--%>

Public Opinion Sampling

Public Opinion Sampling: Increasingly trade policy debates and issues are being defined and driven by public polling and expert opinion. Mendellson and Wolfe (2004) offer an overview of the public policy debate in Canada and the roll of polling in defining the issues and outcomes. It is important for trade policy advisors and marketers to understand and be able to assess the output of the wide range of extensive polling exercises.

At one level, it is only natural that governments engage in processes to bring more views into government. Particularly where trade negotiations involve significant domestic trade-offs, governments need inputs. The big question is whose views should count and how can you get accurate polling results that reflect the views of citizens and interested groups. In the past the main challenge facing government was to figure out what was the right answer (morally, politically, economically), which generally allowed governments to engage in a modernist dialogue with experts, who could use deductive reasoning to identify optimal policies and strategies. Increasingly, however, there is a post-modernist push for policy to reflect the social values of communities. While this is a laudable goal, it raises questions about how to elicit society’s opinions in an accurate manner.

A wide range of methods have been tried, some with more precision and science behind them than others. Generally, opinions (expert, public or group) are brought into the process either through quantitative statistical polling or through some form of qualitative dialogue or process. Each has its merits and uses

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Value of commodities and services The

    The value of services and commodities is frequently decomposed into value in: (1) Dollars and value in Euros. (2) Absolute value and prices in relative prices. (3) House-holds and value in organizations. (4) Utilization and value in exchange.

  • Q : Effect on tax burdens by price

    When the price elasticity of demand for wine as 2.5, in that case rise in the excise tax which raises its price will be: (w) increase total spending upon wine. (x) reduce total spending upon wine. (y) not influence wine consumption. (

  • Q : Decreased market demand for generic 2×4s

    Decreased market demand for generic 2×4s as in illustrated graph would result within a(n) ___________ into the price of 2×4s as well as a(n) ___________ in this lumber mill’s profit-maximizing output. (w) increase; decrease. (x) incr

  • Q : Marginal revenue in selling extra unit

    The price a firm acquires from selling an extra unit of output, minus any revenue lost when price should be reduced in all other units sold, equals: (1) average revenue. (2) marginal profit. (3) mark-up price. (4) marginal revenue. (5) total revenue.<

  • Q : Unlimited amount at any market price A

    A monopoly firm which does not price discriminate does NOT: (w) have a marginal revenue curve which lies below its demand curve. (x) confront a downward-sloping demand curve. (y) have discretion over the price of its output. (z) sell

  • Q : Total revenue for profit-maximizing

    TR (total revenue) for this profit-maximizing pure competitor equivalents area: (i) 0PeQ. (ii) bPec. (iii) aPed. (iv) 0bcQ. (v) 0Pec.

    Q : Market form-product distinguishing In

    In which market form, the products are distinguished. Answer: In Monopolistic competition

  • Q : Increase revenues when price falls When

    When the price elasticity of demand for fried cheesy grits at Pixie’s Breakfast Grill is two, in that case a price cut of $2.80 to $2.00 per serving of grits would be most probably to: (1) reduce Pixie’s revenues from grits by roughly fort

  • Q : Present value of winnings by free

    You win the Idaho state lottery as well as are entitled to two tax-free payments of $500,000 every. You get the first payment today and the next payment in precisely one year. Suppose the interest rate is a generally high 25 percent.

  • Q : Income elasticity of demand computations

    When yearly per capita income increases from $13,500 to $26,500 and custom car sales increase from 100,000 to 200,000, by using the arc elasticity formula, then the income elasticity of demand is: (i) 0.50. (ii) 0.75. (iii) 1.00. (iv)