--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Perpetuities with fixed amount of money

    A security which promises to pay a fixed amount of money annually till the issuer purchases this from an owner is termed as a: (i) present value. (ii) future value. (iii) perpetuity. (iv) residual. (v) trust fund.

  • Q : Positively sloped demand curve of

    When your income is positively and closely tied to the price of a specific product, a raise in its price might cause: (1) The income effect which, in severe conditions, yields a positively sloped demand curve. (2) You to go bankrupt. (3) The powerful positive substitu

    		•
  • Q : Practicing for predatory pricing A firm

    A firm which practices predatory pricing as: (w) tends to incur short-run losses greater than its rival. (x) lowers its price to drive out its rival and then keeps the price low to discourage extra entry. (y) will sell similar amount of output as when

    		•
  • Q : Profit Maximization-total revenue-total

    The entire profit maximizing organization will hire more labor up to the point where: (i) Average physical product of labor equivalents the nominal wage. (ii) Last unit of labor adds uniformly to net revenue and net cost. (iii) Marginal product of the labor is at its

    		•
  • Q : Problem on Blacklisting The

    The Blacklisting was once common however now illegal in the labor market practice of: (i) Boycotting the products of firms whose workers are on strike. (ii) Forcing the workers to sign agreements not to join the unions. (iii) Paying the union officers to systematize u

    		•
  • Q : Problem regarding rise in quantity

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The raise in the quantity supplied of frozen vegetarian lasagna would be most probable to outcome from raise in the: (i) cost of ingredients in the vegetarian lasagna. (ii) Numb

    		•
  • Q : Economic profits in long run A monopoly

    A monopoly will make economic profits within the short run: (w) but cannot create economic profits in the long run. (x) if average total costs [ATC] > P. (y) as long as total revenue exceeds total costs. (z) All of the above.

    		•
  • Q : A legal price floor and revenues Assume

    Assume that the U.S. wheat market is firstly into equilibrium on S0D0. Now assume the government institutes a legal price floor at P3 per bushel of wheat. When the government does nothing else, one outcome will be such

    		•
  • Q : Price charging equality to marginal cost

    Within the short run, a price-maker firm along with important market power but that cannot price discriminate is unable to concurrently maximize profit and: (i) charge a price equal to marginal cost. (ii) minimize average total cost. (iii) produce out

    		•
  • Q : Importance of study of the model of

    The study of the model of pure competition is very significant since this: (w) explains the behavior of most U.S. firms. (x) gives the underpinnings for supply and demand. (y) helps explain why government economic policy is essential. (z) gives a rati

    		•