--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Intermediaries earn income to help

    In the long run within a market system, all intermediaries earn income only when they help sellers and buyers: (w) raise surpluses. (x) by innovating new products. (y) reduce transaction costs. (z) ga

  • Q : Internal financing in Corporate Finance

    Can someone help me in finding out the precise answer from the given options. The corporations might get internal financing by: (i) Borrowing from the stockholders. (ii) Reinvesting the corporate income rather than paying it out as the dividends to stockholders. (iii)

  • Q : Problem of what to produce Describe the

    Describe the problem of What to produce?

  • Q : Illegal price collusion Illegal price

    Illegal price collusion is probably when the market structure for an industry is: (1) monopolistic competition. (2) a monopoly. (3) an oligopoly. (4) pure competition. (5) contestable through exit and entry.

    Q : Featherbedding in its hiring practices

    The summation of monopolistic exploitation across all the workers tends to raise however a firm as well operates at a more socially and economically proficient level of output and employment whenever the firm is capable to engage in: (1) Blacklisting in its dealings t

  • Q : Accounting profits when economic profit

    Whenever economic profit equivalents zero, then the accounting profits: (i) Are explicit costs of the remaining in business. (ii) Will induce raised investment even when accounting costs are much low. (iii) Are too zero. (iv) Reflect normal returns on the investment t

  • Q : Laws and regulations for competitive

    Government regulation intends at certain potentially competitive prices or transactions frequently induce private adjustments through firms and individual therefore unexpected results comprise: (w) increased rates of growth of tax revenues. (x) rapid

  • Q : Demand when total revenue uninfluenced

    When total revenue to a firm is uninfluenced by small price changes, in that case demand is: (1) relatively price elastic. (2) relatively price inelastic. (3) unitarily price elastic. (4) vertical. (5) horizontal.

  • Q : Output produced by profit maximizing

    A profit maximizing monopolist produces output where: (i) MR = MC as long as the corresponding price exceeds average variable costs [P>AVC]. (ii) marginal revenue minus marginal costs [MR - MC] is maximized. (iii) price minus average cost is maximi

  • Q : Raising prices raises total costs for

    Total revenue at your fried hushpuppy stand has been declining currently. Your partner persevere that increasing hushpuppy prices will increase total revenue, although you believe only as fervently which lowering prices will produce more total revenue