--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Technology in supply I have a problem

    I have a problem in economics on Technology in supply. Please help me in the following question. The bumper corn crop caused by the good weather would symbolize a raise in: (i) supply. (ii) Consumer’s tastes for corn. (iii) Demand. (iv) The price of corn. <

  • Q : Medium of Exchange function of money

    Medium of Exchange function of money: Money as a medium of exchange signifies money as a means of the payment for exchange of services and goods. The Goods and services are exchanged for money whenever people sell things. Money is exchanged for goods

  • Q : Determine produce economic profit When

    When point e corresponds to $9,000 per RoboMaid, Robomatic can produce economic profit all month of at most around: (1) $25 million. (2) $40 million. (3) $55 million. (4) $70 million. (5) $85 million.

    Q : Market demand with market power

    LoCalLoCarbo has turn into the favorite of fad dieters. There in illustrated graph curve B shows: (i) LoCalLoCarbo’s marginal cost curve. (ii) LoCalLoCarbo’s average variable cost curve. (iii) LoCalLoCarbo’s average total cost curve. (iv) the market

  • Q : Labor union and an unregulated public

    I have a problem in economics on Labor union and an unregulated public utility. Please help me in the following question. While comparing an influential labor union and an unregulated public utility firm like cable TV, both might: (1) Be considered as the monopolists.

  • Q : Problem on positive quantity Supply The

    The law of supply defines that, other things equivalent: (1) Quantity supplied differs inversely with price. (2) A good’s supply is positively associated to its demand. (3) Quantity supplied is positively associated to price. (4) Prices and cost

  • Q : Elasticity and profit maximization at

    When a monopolist which does not price discriminate produces output where is demand is unitarily elastic, in that case the firm will: (i) never be capable to maximize profit. (ii) maximize profit only when all costs are fixed. (iii) maximize profit wh

  • Q : Buyers and sellers as in price-takers

    Price-takers comprise buyers or sellers who are not capable to: (w) resist monopolistic exploitation. (x) influence the prevailing market price. (y) adjust the amounts they buy or sell. (z) make short-run economic profits.

    Q : Earn income and transfer benefits When

    When a family can earn income and transfer profits of $11,500 by working full time at the minimum wage, and also $12,500 in transfer benefits without working, the family’s net gain through working is: (1) zero. (2) $12,500. (3)

  • Q : Earning income under negative income tax

    Under the negative income tax system demonstrated in this figure, a family of four along with earned income of $15,000 yearly would have a net [after-tax] income of: (i) $30,000 per year. (ii) $27,500 per year. (iii) $25,000 per year.