--%>

Problem on free trade equilibrium

The domestic demand curve for portable radios is provided by Qd = 5000 − 100P, here Qd is the number of radios which would be purchased whenever the price is P. The domestic supply curve for radios is provided by Qs = 150P, where Qs is the amount of radios which would be generated domestically when the price were P. Assume that radios can be received in the world market at a price of $10 per radio. The Domestic radio producers have effectively lobbied Congress to oblige a tariff of $5 per radio.

a) Sketch a graph stating the free trade equilibrium (with no tariff). Clearly state the equilibrium price.

b) By how much would tariff rise producer excess for domestic radio suppliers?

c) How much would govt. collect in tariff revenues?

d) Determine deadweight loss from the tariff?

E

Expert

Verified

a)

162_1.jpg

In free trade equilibrium, domestic demand is 4000, domestic supply is 1500, and import is 2500 units.

b) The producer excess with free trade would be 1/2(10-0)(1500). With the tariff, domestic supply will raise to 2250 and producer surplus will raise to 1/2(15-0)(2250) = 16875. Therefore producer surplus will rise by 9,375.

c) Through tariff, domestic demand will drop to 3500 units and domestic demand will rise to 2250 units.  Therefore, 1250 units will be imported.  The tariffs of $5 on each of such units will outcome in government receipts of 6,250.

d) The deadweight loss from tariff will come from two sources. First, the deadweight loss is related overproduction of domestic suppliers will be 1/2 (2250-1500)5 = 1875. Second, the deadweight loss is related with the reduction in consumption by consumers due to the tariff is 1/2 (4000-3500)5 = 1250.  Thus, the total deadweight loss with this tariff is 3,125.

 

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Why economic problems occur Why

    Why economic problems occur? Answer: This is due to unlimited or infinite wants and inadequate resources.

  • Q : Deter entry from potential competitors

    A firm along with important market power which builds an additional plant to increase excess capacity may be trying to as: (w) ignore a depletion of inventory. (x) deter entry from potential competitors. (y) increase demand and thus raise price and pr

  • Q : How is TVC derived from MC How is TVC

    How is TVC derived from MC? Answer: TVC = Sigma MC

  • Q : Monetary price and Transaction Costs

    You are more probable to shop at a remote farmer’s market at a lower monetary price instead of purchasing apples at a higher monetary price at the local grocery store if: (i) Possible, as production is cheaper at the farmer’s market. (ii) You want to purch

  • Q : Capital receipts Why borrowing is

    Why borrowing is treated as capital receipts? Answer: Because it rises the liability of government.

  • Q : Levels of output by monopolistic

    Monopolistic competitors generate levels of output which are: (w) more than socially optimal and equitable. (x) economically efficient. (y) where marginal social benefits exceed marginal social costs. (z) certain to generate economic profits.

  • Q : Neoclassical production theory I am

    I am facing difficulty in this question .Provide me correct answer of this question to complete my assignment. Why? Neoclassical production theory contains marginal products and heterodox production theory does not.

  • Q : Examples of pairs of complementary goods

    I have a problem in economics on Examples of pairs of complementary goods. Please help me in the following question. The illustrations of pairs of complementary goods would comprise: (1) Coffee and tea. (2) Butter and margarine. (3) Motor boats and wa

  • Q : Prices of output and economic profit in

    for a purely-competitive decreasing-cost industry in a short run equilibrium in that typical firms temporarily produce economic profits, and the average total costs a typical firm incurs are positively associated to t

  • Q : Monopolistic competition in the long run

    In the past 4 decades, the still increasing globalization of trade has caused the United State automobile market to evolve by: (i) highly concentrated oligopoly towards monopolistic competition. (ii) pure monopoly to pure competition. (iii) a cartel t