--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Problem on fast food chains market

    Normal 0 false false

  • Q : Standard categories of economic

    Standard categories of economic discrimination which tend to make income less equally distributed do not comprise: (1) wage discrimination (2) employment discrimination (3) occupational discrimination (4) human capital discrimination (5) income discri

  • Q : Public utilities in natural monopoly

    Public utilities are generally: (1) regulated natural monopolies. (2) competitive non-profit corporations. (3) consequences of diseconomies of scale in production. (4) only subject to laissez-faire regulation. (5) operated by the federal government.

  • Q : Equivalent marginal revenue product

    When a monopolist is maximizing its gain in the product market however consists of no monopsony power in labor market, and then it will: (1) Hire labor till marginal revenue product equivalents the average factor cost. (2) Pay a wage equivalent to the marginal revenue

  • Q : Reasons for shifting demand curve

    Probable reasons for this shift of demand curve from D0 to D1 would not comprise: (1) lowering the lowest age for a driver’s license. (2) Reduces in the prices of ski boats. (3) Raised prices for airline tickets. (4) Decrease in the relative price of gasoline. (

  • Q : Problem on certainty of punishment

    Raising the severity and certainty of punishment decreases the cheating on examinations. This statement imitates: (1) Misplaced cynicism as this issue is ethical, not economic. (2) Purely normative views of the behavior. (3) Unrealistic expectations regarding student

  • Q : Elucidate business cycles Elucidate

    Elucidate briefly business cycles and what role do the Federal Government and Federal Reserve has in trying to manage them?

  • Q : High poverty rate among not employed

    The high poverty rate in between those who do not work: (w) reflects voluntary choices for leisure over income and work. (x) is no cause for concern if it involves voluntary choice. (y) occurs since family responsibilities prevent many people from wor

  • Q : Goods of negative income elasticity of

    When the income elasticity of market demand is negative, in that case most consumers view the good as: (w) a luxury good. (x) having several imperfect substitutes. (y) an inferior good. (z) a normal good. Hey frien

  • Q : Entry of new firm in monopolistic

    Entry of new firms within a monopolistically competitive market: (1) is preventable. (2) may decrease the established firm’s production costs. (3) increases the established firm’s profits. (4) shrinks demand for a successful firm’s p