--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Operation in the short run of fixed

    The curves demonstrated in this figure reflect that: (i) operation in the short run since fixed costs can be measured in the graph. (ii) a disequilibrium that will force some competitors to exit this market. (iii) how firms innovate new technologies in response to pro

  • Q : Determine free-market equilibrium price

    In the year of 1983, the Reagan Administration introduced a new agricultural program known as the Payment-in-Kind Program. To distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Assume the demand function is QD = 28 - 2P and the supp

  • Q : Federal minimum wage rose over

    The LEAST likely outcome, when the federal minimum wage is increased $1 over the equilibrium wage rate, that would be for the: (w) unemployment rate of teenagers and unskilled workers to rise. (x) quantity of unskilled workers supplie

  • Q : Market demand curve of pure monopolist

    A pure monopolist faces as: (w) a perfectly elastic demand for its product because it can't affect market price. (x) a perfectly inelastic demand for its product. (y) the market demand curve for its product. (z) a constant marginal cost curve.

  • Q : Perfect mobility and perfect information

    The model of perfect competition assumes perfect mobility and perfect information. Transaction costs are not present; therefore all buyers and sellers base decisions on the best information obtainable to anyone else, as well as transportation (mobilit

  • Q : Price floors with government purchases

    Suppose the U.S. wheat market is primarily in a stable equilibrium upon S0D0. Assume now that the government institutes a legal price floor at P3 per bushel of wheat. When the government will buy and store any resulting surplus

  • Q : Changes in supply and demand curves

    This alters in the supply- and demand-curves for textbooks could not have resulted from a change in: (w) taxes. (x) relative prices for text books. (y) expectations about future prices. (z) prices for related goods.

  • Q : Substitution effect of income at wage

    Glynn’s preferences in between work and leisure give in a: (i) wealth effect that exceeds the leisure consequence above point c. (ii) weak preference for working more than 40 hours per week. (iii) substitution effect that exceeds the income effect at wage rates

  • Q : Decrement in opportunity costs and

    Opportunity costs and prices tend to be decreased by: (w) competition among speculators and other intermediaries. (x) price floors. (y) the exercise of monopoly power. (z) price ceilings. How can I

  • Q : Production and costs in monopolistic

    In the short run, no profit-oriented monopolistically-competitive firm still knowingly generates any output unless: (1) an economic profit is assured. (2) total revenues are expected to equal or exceed its total variable costs. (3) the average wage ra