--%>

Problem on deadweight loss

Assume that the domestic demand for television sets is explained by Q = 40,000 − 180P and that the supply is provided by Q = 20P. When televisions can be freely imported at a price of $160, then how many televisions would be generated in the domestic market? By how much domestic producer excess and deadweight losses modify when the government establishes a $20 tariff per television set? What when the tariff was $70?

E

Expert

Verified

Whenever televisions can be freely imported at a price of PW = $160, the domestic producers will generate 20(160) = 3200 television sets. The Domestic demand is 40,000 – 180*160 = 11,200 units.

705_2.jpg

Whenever the import duty of $20 is mentioned, the efficient price of importing televisions is $180. At such price, domestic firms will supply 20(180) = 3600 televisions, and demand will be 40,000 – 180(180) = 7600. The domestic producer surplus will raise by region C = (180 – 160)(3200) + 0.5(180 – 160)(3600 – 3200) = 68,000. The tariff makes a deadweight equivalent to region F + K = 0.5(180 – 160)(3600 – 3200) + 0.5(180 – 160)(11,200 – 7600) = 40,000.

The import duty of $70 increases the efficient import price to $230. You can observe from the graph that this is above the equilibrium price of $200 which would prevail in the domestic market devoid of any foreign trade.  Therefore, imposing such a big import duty is equivalent to banning trade in this industry together. The latest price will be $200 and the quantity demanded 4000. Associative to the free trade equilibrium, producer excess would now raise by area B + C = 0.5(200)(4000) – 0.5(160)(3200) = 144,000. The $70 import tariff makes a deadweight loss equivalent to region F + G + J + K = 0.5(200 – 160)(11,200 – 3200) = 160,000.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Monopolist of profit maximizing When

    When this is feasible for total revenue to cover all variable costs, in that case a profit maximizing monopolist will generate: (w) where marginal revenue equals marginal costs [MR = MC]. (x) in the inelastic portion of the demand cur

  • Q : Who tries to buy low in expectation for

    A person who tries to buy low within expectation of being capable to sell high later is: (w) profiteer. (x) speculator. (y) financial intermediary. (z) capital supplier. Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some views fo

  • Q : Problem on Monopolistic Competition

    When fifty fast-food restaurants belonging to fourteen various chains are strung along an eight mile stretch of highway, it is an illustration of: (1) a primitive cartel. (2) pure competition. (3) monopolistic competition. (4) an oligopoly.

    Q : Competitive advertising as waste of

    Economists have conventionally concluded which, from the vantage point of society as an entire, competitive advertising in that case: (1) enables consumers to make more efficient economic choices. (2) is a waste of resources. (3) cons

  • Q : Caveat emptor-Laws and Regulations The

    The Caveat emptor is a prehistoric legal doctrine mainly based on the idea that buyer: (1) Are the finest judges of the value that they will receive when they purchase. (2) Must receive money back guarantees when products are flawed. (3) Need governme

  • Q : Condition for deficit in balance of

    What is the condition when there is a deficit in balance of trade? Answer: When import > export

  • Q : Define excess demand Excess demand : If

    Excess demand: If AD > AS at the full employment level. Then it is termed as Excess demand.

  • Q : Quantity of products in market power

    For a monopolist to raise the quantity of its products sold needs the monopolist to as: (i) raise the price of its product. (ii) charge a constant price. (iii) invest heavily in a distribution network. (iv) lower the price of its product. (v) advertis

  • Q : Exit industry in long run at wholesale

    This purely competitive peach orchard would most likely exit this industry within the long run when the wholesale price per bushel of peaches fell below: (i) $9.00 per bushel of peaches. (ii) $10.00 per bushel of peaches. (iii) $11.00 per bushel of pe

  • Q : Critics of current welfare programs

    Critics of current welfare programs who desire the welfare system scaled down tend to argue which welfare reform should give: (1) whatever this takes to lift all people out of poverty. (2) poor people with incentives to work. (3) nothing; there should