--%>

Problem on Budget constraints

James and Louisa each have an income of $30, which they each spend on tomatoes and all other goods.  They buy tomatoes at their local farmers market, which charges $3 per pound.  Define the units for all other goods so that their price is $1 per unit.  Their preferences may be different, but assume they each have indifference curves with the “standard” shape, and that they each choose to consume less than 5 pounds of tomatoes at this price.

a. The farmers market decides to offer a new quantity discount.  The first 5 pounds of tomatoes bought by any consumer still cost $3 per pound, but any additional quantity of tomatoes can be purchased for $1.50 per pound.  Carefully draw James’ and Louisa’s new budget constraints on the two sets of axes on the next page, putting tomatoes on the x-axis and clearly indicating the quantities at the intercepts. (Note:  their budget constraints will be identical since they have the same income and face the same prices/discounts)

b. In response to the quantity discount, James now purchases more than 5 pounds of tomatoes, but Louisa continues to buy less than 5 pounds. Draw indifference curves on their respective graphs that are consistent with the descriptions of each of their consumption decisions.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Advantages of regional integration Give

    Give the basic advantages of regional integration?

  • Q : Wealth and poverty of poor and higher

    Numerous studies have established which, associate to poor families, higher income families onto average have: (w) more children. (x) greater rates of labor force participation. (y) less human capital and more financial capital. (z) greater rates of p

  • Q : Competition in Labor Markets The

    The horizontal labor supply curve signifies that: (i) The supply of labor is perfectly inelastic. (ii) The firm can hire as much labor as it requires at going wage rate. (iii) Labor and capital are in the fixed supply. (iv) Marginal physical product of the labor is co

  • Q : Structure-conduct-performance From

    From roughly 1890 till 1970 year, the “structure-conduct-performance paradigm” controlled theories regarding how firms behave in various types of markets. The term “structure” in this expression refers to such

  • Q : Purely competition on the average This

    This purely competitive brickyard as in below graph on the average experiences an: (w) economic profit of about $135 per day. (x) economic loss of roughly $150 per day. (y) accounting profit of less than $100 per day. (z) accounting loss of more than

  • Q : Market Power and the Demand for Labor

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The lack of competition in the product market outcomes in: (1) Less labor being hired than when the markets were competitive. (2) More labor being hired than when the markets were competitive.

  • Q : Monopsony power-Purely competitive Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Dissimilar to a purely competitive hirer of labor, the firm with monopsony power can: (i) Both set any wage it wishes and hire as many workers as it desire

  • Q : Profit from cost structures and market

    When cost structures and the market demands facing each of the given types of firms were identical, in that case the greatest profits would be generated through a: (1) pure monopolist. (2) price discriminating monopolist. (3) perfectly competitive fir

  • Q : Profits of monopoly firm A monopoly

    A monopoly firm's profits: (w) equal only normal profits in long-run equilibrium. (x) may be whatever level the firm wishes. (y) are maximized where MC = MR. (z) tend to be lower than that of pure competitors. Hell

  • Q : Problem regarding Craft Unions Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. The craft unions historically tried to systematize all the workers in: (1) A specific company, in spite of size. (2) The United States. (3) The specific broad industry. (4) Relatively highly s