--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Case study on Microeconomics Hello, I

    Hello, I did attach case study on Microeconomics. Regards,

  • Q : Relative Income Measures and

    After adjusting income for taxes and transfers, affects that would be least responsible for the reducing percentages of the U.S. population classified like “middle relative income” from 1976 is probably: (

  • Q : Featherbedding in its hiring practices

    The summation of monopolistic exploitation across all the workers tends to raise however a firm as well operates at a more socially and economically proficient level of output and employment whenever the firm is capable to engage in: (1) Blacklisting in its dealings t

  • Q : Quantity demanded to exceed quantity

    I have a problem in economics on Quantity demanded to exceed quantity supplied. Please help me in the following question. A shortage takes place whenever the current market price causes: (1) Quantity demanded to surpass quantity supplied. (2) Quantity

  • Q : Time and opportunity cost in

    The time and other opportunity costs incurred in obtaining information regarding products and prices and in that case driving to and from markets are illustrations of: (1) mobilization costs. (2) contracting costs. (3) transactions co

  • Q : Quantity of products in market power

    For a monopolist to raise the quantity of its products sold needs the monopolist to as: (i) raise the price of its product. (ii) charge a constant price. (iii) invest heavily in a distribution network. (iv) lower the price of its product. (v) advertis

  • Q : Heterodox explanation I can't discover

    I can't discover the answer of this question based on heterodox explanation. Help me out to get through this question. What is the heterodox explanation of the social provisioning procedure?

  • Q : Capital markets efficiency What is

    What is capital markets efficiency?

  • Q : Profit Maximization in Resource Markets

    I have a problem in economics on Profit Maximization in Resource Markets. Please help me in the following question. To make a decision regarding resource hire, the firm should consider: (1) The price of resource. (2) The productivity (MP) of resource. (3) Output price

  • Q : Determine the equilibrium prises When

    When both sellers and potential buyers suppose prices for rider lawn mowers to raise as summer approaches, in that case throughout March and April (in the short run), the equilibrium: (w) price falls but quantity changes are ambiguous. (x) price rises