--%>

Problem on competitive equilibrium economy

The economy consists of an equal number of smokers (S-types) and asthma sufferers (A-types). Good 1 is cigarettes, good 2 is “other stuff.” S-types have the utility function:

xS1 + xS2

where xS1 is the S-type’s consumption of cigarettes and xS2 is the S-type’s consumption of other stuff. A-types have the utility function

xA2 -  2¯xS1

where ¯ xS1 is the per capita consumption of cigarettes of S-types.

The initial endowments are as follows: S-types have one unit of both goods and A-types have 2 units good 2 and no endowment of good 1.

(i) Is there an efficient consumption plan in which S-types consume cigarettes?
(ii) Find a competitive equilibrium of this economy. Show that it is not efficient.

E

Expert

Verified

i) Consumer 1 has perfect substitute type of utility function .Now they will consume cigarettes only when P1<P2. Now P2 being 1 (numeraire).The consumption plan in which person 1 consumes cigarettes is the one where p1<1

ii) This is the externality case type of utility function for person 2. In which we solve the competitive equilibrium normally without externality and then tell that it is inefficient

Now U1= x1+x2 (1,1)
U2=  x2 (1,0)

Budget constraint for person 1:

P1x1 +p2x2= p1(1) + p2(1)

Put p2=1

P1x1 + x2= p1 + 1

Also for person 2 we have

P1x1 +X2= P1

Now we know person 1 has perfect substitutes requirement and peson 2 demands just good 2

So prices should be such that P1<p2  so that person 1 demands only good 1
So Putting x2*=0

We get:
P1X1= p1+1
X1* =1/p1-1

Now X1 in economy= 2

So, 1/p1-1 =2 P1= 3/2 >1 so it contradicts our assumption and we have to take p1=p2=1

Now put P1=p2=1 in budget constraint we get:

X1+x2=1
X1+ x2=1

From both the budget constraints this means any combination that satisfies this requirement will be competitive equilibrium. These are not efficient because there is an externality case involved plus there is no equality between MRS.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Advantages to sole proprietorships and

    The benefits to sole partnerships and proprietorships associative to the corporations are that both contribute to: (1) Lack of permanence. (2) Limitless financial resources. (3) Limitless liability. (4) Simplicity of organization.

    Q : Price increment in elasticity A price

    A price hike $4 to $5 per slice of pizza because of total revenue to: (w) fall. (x) remain constant. (y) rise. (z) this is not possible to tell from such data.

    Q : Effect of preference on demand Maureen

    Maureen generally drinks two glasses of Lost Horizons Cabernet Sauvignon each evening. Her demand for her preferred brand is least probable to be influenced by:  (i) The bad crop of grapes lowering the quality of Lost Horizons Cabernet. (ii) Getting a $4000 annua

  • Q : Price discriminate for maximizing profit

    Monsieur Cournot has a monopoly on an artesian well from that flows tasty spring water reputed to have medicinal properties. To ignore incurring variable costs, he is adamants that customers bring their own pails and also fill them in

  • Q : Define Real Rate of Interest Define

    Define Real Rate of Interest in Economics?

  • Q : Prohibition in Economic Profit Economic

    Economic profits are not: (1) a surplus of revenues over opportunity costs. (2) quite similar to pure economic rents from society’s viewpoint. (3) zero in a purely competitive economy along with no uncertainty and zero transaction costs. (4) dif

  • Q : Potential advantage of Proprietorships

    Beth and Anna each own a florist shop. After many years of rivalry, they make a decision to team up and make a partnership. The potential advantage of such a union would be that: (1) They can divide up duties and become more proficient. (2) Their partnership profits n

  • Q : Uniting individual sellers of labor Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Economically, the labor unions can be thought of as: (1) Motivating competition between workers for jobs. (2) Raising the flexibility of the nominal wages. (3) Attempts to cartelize and unite

  • Q : Pure competition for quantity adjustment

    The only industrial structure in that all firms are pure quantity-adjusting price takers is: (1) impure oligopoly. (2) pure monopoly. (3) pure or perfect competition. (4) monopolistic competition. (5) pure oligopoly.

    Q : Discrimination problem When racial or

    When racial or personal or sex discrimination decreases worker’s mobility across the occupations: (1) Workers will be completely compensated for their opportunity costs. (2) Economic rent is more probable to be earned by such who are not discriminated against. (