--%>
Assignment Help - homework help

Problem on cross-price elasticity

Kathy purchases two goods, t-shirts and caps.  Her demand for t-shirts is:

Qt = 44 – 3Pt - Pc + .04I

The price of caps is Pc = $2. And her income is I = $300.

a. Graph a demand curve for Kathy’s t-shirts.

b. Determine the number of t-shirts will Kathy buy if the price of t-shirts is Pt = $5?

c. Determine the number of caps will she buy at such prices and her present income? 

d. An increase in the price of caps will outcome in (circle one):

  • Kathy’s demand for t-shirts will shift out away from the origin
  • Kathy’s demand for t-shirts will shift in towards the origin
  • Kathy will move down along her demand curve for t-shirts
  • Can’t tell; it depends on whether or not caps are a normal good to Kathy

e.Determine the cross-price elasticity of the demand for t-shirts with respect to the price of caps?

f. Are caps and t-shirts complements or substitutes? And how do you know?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Minimum Wage Laws I have a problem in

    I have a problem in economics on Minimum Wage Laws. Please help me in the following question. Minimum wage legislation has been promotes as a technique to: (i) Make sure that workers are paid beneath the subsistence salaries. (ii)  Perpetuate poverty. (iii) Maxim

    		•
  • Q : Least possible cost for primary economy

    The least possible costs of alternative outcomes to the primary economic question of “what?” can be represented with the production possibilities curve through: (1) The slopes of movements all along the curve. (2) Shifting the curve up by

    		•
  • Q : Discount coupons and trip afforded by

    Relative to people along with lower incomes, and high-income families be likely to shop for groceries less often and use fewer discount coupons, although buy more throughout each trip, since: (w) their superior access to transportatio

    		•
  • Q : Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility

    The law of diminishing marginal utility might be evidenced by the person: (i) Smoking more however enjoying it less. (ii) Purchasing a new car subsequent to getting an increase. (iii) Distributing excess food to starving children. (iv) Who studies muc

    		•
  • Q : Relative price and income inelasticity

    Technological advances have raised agricultural productivity enormously among 1800 and nowadays, and therefore, the relative incomes of family farmers declined dramatically. There hardships endured through American farm families throughout this period

    		•
  • Q : College loan-Rational Ignorance Assume

    Assume that a student takes out a college loan which needs 12% annual interest, however later learns that his aunt makes loans to the family members at 5% interest. The student has suffered from the problem termed as: (1) Rational ignorance. (2) Blind indifference. (3

    		•
  • Q : Nondiscriminating monopolists in short

    Within short run equilibrium, there nondiscriminating monopolists will: (w) charge prices greater than their marginal costs. (x) produce outputs which maximize social welfare. (y) produce where their total revenues are maximized. (z)

    		•
  • Q : Labor Productivity The American workers

    The American workers tend to be much productive than their counterparts in the South America or Asia in part as they have: (i) Superior natural genetic endowments. (ii) Access to the better sports programming, that promotes the team-work. (iii) More capital to work wi

    		•
  • Q : Law of diminishing returns for a good

    The point is inevitably reached where an individual derives less extra enjoyment from the extra units of any good. This is mainly well-suited with: (i) Supply curves that slope-up and to right. (ii) Concave (or bowed out) production possibilities frontiers. (iii) The

    		•
  • Q : Statement of Demand Prices I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Statement of Demand Prices. Please help me in the following question. Demand prices are stated as the relative: (1) Prices sellers charge for goods whether we purchase or not. (2) Values that individual subjectively put on having a bit

    		•