--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Determine economic rent by annual income

    The philosophers in this demonstrated graph are enjoying economic rent equal to: (w) shaded area A. (x) shaded area B. (y) shaded area C. (z) the sum of the shaded areas.

    Q : Example of predatory behavior Assume

    Assume that a new Wal-Mart is built just outside a small town, and also Wal-Mart aggressively cuts prices therefore much that the rivals close their doors. In that case, once its rivals exit the market, the Wal-Mart raises prices significantly. Wal-Ma

  • Q : Higher interest rate in funds A higher

    A higher interest rate is probably to be a consequence of: (1) lower expected profitability to investors. (2) new tax breaks onto interest income. (3) weakening preferences for current income over future income. (4) increased preferences for recent co

  • Q : Depended price on present value The

    The prospects for getting rich by buying assets at prices substantially below their present values are dampened by the: (w) special advantages you have in securing investment information. (x) lack of competition for information regarding profit opport

  • Q : Problem on equilibrium price Refer to

    Refer to the following data. Equilibrium price will be:  A) $4. B) $3. C) $2. D) $1. Give the answer of above questaion

  • Q : Least probable resource for supply curve

    The resource least probable to conform to the supply curve demonstrated in this figure would be: (w) land. (x) capital. (y) labor. (z) entrepreneurship.

    Q : Division of labor advantages for workers

    The advantages from the division of labor are improved as workers: (1) Are protected by the barriers which limit the international trade. (2) Who each recognize all facets of production gain an enhanced understanding of the whole project. (3) Constant

  • Q : Increase total revenue at a diminishing

    When a monopolist increases output along with elastic demand, then total revenue: (w) increases at a constant rate. (x) increases at an increasing rate. (y) increases at a diminishing rate. (z) All of the above are possible.

  • Q : Determining Substitution products When

    When a price hike for Big Gulps of GlugaChug from $1 to $2 improves sales of dehydrated water from 50 to 100 kegs, then the dehydrated water and GlugaChug are: (1) Joint outputs in the production. (2) Complements. (3) Substitutes. (4) Mixed resource alternatives.

  • Q : Earning income under negative income tax

    Under the negative income tax system demonstrated in this figure, a family of four along with earned income of $15,000 yearly would have a net [after-tax] income of: (i) $30,000 per year. (ii) $27,500 per year. (iii) $25,000 per year.