--%>

Problem regarding to intermediation for ticket scalping

Ticket-scalpers allow latecomers to ignore standing into line for tickets and permit people to wait till the last moment before deciding to attend athletic or concerts events. Are promoters of an event harmed through scalping? Must ticket scalpers' services be free? See when you can devise graphs to clarify this form of speculation.

E

Expert

Verified

The production of any type of good or service, with avoidance of queuing, involves costs. Without compensation, any scalper will not give this service. Events’ promoters who wish to ignore scalping could simply increase prices till they were assured surpluses of tickets and seats. Promoters do not do this since they are not harmed by scalping and do not actually want to remove scalping. When scalping was eliminated, this would decrease demands for tickets for events which unexpectedly failed to draw adequate crowds to fill the seats. Following figure demonstrates the market for scalping and tickets.

1932_intermediation for ticket scalping.png

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Movement of Supply Curve towards up and

    The rise in the price of Pepsi will effect a: (1) Shift of the supply curve of Coke to left. (2) Shift of the supply curve of Pepsi to right. (3) Movement downwards all along the supply curve of Coke. (4) Movement up and to right all along the supply curve of Pepsi.

  • Q : Output at unitary price elasticity

    Babble-On maintains world-wide patents for software which translates any of 314 spoken languages into text, along with automatic audio and text translations into some of the other three-hundred-thirteen languages. Facing Babble-On the demand curve has unitary

  • Q : Problem regarding Principal Agent The

    The baseball manager, whose players decline to bunt occasionally, rather always swinging for the homeruns, faces a: (i) Second-mover drawback. (ii) Prisoner’s dilemma. (iii) Principal-agent problem. (iv) Grim strategy. Can so

  • Q : Predation by charging a low price

    Predation by charging a low price is often a successful entry deterrent for all of the given reasons except the concept that low prices: (w) signal low profit. (x) make entry complicated while entry is costly. (y) may signal to a pote

  • Q : Total cost for monopolistic competitor

    Total cost for that monopolistic competitor in shown below figure equals area: (w) 0cbQ. (x) 0deQ + dcbe. (y) 0paQ   cpab. (z) All of the above.

    Q : Evidence of Diminishing Marginal Utility

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The law of diminishing marginal utility might be evidenced by the person: (i) Smoking more however enjoying each and every extra cigarette less. (ii) Buying a latest car after

  • Q : Interdependent decisions of oligopolies

    Industries dominated by some large firms whose decisions are interdependent are: (1) oligopolies. (2) monopolies. (3) cartels. (4) monopsonies. Please choose the right answer from above...I want your suggestion for the same.

  • Q : Problem on Blacklisting The

    The Blacklisting was once common however now illegal in the labor market practice of: (i) Boycotting the products of firms whose workers are on strike. (ii) Forcing the workers to sign agreements not to join the unions. (iii) Paying the union officers to systematize u

  • Q : Revenue added via selling an additional

    The revenue added through selling an additional unit of output is: (w) demand elasticity. (x) average profit rate. (y) supply elasticity. (z) marginal revenue. How can I solve my Economics problem?

  • Q : Excess in balance of trade When there

    When there is an excess in the balance of trade? Answer: When export > import (that is, when export is greater than import).