--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Problem on deadweight loss

Assume that the domestic demand for television sets is explained by Q = 40,000 − 180P and that the supply is provided by Q = 20P. When televisions can be freely imported at a price of $160, then how many televisions would be generated in the domestic market? By how much domestic producer excess and deadweight losses modify when the government establishes a $20 tariff per television set? What when the tariff was $70?

E

Expert

Verified

Whenever televisions can be freely imported at a price of PW = $160, the domestic producers will generate 20(160) = 3200 television sets. The Domestic demand is 40,000 – 180*160 = 11,200 units.

705_2.jpg

Whenever the import duty of $20 is mentioned, the efficient price of importing televisions is $180. At such price, domestic firms will supply 20(180) = 3600 televisions, and demand will be 40,000 – 180(180) = 7600. The domestic producer surplus will raise by region C = (180 – 160)(3200) + 0.5(180 – 160)(3600 – 3200) = 68,000. The tariff makes a deadweight equivalent to region F + K = 0.5(180 – 160)(3600 – 3200) + 0.5(180 – 160)(11,200 – 7600) = 40,000.

The import duty of $70 increases the efficient import price to $230. You can observe from the graph that this is above the equilibrium price of $200 which would prevail in the domestic market devoid of any foreign trade.  Therefore, imposing such a big import duty is equivalent to banning trade in this industry together. The latest price will be $200 and the quantity demanded 4000. Associative to the free trade equilibrium, producer excess would now raise by area B + C = 0.5(200)(4000) – 0.5(160)(3200) = 144,000. The $70 import tariff makes a deadweight loss equivalent to region F + G + J + K = 0.5(200 – 160)(11,200 – 3200) = 160,000.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Problem regarding Hicks Model of

    The time period of union strikes and the equilibrium wage rate at conclusion of the strike are focus at: (i) Dept. of Labor’s Collective Bargaining Arbitration Division. (ii) Collective bargaining model made by Sir John Hicks. (iii) Bilateral monopoly model.(iv)

    		•
  • Q : Competitive firm shuts down in short run

    A competitive firm shuts down within the short run when: (w) this suffers a loss. (x) normal profit = 0. (y) ATC > P. (z) the minimum AVC > P. Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some views for above Econo

    		•
  • Q : Freedom of entry in monopolistically

    Along with freedom of entry in a monopolistically competitive market, in long run equilibrium is reached along with firms: (w) earning zero economic profit. (x) producing where price equals marginal cost. (y) producing their most efficient output. (z)

    		•
  • Q : Relation between average and marginal

    Describe the relation between average revenue and marginal revenue. whenever a firm can sell an extra unit or a good by lowering price.

    		•
  • Q : Positively sloped demand curve of

    When your income is positively and closely tied to the price of a specific product, a raise in its price might cause: (1) The income effect which, in severe conditions, yields a positively sloped demand curve. (2) You to go bankrupt. (3) The powerful positive substitu

    		•
  • Q : Economic efficiency of purely

    Most economists favor purely competitive markets since they tend to as: (1) economies of scale. (2) large profits. (3) mutual interdependence. (4) corporate organizations. (5) economic efficiency. Hello guys I want

    		•
  • Q : Fixed cost in long run Can there be

    Can there be certain fixed cost in long run? If not why? Answer: No, there can’t be any fixed cost in long run. The main reason is that there is no fixed inpu

    		•
  • Q : Existence of Diseconomies I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Existence of Diseconomies. Please help me in the following question. Diseconomies of the scale exist if: (1) Price reduces as more units are sold. (2) Total costs reduction as output raise. (3) Average costs raise as output rises. (4)

    		•
  • Q : Economic efficiency for pure competition

    Pure competition yields economic efficiency through: (w) punishing profit maximizing behavior. (x) forcing firms to adopt the least costly technologies available. (y) generating high profits as incentives. (z) rewarding entrepreneurs

    		•
  • Q : Average variable costs of pure

    Average variable costs per generic brick of this pure competitor equal approximately: (i) $.02 (2 cents per brick). (ii) $.04 (4 cents per brick). (iii) $.07 (7 cents per brick). (iv) $.09 (9 cents per brick).