Problem regarding to Government Subsidies in equilibrium

Suppose the market for exercise equipment is primarily in equilibrium, and after that the government places a subsidy upon the exercise equipment. The probable result would be: (1) increased production and purchases of exercise equipment. (2) that buyers would pay higher prices for exercise equipment. (3) prolonged shortages of exercise equipment. (4) decreased production and purchases of exercise equipment. (5) prolonged surpluses of exercise equipment.

Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some views for above economics problems.

View Complete Question

Related Questions in Microeconomics

Q : Boosting minimum wage laws Boosting

Boosting minimum wage laws from $5 to $8 per hour is LEAST probable to: (w) give some unskilled workers with higher incomes. (x) cause some low-wage workers to lose their jobs. (y) raise friendship like a basis for employment. (z) decrease unemploymen

Q : When are average and outputs prices of

Average and Outputs prices for CDs and DVDs both rose throughout 1999 to 2000 (before the start of Napster and subsequent file-sharing software), which implying: (1) supply of prerecorded music should have grown. (2) law of demand doesn’t apply

Q : Supply of good at market price When

When producers become willing and capable to sell more of a good at each and every market price, then there has been a raise in: (1) Consumer preferences. (2) Supply. (3) Quantity supplied. (4) Demand. (5) Capitalists’ profits.

Q : Demand in Dynamics The raise in the

The raise in the supply of potatoes is probable to decrease the: (i) Supply of potato harvesters. (ii) Demand for pasta and rice. (iii) Price of Big Macs. (iv) Quantity of ketchup people put on hot-dogs. (e) Budgets of most house-holds.

Q : Most likely resources in short run I

I have a problem in economics on most likely resources in short run. Please help me in the following question. The most probable of the given resources to be fixed for the farmer in short run would be: (1) Land. (2) Labor. (3) Fertilizer. (4) All the above would be of

Q : Critics of the simple limit pricing

Critics of the straightforward limit pricing strategy argue about that: (w) sunk costs are not important in deterring entry. (x) for limit pricing to work, there should be a credible threat to keep old output levels. (y) this is rational to expect the

Q : Values of the Marginal Product and

Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Hourly salaries as reflected in take-home pay are probable to be less than the values of worker’s marginal product (or VMP) in part since of: (1) Monopsonistic exploitation which causes

Discover Q & A

Leading Solution Library

Avail More Than 1426254 Solved problems, classrooms assignments, textbook's solutions, for quick Downloads

No hassle, Instant Access

Start Discovering

18,76,764

1930782
Asked

3,689

Active Tutors

1426254

Questions
Answered

Start Excelling in your courses, Ask an Expert and get answers for your homework and assignments!!

Submit Assignment