--%>

Problem on competitive equilibrium economy

The economy consists of an equal number of smokers (S-types) and asthma sufferers (A-types). Good 1 is cigarettes, good 2 is “other stuff.” S-types have the utility function:

xS1 + xS2

where xS1 is the S-type’s consumption of cigarettes and xS2 is the S-type’s consumption of other stuff. A-types have the utility function

xA2 -  2¯xS1

where ¯ xS1 is the per capita consumption of cigarettes of S-types.

The initial endowments are as follows: S-types have one unit of both goods and A-types have 2 units good 2 and no endowment of good 1.

(i) Is there an efficient consumption plan in which S-types consume cigarettes?
(ii) Find a competitive equilibrium of this economy. Show that it is not efficient.

E

Expert

Verified

i) Consumer 1 has perfect substitute type of utility function .Now they will consume cigarettes only when P1<P2. Now P2 being 1 (numeraire).The consumption plan in which person 1 consumes cigarettes is the one where p1<1

ii) This is the externality case type of utility function for person 2. In which we solve the competitive equilibrium normally without externality and then tell that it is inefficient

Now U1= x1+x2 (1,1)
U2=  x2 (1,0)

Budget constraint for person 1:

P1x1 +p2x2= p1(1) + p2(1)

Put p2=1

P1x1 + x2= p1 + 1

Also for person 2 we have

P1x1 +X2= P1

Now we know person 1 has perfect substitutes requirement and peson 2 demands just good 2

So prices should be such that P1<p2  so that person 1 demands only good 1
So Putting x2*=0

We get:
P1X1= p1+1
X1* =1/p1-1

Now X1 in economy= 2

So, 1/p1-1 =2 P1= 3/2 >1 so it contradicts our assumption and we have to take p1=p2=1

Now put P1=p2=1 in budget constraint we get:

X1+x2=1
X1+ x2=1

From both the budget constraints this means any combination that satisfies this requirement will be competitive equilibrium. These are not efficient because there is an externality case involved plus there is no equality between MRS.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Present Value of Capitalization The

    The present value of $1000 two years by now is: (w) $1000. (x) greater than $1000. (y) less than the present value of $1000 one year by currently. (z) $1,210. Hey friends please give your opinion for the problem of Economics that i

  • Q : Example of a vertical merger An example

    An example of the vertical merger would be: (i) Merging the Oscar Myer hot dog Company with Wrangler Jeans Company and Aquafina Water Company. (ii) The log cabin architecture firm merging with the logging company and construction company. (iii) Merger between Wachovia

  • Q : Unexpected inventory growth of price

    These supply and demand curves within the sugar market specify that: (w) a price floor of P0 for sugar will cause a surplus. (x) a price ceiling of P2 will cause a shortage. (y) the market clears while quantity equals Q0

  • Q : Falling probably interest rate The

    The interest rate will probably fall when households decide to: (w) consume more currently, shrinking the loanable funds obtainable for business investments. (x) buy new homes in place of restoring their old ones. (y) increase the liquidity of their a

  • Q : Synonym of Word Inequity Of the given,

    Of the given, the closest synonym for the word inequity is: (w) inequality. (x) disproportional. (y) unfairness. (z) regressivity. Can someone explain/help me with best solution about problem of Economics

  • Q : Contestable markets and purely

    Contestable markets and purely competitive markets are related in that both: (w) consist of large numbers of firms. (x) consist of firms who are price takers. (y) are characterized by easy entry. (z) are characterized by large economies of scale.

  • Q : Economics surpluses drives price down,

    surpluses drives price down, shortages drives them up

  • Q : Competitive Markets and Labor unions I

    I have a problem in economics on Competitive Markets-Labor unions. Please help me in the following question. The purely competitive labor markets are not characterized through: (1) Most of the individual buyers and sellers of the labor services. (2) S

  • Q : Determine income elasticity of demand

    An income elasticity of demand for a good equivalent to two implies roughly that: (1) demand curves for the good slope upward. (2) the product is an inferior good. (3) each 1% gain in income boosts the amount sold through 2%. (4) a 20% gain in income