--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Majority of surviving below the poverty

    In the United States, a mainstream of those living below “the poverty line”: (1) have televisions, automobiles, main appliances, and other amenities possessed only by the wealthy [when anyone] in earlier times and nowadays, only by the wea

  • Q : Equilibrium Market Price by Rate of

    Assume that an existing apartment complicated is predicted to generate a consistent net of $1,250,000 cash flow per year into rent, after deducting all recurring variable costs (for example, taxes, utilities, and maintenance). When th

  • Q : Poverty and Human Capital Enabling

    Enabling labor to move out of low-wage occupations by enhancing their education, skills, training and mobility, which will tend to: (w) lower the wages of those who leave the low wage occupation. (x) raise the wages of those who remain in the low wage

  • Q : Labor Derived Demand The faddish

    The faddish popularity of Atkins and the South Beach diets both of which advice dieters to eat additional meat and to decrease the intake of starchy carbohydrates, probably decreased incomes most sharply for: (1) cattle ranchers. (2) Grocery store clerks. (3) Sushi ch

  • Q : Split roughly burden of tax The burden

    The burden of an excise (i.e., per unit) tax would be divide roughly fifty by fifty on consumers and suppliers of the taxed good within: (w) Panel A. (x) Panel B. (y) Panel C. (z) Panel D.

  • Q : Legal form of business in United States

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Which of the given below is not a legal form of the business in United States? (1) Partnership. (2) Corporation. (3) Limited partnership. (4) Producer cooperative.  (5) All the above are

  • Q : Profit-maximizing competitor in short

    This profit-maximizing pure competitor would close down within the short run when the price fell below the price resultant to: (i) point c. (ii) point d. (iii) point e. (iv) point f. (v) point g.

    Q : Importance of study of the model of

    The study of the model of pure competition is very significant since this: (w) explains the behavior of most U.S. firms. (x) gives the underpinnings for supply and demand. (y) helps explain why government economic policy is essential. (z) gives a rati

  • Q : Emphasis on equality of opportunity An

    An emphasis on equality of opportunity, although not essentially equality of result, is a center-piece of a system of distribution termed as: (1) meritocracy. (2) laissez faire capitalism. (3) feudalism. (4) socialism. (5) syndicalism

  • Q : Asymmetric Information-Efficiency of

    Asymmetric information is less difficult for the efficiency of laissez faire transactions whenever transactions: (i) Are voluntary and are predict to be repeated many times. (ii) Costs are relatively very high. (iii) Are regulated by the complex govt.