--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Types of elasticity of supply Types of

    Types of elasticity of supply: There are five kinds of elasticity of supply:1. Perfectly elastic supply:

    Q : Official unemployement Provide the

    Provide the solution of this question. To be officially unemployed a person must: A) be in the labor force. B) be 21 years of age or older. C) have just lost a job. D) be waiting to be called back from a layoff.

  • Q : Determine prices by maximize total

    LoCalLoCarbo that is Favorite Corporation of fad dieters, which can maximize its total revenue when this produces: (1) output q2 and charges a price equal to P1. (2) output q3 and charges a price of more than P2 althou

  • Q : Coefficient of price elasticity Why the

    Why the coefficient of price elasticity of demand is is negative?

  • Q : Gross Domestic Product of Norway What

    What do you mean by Gross Domestic Product of Norway?

  • Q : Annual total costs of production When

    When Prohibition Corporation maximizes profit into its production of St. Valentine’s Day software, there annual total costs of it will be around: (1) $180 million. (2) $140 million. (3) $100 million. (4) $80 million. (5) $40 mil

  • Q : Probable outcome of a shift problem The

    The shift from D0 to D1 would be a probable outcome of: (i) An alter in the price of gasoline. (ii) Winter ending and summer coming, and hence more people take vacations. (iii) A reduction in the number miles driven. (iv) A rise in the cost of petroleum employed to ge

  • Q : Investor Optimism for Loanable Funds An

    An increase within investor optimism will cause: (w) interest rates to rise. (x) slower technology advances. (y) slumps in business construction. (z) interest rates to fall. Please choose the right answer from abov

  • Q : Lowest price in shopping for expected

    Consumers shop for the lowest price probable for a good only till the expected benefits of shopping no longer go beyond the expected: (w) maximum legal prices for the good. (x) prices available in the black market. (y) transaction costs related with a

  • Q : Efficiency Wages-Expected losses

    Expected losses to the workers from shirking are raised when a firm accepts a policy of: (1) Dividing the productive tasks and hence the division of labor is optimal. (2) Paying the efficiency wages which surpass market-clearing wages. (3) Avoiding the legal liability