--%>

Problem on competitive equilibrium economy

The economy consists of an equal number of smokers (S-types) and asthma sufferers (A-types). Good 1 is cigarettes, good 2 is “other stuff.” S-types have the utility function:

xS1 + xS2

where xS1 is the S-type’s consumption of cigarettes and xS2 is the S-type’s consumption of other stuff. A-types have the utility function

xA2 -  2¯xS1

where ¯ xS1 is the per capita consumption of cigarettes of S-types.

The initial endowments are as follows: S-types have one unit of both goods and A-types have 2 units good 2 and no endowment of good 1.

(i) Is there an efficient consumption plan in which S-types consume cigarettes?
(ii) Find a competitive equilibrium of this economy. Show that it is not efficient.

E

Expert

Verified

i) Consumer 1 has perfect substitute type of utility function .Now they will consume cigarettes only when P1<P2. Now P2 being 1 (numeraire).The consumption plan in which person 1 consumes cigarettes is the one where p1<1

ii) This is the externality case type of utility function for person 2. In which we solve the competitive equilibrium normally without externality and then tell that it is inefficient

Now U1= x1+x2 (1,1)
U2=  x2 (1,0)

Budget constraint for person 1:

P1x1 +p2x2= p1(1) + p2(1)

Put p2=1

P1x1 + x2= p1 + 1

Also for person 2 we have

P1x1 +X2= P1

Now we know person 1 has perfect substitutes requirement and peson 2 demands just good 2

So prices should be such that P1<p2  so that person 1 demands only good 1
So Putting x2*=0

We get:
P1X1= p1+1
X1* =1/p1-1

Now X1 in economy= 2

So, 1/p1-1 =2 P1= 3/2 >1 so it contradicts our assumption and we have to take p1=p2=1

Now put P1=p2=1 in budget constraint we get:

X1+x2=1
X1+ x2=1

From both the budget constraints this means any combination that satisfies this requirement will be competitive equilibrium. These are not efficient because there is an externality case involved plus there is no equality between MRS.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Average variable costs per generic of

    Average variable costs per generic 2×4 of this pure competitor’s equal roughly: (w) $0.20 (20¢ per 2×4). (x) $1.00 per 2×4. (y) $1.70 per 2×4. (z) $2.10 per 2×4.

    Q : Differences in site values An acre of

    An acre of Manhattan is worth additional than an acre of prime Iowa farm land due to differences in: (1) perpetuities. (2) time preferences. (3) site values. (4) interest rates. (5) taxes. Can someone explain/help me with best solu

  • Q : Microeconomics Assignment Please give

    Please give me a quote for this uploaded assignment. I need it by the 10th of may 2013. Thank You

  • Q : Depreciation expense The Realto Theatre

    The Realto Theatre purchased a new projector costing $37,000 on January 1, 2010. Since of changing technologies, the projector is predictable to last five years after which it will be obsolete and contain a salvage value of $1,000 as a collectors item. Compute the

  • Q : Demand when oligopolistic firm

    When an oligopolistic firm increases its price, in that case the demand this faces will be: (1) more elastic if the other firms in the industry raise their prices. (2) less elastic when no other firms in the industry raise their prices. (3) more elast

  • Q : Expected Rate of Inflation What is the

    What is the Expected Rate of Inflation. Illustrate the term.

  • Q : Impact of economy according to price

    If price ceiling or price floor were removed what is the impact on the economy?

  • Q : Define Visible items in BOP Visible

    Visible items: All kinds of goods that are exported and imported are termed as visible items. These are visible as such are made up of some matter or material. The record of such items is obtainable with the ports. Illustrations: Tea, Jute items, Petr

  • Q : Different pure economics rent Pure

    Pure economic rents are different most from economic profits in which they are: (w) received by the owners of productive resources. (x) frequently costs to the firm using the resources which generate them, but not to society as a whol

  • Q : High prices elasticities of demand

    Taxing private auto travel as well as subsidizing mass transit will most effectively limit auto travel and raise the use of mass transit when the price elasticities of demand for auto travel: (1) and mass transit are low, and the cross-elasticity of d