Profit maximization for firm in pure competition
Profit maximization for a firm within pure competition arises while: (w) MC = P = MR. (x) MC > MR. (y) AC = P. (z) MC = AC. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding Economics generally?
Profit maximization for a firm within pure competition arises while: (w) MC = P = MR. (x) MC > MR. (y) AC = P. (z) MC = AC.
Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding Economics generally?
When both demand and supply rise within the market for cell phones, we would suppose the market price to: (w) increase. (x) decrease. (y) increase, decrease, or stay similar, depending upon the relative magnitudes of the shifts. (z) s
I have a problem in economics on rational consumer-Relative Prices. Please help me in the following question. The rational consumer purchasing decisions depend mainly on: (1) Current market prices. (2) Absolute prices. (3) Nominal prices. (4) Monetary prices. (5) Rela
When this firm is a typical pure competitor within this industry as in demonstrated figure, then the firm is: (i) making normal accounting profit. (ii) making zero economic profit. (iii) breaking even. (iv) into an industry within long run equilibrium
A price elasticity of demand of 2.0 implies that at that point, the demand curve is: (w) income elastic. (x) relatively price elastic. (y) relatively price inelastic. (z) unitarily price elastic. I need a good answ
Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. When resource suppliers are paid less than the values of their marginal products (or VMPs), they are stated to be: (i) Monopolistic. (ii) Exploited. (iii) Monopsonistic. (iv) In equilibrium.
All transaction costs would be zero when: (1) Congress required current prices to be cut by eighteen percent. (2) market information and transportation were both costless. (3) market prices were legally restricted to production costs. (4) inflation we
For identical level of guaranteed transfer payments, the earn income and incentive to work is probable to be: (w) greater with a negative income tax than with transfers in kind. (x) greater with transfers in kind than
Why is economics seen like a social science?
Let consider the law of demand. The idea that the higher price for a normal good will outcome in less of good being purchased never based logically on the: (1) Income effect, by which the higher price decreases the purchasing power of the income. (2) Demand for good f
Maximizes total revenue by a monopolist where marginal revenue: (w) equals marginal cost. (x) is rising. (y) is zero. (z) is negative. Hey friends please give your opinion for the problem of
18,76,764
1929407 Asked
3,689
Active Tutors
1435667
Questions Answered
Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!