entry of new firms within a monopolistically competitive market: (1) is preventable. (2) may decrease the established firm’s production costs. (3) increases the established firm’s profits. (4) shrinks demand for a successful firm’s p

  • Q : Psychological Pricing Define the term

    Define the term Psychological Pricing and what are their aspects?

  • Q : Economic efficiency for pure competition

    Pure competition yields economic efficiency through: (w) punishing profit maximizing behavior. (x) forcing firms to adopt the least costly technologies available. (y) generating high profits as incentives. (z) rewarding entrepreneurs