--%>

Price floors with government purchases of surpluses

Suppose the U.S. wheat market is primarily in a stable equilibrium upon S0D0. Assume now that the government institutes a legal price floor at P3 per bushel of wheat. When the government will buy and store any resulting surplus, thus keeping a quantity of wheat off the market, in that case: (1) taxpayers will make total payments to farmers equivalent to 0Q1aeQ3 for unconsumed wheat. (2) Americans as eventual wheat consumers will buy Q1 wheat at price P3. (3) total revenue annually for farmers will equivalent 0P3eQ3. (4) the gains to farmers will be exceeded through losses to taxpayers and consumers, therefore this agricultural policy causes economic inefficiency. (5) all of the above.

1658_examle of Total Revenue.png

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding Economics generally?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Problem on Market Power and Demand for

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Imperfect competition in the product markets outcomes in: (i) Less labor hired than when product markets were competitive. (ii) Above the equilibrium wages being paid by the monopolists. (iii)

  • Q : Means of monopolistic competition

    Select the right answer of the question. Monopolistic competition means: 1) a market situation where competition is based entirely on product differentiation and advertising. 2) a large number of firms producing a standardized or homogeneous product. 3) many firms pro

  • Q : Coefficient of cross-elasticity of

    When a price hike from $15 to $20 for DVD disks causes sales of DVD players to reduce from 100 to 50 units, in that case the coefficient of cross-elasticity of demand among these goods is approximately: (w) 1/10. (x)  10. (y)  7/3. (z) 

  • Q : Effect of total revenue on economic loss

    The economic loss occurs whenever total revenue: (i) Is equivalent to the total costs. (ii) Fails to cover the opportunity costs. (iii) Surpasses opportunity costs. (iv) Surpasses the explicit costs. Can someone please help me in f

  • Q : Effective price discrimination

    Effective price discrimination does NOT need a firm to: (w) segment the market into groups along with various demand elasticities.  (x) be a monopoly. (y) prevent trading among customers who are charged different prices. (z) possess some market p

  • Q : Determining Substitution products When

    When a price hike for Big Gulps of GlugaChug from $1 to $2 improves sales of dehydrated water from 50 to 100 kegs, then the dehydrated water and GlugaChug are: (1) Joint outputs in the production. (2) Complements. (3) Substitutes. (4) Mixed resource alternatives.

  • Q : Immobility of Labor-Monopsony Power I

    I have a problem in economics on Monopsony Power and Immobility of Labor. Please help me in the given question. The immobility of labor is economically significant as: (1) Most of the people like to move, however can't. (2) People in high salary occupations won't be c

  • Q : Burden of tax reduce on suppliers of

    Most of the burden of an excise (i.e., per unit) tax would be borne through consumers of the taxed good, although some of the tax burden would reduce on suppliers of the good demonstrated in: (w) Panel A. (x) Panel B. (y) Panel C. (z)

  • Q : Law of Demand in respect to relative

    I have a problem in economics on Law of Demand in respect to relative price. Please help me in the following question. The law of demand defines that as: (1) Absolute prices rise, quantity demanded raises. (2) Relative prices raise, quantity demanded

  • Q : Assumption of Ceteris paribus Can

    Can someone help me in finding out the right answer from the given options. Suppose that everything except the variables we are studying remains constant or steady is termed as the: (1) Ceteris paribus assumption. (2) Ex-ante assumption. (3) Ex-post assumption. (4) Po