--%>

Problem on free trade equilibrium

The domestic demand curve for portable radios is provided by Qd = 5000 − 100P, here Qd is the number of radios which would be purchased whenever the price is P. The domestic supply curve for radios is provided by Qs = 150P, where Qs is the amount of radios which would be generated domestically when the price were P. Assume that radios can be received in the world market at a price of $10 per radio. The Domestic radio producers have effectively lobbied Congress to oblige a tariff of $5 per radio.

a) Sketch a graph stating the free trade equilibrium (with no tariff). Clearly state the equilibrium price.

b) By how much would tariff rise producer excess for domestic radio suppliers?

c) How much would govt. collect in tariff revenues?

d) Determine deadweight loss from the tariff?

E

Expert

Verified

a)

162_1.jpg

In free trade equilibrium, domestic demand is 4000, domestic supply is 1500, and import is 2500 units.

b) The producer excess with free trade would be 1/2(10-0)(1500). With the tariff, domestic supply will raise to 2250 and producer surplus will raise to 1/2(15-0)(2250) = 16875. Therefore producer surplus will rise by 9,375.

c) Through tariff, domestic demand will drop to 3500 units and domestic demand will rise to 2250 units.  Therefore, 1250 units will be imported.  The tariffs of $5 on each of such units will outcome in government receipts of 6,250.

d) The deadweight loss from tariff will come from two sources. First, the deadweight loss is related overproduction of domestic suppliers will be 1/2 (2250-1500)5 = 1875. Second, the deadweight loss is related with the reduction in consumption by consumers due to the tariff is 1/2 (4000-3500)5 = 1250.  Thus, the total deadweight loss with this tariff is 3,125.

 

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : State marginal propensity to consume

    Marginal propensity to consume: It is stated as the measure of rate at which the aggregate consumption expenditure changes as the national income changes. MPC= C/Y

  • Q : Ratio of Wealth and Poverty In 1980

    In 1980 year, the chief executive officers that stand for CEOs of main corporations had income which averaged roughly 40 times as much as the workers they working. In 2005, such ratio is less than: (1) twenty to one. (2) forty to one. (3) one hundred

  • Q : Estimate federal poverty rate The

    The federal poverty rate computed by the Bureau of the Census is the: (w) ratio of poverty income to the average income. (x) number of persons below the poverty line. (y) percentage of persons below the poverty line. (z) official defi

  • Q : Monopolistic Exploitation dilemma In

    In equilibrium for the price maker firm, the rate of monopolistic exploitation is the difference between: (p) P and MR. (q) P and MC. (iii) Total revenue and net cost per unit of output. (r) Output price and rate of monopsonistic exploitation. (s) VMP and MRP.

  • Q : Elasticity formula when price falls

    When the quantity of SCUBA lessons demanded by Hawaiian tourist’s increases from 800 to 1,000 weekly and if the price drops/falls from $30 to $20 per session, by using the arc elasticity formula, the price elasticity of demand will be: (i) 5.555

  • Q : Labor union and an unregulated public

    I have a problem in economics on Labor union and an unregulated public utility. Please help me in the following question. While comparing an influential labor union and an unregulated public utility firm like cable TV, both might: (1) Be considered as the monopolists.

  • Q : Labor Contracts-Agreement of shops I

    I have a problem in economics on Labor Contracts-Shop Agreements. Please help me in the following question. The union leaders would tend to favor the contract clause needing: (1) A sweat shop. (2) An agency shop. (3) A union shop. (4) An open shop.

  • Q : Profits predict by structure conduct

    When cost structures and market demands were identical for each of the given types of firms, in that case the structure-conduct-performance paradigm would predict the greatest profits for: (1) pure monopolist. (2) price-discriminating monopolist. (3)

  • Q : Problem on utility-maximizing bundle

    Jane consumes only apples and chocolate.  She is always willing to trade 1piece of chocolate for exactly 3 apples. Her income is $200.  She can buy apples for $1 each and chocolate for $2 per piece.a. To Jane, apples and chocolate are (circle 1):

  • Q : Economic good becomes an economic bad

    Economic good becomes an economic bad whenever consumption is expanded into an area where: (1) Marginal returns are reducing. (2) Sellers experience an honest hazard. (3) Marginal utility is negative. (4) Buyers suffer from unfavorable choice. (5) Exc