--%>

Problem on Budget constraints

James and Louisa each have an income of $30, which they each spend on tomatoes and all other goods.  They buy tomatoes at their local farmers market, which charges $3 per pound.  Define the units for all other goods so that their price is $1 per unit.  Their preferences may be different, but assume they each have indifference curves with the “standard” shape, and that they each choose to consume less than 5 pounds of tomatoes at this price.

a. The farmers market decides to offer a new quantity discount.  The first 5 pounds of tomatoes bought by any consumer still cost $3 per pound, but any additional quantity of tomatoes can be purchased for $1.50 per pound.  Carefully draw James’ and Louisa’s new budget constraints on the two sets of axes on the next page, putting tomatoes on the x-axis and clearly indicating the quantities at the intercepts. (Note:  their budget constraints will be identical since they have the same income and face the same prices/discounts)

b. In response to the quantity discount, James now purchases more than 5 pounds of tomatoes, but Louisa continues to buy less than 5 pounds. Draw indifference curves on their respective graphs that are consistent with the descriptions of each of their consumption decisions.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : When are price variation tendencies

    Price variation tendencies are indeterminate while we know simply that: (1) super star salaries make this hard for team owners to meet rising demands for sporting events. (2) more people main in music although demands for musicians are falling. (3) oi

  • Q : When did marginal utility diminished

    The marginal utility most obviously diminished whenever: (1) Eric sang six songs rather than only one on karaoke night at local club. (2) Molly’s piano lessons absorbed 20 hrs last week she could have used up for studying. (3) Karen built 12 boxes however only 9

  • Q : Highest legal price for Whopper Slushees

    Beginning at equilibrium, a new highest legal price for Whopper Slushees set at P1 would: (i) cause people to purchase more Slushees and fewer cones from Dairy Queen. (ii) Reduce total market demand. (iii) Yield surplus demand and a scarcity. (iv) Inc

  • Q : Price fluctuations to go bankrupt in

    Speculators are most probable to go bankrupt when their activities: (w) increase price fluctuations. (x) decrease transaction costs to other buyers or sellers. (y) dampen the volatility of prices. (z) improve economic efficiency.

    Q : Consequence of Rational Ignorance Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Being disappointed whenever you finally learn how some desserts are accessible after you have already told the server at a restaurant that you will try the ‘all-you-can-eat’ buffet

  • Q : Characterized purely competitive firm

    For a purely competitive firm long run equilibrium is characterized by: (w) P > MR > MC > ATC. (x) P = MR = MC = minimum LRAC. (y) maximum MC - MR. (z) minimum TR + TC. Can anybody suggest me the proper ex

  • Q : Illustration of limit pricing strategy

    An illustration of limit pricing strategy occurs while the incumbent firm: (w) sets a price below costs to drive its competitor out of the market. (x) redesigns its product lines to create components incompatible along with rivals. (y) which has a cos

  • Q : Most likely Diminishing Marginal Utility

    Jana chugs 5 big cups of Gatorade in five minutes after winning the marathon. Jana’s marginal utility is much likely to be: (1) Equivalent for each cup as she was very thirsty. (2) Maximized at 3 cups, when she is reaching the equilibrium. (3) Diminishing whenev

  • Q : Problem on long run competitive

    The technology is such that LAC is minimized at firm’s output equivalent to 10 and minimum LAC is Rs. 15. Assume that the demand schedule for the product is given as shown:

    Q : Short Run-At least one resource is fixed

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. In short run: (1) The quantities of all firm’s resources are variable. (2) Managers are less proficient than they are in long run. (3) At least one of the resources is fix