--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Relative price and income inelasticity

    Technological advances have raised agricultural productivity enormously among 1800 and nowadays, and therefore, the relative incomes of family farmers declined dramatically. There hardships endured through American farm families throughout this period

  • Q : Demands possibly the least income

    Demands are possibly the least income elastic for very poor Americans for: (i) automobile services. (ii) Big Macs. (iii) lard. (iv) housing. (v) health care. Can anybody suggest me the proper expla

  • Q : Most efficient production technique of

    Refer to the given data give the answer of following question. In view of the indicated resource prices, the economically most efficient production technique(s) is (are) technique(s): A) #1. B) #2 and #4. C) #3. D) #1 and #3.

    Q : Craft Unions problems I have a problem

    I have a problem in economics on Craft Unions problems. Please help me in the given question. The craft unions arrange all the workers: (i) In a given industry or firm, despite of skill or craft. (ii) In a specified craft, even when they work for dist

  • Q : Lower costs of large oligopolists This

    This is possible that consumers could pay a lower price within an oligopoly market than a competitive market since large oligopolists: (w) can price below cost. (x) often give quantity discounts to loyal customers. (y

  • Q : Attract new firms by economics profits

    Economic profits within a competitive industry are signals which: (i) attract new firms into the industry. (ii) hinder innovation of new technologies. (iii) encourage inefficiency in existing firms. (iv) business conditions are deteriorating. (v) pric

  • Q : Problem relating to supply curve Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The supply curve reveals the highest: (i) Stock on hand in inventory. (ii) Gains a firm makes by selling varying quantity of a good. (iii) Quantity of a good which sellers will offer at differ

  • Q : Price discrimination to increase

    A firm can practice price discrimination to increase its profitability when this: (w) confronts a perfectly elastic demand curve. (x) is a pure quantity adjuster. (y) has some market power and is able to separate its customers into various groups alon

  • Q : Break-even level of income under

    For a family of four the break-even level of income under the negative income tax system demonstrated in this figure is: (1) $15,000 per year. (2) $30,000 per year. (3) $45,000 per year. (4) $60,000 per year. (5) $75,000 per year.

  • Q : Utility function notes on separable

    notes on separable utility function in microeconomics