--%>

Problem on sellers utility function

The economy consists of a single buyer and a single seller. The buyer has the utility function

b ln xB1 + xB2

with b ≤ 10. The seller has the utility function

s ln xS1 + xS2

The buyer is endowed with 0 units of good 1 and 10 units of good 2. The seller is endowed with 1 unit of good 1 and 10 units of good 2.

(i) Find the demand and supply, the inverse demand and the inverse supply functions.
(ii) Find the competitive equilibrium.
(iii) The government imposes a tax on good 1. The tax is t units of good 2 for every 1 unit of good 1 transacted. Find the after-tax competitive equilibrium. What is the effect of this tax on the price paid by the buyer?

E

Expert

Verified

Given: Sellers Utility function and endowment as:

SlnX1S + X2S (1,10)
Buyers as:  blnX1B + X2B (0,10)

Budget constraint for buyer will be: p1x1 + p2x2= p1(0) +p2(10)
Plus at the optimal MRS= Price Ratio

b/x1= p1/p2

Put P2=1 (numeraire)

So  x1B*=B/p1 This is the inverse demand curve

Similarily we do it for seller and we get

s/x1= p1/p2

or  x1*s = s/p1.This is the Inverse  supply curve

b) For competitive equilibrium We know that  total supply In the economy for X1 is 1 that should be equal to demand implies x1*B= B/p1=1 and  p1*= B and P2*= 1

c) There is Only one good 1 in the economy so  there is a tax t for good two and price will be b+t for buyers now and p2=1

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Comparative advantage of growing fruits

    The Oranges are grown-up in Florida and potatoes are grown up in Maine mainly as: (i) There is no orange-grower’s lobby in the Maine to save from harm and Maine oranges from the unfair competition. (ii) Potatoes are not eaten in the Florida. (iii) Maine consists

  • Q : Hike in relative price of a good I have

    I have a problem in economics on Hike in relative price of a good. Please help me in the following question. The hike in relative price of a good will quickly increase the: (i) Quantity demanded. (ii) Market supply. (iii) Rate of inflation. (iv) Quant

  • Q : Law of Diminishing Merginal utility Law

    Law of Diminishing Merginal utility: This states that as consumer consumes more and more units of commodity, the utility derived from each and every successive unit goes on decreasing. According to this law TU increases at decreasing rate and the MU d

  • Q : Problem on siyazama production

    The table below  contains information about  the production possibilities frontier ( PPF or PPC)  of siyazama agricultural cooperative.

  • Q : Demand prices exceeds supply prices

    When only Q0 papayas reached the market in that case: (1) desperate buyers would be willing to pay only P1 per papaya. (2) production costs would exceed P2 per papaya. (3) buyers would be indifferent regarding getting additional papaya

  • Q : Problem on Consumer Sovereignty The

    The phrase ‘dollar votes’ refers to the consumers: (1) Voting patterns in the national elections. (2) Recognizing what goods are produced. (3) Each containing an equivalent says about what is generated. (4) Being subservient to big firms.

    Q : Natural barriers to entry technology

    Natural barriers to entry would include: (w) long established brand loyalty. (x) enforcement of existing antitrust laws. (y) technology which dictates large plant size. (z) patents and copyright laws. Can anybody s

  • Q : Marginal revenue curve with marginal

    LoCalLoCarbo has turn into the favorite of fad dieters. There in demonstrated figure curve A shows: (i) LoCalLoCarbo’s marginal cost curve. (ii) LoCalLoCarbo’s average variable cost curve. (iii) LoCalLoCarbo’s average total cost curve. (iv) the marke

  • Q : Market shifting while supply fallen and

    Specified the shifts demonstrated in the market for peanuts, there is the: (1) price will fall.(2)  quantity of output will rise slightly. (3) supply has fallen while demand has grown. (4) main adjustment happens in the quantity exchanged. (5) va

  • Q : In value planning what matter in

    In the value of planning what still matters in strategic management lies?