--%>

Problem regarding to intermediation for ticket scalping

Ticket-scalpers allow latecomers to ignore standing into line for tickets and permit people to wait till the last moment before deciding to attend athletic or concerts events. Are promoters of an event harmed through scalping? Must ticket scalpers' services be free? See when you can devise graphs to clarify this form of speculation.

E

Expert

Verified

The production of any type of good or service, with avoidance of queuing, involves costs. Without compensation, any scalper will not give this service. Events’ promoters who wish to ignore scalping could simply increase prices till they were assured surpluses of tickets and seats. Promoters do not do this since they are not harmed by scalping and do not actually want to remove scalping. When scalping was eliminated, this would decrease demands for tickets for events which unexpectedly failed to draw adequate crowds to fill the seats. Following figure demonstrates the market for scalping and tickets.

1932_intermediation for ticket scalping.png

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Problem on Substitution Market demand

    Market demand curve for the Hormel’s canned Spam [that is, a processed pork product which is an inferior good for most of the people], would shift rightward as the effect of major increases in: (i) Publicity regarding high correlations among hea

  • Q : Price elasticity of demand when price

    When P = $10 for Tiny Tee-shirts, and Q = 20, but when P = $5, Q = 25. The price elasticity of demand for Tiny Tee-shirts of: (w) 3.0. (x) 1/3. (y) 1/2. (z) 21. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for giv

  • Q : High prices elasticities of demand

    Taxing private auto travel as well as subsidizing mass transit will most effectively limit auto travel and raise the use of mass transit when the price elasticities of demand for auto travel: (1) and mass transit are low, and the cross-elasticity of d

  • Q : Horizontal individual demand curves The

    The market demand curve is recognized by: (i) Vertically summing up individual demand curves. (ii) Graphing intersections of demand and supply over time. (iii) Holding quantity constant while summing up each price on demand curve. (iv) Horizontally summing up individu

  • Q : Minor Inefficiencies in Monopolistic

    Minor inefficiencies generated since monopolistic competitors differentiate their products may be more than offset through the: (w) increase in economic equity. (x) expansion of the psychologically-meaningful choices obtainable to consumers. (y) reduc

  • Q : Estimate price by price elasticity of

    At the point on the demand curve for RoboMaids where the price elasticity of demand is unitary, the price would be roughly: (i) $10,000, resulting in sales of roughly 16,000 robots monthly. (ii) $13,000, resulting in sales of approxim

  • Q : Normal accounting profits in monopoly

    This monopoly makes Q units and experiences as: (1) economic profits equal to 0cbQ. (2) economic losses equal to cpab. (3) more than normal accounting profits. (4) marginal cost in excess of average total cost. (5) total revenue less than total cost.<

  • Q : Critics of the simple limit pricing

    Critics of the straightforward limit pricing strategy argue about that: (w) sunk costs are not important in deterring entry. (x) for limit pricing to work, there should be a credible threat to keep old output levels. (y) this is rational to expect the

  • Q : Comparable the changes in TC and TVC

    Tell me the answer of this question. In comparing the changes in TC and TVC associated with an additional unit of output, we discover that: A) the change in TVC is equal to MC, while the change in TC is equal to TFC. B) the change in TC exceeds the change in TVC. C) t

  • Q : Quality and safety in Adverse Selection

    The popular sporting goods magazine publishes a report on quality and safety of different brands of ski equipment. This report would be most probable to determine a problem consumer’s face since of: (i) Adverse selection. (ii) Brand-name bias. (iii) High priced