--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Interest Rate Reinvestment Risk Explain

    Explain the term Interest Rate Reinvestment Risk in detail?

  • Q : Present value of a bond paying by

    At an interest rate of 5 percent per year the present value of a bond paying $100 yearly forever is: (a) infinite. (b) $500. (c) $909.10. (d) $2000. I need a good answer on the topic of Economics problems. Please give me your sugge

  • Q : Intermediate economics hw help I don't

    I don't know how to do this kind of homework

  • Q : Marginal tax rate under negative income

    The marginal tax rate upon earned income under negative income tax system demonstrated in this figure is: (1) 15 percent. (2) 20 percent. (3) 25 percent. (4) 33.3 percent. (5) 50 percent.

    Q : When price of a good or resource drops

    When the price of a good or resource drops/falls, the demands for: (i) that good or resource rise. (ii) Complementary goods or resources reduce. (iii) Replacement of goods or resources reduces. (iv) Luxury goods and inferior resources drop/fall.

  • Q : Economies of scale If there are

    If there are significant economies of scale in an industry, then: A) a firm that is large may be able to produce at a lower unit cost than can a small firm. B) a firm that is large will have to charge a higher price than will a small firm. C) entry to that industry wi

  • Q : Comparative Advantage in opportunity

    The most important declines in opportunity costs of multiple goods for the consumers and greatest rises in the value of net production for all societies everywhere tend to be realized whenever production is organized in accord by: (1) The optimal clas

  • Q : Zero economic profits in long-run

    In long-run equilibrium, a monopolistically competitive firm is making: (a) economic profits. (b) zero economic profits. (c) negative economic profits. (d) revenues that exceed total costs. Can anybody suggest me t

  • Q : Minimizes losses and maximizes profits

    When Firm B in demonstrated graph successfully minimizes losses and maximizes its profits that have: (1) covered overhead while incurring short-run economic losses. (2) potential economic profit of Pbgh per period. (3) total costs equal to 0phq2. (4)

  • Q : Problem on Minimum Wage Laws The

    The Minimum wage legislation is UNLIKELY to aid: (i) Skillful workers who compete with untrained workers. (ii) Untrained workers who don’t lose their jobs. (iii) Buyers of goods which are more capital intensive associative to the buyers of labor intensive goods.