--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Monopolistically-competitive market

    When numerous new firms enter a monopolistically-competitive market, in that case the demand curves facing the firms previously in that market will: (1) shift to the left and turn into more price elastic. (2) become straighter and less income elastic.

  • Q : Price elasticity of demand relatively

    The transfer of wealth from industrialized countries to oil exporting countries (OPEC) which followed skyrocketing oil prices within the 1970 year indicates such that the price elasticity of demand for oil: (w) relatively low. (x) relatively high. (y)

  • Q : Price elasticity of supply of commodity

    Determine the price elasticity of supply of a commodity whose straight line supply curve passes via the origin forming an angle of 45 degree/75 degree? Answer: Unit

  • Q : Equality between marginal revenue and

    If all variable costs can be covered, in that case every firm maximizes profit by adjusting output till: (w) total revenue is maximized. (x) marginal revenue = average cost. (y) average cost = marginal cost. (z) marginal revenue = marginal cost.

  • Q : Capital receipts Why borrowing is

    Why borrowing is treated as capital receipts? Answer: Because it rises the liability of government.

  • Q : Total revenue for profit-maximizing TR

    TR stands for total revenue for this profit-maximizing pure competitor as in below figure equals area: (i) 0Phq2. (ii) 0bgq2. (iii) Pbgh. (iv) 0aeq1. (v) daef.

    Q : Elasticity of demand changes with price

    Calculating the price elasticity of demand for DVD games for a price variation from $50 to zero in such demand curve is: (w) 0. (x) infinity. (y) mostly meaningless since elasticity changes continuously over such range. (z) 1.5.

    Q : Meaning of utility For economists, the

    For economists, the term "utility" signifies: 1) versatility and flexibility 2) rationality 3) pleasure and satisfaction 4) purposefulness.

  • Q : Least likely monopsony power Which of

    Which of the given below employers is LEAST likely to encompass monopsony power? (1) The secretarial service firm in the Los Angeles. (2) The police force in Eau Claire, Wisconsin. (3) U.S. Department of Defense. (4) Wal-Mart in the Snowflake, Arizona. (5) Community h

  • Q : Problem on price mark up A company

    A company consists $27 per unit in variable costs and $1,000,000 annually in fixed costs. Demand is predicted to be 100,000 units annually. Determine the price if a markup of 40% on total cost is used to determine the price?