--%>

Problem on competitive equilibrium economy

The economy consists of an equal number of smokers (S-types) and asthma sufferers (A-types). Good 1 is cigarettes, good 2 is “other stuff.” S-types have the utility function:

xS1 + xS2

where xS1 is the S-type’s consumption of cigarettes and xS2 is the S-type’s consumption of other stuff. A-types have the utility function

xA2 -  2¯xS1

where ¯ xS1 is the per capita consumption of cigarettes of S-types.

The initial endowments are as follows: S-types have one unit of both goods and A-types have 2 units good 2 and no endowment of good 1.

(i) Is there an efficient consumption plan in which S-types consume cigarettes?
(ii) Find a competitive equilibrium of this economy. Show that it is not efficient.

E

Expert

Verified

i) Consumer 1 has perfect substitute type of utility function .Now they will consume cigarettes only when P1<P2. Now P2 being 1 (numeraire).The consumption plan in which person 1 consumes cigarettes is the one where p1<1

ii) This is the externality case type of utility function for person 2. In which we solve the competitive equilibrium normally without externality and then tell that it is inefficient

Now U1= x1+x2 (1,1)
U2=  x2 (1,0)

Budget constraint for person 1:

P1x1 +p2x2= p1(1) + p2(1)

Put p2=1

P1x1 + x2= p1 + 1

Also for person 2 we have

P1x1 +X2= P1

Now we know person 1 has perfect substitutes requirement and peson 2 demands just good 2

So prices should be such that P1<p2  so that person 1 demands only good 1
So Putting x2*=0

We get:
P1X1= p1+1
X1* =1/p1-1

Now X1 in economy= 2

So, 1/p1-1 =2 P1= 3/2 >1 so it contradicts our assumption and we have to take p1=p2=1

Now put P1=p2=1 in budget constraint we get:

X1+x2=1
X1+ x2=1

From both the budget constraints this means any combination that satisfies this requirement will be competitive equilibrium. These are not efficient because there is an externality case involved plus there is no equality between MRS.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Problem regarding Bilateral Monopoly

    The Bilateral monopoly models would be most suitably employed to analyze the negotiations among: (1) Le-Bron James, an all-star NBA basketball player and the Cleveland Cavaliers. (2) A newly hired clerk at Wal-Mart and the Wal-Mart Human Resources Dep

  • Q : Investment and the Demand for Loanable

    When the present value of the expected future income by additional investment exceeds the current cost of additional investment, in that case investment will: (w) rise. (x) fall. (y) not change. (z) There is insuffici

  • Q : Consumer behaviour Please, describe me

    Please, describe me what lexicographic is and its application also.

  • Q : Sum of Monopolistic Exploitation Sum of

    Sum of the monopolistic exploitation across all workers tends to rise however a firm as well functions at a more socially and economically proficient level of output and employment whenever the firm is capable to engage in: (1) Blacklisting in its dea

  • Q : Subsidies on a good for buyers and

    Government subsidies on a good because of: (w) less of the good to be produced and purchased. (x) prolonged excess demands for the good. (y) buyers to pay lower prices, when sellers receive higher prices. (z) prolonged shortages of the good.

  • Q : Price increment in elasticity A price

    A price hike $4 to $5 per slice of pizza because of total revenue to: (w) fall. (x) remain constant. (y) rise. (z) this is not possible to tell from such data.

    Q : Monopolistic competition and product

    The demand curve facing a monopolistically competitive firm might shift rightward when this: (w) increases wages to workers. (x) experiences a decline in costs. (y) advertises successfully. (z) responds strategically to competitors&rs

  • Q : Monopsonistic Exploitation Can someone

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The employer with monopsony power exploits the labor if it pays a wage: (i) At a bare subsistence level. (ii) That stabilizes worker population. (iii) Less

  • Q : Potential advantage of Proprietorships

    Beth and Anna each own a florist shop. After many years of rivalry, they make a decision to team up and make a partnership. The potential advantage of such a union would be that: (1) They can divide up duties and become more proficient. (2) Their partnership profits n

  • Q : Influence on the total cost of plans of

    For a negative income tax the break-even level of income plan (NIT) is: (1) negatively related to the plan’s basic income floor. (2) positively related to the negative income tax rate. (3) a main influence on the total cost of t