--%>

Problem on Budget constraints

James and Louisa each have an income of $30, which they each spend on tomatoes and all other goods.  They buy tomatoes at their local farmers market, which charges $3 per pound.  Define the units for all other goods so that their price is $1 per unit.  Their preferences may be different, but assume they each have indifference curves with the “standard” shape, and that they each choose to consume less than 5 pounds of tomatoes at this price.

a. The farmers market decides to offer a new quantity discount.  The first 5 pounds of tomatoes bought by any consumer still cost $3 per pound, but any additional quantity of tomatoes can be purchased for $1.50 per pound.  Carefully draw James’ and Louisa’s new budget constraints on the two sets of axes on the next page, putting tomatoes on the x-axis and clearly indicating the quantities at the intercepts. (Note:  their budget constraints will be identical since they have the same income and face the same prices/discounts)

b. In response to the quantity discount, James now purchases more than 5 pounds of tomatoes, but Louisa continues to buy less than 5 pounds. Draw indifference curves on their respective graphs that are consistent with the descriptions of each of their consumption decisions.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Intersections of supply and demand

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. The prices beneath the intersections of supply and demand curves cause: (i) Shortages. (ii) Surpluses. (iii) Demands to expand. (iv) Inventories to grow. (v) Sc

  • Q : Corporations stockholders not liable

    The corporation’s stockholders are not personally liable for the debts of firm since: (1) The Corporation is considered as a legal person, separate from its owner. (2) Usually there are too many stockholders to try to hold them all accountable. (3) In a corporat

  • Q : Aggregate effective demand Why,

    Why, according to Keynes, is investment the key economic variable? Why does he think that the volatility of investment spending is likely to cause a problem of aggregate effective demand? Why does he think that this problem can only be solved by government interventio

  • Q : Types of output for producing goods

    Kinds of output subsequently used to generate other goods are termed as: (w) land. (x) labor. (y) capital. (z) primary resources. Hey friends please give your opinion for the problem of Eco

  • Q : Economists conceive of any resource

    Economists can’t conceive of any resource or product for which the: (i) Price elasticity of demand is zero (0) and the demand curve is vertical. (ii) Price elasticity of supply is zero (0) and supply curve is vertical. (iii) Income elasticity of

  • Q : Easily enter or exit the market in the

    This graph depicts a short run situation while long run equilibrium has been achieved for a firm along with some market (price-making) power when the firm cannot price discriminate and: (w) has explicit costs but no i

  • Q : Effects of marginal utility on Consumer

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. When your marginal utility from $5 movies averages 50 utils and your marginal utility from $2 gallons of the gasoline is 20 utils, you can: (1) Not add to your satisfaction by m

  • Q : Problem regarding Inferior Goods

    Subsequent to Fred received a promotion and a big raise; he bought some macaroni and cheese dinners. For Fred, the: (1) Demand for the macaroni and cheese dinners is not predictable. (2) Macaroni and cheese dinners are the normal goods. (3) Demand for cheese and macar

  • Q : Normal accounting profits in monopoly

    This monopoly makes Q units and experiences as: (1) economic profits equal to 0cbQ. (2) economic losses equal to cpab. (3) more than normal accounting profits. (4) marginal cost in excess of average total cost. (5) total revenue less than total cost.<

  • Q : Problem on law of demand Let think

    Let think about the law of demand. The idea that a big price for a normal good will outcome in less of the good being bought never based logically on the: (i) Income effect. (ii) Demand for the good falling since of the higher price. (iii) Law of redu