--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Short-run shutdown price The short-run

    The short-run shutdown price arises where price: (w) equals AFC at the minimum. (x) is below ATC and above AVC. (y) equals AVC at its minimum point. (z) is above MR. Hey friends please give your opinion for the pro

  • Q : Marginal tax rate on earn income The

    The marginal tax rate onto earned income in the negative income tax system demonstrated in this figure is: (1) 15 percent. (2) 20 percent. (3) 25 percent. (4) 33.3 percent. (5) 50 percent.

  • Q : Cartel Select the right answer of the

    Select the right answer of the question. We would expect a cartel to achieve: A) both allocative efficiency and productive efficiency. B) allocative efficiency, but not productive efficiency. C) productive efficiency, but not allocative efficiency. D) neither allocati

  • Q : Changes in Household Demand The changes

    The changes in a household’s tastes most directly influence the families: (1) Number of members. (2) Demands for goods. (3) Total wealth. (4) Income constraint. Can someone please help me in finding out the a

  • Q : Where is the price elasticity of supply

    The price elasticity of supply as in below demonstrated figure is unitary within: (w) Panel A. (x) Panel B. (y) Panel C. (z) Panel D.

    Q : Long-run supply curve in industry When

    When Christmas trees are a constant cost industry and such firm is typical, in that case the industry’s long-run supply curve is curve that is: (w) A. (x) B. (y) C. (z) E.

    Q : Power monopsonist I have a problem in

    I have a problem in economics on Power of monopsonist. Please help me in the given question. The firm which is the sole buyer of a specific good or resource is a: (m) Monopsonist. (n) Plutocracy. (o) Bilateral monopolist. (p) Price discriminator. (q) Conglomerate.

  • Q : Calculate price elasticity of demand

    Paradise Planners sold deluxe Hawaiian winter vacation’s 170 packages at a price of $1900, although only 130 tourists signed up while the price increased to $2100. Such Hawaiian vacations have a price elasticity of demand approximately equal to:

  • Q : Problem regarding Subjective Prices

    Mike trades 6 vintage baseball cards for the Jake’s original Ty Cobb card. When Mike’s six cards had equivalent total market value with Jake’s Ty Cobb card, then this trade would show: (i) Unfair incentive. (ii) Demand price. (iii) Opportunity cost.

  • Q : Negative price cross elasticities of

    When two goods have negative price cross elasticities of demand, in that case the goods are: (1) inferior goods. (2) luxury goods. (3) complementary goods: (4) substitute goods. (5) normal goods. Hey friends please