--%>

Problem regarding to present value and rates of return

When the price of a financial asset is of $2,000 and the interest rate is 10 percent, in that case investment is not reasonable for: (1) a perpetuity paying $200 annually. (2) an income stream paying $1000, $800, and $600, respectively, on the ends of all of the next three years. (3) a bond paying $2,420 two years hence. (4) an asset worth $2,600 three years hence. (5) a bond paying $4,000 in six years.

Hey friends please give your opinion for the problem of Economics that is given above.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Competitive resource markets and low

    When resource markets are competitive and transaction costs are low, in that case landowners: (1) pass forward completely any land tax. (2) can drive up the rental rate of land by changing its supply. (3) bear the full burden of any t

  • Q : Law of Demand in respect to relative

    I have a problem in economics on Law of Demand in respect to relative price. Please help me in the following question. The law of demand defines that as: (1) Absolute prices rise, quantity demanded raises. (2) Relative prices raise, quantity demanded

  • Q : Marginal cost by price discriminate

    When a monopolist which does not price discriminate maximizes profit and charges a price equal to marginal cost, this will: (i) minimize average cost and generate zero economic profit. (ii) minimize average cost and generate a positiv

  • Q : Present value of winnings by free

    You win the Idaho state lottery as well as are entitled to two tax-free payments of $500,000 every. You get the first payment today and the next payment in precisely one year. Suppose the interest rate is a generally high 25 percent.

  • Q : Price of a Financial Asset When the

    When the price of a financial asset of price $10,000 and the interest rate is 10 percent, investment is NOT justified for: (w) a perpetuity paying $1,000 annually. (x) an asset paying respectively as $5,000, $4,000, a

  • Q : Maximizing utility from consumption of

    Given that a MU of French fries of 35 utils and a MU for serving of potato chips at 25 utils, when their respective prices are $1.50 and $.80, the person who wants to maximize utility from the consumption of both of such goods would consume: (i) The similar amount of

  • Q : Economic minimized losses or maximized

    When a firm’s total revenue potentially exceeds total variable cost for at least one output level, in that case economic losses are minimized or profit is maximized through producing where: (i) average total cos

  • Q : Dilemma model of prisoner When the

    When the Kroger grocery chain raises the price of Starbuck’s Frappuccino, in that case Safeway will remain its price the same. Although, if Kroger drops the price of Frappuccino, then Safeway will match the price cut. This kind of behavior conforms to the: (1) s

  • Q : Burden of tax reduce on suppliers of

    Most of the burden of an excise (i.e., per unit) tax would be borne through consumers of the taxed good, although some of the tax burden would reduce on suppliers of the good demonstrated in: (w) Panel A. (x) Panel B. (y) Panel C. (z)

  • Q : Relatively price inelasticity of demand

    When cuts into the price of cowboy hats drive down total revenues to hat makers, in that case demand: (1) relatively price elastic. (2) relatively price inelastic. (3) unitarily price elastic. (4) infinitely price elastic. (5) zero pr