--%>

Problem on Budget constraints

James and Louisa each have an income of $30, which they each spend on tomatoes and all other goods.  They buy tomatoes at their local farmers market, which charges $3 per pound.  Define the units for all other goods so that their price is $1 per unit.  Their preferences may be different, but assume they each have indifference curves with the “standard” shape, and that they each choose to consume less than 5 pounds of tomatoes at this price.

a. The farmers market decides to offer a new quantity discount.  The first 5 pounds of tomatoes bought by any consumer still cost $3 per pound, but any additional quantity of tomatoes can be purchased for $1.50 per pound.  Carefully draw James’ and Louisa’s new budget constraints on the two sets of axes on the next page, putting tomatoes on the x-axis and clearly indicating the quantities at the intercepts. (Note:  their budget constraints will be identical since they have the same income and face the same prices/discounts)

b. In response to the quantity discount, James now purchases more than 5 pounds of tomatoes, but Louisa continues to buy less than 5 pounds. Draw indifference curves on their respective graphs that are consistent with the descriptions of each of their consumption decisions.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Problem regarding Substitution effect

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. John freshly learned that a hotdog-and-fries combo is accessible at a local mall for similar price as a slice of pizza at Gino’s, where he routinely ate lunch. He starts buying hotdogs m

  • Q : Generates price and a quantity

    All prospective suppliers [sellers] would be in equilibrium when this market for teleporter buttons created a price and a quantity consistent along with: (1) eliminating the shortage Q1-Q3 existing at P3. (2) any point along the demand

  • Q : Income elasticity of inferior goods

    Negative income elasticities of demand entail those goods are: (1) luxuries. (2) necessities. (3) inferior. (4) substitutes. (5) expensive. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding

  • Q : Good theory It is frequently said that

    It is frequently said that a good theory is one which can in principle be refuted by an empirical, data-oriented study. Describe why a theory which cannot be evaluated empirically is not a good theory.In evaluating theory there are two steps: f

  • Q : Minimum wage laws for graduates students

    Casual surveys of students at the starting of each semester reveal an amused although overwhelming maintain for a proposal to increase the legal minimum wages of graduates from college to $50,000 yearly. They supposed our proposal was facetious. But a

  • Q : Relative Prices-Rational consumer I

    I have a problem in economics on Relative Prices-Rational consumer. Please help me in the following question. The rational consumer buying decisions based on: (1) Present prices. (2) Absolute prices. (3) Nominal prices. (4) Relative prices.

    Q : Lowest possibility for price elasticity

    The price elasticity of demand would possibly be lowest for: (1) Dasani. (2) Deer Park. (3) Aquafina. (4) bottled water. (5) Perrier. Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding

  • Q : Risk and Uncertainty of Probability

    If estimating the nature of a probability function for an event entails considerable guesswork since experience along with the event is more sporadic or rare which any estimates are extremely speculative, in that case we confront a concept Fra

  • Q : International federal or agreements and

    Consider goods for that various people are willing and capable to pay much more than the costs of production therefore widespread shortages exist. International federal or agreements, state and local laws as well as regulations are probably key factor

  • Q : Substitution effects resulting from

    The Law of Demand mainly relies heavily on the: (1) Buying power consequences of relative price modifications. (2) Substitution effect resultant from the relative price changes. (3) Increase in opportunity costs as income is worn out. (4) Principle of the non satiety.