--%>

Problem on competitive equilibrium of two consumers

The economy consists of two consumers, A and B. Both consumers are endowed with one unit of good 1 and one unit of good 2. Consumer A is entirely indifferent between all consumption plans. Consumer B has the utility function u(xB1 ; xB2 ) = xB1 xB2 .

(i) Find a competitive equilibrium for this economy. (Hint: guess an equilibrium price and then check that it works.)

(ii) Find a second competitive equilibrium (different from the one you found in part (i)).

(iii) Show that the equilibrium is not efficient.

E

Expert

Verified

Budget constraint for person 1:

P1x1 +p2x2 = p1(1) + p2(2)

Similarly  for person 2:

P1x1+ p2x2= p1(1) + p2(2)

Now person 1 will consume according to the MRS= Price Ratio condition and we get:

So we get:
X1* = 1/2 (p1+1)/p1
X2*= 1/2 (p1+1)/p2

Similarily for person 2:
X1*= X1* = 1/2 (p1+1)/p1
X2*= 1/2 (p1+1)/p2

Now total x1* in economy is 2

So p1+1/p1= 2
P1+1= 2P1
So, p1*=1
And p2=1 (numeraire)

So competitive equilibrium:
(1,1) – Person 1
(1,1)- Person 2

b) second competitive equilibrium

(1/3, 2/3) and( 2/3, 1/3)

c) For efficiency MRS1= MRS2

Now x2/x1= x2/x1
For above(Put the values 1/3, 2/3 and 2/3,1/3 in MRS condition 2 not equal to 1

So this is not efficient

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Positive economic profit and accounting

    Purely competitive equilibrium, in long-run firms normally experience positive accounting profit and economic profit which is: (w) also positive, but smaller. (x) zero. (y) negative, but barely that why. (z) either positive, zero, or negative.

  • Q : Short-run equilibrium of

    A purely-competitive, short-run equilibrium does NOT need which each firm: (w) produces where MC = MR = P > min(AVC). (x) experiences no excess demand or excess supply. (y) earns only zero economic profit. (z) adjust output hence m

  • Q : Determine probable price taker Of the

    Of the given firms, the probably to be a price taker would be: (1) Microsoft. (2) Wal-Mart. (3) Toyota. (4) the Los Angeles Lakers. (5) the biggest wheat farm in Canada. I need a good answer on the topic of

  • Q : Legal constraints in Labor Markets The

    The employer can legally pursue a policy of: (i) Wage discrimination which is based on the race or gender. (ii) Closed shop agreements with the unions. (iii) Firing the workers who join union. (iv) Wage discrimination mainly based on the employee’s seniority. (v

  • Q : Neoclassical economics One of my

    One of my friends can't find the answer of this question .Give me answer of this question. How are economic theories created in neoclassical economics?

  • Q : Requirement of Production Possibilities

    Deriving a production possibilities frontier needs the supposition that: (1) Resources are variable in the supply. (2) There are limitless numbers of goods. (3) Economic growth takes place at a normal rate. (4) All scarce resources are proficiently em

  • Q : Profits and Losses-Natural selection

    The Natural selection theory states that the manager’s failures to maximize the profits cause: (i) Firing of its managers. (ii) The firm’s collapse. (iii) Outside take-overs. (iv) All of the above. Can someone please he

  • Q : Consequences of rise in union wages Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The possible consequences of a rise in union wages comprise reduced: (1) Union employment and a refusal in non-union wages. (2) Shares of national income to the labor however growth of union e

  • Q : Personal discrimination Personal

    Personal discrimination: (1) may impede economic discrimination. (2) fosters wage, employment, occupational, and human capital discrimination. (3) causes housing prices to exceed levels affordable by the poor. (4) is the only cause of occupational dis

  • Q : Negative income tax in welfare system

    Relation to the current U.S. welfare system, a suitable negative income tax plan would: (1) be much more difficult and more expensive to administer. (2) reduce some of the current disincentives for work. (3) result in a substantial de