--%>

Problem on cross-price elasticity

Kathy purchases two goods, t-shirts and caps.  Her demand for t-shirts is:

Qt = 44 – 3Pt - Pc + .04I

The price of caps is Pc = $2. And her income is I = $300.

a. Graph a demand curve for Kathy’s t-shirts.

b. Determine the number of t-shirts will Kathy buy if the price of t-shirts is Pt = $5?

c. Determine the number of caps will she buy at such prices and her present income? 

d. An increase in the price of caps will outcome in (circle one):

  • Kathy’s demand for t-shirts will shift out away from the origin
  • Kathy’s demand for t-shirts will shift in towards the origin
  • Kathy will move down along her demand curve for t-shirts
  • Can’t tell; it depends on whether or not caps are a normal good to Kathy

e.Determine the cross-price elasticity of the demand for t-shirts with respect to the price of caps?

f. Are caps and t-shirts complements or substitutes? And how do you know?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Long run and short run costs I have

    I have difficulty in this question. Provide me correct solution of this to submit my assignment. What is the relationship among long run and short run costs?

  • Q : When is demand perfectly price inelastic

    Demand is perfectly price inelastic when the quantity demanded for Pixie’s cheesy fried grits is of: (w) zero. (x) P4. (y) P2. (z) More information is required.

    Q : Effect of percentage change in price

    Give the answer of following question. When the percentage change in price is greater than the resulting percentage change in quantity demanded: A) a decrease in price will increase total revenue. B) demand may be either elastic or inelastic. C) an increase in price

  • Q : Problem regarding Bilateral Monopoly

    The bilateral monopoly model is most likely most applicable in analyzing a case where a: (1) Major employer collectively bargains with the influential union. (2) Firm consists of monopoly power in output market and monopsony power in the labor market. (3) Labor market

  • Q : Right-to-Work Laws problem Can someone

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The provisions of Taft Hartley Act did not proscribe: (i) Secondary boycotts. (ii) Closed shops. (iii) Jurisdictional strikes. (iv) Right-to-work laws.

  • Q : Illustration of Substitution Effect

    Sally is very rich that money hardly matters to her, although when the price of JIF chunky peanut butter doubled Sally switched to Peter Pan chunky peanut butter. This alters is an example of the: (1) Income effect. (2) Payback effect. (3) Substitution effect. (4) Pri

  • Q : Unitarily elasticity in supply curve At

    At point b, in demonstrated figure the supply curve into this graph is: (w) perfectly elastic. (x) elastic, but not perfectly that why. (y) unitarily elastic. (z) inelastic.

    Q : Efficiency and Income Distribution Even

    Even though property rights are fully given and cost-less enforced and transaction costs (i.e., information costs, contracting costs, and mobility costs) are nonexistent, in that case equilibria in all markets in a whole economy may a

  • Q : Revenue when short-run losses minimize

    To minimize short-run losses, then a firm’s revenue should at least cover its short-run total as: (w) explicit costs. (x) fixed costs. (y) variable costs. (z) implicit costs. Hey friends please give your opin

  • Q : Unimportant economies of scale If

    If comparing market structures, when economies of scale are unimportant: (w) the most efficient form of market structure is a pure monopoly. (x) purely competitive industries and price discriminating monopolies are equally efficient. (y) price discrim