--%>

Problem on sellers utility function

The economy consists of a single buyer and a single seller. The buyer has the utility function

b ln xB1 + xB2

with b ≤ 10. The seller has the utility function

s ln xS1 + xS2

The buyer is endowed with 0 units of good 1 and 10 units of good 2. The seller is endowed with 1 unit of good 1 and 10 units of good 2.

(i) Find the demand and supply, the inverse demand and the inverse supply functions.
(ii) Find the competitive equilibrium.
(iii) The government imposes a tax on good 1. The tax is t units of good 2 for every 1 unit of good 1 transacted. Find the after-tax competitive equilibrium. What is the effect of this tax on the price paid by the buyer?

E

Expert

Verified

Given: Sellers Utility function and endowment as:

SlnX1S + X2S (1,10)
Buyers as:  blnX1B + X2B (0,10)

Budget constraint for buyer will be: p1x1 + p2x2= p1(0) +p2(10)
Plus at the optimal MRS= Price Ratio

b/x1= p1/p2

Put P2=1 (numeraire)

So  x1B*=B/p1 This is the inverse demand curve

Similarily we do it for seller and we get

s/x1= p1/p2

or  x1*s = s/p1.This is the Inverse  supply curve

b) For competitive equilibrium We know that  total supply In the economy for X1 is 1 that should be equal to demand implies x1*B= B/p1=1 and  p1*= B and P2*= 1

c) There is Only one good 1 in the economy so  there is a tax t for good two and price will be b+t for buyers now and p2=1

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Merits of regional integration

    Elucidate the merits of regional integration?

  • Q : Least likely example of Substitution

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. Assume that the War in Iraq spilled over into another oil exporting countries. When U.S. gasoline prices rose to, state, $10 per gallon, the least likely outcome would be that:

  • Q : Law of supply regarding firms I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Law of supply regarding firms. Please help me in the following question. The law of supply signifies that: (i) Firms provide less for sale at lower prices. (ii) Purchases and prices differ inversely. (iii) Minimum inve

  • Q : Model of production possibilities

    Can someone help me in determining the right answer from the given options. The production possibilities frontier model can be employed to describe: (1) The scarcity. (2) Full employment, efficiency and limited resources. (3) The opportunity costs and

  • Q : Unexpected growth of inventories Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Whenever the quantity of a good supplied surpasses the quantity demanded: (i) Unexpected growth of inventories will cause prices to drop. (ii) The present market price is beneath equilibrium.

  • Q : Various close substitutes and little

    The demand for an exact good tends to be relatively more price elastic when the good: (1) has various close substitutes and very little complements. (2) is taken as a necessity in place of a luxury. (3) is an inferior good. (4) is rel

  • Q : Increase in demand for Normal Goods

    Zelda’s purchases of bigger and more cubic zirconium rings since she got a big pay raise are an illustration of a/an: (i) Raise in demand. (ii) Raise in quantity demanded. (iii) Raise in supply. (iv) Deterioration of the tastes.

    Q : Price discrimination in the sale of a

    Price discrimination in the sale of a good show charging various prices that: (w) reflect differences in production costs. (x) do not reflect differences in production costs. (y) are dictated by market conditions. (z) cause a monopoly to be inefficien

  • Q : Similarity of elasticities of demand

    When a price hike for regular gas from $2.00 to $2.20 reduces quantity demanded from 20 million gallons to 19 million gallons daily, and an raise in the price of premium gas from $3.00 to $3.20 decreases its quantity demanded daily from 20 million gal

  • Q : Problem on Illegal Union Strategies Not

    Not between strategies historically employed by some unions however now illegal in the United States are: (i) Jurisdictional strikes centered on which the unions will stand for a firm’s staff. (ii) Agency shop contracts forcing the non-union staff to pay ‘