--%>

Problem on Stock per share value

ABC Company plans to buy back 1 million shares of its own stock from its cash reserves at $50 a share. This will raise the bankruptcy costs by $10 million, and the debt/assets ratio from 35% to 40%. The income tax rate of the company is 30%. Determine the value of the stock per share after this buyback. Is the company making the correct move?

E

Expert

Verified

Shares repurchased = 1 million*$50 = $50 million

Increase in bankruptcy costs = $10 million

Assume the total value is $1000 million. Since the debt-to-assets ratio is 35% initially, the value of debt is $350 million and that of equity is $650 million. Assuming that the after-tax cost of debt is 5.6%

Value of firm after buy back = 1000 + 50*.3 – (10*.3)/0.056 = 961.43 million
Value of equity = 0.6*961.43 = 576.88
Share price before buy back = 650/50 =13 million shares
Since 1 million is bought back,
Share price after buyback = 576.88/12 = $48.07

Hence the company is not making the right move.

   Related Questions in Corporate Finance

  • Q : Explain Cost of capital aspect Cost of

    Cost of capital aspect: Estimation of WCR is beneficial from the point of view of cost of capital too. A sound working capital position is beneficial from the point of view of both owners and lenders of the company. A sufficiently positive position me

  • Q : Explain the definition of WACC An

    An investment bank computed my WACC. The report is as: “the definition of the WACC is defined as WACC = RF + βu (RM – RF); here RF being the risk-free rate and βu the unleveraged beta and RM the market risk rate.” It is differ from what we

  • Q : Explain undervaluation of share on the

    Suppose we calculate g as ROE (1–p)/(1–ROE (1–p)) and the Ke by the CAPM. We replace both values into the formula PER = (ROE (1+g) – g)/ROE (Ke-g) but there PER we obtain is fully different from the one we get by dividing the quotation of the s

  • Q : Explain the way of estimating an average

    Explain the way of estimating an average.

  • Q : Is it correct to use valuation of

    Is this correct to use in the valuation of the shares of a certain company the “the real net assets value” which, as per to the Institute of Accounting and Auditing (ICAC), shows the “book value of shareholder’s equity, corrected through increa

  • Q : How economic doctrine relies on

    I read in a sentence passed through the Supreme Court that, so as to value companies, economic doctrine relies upon intermediary methods among ‘Anglo-Saxon’ theoretical models and the practical models common in the United

  • Q : Tax benefits of lease FedEx would like

    FedEx would like to acquire 300 vans for its business. It can buy each van for $35,000, depreciate it completely over 5 years, and then sell it for $10,000. The tax rate of FedEx is 30%, and its cost of debt is 10%. Avis Fleet Rental will lease these vans to FedEx for

  • Q : All rates are stated annually with

    1 Assume the following (all rates are stated annually with semiannual compounding) a. Six Month Spot Rate is 2% b. Six Month Forward rate starting at month six is 2.2% c. Six Month Forward rate starting at month 12 is 2.4% d. Six Month Forward rate starting at mont

  • Q : Additive risk in the CAPM Suppose that

    Suppose that the two securities APPL and MSFT account for the entire large cap technology component of the S&P 500 (hypothetically – of course – there are really plenty of others). Further, suppose that their weights in the S&P index were as follow

  • Q : How present value of tax shields be

    I have two valuations of the company that we set as an objective. Within one of them, the present value of tax shields (D Kd T) computed using Ku (required return to unlevered equity) and, in one, by using Kd (required return to debt). The second valuation is too high