--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Influence of subsidy on good Assume

    Assume that the market for a good is initially in equilibrium, and then the govt. places a subsidy on good. The probable result would be: (i) Raised production and purchases of good. (ii) That buyers would pay big prices for the good. (iii) Extended scarcity of the go

  • Q : Marginal revenue and monopoly For a

    For a nondiscriminating monopolist, the marginal revenue is: (w) identical to price. (x) always positive. (y) always less than price. (z) always greater than price. Hello guys I want your advice. P

  • Q : Political pressure on government

    When the government imposes a price floor upon a product, in that case there may be political pressure for the government: (1) to produce several of the good itself. (2) to restrict the demands of private buyers. (3) to buy and then store some surplus

  • Q : Market demand in short run purely

    Ceteris paribus, inside the short run an increase into the market demand for this product would permit this purely competitive firm to be: (w) make only normal profits. (x) break even. (y) make economic profits, although not in the long run. (z) compe

  • Q : Marginal Productivity Theory about

    Differences into the demands for various resources, into the talents and kinds of labor people possess, within labor/leisure trade-offs, into inheritances, and by luck all play roles into explaining: (1) differences in income among individuals. (2) the term structure

  • Q : Market Power-Monopsony Power-Employment

    With a specific market demand for the product and a specific market labor supply curve, the employment will be smallest if a firm is: (1) Monopolist in product market and a pure competitor in the labor market. (2) Pure competitor in labor and product markets. (3) Pure

  • Q : Market in equilibrium point by interest

    When this market is primarily in equilibrium at point c, any drop within interest rates caused through an increase in people’s willingness to save will cause as: (1) the rate of return schedule reflected into I0 to shift to the

  • Q : Define Yield to Maturity Describe what

    Describe what do you mean by the term Yield to Maturity?

  • Q : Kinked demand curve for an oligopoly A

    A kinked demand curve for an oligopoly is probably when: (1) all the rival firms face identical demand curves. (2) rival firms are expected to match price cuts, but not price hikes. (3) firms ignore their rivals’ strategies when