--%>

Problem on Budget constraints

James and Louisa each have an income of $30, which they each spend on tomatoes and all other goods.  They buy tomatoes at their local farmers market, which charges $3 per pound.  Define the units for all other goods so that their price is $1 per unit.  Their preferences may be different, but assume they each have indifference curves with the “standard” shape, and that they each choose to consume less than 5 pounds of tomatoes at this price.

a. The farmers market decides to offer a new quantity discount.  The first 5 pounds of tomatoes bought by any consumer still cost $3 per pound, but any additional quantity of tomatoes can be purchased for $1.50 per pound.  Carefully draw James’ and Louisa’s new budget constraints on the two sets of axes on the next page, putting tomatoes on the x-axis and clearly indicating the quantities at the intercepts. (Note:  their budget constraints will be identical since they have the same income and face the same prices/discounts)

b. In response to the quantity discount, James now purchases more than 5 pounds of tomatoes, but Louisa continues to buy less than 5 pounds. Draw indifference curves on their respective graphs that are consistent with the descriptions of each of their consumption decisions.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Problem on Supply Prices Can someone

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The relative monetary values organizations put on selling a bit more or less of a good are termed as: (i) Supply curves. (ii) Gain-maximizing prices. (3) Supply prices. (4) Pric

  • Q : Break-even on profit-maximizing strategy

    Robomatic Corporation would exactly break-even upon its RoboMaids when, instead of exactly identifying its profit-maximizing strategy, this: (i) operated at point i, charging only $10,000 per unit and producing 16,000 robots. (ii) pri

  • Q : Percent of interest rate for the price

    When the Bank of England issues perpetuities which pay of £100 yearly, forever, beginning one year by today, in that case at an interest rate of 5 percent the price of that bonds is: (1) £9,500. (2) £5,000. (3) £2,000. (4) &pou

  • Q : Income elasticity of demand with small

    The income elasticity of demand can be approximately computed if we identify the percentage change within the: (1) quantity of a good demanded yielded by a specified absolute change in income. (2) price generated through a specified change in quantity

  • Q : Government rent control imposing When

    When government rent controls are imposed at R0 when demand equals D0 and then demand changes to D1, there is the: (w) quality of housing is likely to enhance. (x) housing market will be plagued through shortages. (y) price ceili

  • Q : Bargaining power of the union problem

    When a firm's inventories are comparatively high, then the bargaining power of union is: (i) Huge, since the firm cannot afford interruptions of the production. (ii) Great, since the firm's gains are low. (iii) Low, since the firm can sell its invento

  • Q : Screening devices problem The Screening

    The Screening devices employed whenever employers try to save adverse selection by the applicants for place do not comprise: (i) review resumes to recognize applicant’s qualifications. (ii) Needing non-compete clauses which prevent latest employees from working

  • Q : Economies of Scope-Firms using

    Firms which use similar production facility or groups of inputs to concurrently generate various kinds of products are taking benefit of: (1) Tax loop-holes. (2) Variegated production. (3) Economies of scope. (4) Economies of scale. (5) Monopoly power.

    Q : Least likely example of Substitution

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. Assume that the War in Iraq spilled over into another oil exporting countries. When U.S. gasoline prices rose to, state, $10 per gallon, the least likely outcome would be that:

  • Q : Principle of equal marginal utilities

    The thought that, in equilibrium, the more you pay for the good, more it is worth (that is, at the margin) to you is most intimately associated to the: (1) Law of diminishing returns. (2) Equivalent satisfaction corollary. (3) Veblen effect. (4) Rising cost hypothesis