--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Complementary Goods-Increasing prices

    When the price of hot dogs rises, you would suppose the demand for: (i) mustard to rise. (ii) Hot dogs to reduce. (iii) Buns to rise. (iv) Hot dogs to rise. (v) Buns to reduce. Find out the right answer from the above options.

  • Q : Income elasticity of demand The income

    The income elasticity of demand for mass transit of 0.6 signifies that the demand for mass transit: (1) Is a requirement. (2) Is a luxury. (3) Will increase at a slower rate than income. (4) Will drop/fall when personal incomes increases average.

  • Q : Investment by profit-maximizing pure

    For such illustrated figure profit-maximizing pure competitor, there area aPed shows: (1) fixed cost (TFC). (2) average fixed cost (AFC). (3) the lowest possible economic loss. (4) maximum economic profits. (5) the rate of return on investment. <

  • Q : Market Demand versus Individual Demand

    What is the difference between Market Demand and Individual Demand?

  • Q : Upwardly sloping supplies of resources

    When supplies of some resources are upwardly sloping to an industry, in that case increasing the industry’s output results within: (w) higher output due to increased profits from falling input prices. (x) reductions of output because of increase

  • Q : Contribution Standard The concept that

    The concept that people must have income in proportion to their productivity is termed as the: (1) equality standard of distribution. (2) productivity standard of distribution. (3) needs standard of distribution. (4) utility standard

  • Q : Prohibition in financial intermediaries

    Financial intermediaries are not: (1) channels linking parties who want to save to parties who want to invest. (2) restricted to serving primarily large savers and investors. (3) more significant in determining the U.S. money supply than all are produ

  • Q : Examples of command economies Give the

    Give the answer of following question .Tell examples of command economies: A) the United States and Japan. B) Sweden and Norway. C) Mexico and Brazil. D) Cuba and North Korea.

  • Q : Rational consumer-Relative Prices I

    I have a problem in economics on rational consumer-Relative Prices. Please help me in the following question. The rational consumer purchasing decisions depend mainly on: (1) Current market prices. (2) Absolute prices. (3) Nominal prices. (4) Monetary prices. (5) Rela

  • Q : Income elasticity-distribution and

    The time people focus upon politics and government policies tends to be income elastic. Nonetheless, high wage rates raise the opportunity costs of voting. Mutually, these facts suggest that, which relative to wealthier or higher-income people and low