--%>

Problem on competitive equilibrium of two consumers

The economy consists of two consumers, A and B. Both consumers are endowed with one unit of good 1 and one unit of good 2. Consumer A is entirely indifferent between all consumption plans. Consumer B has the utility function u(xB1 ; xB2 ) = xB1 xB2 .

(i) Find a competitive equilibrium for this economy. (Hint: guess an equilibrium price and then check that it works.)

(ii) Find a second competitive equilibrium (different from the one you found in part (i)).

(iii) Show that the equilibrium is not efficient.

E

Expert

Verified

Budget constraint for person 1:

P1x1 +p2x2 = p1(1) + p2(2)

Similarly  for person 2:

P1x1+ p2x2= p1(1) + p2(2)

Now person 1 will consume according to the MRS= Price Ratio condition and we get:

So we get:
X1* = 1/2 (p1+1)/p1
X2*= 1/2 (p1+1)/p2

Similarily for person 2:
X1*= X1* = 1/2 (p1+1)/p1
X2*= 1/2 (p1+1)/p2

Now total x1* in economy is 2

So p1+1/p1= 2
P1+1= 2P1
So, p1*=1
And p2=1 (numeraire)

So competitive equilibrium:
(1,1) – Person 1
(1,1)- Person 2

b) second competitive equilibrium

(1/3, 2/3) and( 2/3, 1/3)

c) For efficiency MRS1= MRS2

Now x2/x1= x2/x1
For above(Put the values 1/3, 2/3 and 2/3,1/3 in MRS condition 2 not equal to 1

So this is not efficient

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Vigorous competition in long run market

    Vigorous competition into a market depends in the long run most strongly upon the: (w) number of buyers and sellers presently in the market. (x) freedom to enter and exit the market. (y) sizes of the average firm within the market. (z) uniformity [hom

  • Q : Personal distribution of income Select

    Select the right ans wer of the question. The personal distribution of income refers to the: A) division of income between personal taxes, consumption expenditures, and saving. B) division of income on the basis of industry sources, for example, agriculture, transport

  • Q : Problem regarding analyzing persistent

    In analyzing persistent shortages within the U.S. market for adoptable children: (w) children are most reasonably considered investment goods. (x) children might reasonably be functioned as consumer goods. (y) lower prices charged adopting families would result within

  • Q : Earning income under negative income tax

    Under the negative income tax system demonstrated in this figure, a family of four along with earned income of $15,000 yearly would have a net [after-tax] income of: (i) $30,000 per year. (ii) $27,500 per year. (iii) $25,000 per year.

  • Q : Problem on buying a used car You desire

    You desire to purchase a used car. The dealer knows accurately how well the car works and how much it must cost, although you are not sure of its value. This is an illustration of: (i) Asymmetric information. (ii) Dealer rights. (iii) Predatory pricing. (iv) First mov

  • Q : Effects of price ceiling Effects of

    Effects of price ceiling: The consequences of price ceiling might be: A) Scarcity of the commodity B) The government might oblige rationing that is, supply of goods in limited q

  • Q : Problem on average household income Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Demand curve for the gasoline, a normal good, would shift to right when: (1) The legal least age to drive was raised to 18 all through the world. (2) New oil fields were discovered and exploit

  • Q : Percentage of incomes persistently The

    The percentage of American families along with incomes persistently below the poverty line is around: (w) 1 2%. (x) 3 5%. (y) 5 7%. (z) 8 10%. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regardi

  • Q : Inelastic demand over relevant price

    While rate hikes will boost a utility's total revenue, in that case the utility faces: (w) elastic demand over the relevant price range. (x) unitarily elastic demand over the relevant price range. (y) inelastic demand over the relevant price range. (z

  • Q : Firms in purely competitive markets

    Firms within purely competitive markets as: (1) practice price discrimination more often than do firms along with market power. (2) do not price discriminate since they are more interested in their customers than are monopolists. (3) cannot price disc