--%>

Problem on Nash equilibrium

In a project, employee and boss are working altogether. The employee can be sincere or insincere, and the Boss can either reward or penalize. The employee gets no benefit for being sincere but gets utility for being insincere (30), for getting rewarded (10) and for being penalized (-30). The Boss gets utility from seeing sincere (20) or insincere (-10) behavior. They also get utility for giving rewards and by penalizing, but the size of the utility change depends on whether the reward obeys sincere (20) or insincere (10)  work. Likewise the size of the utility change depends on whether the penalty obeys sincere (-10) or insincere (0) behavior.

a) Determine the Nash equilibrium making use of the extensive form and.
b) Recommend,what could the Boss do to enhance the end result?

   Related Questions in Mathematics

  • Q : Problem on mixed-strategy equilibrium

    Assume three Offices (A, B, & C) in downtown,  simultaneously decide whether to situate in a new Building. The payoff matrix is illustrated below. What is (are) the pure stratgy Nash equilibrium (or equilibria) and mixed-strtegy equilibrium of the game?

  • Q : Numerical Analysis Hi, I was wondering

    Hi, I was wondering if there is anyone who can perform numerical analysis and write a code when required. Thanks

  • Q : Problem on Fermats method A public key

    A public key for RSA is published as n = 17947 and a = 3. (i) Use Fermat’s method to factor n. (ii) Check that this defines a valid system and find the private key X.

    Q : Explain lognormal stochastic

    Explain lognormal stochastic differential equation for evolution of an asset.

  • Q : Problem on Nash equilibrium In a

    In a project, employee and boss are working altogether. The employee can be sincere or insincere, and the Boss can either reward or penalize. The employee gets no benefit for being sincere but gets utility for being insincere (30), for getting rewarded (10) and for be

  • Q : Formal logic It's a problem set, they

    It's a problem set, they are attached. it's related to Sider's book which is "Logic to philosophy" I attached the book too. I need it on feb22 but feb23 still work

  • Q : Explain Factorisation by Fermats method

    Factorisation by Fermat's method: This method, dating from 1643, depends on a simple and standard algebraic identity. Fermat's observation is that if we wish to nd two factors of n, it is enough if we can express n as the di fference of two squares.

  • Q : What is Big-O hierarchy The big-O

    The big-O hierarchy: A few basic facts about the big-O behaviour of some familiar functions are very important. Let p(n) be a polynomial in n (of any degree). Then logbn is O(p(n)) and p(n) is O(an<

  • Q : Problem on Maple (a) Solve the

    (a) Solve the following  by: (i) First reducing the system of first order differentiat equations to a second order differential equation. (ii) Decoupling the following linear system of equa

  • Q : Test Please read the assignment

    Please read the assignment carefully and confirm only if you are 100% sure. Please go through below mentioned guidelines and penalties: • Your solution must be accurate and complete. • Please do not change Subject Title of the Email. • Penalty clause will be applied in case of delayed or plag