--%>

Purely competitive or monopolies or oligopolists firms

Compared to either purely competitive firms or oligopolists, monopolies are: (w) more probable to consider the possible reactions of other firms. (x) oblivious to the actions of other firms. (y) less likely to engage into nonprice competition. (z) likely to make more than the socially optimal amount of output.

Please choose the right answer from above...I want your suggestion for the same.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Short run in Substitution process In

    In the short run, simple and cheap new cures for cancer and heart disease would most likely decrease the: (i) Gains of tobacco companies. (ii) Absentee rates of nearly all young workers. (iii) Demands for the hospital beds in intensive care units. (iv) Supplies of doc

  • Q : Income Distribution in Lorenz Curve

    When line 0D0' represents the 1929s U.S. income distribution and line 0B0'shows the 1975 income distribution, in that case the 2005 year’s income distribution would be signified by: (i) line 0A0'. (ii) line 0B0'. (iii) line 0C0'. (iv) line 0D0'.

  • Q : Effects of price ceiling Effects of

    Effects of price ceiling: The consequences of price ceiling might be: A) Scarcity of the commodity B) The government might oblige rationing that is, supply of goods in limited q

  • Q : Prohibition in Pure Economic Profits

    Pure economic profits are NOT: (w) normal costs of production. (x) reduced to “normal” levels in long-run pure competition. (y) zero in long run monopolistic competition. (z) possible under pure competition in the short-run.

  • Q : Marginal product I can't discover the

    I can't discover the answer of this question of my economy assignment. Help me out to go through this question. If any variable input is not scarce input, then at maximum output what would be its marginal product?

  • Q : Type of model used by economists Which

    Which type of model is used by the economists to analyze competitive market?

  • Q : Problem of Nash Equilibrium Carlos and

    Carlos and Ivana are room-mates and friends. Carlos and Ivana eat together despite who cooks on a given night. Within this payoff matrix, Nash equilibrium could never be obtained in that: (w) neither Carlos nor Ivana cook, nor do they eat. (x) Carlos

  • Q : Evidence of Diminishing Marginal Utility

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The law of diminishing marginal utility might be evidenced by the person: (i) Smoking more however enjoying each and every extra cigarette less. (ii) Buying a latest car after

  • Q : Output produces by monopolistic

    This monopolistic competitor generates Q0 output where is: (1) MR = MC. (2) MSB > MSC. (3) average cost is not minimized. (4) P = ATC. (5) All of the above.

    Q : Quality and safety in Adverse Selection

    The popular sporting goods magazine publishes a report on quality and safety of different brands of ski equipment. This report would be most probable to determine a problem consumer’s face since of: (i) Adverse selection. (ii) Brand-name bias. (iii) High priced