--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Prices decrement in price elasticity of

    When animal rights activists persuade several fur coat buyers to switch to micro-fiber jackets as well as pelt prices decrease from $150 to $50 each, resultant in the baby seal harvest decreasing from 18,000 to 6,000 yearly, in that case the price elasticity

  • Q : Price discriminate by unregulated

    Unregulated monopolistic firms which do not price discriminate do NOT: (i) have power as price makers. (ii) dominate the supply side of the market. (iii) select profit maximizing price/quantity combinations from the market demand curv

  • Q : Problem regarding Privatization I have

    I have a problem in economics on Problem regarding Privatization. Please help me in the following question. The procedure of transforming government-run production facilities into ‘for-profit’ businesses is: (i) Privatization. (ii) Cartelization. (iii) Cap

  • Q : Market Adjustments in outputs and

    Outputs and average prices for CDs and DVDs both rose throughout 1999 to 2000 (just before file sharing became ordinary), implying such that: (1) supply of prerecorded music should have grown. (2) law of demand does not apply to music. (3) demand for

  • Q : Upwardly sloping supplies of resources

    When supplies of some resources are upwardly sloping to an industry, in that case increasing the industry’s output results within: (w) higher output due to increased profits from falling input prices. (x) reductions of output because of increase

  • Q : Greater economics loss than fixed costs

    Within the short run, there a monopolistically competitive firm will NOT operate at: (w) an economic loss that is less than fixed costs. (x) an economic loss that is greater than fixed costs. (y) making a normal profit. (z) making economic profits.

  • Q : Illustrate normative statement In

    In economics illustrate normative statement?

  • Q : Present Value of Annual Interest Rate

    When the annual interest rate is 11 percent and a small office building can be expected to lease perpetually for price of $33,000 annually, the building and also the land it sits onto have a present value of approximately: (1) $363,00

  • Q : Effect of minimum wage laws in

    The Minimum wage laws might efficiently raise employment: (i) When the set wage value surpasses labor market equilibrium. (ii) In industries of profoundly exercised monopsony power. (iii) In no condition; higher minimum wage floods the labor supply and lower minimum w

  • Q : Taxes on pure land rent Taxes on pure

    Taxes on pure land rents: (1) especially distort economic behavior. (2) are forward shifted to consumers. (3) transfer income from the public treasury to private landowners. (4) are allocatively neutral relative to most alternative taxes. (5) are over