--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Relative profitability and efficiencies

    From around 1890 until 1970 year, the “structure-conduct-performance paradigm” dominated theories concerning how firms behave in various types of markets. Here the word “performance” in this context consider to things as: (i) d

  • Q : Labor Unions-jurisdictional strikes

    Preceding to the merger of the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations to the AFL CIO merger in year 1955: (1) The AFL was an alliance of the industrial unions. (2) The CIO was an alliance of the craft unions. (3) Jurisdictional strikes o

  • Q : Elasticity and profit maximization A

    A nondiscriminating monopolist cannot maximize profits through producing where demand: (w) price elastic. (x) price inelastic. (y) above marginal cost. (z) above marginal revenue. Can someone explain/help me with b

  • Q : Average standard of living in Africa

    Elucidate briefly the average standard of living in Africa?

  • Q : Why are buyers and sellers forced to be

    Several buyers and sellers are forced to be price-takers since: (w) vigorous competition maintains individuals from noticeably influencing the market. (x) only monopoly firms adjust quantities. (y) markets adjust slowly. (z) quantity adjustment is not

  • Q : Marginal revenue product and marginal

    When a monopolist maximizes the profit in a product market, it will: (i) Hire labor till the marginal revenue product equivalents marginal resource cost. (ii) Hire labor till the value of marginal product equivalents marginal resource cost. (iii) Pay a wage equivalent

  • Q : What is the meaning of ex-ante savings

    Meaning of ex-ante savings: Ex-ante savings are expected savings or planned savings.

  • Q : Change in the price of a resource A

    A change in the price of a resource will cause a modification in the: (w) demand for the resource. (x) supply of the resource. (y) quantity demanded of the resource. (z) demand for the good the resource produces. H

  • Q : Labor Unions and Aggregate Wage Income

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The least likely outcome when unions succeed in increasing their member’s wages is that: (i) Wages in non-union sectors will drop. (ii) Employment will grow in the non-union sectors. (ii