--%>

Problem on sellers utility function

The economy consists of a single buyer and a single seller. The buyer has the utility function

b ln xB1 + xB2

with b ≤ 10. The seller has the utility function

s ln xS1 + xS2

The buyer is endowed with 0 units of good 1 and 10 units of good 2. The seller is endowed with 1 unit of good 1 and 10 units of good 2.

(i) Find the demand and supply, the inverse demand and the inverse supply functions.
(ii) Find the competitive equilibrium.
(iii) The government imposes a tax on good 1. The tax is t units of good 2 for every 1 unit of good 1 transacted. Find the after-tax competitive equilibrium. What is the effect of this tax on the price paid by the buyer?

E

Expert

Verified

Given: Sellers Utility function and endowment as:

SlnX1S + X2S (1,10)
Buyers as:  blnX1B + X2B (0,10)

Budget constraint for buyer will be: p1x1 + p2x2= p1(0) +p2(10)
Plus at the optimal MRS= Price Ratio

b/x1= p1/p2

Put P2=1 (numeraire)

So  x1B*=B/p1 This is the inverse demand curve

Similarily we do it for seller and we get

s/x1= p1/p2

or  x1*s = s/p1.This is the Inverse  supply curve

b) For competitive equilibrium We know that  total supply In the economy for X1 is 1 that should be equal to demand implies x1*B= B/p1=1 and  p1*= B and P2*= 1

c) There is Only one good 1 in the economy so  there is a tax t for good two and price will be b+t for buyers now and p2=1

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : When would transaction cost be zero All

    All transaction costs would be zero when: (1) Congress required current prices to be cut by eighteen percent. (2) market information and transportation were both costless. (3) market prices were legally restricted to production costs. (4) inflation we

  • Q : Characteristic of Vertical Integration

    Vertical integration is the characteristic of all firms which: (1) Control multiple features of the production of an output from raw materials to the retail sales. (2) Operate as international cartels, dealing mainly in non-renewable resources. (3) Mo

  • Q : Definition of Corporate bonds I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Definition of Corporate bonds. Please help me in the following question. The corporate bonds are on an average, _____ than stocks to the investor and _____ then stocks to the issuing corporation. (1) Riskier; less of a risk (2) Riskier

  • Q : Excess supply at the minimum price

    Programs which guarantee farmers minimum prices which exceed equilibrium prices will yield: (w) cheaper food for consumers. (x) excess demand in food markets. (y) excess supply at the minimum price. (z) higher equilibrium prices.

  • Q : Price elasticity of demand When a

    When a monopolist’s marginal costs of production are positive and the demand curve, this faces is a negatively sloped straight line, as of the subsequent possibilities the absolute value of the price elasticity of demand at a pr

  • Q : Marginal revenue and monopoly For a

    For a nondiscriminating monopolist, the marginal revenue is: (w) identical to price. (x) always positive. (y) always less than price. (z) always greater than price. Hello guys I want your advice. P

  • Q : Rates of Return on Investment The

    The income stream per period like a percentage of the dollar outlay for investment into a capital good is the: (1) present value of the investment good. (2) rate of economic profit. (3) interest rate. (4) rate of retu

  • Q : Generous welfare programs Critics

    Critics charge which generous welfare programs have sharply raised the: (w) balance of trade deficit. (x) amount of voluntary poverty. (y) antagonism between economic classes. (z) level of involuntary unemployment.

    Q : Explicit Costs of business The Explicit

    The Explicit costs of doing the business would comprise: (i) The value of owner’s time (ii) Depreciation on the company owned truck (iii) The interest that the owner could earn when her savings were not tied up in firm. (iv) Salaries paid to the

  • Q : Problem on decline of demand The

    The automakers slashed prices and gave ‘zero percent financing’ throughout the year 2001-2003 recession. An expected outcome was: (1) The decline in the demand for utilized cars. (2) enhanced maintenance of older cars by their owners. (3) Buyers purchasing