--%>

Question on lowering the supply

The Reagan Administration introduced new agricultural program named as the Payment-in-Kind Program, in the year of 1983. In order to distinguish how the program worked, let's assume the wheat market. Now assume the government desire to lower the supply of wheat by 25 percent from the free-market equilibrium by paying farmers to withdraw land from production. Though, the payment is made in wheat instead of in dollars--hence the name of the program. The wheat comes from the government's vast reserves that resulted from previous price-support programs. The amount of wheat paid is equivalent to the amount which could have been harvested on the land withdrawn from production. Farmers are free to sell this wheat on the market. How much is produced by farmers now? How much is supplied indirectly to the market by the government? What is the new market price? How much do the farmers gain? Do consumers gain or lose?
Since the free market supply by farmers is 20 billion bushels, the 25 percent reduction needed by the new Payment-In-Kind (PIK) Program would imply that the farmers now generate 15 billion bushels. To encourage farmers to withdraw their land from cultivation, the government have to give them 5 billion bushels, which they sell on the market.
Since the total supply to the market is still 20 billion bushels, the market price does not change; this remains at $4 per bushel. The farmers gain $20 billion, equal to ($4)(5 billion bushels), from the PIK Program, since they incur no costs in supplying the wheat (which they received from the government) to the market. The PIK program does not influence consumers in the wheat market, since they purchase the similar amount at the same price as they did in the free market case.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Proprietorships and corporations I have

    I have a problem in economics on Proprietorships and corporations. Please help me in the following question. Most of the firms in United States are organized as ________, however two-third of all gain is received by the _________. (1) Corporations; restricted partners

  • Q : Production possibility history of World

    Can someone help me in determining the right answer from the given options. Through the onset of World War-II, the United States: (i) Expanded the military output just by increases taxes rigorously. (ii) Moved in the direction of its production possibilities frontier.

  • Q : Enter or leave the market by resources

    For a purely competitive industry in the long run: (i) several firms exit hence others may earn more than normal profits. (ii) established firms reap higher profits than newer firms. (iii) all resources are fixed for the industry as an entire. (iv) pe

  • Q : Negative income tax programs Negative

    Negative income tax programs attack poverty through: (w) levying heavy taxes on the poor to encourage them to work more. (x) providing transfers in kind to low income households. (y) providing cash subsidies to guarantee a minimum income to low income

  • Q : Surviving for maximum profits in

    Supposing that the competitive firms should seek the maximum profits to survive signifies that: (1) Firm do not make trial-and-error decisions. (2) Each and every firm always seeks the maximum gain and nothing else. (3) Competition is very profitable.

  • Q : Problem on Monopsonistic exploitation I

    I have a problem in economics on Monopsonistic exploitation. Please help me in the following question. The Monopsonistic exploitation of labor signifies that the: (i) Influenced workers receive much low wages. (ii) Firm reaps big economic gains by exploiting the worke

  • Q : Determine demand over the relevant

    Predictions which higher gasoline prices will increase total spending on gas imply such as the demand over the relevant price range that is: (w) unlimited. (x) relatively price elastic. (y) unitarily price elastic. (z) relatively price inelastic.

  • Q : Present Value of Future Income The

    The present value of future income is: (w) higher, the higher the interest rate. (x) lower, the higher the interest rate. (y) unaffected by the interest rate. (z) purely objective, and not subjective at all. Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some views for above Economics pr

  • Q : Oligopolistic pricing behavior

    Collusive oligopolistic pricing behavior: (1) leads to natural monopoly when only some firms dominate an industry. (2) entails overt agreement among many firms in setting outputs and prices. (3) arises while contestable firms simultaneously raise or l

  • Q : Create demand and supply tables Suppose

    Suppose the demand and supply for milk is described by the following equations: QD =  600 - 100P;  QS = - 150 + 150P, where P is price in dollars, QD is quantity de