--%>

Problem on free trade equilibrium

The domestic demand curve for portable radios is provided by Qd = 5000 − 100P, here Qd is the number of radios which would be purchased whenever the price is P. The domestic supply curve for radios is provided by Qs = 150P, where Qs is the amount of radios which would be generated domestically when the price were P. Assume that radios can be received in the world market at a price of $10 per radio. The Domestic radio producers have effectively lobbied Congress to oblige a tariff of $5 per radio.

a) Sketch a graph stating the free trade equilibrium (with no tariff). Clearly state the equilibrium price.

b) By how much would tariff rise producer excess for domestic radio suppliers?

c) How much would govt. collect in tariff revenues?

d) Determine deadweight loss from the tariff?

E

Expert

Verified

a)

162_1.jpg

In free trade equilibrium, domestic demand is 4000, domestic supply is 1500, and import is 2500 units.

b) The producer excess with free trade would be 1/2(10-0)(1500). With the tariff, domestic supply will raise to 2250 and producer surplus will raise to 1/2(15-0)(2250) = 16875. Therefore producer surplus will rise by 9,375.

c) Through tariff, domestic demand will drop to 3500 units and domestic demand will rise to 2250 units.  Therefore, 1250 units will be imported.  The tariffs of $5 on each of such units will outcome in government receipts of 6,250.

d) The deadweight loss from tariff will come from two sources. First, the deadweight loss is related overproduction of domestic suppliers will be 1/2 (2250-1500)5 = 1875. Second, the deadweight loss is related with the reduction in consumption by consumers due to the tariff is 1/2 (4000-3500)5 = 1250.  Thus, the total deadweight loss with this tariff is 3,125.

 

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Problem on blue collar workers I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Problem on blue collar workers. Please help me in the following question. The labor unions have tended to be very successful in organizing: (i) White collar workers. (ii) Blue collar workers. (iii) Professionals. (iv) Clerical workers.

  • Q : Elastic and Inelastic demand An

    An increase in the price of goods, outcomes in an increase in expenses on it. This demand is elastic or inelastic? Answer: Inelastic since there is direct relation

  • Q : Wage Discrimination and Social Welfare

    The sum up of monopsonistic exploitation by the firm raises however the firm as well operates at a more socially and economically proficient level of output and employment whenever the firm is capable to engage in: (i) Blacklisting in its hiring of the labor. (ii) Yel

  • Q : Substitutes and compliments pizza and

    pizza and sausage substitute or compliment wheat and rye substitute or compliment

  • Q : Profit-maximizing price The

    The profit-maximizing price for “Silver Screen Classic” of Nostalgia DVDs is: (i) $6 per copy. (ii) $10 per copy. (iii) $12 per copy. (iv) $16 per copy. (v) $20 per copy.

    Q : Quintile distribution of income Give

    Give the answer of following question. In the quintile distribution of income, the term "quintile" represents: A) 5 percent of the income receivers. B) 10 percent of the income receivers. C) 20 percent of the income receivers. D) 25 percent of the income receivers.

  • Q : Total revenue in profit-maximizing

    Total revenue (i.e., TR=PQ) for such profit-maximizing competitive firm equals area as: (a) 0P1gq5. (b) 0P1dq4. (c) 0P2cq3. (d) P2

  • Q : Equal Income in Lorenz Curve When all

    When all households have equal incomes, in that case the Lorenz curve would be: (w) zero. (x) a 45 degree line. (y) 1. (z) rectangularly hyperbolic. Hey friends please give your opinion for the problem of E

  • Q : Decrement in opportunity costs and

    Opportunity costs and prices tend to be decreased by: (w) competition among speculators and other intermediaries. (x) price floors. (y) the exercise of monopoly power. (z) price ceilings. How can I

  • Q : Problem of Moral Hazard by an individual

    The problem of moral hazard is finest explained by the behavior of an individual who: (1) Dates two distinct people on the sly. (2) Doesn’t lock up her car since theft is covered by the insurance. (3) Steals to support the serious drug habit. (4) Understates the