--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Employed Currency in 1700s In 1700s

    In 1700s what currency was employed?

  • Q : Exit from a competitive industry Exit

    Exit from a competitive industry will carry on till economic: (w) losses are driven to zero. (x) profits precisely offset accounting losses. (y) profit exceeds accounting profit. (z) resources have minimum incomes.

  • Q : Shifting demand of labor The demand for

    The demand for labor will shift because of changes in all of the given except: (w) prices of other resources. (x) prices of output. (y) MPP (z) wages. Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some views for

  • Q : Main economic purpose of financial

    A financial system's main economic reason is to: (w) channel savings to more efficient and productive uses. (x) print money to assist the government. (y) increase the money multiplier. (z) protect individuals against recessions.

  • Q : Operating competitors with market power

    A firm operating along with a lot of competitors but that still has some control over price is a: (i) pure quantity adjuster. (ii) member of an oligopoly. (iii) purely competitive firm. (iv) firm with some market power. (v) cartel.

  • Q : Demanding more labor in competitive fim

    A competitive firm will demand more labor when: (1) technological advances favor automation. (2) the price of the firm's output rises. (3) more firms enter the industry. (4) the value of the marginal product is below the wage rate. (5) workers utilize

  • Q : Price signalling reallocations in use

    An illustration of prices signalling desirable reallocations would happen while rising product demand leads to rising: (w) levels of investment during the economy. (x) employment of resources producing such good. (y) shifts of resources within other outputs. (z) quick

  • Q : Prices of output and economic profit in

    for a purely-competitive decreasing-cost industry in a short run equilibrium in that typical firms temporarily produce economic profits, and the average total costs a typical firm incurs are positively associated to t

  • Q : Effect of minimum wage laws in

    The Minimum wage laws might efficiently raise employment: (i) When the set wage value surpasses labor market equilibrium. (ii) In industries of profoundly exercised monopsony power. (iii) In no condition; higher minimum wage floods the labor supply and lower minimum w

  • Q : Inter-temporal Costs and Benefits

    Harvey is currently a Junior Analyst at a financial firm.  His annual salary is $30,000, and past experience leads him to believe that the real (inflation adjusted) value of his salary will remain at that level in the future.  (Assume he is paid at the end o