--%>

Problem on Budget constraints

James and Louisa each have an income of $30, which they each spend on tomatoes and all other goods.  They buy tomatoes at their local farmers market, which charges $3 per pound.  Define the units for all other goods so that their price is $1 per unit.  Their preferences may be different, but assume they each have indifference curves with the “standard” shape, and that they each choose to consume less than 5 pounds of tomatoes at this price.

a. The farmers market decides to offer a new quantity discount.  The first 5 pounds of tomatoes bought by any consumer still cost $3 per pound, but any additional quantity of tomatoes can be purchased for $1.50 per pound.  Carefully draw James’ and Louisa’s new budget constraints on the two sets of axes on the next page, putting tomatoes on the x-axis and clearly indicating the quantities at the intercepts. (Note:  their budget constraints will be identical since they have the same income and face the same prices/discounts)

b. In response to the quantity discount, James now purchases more than 5 pounds of tomatoes, but Louisa continues to buy less than 5 pounds. Draw indifference curves on their respective graphs that are consistent with the descriptions of each of their consumption decisions.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Advertising for higher prices Brand

    Brand name aspirin sells on higher prices than generic aspirin since: (w) higher prices mean higher quality. (x) they are chemically superior. (y) they cost more to produce. (z) advertising campaigns relate the brand name along with quality.

  • Q : Quantity demanded vary inversely I have

    I have a problem in economics on Quantity demanded vary inversely. Please help me in the following question. The law of demand defines that price and: (1) Quantity demanded differ directly. (2) Quantity demanded differs inversely. (3) Demand differs d

  • Q : Price elasticity and market power The

    The price elasticity of demand equals one when this firm produces where total revenue is: (i) $72,000 per period. (ii) $80,000 per period. (iii) $96,000 per period. (iv) $100,000 per period. (v) $144,000 per period.

    Q : Function of Capitalization Winning

    Winning $50,000 yearly for 20 years is similar as winning: (w) $1 million today. (x) less than $1 million today. (y) more than $1 million today. (z) $100 per day, forever. Hello guys I want your advice. Please recommend some views

  • Q : Earn normal accounting profit in the

    When a purely competitive industry is into long run equilibrium, in that case a typical firm can: (w) earn normal accounting profit although only zero economic profit. (x) incur economic losses when these are offset by accounting prof

  • Q : Effects of price in Complementary Goods

    The demands for vast new sport utility vehicles [or SUVs] like Hummers and Ford Explorers would most likely reduce most sharply in response to a 50%: (i) Rise in the annual cost of driver’s license. (ii) Decreasing in rent on luxury apartments on the center of b

  • Q : Arc elasticity for labor of demand The

    The arc elasticity of Bosun’s demand for labor between point d and point e is roughly: (1) one. (2) 1.25. (3) 2.50. (4) 3.75. (5) 5.00.

    Q : Increment in production with

    An increase in the production of stereos at similar time that consumers expect a price decline would outcomes in ______ in equilibrium price as well as equilibrium quantity will ______: (w) decrease; be uncertain. (x) increase; be uncertain. (y) decrease; decrease. (z

  • Q : Price equality with marginal costs It

    It is not possible for a nondiscriminating, that profit maximizing monopolist to attain equilibrium where MR = MC as well as: (w) economic profit = 0. (x) economic profit is negative. (yz marginal costs are at the minimum of average costs [MC = ATC].

  • Q : Kinked demand curve model of

    The kinked demand curve model of oligopolistic pricing behavior reflects the concept which: (1) price hikes fail to accommodate small hikes in costs. (2) other firms ignore price hikes by single firms. (3) other firms match any price cuts by any singl