--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : What is Marginal physical product

    Marginal physical product: It refers to the addition build to the total product.

  • Q : Social Welfare and Value of Marginal

    I have a problem in economics on Social Welfare and Value of Marginal Product of Labor. Please help me in the following question. The social value of additional output from the additional units of labor is: (i) Marginal revenue of the product of labor

  • Q : Problem of Income Effects on paychecks

    I have a problem in economics on Income Effects on paychecks. Please help me in the following question. Whenever prices are increased and your paycheck does not alter the purchasing power of your pay refuses. This is an instance of the: (1) Substituti

  • Q : World price in market When for wheat

    When for wheat the world price is $10 per bushel, and Del, who one owns the biggest wheat farm into North Dakota, will work at: (i) point a. (ii) point b. (iii) point c. (iv) point d. (v) point f.

    Q : Opinion about kinked demand curve model

    George Stigler concluded which the kinked demand curve model is incorrect to the extent that this depends on: (w) marginal cost pricing. (x) pure competition. (y) interdependent decision making.  (z) sticky prices.

  • Q : Economically inefficient level of output

    A monopolist produces an economically inefficient level of output since: (i) the difference among marginal revenue [MR] and marginal costs [marginal costs [MC] is maximized. (ii) P > average total costs [ATC], therefore MSB < MSC. (iii) all cons

  • Q : Elucidate GNI per capita Elucidate GNI

    Elucidate GNI per capita?

  • Q : Setting price and produces an output

    Assume that Babble-On’s patents for speech-translation software covering 314 languages lapsed, as well as entry of new competitors within this market eroded the demand for Babble-On software, but the firm retains several market powers since competitors’ pr

  • Q : Importance of study of the model of

    The study of the model of pure competition is very significant since this: (w) explains the behavior of most U.S. firms. (x) gives the underpinnings for supply and demand. (y) helps explain why government economic policy is essential. (z) gives a rati

  • Q : Altering the value of place for better

    The trucker who hauls fresh oranges from Florida to the New York raises the value of oranges by directly and productively changing their: (i) Time of consumption. (ii) Location or Place. (iii) Ownership or Possession. (iv) Form and substance.

    Discover Q & A

    Leading Solution Library
    Avail More Than 1427856 Solved problems, classrooms assignments, textbook's solutions, for quick Downloads
    No hassle, Instant Access
    Start Discovering

    18,76,764

    1949739
    Asked

    3,689

    Active Tutors

    1427856

    Questions
    Answered

    Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!

    Submit Assignment

    ©TutorsGlobe All rights reserved 2022-2023.