--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Illustrate an example of relative price

    Joy waits into a long line at her local bookstore therefore she can be between the first to buy and read a newly-printed hardback copy of the newest Harry Potter adventure. And Lindsay waits till a lower priced paperback edition is printed just before buying any Potte

  • Q : Price elasticity of demand over price

    When the price Pixie’s Restaurant charges for its well-known cheesy fried grits rises from $2 to $4 and quantity demanded falls from 750 to 500 servings weekly, the price elasticity of demand over such price range is approximate

  • Q : Profit Maximization in Labor Markets

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. All the profit maximizing firms use labor up to the point where: (1) VMP = MFC. (2) VMP = w. (3) VMP = MRP. (4) MRP = MFC. (5) MR   MC is maximized.

  • Q : Best illustration of an oligopoly The

    The best illustration of an oligopoly is: (1) guaranteed next-day delivery of packages and mail. (2) cranberry production. (3) all the local electric utility companies in New England. (4) the United Autoworkers [UAW] union. (5) Wal-Mart.

  • Q : Economic growth Give the answer of

    Give the answer of following question. Economic growth is best defined as an increase in: A) either real GDP or real GDP per capita. B) nominal GDP. C) total consumption expenditures. D) wealth in the economy.

  • Q : Pure competitors in market structures

    Marginal revenue is not below the market price by the perspectives of simply: (i) monopolistic competitors. (ii) monopolists. (iii) cartel members. (iv) pure oligopolists. (v) pure competitors. Can

  • Q : Increasing demand for Complementary

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. When tortilla chips go on sale for fifty percent off, then the demand for salsa is most probable to: (1) Stay similar. (2) Reduce. (3) Raise. (d) Raise only when salsa as well g

  • Q : Monopsony Power and Immobility of Labor

    Immobility of the labor is significant economically as: (1) Most of the people like to move, however cannot. (2) People in high salary occupations won't be completely compensated for the costs and difficulties related with their occupations. (3) It we

  • Q : Screening and Credentialism The critics

    The critics of ‘credentialism’ suppose that firms making employment decisions tend to mainly rely too heavily on: (i) Personal contacts. (ii) Personality testing. (iii) Past experience. (iv) Job interviews. (v) Formal education and trainin

  • Q : Why demand curve face monopolistically

    Why is demand curve facing a monopolistically competitive firm probable to be very elastic?