--%>

Problem on Budget constraints

James and Louisa each have an income of $30, which they each spend on tomatoes and all other goods.  They buy tomatoes at their local farmers market, which charges $3 per pound.  Define the units for all other goods so that their price is $1 per unit.  Their preferences may be different, but assume they each have indifference curves with the “standard” shape, and that they each choose to consume less than 5 pounds of tomatoes at this price.

a. The farmers market decides to offer a new quantity discount.  The first 5 pounds of tomatoes bought by any consumer still cost $3 per pound, but any additional quantity of tomatoes can be purchased for $1.50 per pound.  Carefully draw James’ and Louisa’s new budget constraints on the two sets of axes on the next page, putting tomatoes on the x-axis and clearly indicating the quantities at the intercepts. (Note:  their budget constraints will be identical since they have the same income and face the same prices/discounts)

b. In response to the quantity discount, James now purchases more than 5 pounds of tomatoes, but Louisa continues to buy less than 5 pounds. Draw indifference curves on their respective graphs that are consistent with the descriptions of each of their consumption decisions.

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Problem relating to Exploitation I have

    I have a problem in economics on Problem concerning Exploitation. Please help me in the given question. Whenever resource suppliers are salaried less than the values of their marginal products [or VMPs], then they are stated to be: (p) Monopsonistic. (q) Monopolistic.

  • Q : Monopsony Power and Demand for Labor

    Subsequent to adjusting for inflation, Alex Rodriquez salary with NY Yankees was much higher in the year 2006 than Henry Aaron's salary with the Atlanta Braves in the year 1970s that implies that: (i) The 2006 Yankees was more liberal than the year 1970s Braves. (ii)

  • Q : Determine total revenue with formula

    Please help me to solve the problem of total revenue that is given below: Total revenue can be computed by the formula as: (w) P + Q. (x) P * Q. (y) ep * P. (z) ep * Q. Hello gu

  • Q : Determine the equilibrium prises When

    When both sellers and potential buyers suppose prices for rider lawn mowers to raise as summer approaches, in that case throughout March and April (in the short run), the equilibrium: (w) price falls but quantity changes are ambiguous. (x) price rises

  • Q : Problem concerning Exploitation I have

    I have a problem in economics on Problem concerning Exploitation. Please help me in the given question. Whenever resource suppliers are salaried less than the values of their marginal products [or VMPs], then they are stated to be: (i) Monopsonistic.

  • Q : Efficiency Wages-Expected losses

    Expected losses to the workers from shirking are raised when a firm accepts a policy of: (1) Dividing the productive tasks and hence the division of labor is optimal. (2) Paying the efficiency wages which surpass market-clearing wages. (3) Avoiding the legal liability

  • Q : Unitarily elastic for all prices and

    On such demand curve for pizza as in below demonstrated graph, there demand is: (w) elastic for all prices and quantities demonstrated. (x) unitarily elastic for all prices and quantities shown. (y) elastic at high prices and inelastic at low prices. (z) inelastic at

  • Q : Hypothetical demands for perfect price

    In this figure demonstrating hypothetical demands for socket sets, there demand curve: (1) D1D1 is perfectly price-inelastic. (2) D2D2 is perfectly price elastic. (3) D3D3

  • Q : Quantity demanded of good What cause do

    What cause do heterodox economists employ to argue that the quantity demanded of good is a not a function of its price but of the family’s (consumer’s) income? And also discuss, For heterodox economists, household choice is not regarding maximizing utility

  • Q : Form of Discrimination The form of

    The form of discrimination which probably causes the smallest problems for income distribution is: (1) occupational discrimination. (2) human capital discrimination. (3) price discrimination. (4) personal discrimination. (5) employment discrimination.