--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Long-run equilibrium output of

    This monopolistic competitor produces Q0 units and is demonstrated: (w) earning total profit equal to 0PbQ. (x) as a price taker. (y) setting price equal to marginal revenue. (z) in long-run equilibrium.

  • Q : Determine inferior good by income

    As in below figure demonstrates how consumption of goods A, B, C, and D varies like a family’s income changes. Of such goods, the only inferior good: (w) good A. (x) good B  (y) good C. (z) good D.

  • Q : Total variable costs of

    This profit-maximizing competitive firm’s total variable costs or TVC as in illustrated figure can be computed area as: (i) 0P3fq4. (ii) P2P1de. (iii) P3P2ef. (iv) 0P2eq4. (v) aced.

    Q : Pure competition and monopolistic

    Pure competition and monopolistic competition are: (1) polar opposites on the continuum of market structures. (2) the two market structures in that firms are pure quantity adjusters. (3) both characterized by an absence of barriers to long run entry a

  • Q : Negatively-sloped straight line in

    When a demand curve is a negatively-sloped straight line, in that case demand is perfectly: (w) elastic where quantity demanded is zero. (x) elastic where price is zero. (y) inelastic where quantity demanded is zero. (z) elastic or inelastic all over

  • Q : Define marginal revenue Marginal

    Marginal revenue: This is the change in total revenue by selling one more or a lesser amount of unit of commodity.

  • Q : Increasing return to a factor Describe

    Describe the likely behaviour of total product beneath the phase of increasing return to a factor.

  • Q : Income elasticity-distribution and

    The time people focus upon politics and government policies tends to be income elastic. Nonetheless, high wage rates raise the opportunity costs of voting. Mutually, these facts suggest that, which relative to wealthier or higher-income people and low

  • Q : Separable utility function One of my

    One of my friends can't find the answer of this question. Give answer of following economic based question. Tell me about strongly separable utility function?

  • Q : Monopsonist in the labor market I have

    I have a problem in economics on Monopsonist in the labor market. Please help me in the following question. The monopsonist in labor market faces the: (1) Market demand for the labor. (2) Household’s demand for the labor. (3) Household’s s