--%>

Problem on sellers utility function

The economy consists of a single buyer and a single seller. The buyer has the utility function

b ln xB1 + xB2

with b ≤ 10. The seller has the utility function

s ln xS1 + xS2

The buyer is endowed with 0 units of good 1 and 10 units of good 2. The seller is endowed with 1 unit of good 1 and 10 units of good 2.

(i) Find the demand and supply, the inverse demand and the inverse supply functions.
(ii) Find the competitive equilibrium.
(iii) The government imposes a tax on good 1. The tax is t units of good 2 for every 1 unit of good 1 transacted. Find the after-tax competitive equilibrium. What is the effect of this tax on the price paid by the buyer?

E

Expert

Verified

Given: Sellers Utility function and endowment as:

SlnX1S + X2S (1,10)
Buyers as:  blnX1B + X2B (0,10)

Budget constraint for buyer will be: p1x1 + p2x2= p1(0) +p2(10)
Plus at the optimal MRS= Price Ratio

b/x1= p1/p2

Put P2=1 (numeraire)

So  x1B*=B/p1 This is the inverse demand curve

Similarily we do it for seller and we get

s/x1= p1/p2

or  x1*s = s/p1.This is the Inverse  supply curve

b) For competitive equilibrium We know that  total supply In the economy for X1 is 1 that should be equal to demand implies x1*B= B/p1=1 and  p1*= B and P2*= 1

c) There is Only one good 1 in the economy so  there is a tax t for good two and price will be b+t for buyers now and p2=1

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : State Performance of Funds Performance

    Performance of Funds: The performance of funds mainly depends on how much diversification has been taken up by a portfolio manager and also if the company’s fundamentals have been assessed well and no hasty decision has been made on the basis of

  • Q : Effects of deceptive accounting

    Whenever stockholders who made big financial investments in Enron prior to the mid-1990s suffered huge losses during the year 2001-2002 since of deceptive accounting practices and insider trading, they were the victims of problem termed as: (1) Adverse selection (2) M

  • Q : Quantity sold of total revenue of pure

    Total revenue of a pure competitor is its quantity sold that is multiplied by its: (w) profit per unit. (x) price per unit. (y) average variable cost. (z) overhead cost per unit. Can someone explain/help me with be

  • Q : Help For a monopsonist in the labor

    For a monopsonist in the labor market, the marginal resource cost of labor is:

  • Q : Monopolist in an output market Can

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The labor monopsonist who is as well a monopolist in an output market: (1) Always makes huge profits. (2) Hires more units of the labor when

  • Q : Calculating Economic and Accounting

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Net sales revenue of the Rusty Key Corporation for the year 2005 is $190,000. The net explicit costs incurred were $70,000, and net implicit costs were $65,000. The accounting profit is ____ a

  • Q : Production Costs in generating goods

    Production possibilities frontiers be inclined to concave (or bowed out) from the origin as: (1) goods differ in their capacities to gratify individual needs. (2) A land, labor and capital mix is needed for all the production. (3) People vary in their

  • Q : Generic calculations in elasticity

    While the temperature drops by 102o F to 54o F, just diehard surfers buy surf boards and sales plummet by 56,000 down to 14,000 monthly. For surf boards the temperature elasticity of the demand is: (w) 0.975. (x) 1.95. (y) 3.90. (z) -1.95. <

  • Q : Supply of bonds for demand for loanable

    An increase in the supply of bonds tends to: (1) reduce the interest rate. (2) occur simultaneously with an increase in the demand for loanable funds. (3) yield an increase gross investment but a decrease in net investment. (4) drive up the prices of

  • Q : Relative price and income inelasticity

    Technological advances have raised agricultural productivity enormously among 1800 and nowadays, and therefore, the relative incomes of family farmers declined dramatically. There hardships endured through American farm families throughout this period