--%>

Psychological Pricing

Define the term Psychological Pricing and what are their aspects?

E

Expert

Verified

Psychological Pricing:

This policy considers the psychology of prices and not only the economics. When the customers can judge the quality of a product by examining it, they make less use of price to judge the quality of product. They rely more on their judgments, past experience with the product and its superior/ attractive/ unique features.

When customers cannot judge quality because of lack of information or skill, price becomes an important quality signal.

Another aspect of this type of pricing is reference prices, which are prices that the buyers carry in their minds and refer to when they look at the product. Sellers can influence or use the reference prices when setting prices. Even small differences in prices can suggest product differences.

Many customers believe that prices should end in odd numbers. Many customers see that a pair of shoes are priced at $99 instead of $100 as a price in $90 range (two figure price) rather than $100 (three figure prices) and thus psychologically considers the product to be less expensive.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Price elasticities for market demand

    Of the given price elasticities [ed] for market demand curves, there the one which is absolutely implausible by the vantage of standard economic theory would be one for that, across all conceivable ranges of prices: (1) ed= 0 and the

  • Q : Demand curve for Complementary Goods

    The ban on assault weapons enacted in the year 1994 lapsed in the year 2004. Prices for assault weapons fell in year 2004 since the only way to get such guns throughout the ban was via the black market. This modify in the law in year 2004 is most probable to shift the

  • Q : Quintile distribution of income Give

    Give the answer of following question. In the quintile distribution of income, the term "quintile" represents: A) 5 percent of the income receivers. B) 10 percent of the income receivers. C) 20 percent of the income receivers. D) 25 percent of the income receivers.

  • Q : Determine equality of marginal revenue

    Marginal revenue equals the change within total: (w) profit as output expands slightly. (x) output from hiring an additional worker. (y) revenue from selling an extra unit of output. (z) tax rates while tax revenue increases a bit.

    Q : Marginal utility of Goods and Bads When

    When Joe Glutton’s final bite of a burger yielded no profit in total utility, then Joe: (i) Don’t like hamburgers. (ii) Has reached the minimum utility from eating the burgers. (iii) Has reached the point where marginal utility of hamburgers is 0 (zero). (

  • Q : Direction of the income effect The

    The direction of the income effect can’t be: (i) Negative for inferior goods. (ii) Positive for the luxury goods. (iii) Zero for a good which some people consider a requirement. (iv) Expected when we know only the size and direction of substitution effect.

  • Q : Marginal revenue with price discriminate

    For any firm along with some degree of market power but that cannot price discriminate, the price is: (w) constant along the demand curve. (x) identical with marginal revenue. (y) greater than marginal revenue. (z) less than marginal revenue.

  • Q : Selling of physically indistinguishable

    While physically indistinguishable units of a good are concurrently sold at various prices at various locations, such price differentials reflect: (1) differences within marketing and advertising costs. (2) rational ignorance by consumers. (3) differe

  • Q : Labor Contracts-Featherbedding The

    The Restrictive work rules which need firms to employ more workers than essential are termed as: (i) Feather-bedding. (ii) Seniority contracts. (iii) Blacklisting regulations. (iv) Agency shop provisions. (v) Yellow dog contracts.

  • Q : Uncertainty and Decision-making I have

    I have a problem in economics on Uncertainty and Decision-making. Please help me in the following question. The error of omission would be: (i) The failure of an individual to invest in Microsoft 20 years ago. (ii) Individual cheating on a test. (iii)