--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Find out marginal cost curve

    LoCalLoCarbo has turn into the favorite of fad dieters. Therefore in illustrated figure there curve C shows: (1) LoCalLoCarbo’s marginal cost curve. (2) LoCalLoCarbo’s average variable cost curve. (3) LoCalLoCarbo’s average total cost curve. (4) the

  • Q : Law of supply regarding firms I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Law of supply regarding firms. Please help me in the following question. The law of supply signifies that: (i) Firms provide less for sale at lower prices. (ii) Purchases and prices differ inversely. (iii) Minimum inve

  • Q : Differnt types of demand and supply i

    i want to understand different market competitions using graphs and solving some problems

  • Q : Reform welfare mess Proposals to reform

    Proposals to reform the “welfare mess” comprises: (w) increasing education levels. (x) increasing job training programs. (y) enforcement of the Equal Pay Act. (z) negative income taxes. How can I solve

  • Q : Llustration of the problem of Moral

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. Failing to lock your door whenever you go out since you have theft insurance is an illustration of the trouble of: (1) Indifference. (2) Apathy. (3) Moral hazard. (4) Market pow

  • Q : Higher interest rate in current

    For current consumption growing preferences over future consumption would be evidenced from a: (w) higher interest rate. (x) more quick rate of investment. (y) larger government budget surplus. (z) surplus into the balance of trade.

  • Q : Market Power and Monopsony Power-

    Assume that a firm with market power in the output market wants to develop and that hiring more workers needs it to raise salaries 8 percent for all the workers. Output prices will most likely: (i) Increase 8 percent to cover the wage rise. (ii) Increase less than 8 p

  • Q : Ratio of Wealth and Poverty In 1980

    In 1980 year, the chief executive officers that stand for CEOs of main corporations had income which averaged roughly 40 times as much as the workers they working. In 2005, such ratio is less than: (1) twenty to one. (2) forty to one. (3) one hundred

  • Q : Proprietorships-Limited liability Which

    Which of the given below is not a benefit of the sole proprietorship? (i) Limited liability. (ii) Easiness of organization. (iii) Flexibility. (iv) Freedom from govt. regulation. Choose the right answer from the above options.

  • Q : Short run effects of income tax rate If

    If this illustrated figure given Lorenz curves for distribution of income after taxes and transfers, the probably short run effects of 10 percent increases within both income tax rates and government transfer