--%>

Problem on Substitution Effect

The cost of cashmere plummets and most of the people start employing this once costly material as pillow covers and to knit sweaters for their pets. This is an illustration of: (i) The income effect. (ii) The change in preferences and taste. (iii) The law of diminishing marginal utility. (iv) The substitution effect. (v) The change in producer’s expectations.

Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the above options.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Maximizing utility from consumption of

    Given that a MU of French fries of 35 utils and a MU for the serving of potato chips at 25 utils, when their respective prices are $1.50 and $.80, a person who wishes to maximize the utility from the consumption of both of such goods would consume: (1) The similar amo

  • Q : Price crosses elasticity of demand for

    When each 1 percent hike in the price of pencils causes a 2 percent decline within the quantity of erasers sold, the price crosses elasticity of demand for such complementary goods is about: (1) -2.0. (2) -1.0. (3) -4.0. (4) 2.0. (5) 1.0.

  • Q : Computations of price elasticity of

    The price elasticity of demand in given figure below for DVD games among prices of $30 and $40 is roughly: (w) 3/7. (x) 7/3. (y) 1/21. (z) 21.

    Q : Potential advantage of Proprietorships

    Beth and Anna each own a florist shop. After many years of rivalry, they make a decision to team up and make a partnership. The potential advantage of such a union would be that: (1) They can divide up duties and become more proficient. (2) Their partnership profits n

  • Q : Problem on positive quantity Supply The

    The law of supply defines that, other things equivalent: (1) Quantity supplied differs inversely with price. (2) A good’s supply is positively associated to its demand. (3) Quantity supplied is positively associated to price. (4) Prices and cost

  • Q : Question 2 Explain the concept of a

    Explain the concept of a concentration ration. Is the concentration ratio in a monopolistically competitive industry likely to be higher than for a perfectly competitve industry? Explain the answer

  • Q : Economic efficiency for pure competition

    Pure competition yields economic efficiency through: (w) punishing profit maximizing behavior. (x) forcing firms to adopt the least costly technologies available. (y) generating high profits as incentives. (z) rewarding entrepreneurs

  • Q : Monopolistic competition in market power

    A firm which has some market power but for that long-run profit is prevented by freedom of entry and exit is engaged within: (1) pure monopoly. (2) pure oligopoly. (3) monopolistic competition. (4) socially responsible behavior. (5) pure competition.<

  • Q : Determining type of good An increase in

    An increase in the income of Consumer X leads to fall in demand for that good by that consumer. Name the good X termed? Answer: Inferior good

  • Q : Cost of inputs in Determinants of demand

    I have a problem in economics on Cost of inputs in Determinants of demand. Please help me in the following question. The entire given are determinants of demand apart from. (i) Taxes and preferences. (ii) The cost of inputs. (iii) Price expectations.