--%>

Problem on deadweight loss

Assume that the domestic demand for television sets is explained by Q = 40,000 − 180P and that the supply is provided by Q = 20P. When televisions can be freely imported at a price of $160, then how many televisions would be generated in the domestic market? By how much domestic producer excess and deadweight losses modify when the government establishes a $20 tariff per television set? What when the tariff was $70?

E

Expert

Verified

Whenever televisions can be freely imported at a price of PW = $160, the domestic producers will generate 20(160) = 3200 television sets. The Domestic demand is 40,000 – 180*160 = 11,200 units.

705_2.jpg

Whenever the import duty of $20 is mentioned, the efficient price of importing televisions is $180. At such price, domestic firms will supply 20(180) = 3600 televisions, and demand will be 40,000 – 180(180) = 7600. The domestic producer surplus will raise by region C = (180 – 160)(3200) + 0.5(180 – 160)(3600 – 3200) = 68,000. The tariff makes a deadweight equivalent to region F + K = 0.5(180 – 160)(3600 – 3200) + 0.5(180 – 160)(11,200 – 7600) = 40,000.

The import duty of $70 increases the efficient import price to $230. You can observe from the graph that this is above the equilibrium price of $200 which would prevail in the domestic market devoid of any foreign trade.  Therefore, imposing such a big import duty is equivalent to banning trade in this industry together. The latest price will be $200 and the quantity demanded 4000. Associative to the free trade equilibrium, producer excess would now raise by area B + C = 0.5(200)(4000) – 0.5(160)(3200) = 144,000. The $70 import tariff makes a deadweight loss equivalent to region F + G + J + K = 0.5(200 – 160)(11,200 – 3200) = 160,000.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Are you being charged too much for

    This exercise inspects the higher prices charged in UK for music downloads as compared to the rest of Europe.

  • Q : Thorstein Veblen-Biography Thorstein

    Thorstein Veblen is most particularly remembered for arguing that: (i) Consumer surplus is maximized by setting the marginal utility equivalent to price. (ii) National income [or NI] equivalents gross domestic product [or GDP] in circular flow model.

  • Q : Problem on positive quantity Supply The

    The law of supply defines that, other things equivalent: (1) Quantity supplied differs inversely with price. (2) A good’s supply is positively associated to its demand. (3) Quantity supplied is positively associated to price. (4) Prices and cost

  • Q : Individual firm in purely competitive

    In a purely competitive industry, the individual firm: (i) can raise the quantity demanded by lowering the price of its product. (ii) experiences substantial economies of scale. (iii) faces a completely inelastic demand curve. (iv) cannot influence th

  • Q : Market supplies of labor in long run

    During the long run, the labor supply curve facing a main industry: (w) will always be positively associated to the wage rate. (x) will slope upward only when individual labor supply curves slope upward. (y) can be backward bending at very high wage r

  • Q : Define Producers equilibrium Producers

    Producers equilibrium signifies the stage beneath which with the help of given factors of production producer attain the level of production of which he is acquiring maximum gain.

  • Q : Requirements for pure competition The

    The needs for pure competition are most intimately met by the market for: (i) domestic (American) steel. (ii) comic books. (iii) sugar-coated cereal within your local grocery store. (iv) stocks and bonds traded on Wall Street after they have been issu

  • Q : Emergence and development of common

    The economist most intimately identified along with the emergence and early development of common equilibrium analysis was: (w) Adam Smith. (x) Leon Walras. (y) Alfred Marshall. (z) William Stanley Jevons. Can some

  • Q : Rule of thumb for office rent Is there

    Is there any rule of thumb for office rent or on lease per gross income? If yes, then explain?

  • Q : Lowest possible price in transaction

    Is the assertion such that "Everyone all the time buys everything at the lowest possible price" right? Have you paid more than you had to for any good yet, after permitting for all transaction costs?