--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Economic profit in the short run by

    This illustrated graph is most consistent along with the environment confronted through a: (w) purely competitive firm which makes economic profit within the short run. (b) monopolistically-competitive firm into long run equilibrium. (c) firm along with oligopoly powe

  • Q : Question based on production

    In drawing the production possibilities curve we assume that: 1) technology is fixed. 2) unemployment exists. 3) economic resources are unlimited. 4) wants are limited.

  • Q : Low-income elasticities of demand

    Placing an excise tax upon goods along with low-income elasticities of demand will share out the tax burden as: (1) proportionally between high-income and low-income households. (2) disproportionately on high-income households. (3) disproportionately

  • Q : Minimum Wage Laws-Group least likely to

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The group which is least likely to be helped by the minimum wage law is: (1) African-American teenagers. (2) Skilled industrial workers. (3) Members of the unions. (4) Experienced construction

  • Q : Annual total revenue of production When

    When Prohibition Corporation maximizes profit in its production of St. Valentine’s Day software, so annual total revenue of it will be around: (1) $140 million. (2) $250 million. (3) $320 million. (4) $420 million. (5) $1 billio

  • Q : Relative price and income inelasticity

    Technological advances have raised agricultural productivity enormously among 1800 and nowadays, and therefore, the relative incomes of family farmers declined dramatically. There hardships endured through American farm families throughout this period

  • Q : Equality Standard of Income Distribution

    When the equality standard of income distribution were adopted: (w) people would be paid the values of their marginal products. (x) family incomes would be identical for families of all sizes. (y) poets and engineers would have the same incomes. (z) g

  • Q : Find elastic demand when price and

    When the price of Kellogg's Corn Flakes goes up from $1.89 to $2.05 as well as quantity demanded changes from 250 to 210, in that case the demand for Kellogg's Corn Flakes: (w) unitary elastic. (x) relatively inelastic. (y) relatively

  • Q : Effect of Increase in per capita income

    Rises in per capita income in the United States would be most probable to reduce the: (i) Demands for lard, pinto beans, and utilized tires. (ii) Excesses in the federal govt. budget. (iii) Supply of untrained labor relative to skilled labor. (iv) Tot

  • Q : Market demands in short run Can someone

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. In short run, the market demands are: (1) Stimulated if resource costs increase. (2) Simply estimated employing aggregate data. (3) Positively associated to the