--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Holding less liquid assets in investment

    When households become more willing to hold less liquid assets, in that case the: (w) interest rate rises. (x) present value of future income falls. (y) interest rate falls. (z) stock market will crash. I need a go

  • Q : Question on production possibilities

    Refer to the given diagram. Which of the following positions relative to PP1 would be the most likely to result in a future production possibilities curve of PP3, rather than PP2 ?  1) A. 2) B. 3) C.  4) D.

    Q : Isoquants and isocost lines By using

    By using isoquants and isocost lines, illustrates graphically that rise in y will result in a decline in the quantity demanded of x1 and also illustrates that rise in the price of x1 will result in a reduction in the quantity demanded of x1<

  • Q : Is cotton textile is macroeconomic or

    Is the study of cotton textile business a macroeconomic or a microeconomic study? Answer: The study of cotton textile business is a microeconomic study.

  • Q : Product differentiation through

    Firms are not only trying to differentiate their products within the minds of consumers while: (1) main networks launch comparable programs to mimic successful “reality TV” shows. (2) beer advertisers feature wild parties in TV advertisements. (3) a deterg

  • Q : Demand for a good at price elasticity

    The curve which could demonstrate the demand for a good which has price elasticity equal to one is within: (w) Panel A. (x) Panel B. (y) Panel C. (z) Panel D.

    Q : Define normal goods Normal goods:

    Normal goods: Normal goods are such goods whose demand increases with the increase in income of consumer.

  • Q : Intersections of supply and demand

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The prices beneath the intersections of supply and demand curves cause: (i) Shortages. (ii) Surpluses. (iii) Demands to expand. (iv) Inventories to grow. (v) Sc

  • Q : Externalities or public goods in purely

    A purely competitive economy along with no externalities or public goods tends to be efficient since: (1) firms try to act socially responsible. (2) government planners specify the best allocation. (3) all prices approximate marginal social benefits a

  • Q : Problem on zero bond price You are

    You are provided a bond which will pay no interest however will return the par value of $1,000 20 years from now. When your needed return for this bond is 7.35%, what are you willing to reimburse or pay?