--%>

Price floors with government purchases of surpluses

Suppose the U.S. wheat market is primarily in a stable equilibrium upon S0D0. Assume now that the government institutes a legal price floor at P3 per bushel of wheat. When the government will buy and store any resulting surplus, thus keeping a quantity of wheat off the market, in that case: (1) taxpayers will make total payments to farmers equivalent to 0Q1aeQ3 for unconsumed wheat. (2) Americans as eventual wheat consumers will buy Q1 wheat at price P3. (3) total revenue annually for farmers will equivalent 0P3eQ3. (4) the gains to farmers will be exceeded through losses to taxpayers and consumers, therefore this agricultural policy causes economic inefficiency. (5) all of the above.

1658_examle of Total Revenue.png

Can anybody suggest me the proper explanation for given problem regarding Economics generally?

   Related Questions in Microeconomics

  • Q : Split roughly burden of tax The burden

    The burden of an excise (i.e., per unit) tax would be divide roughly fifty by fifty on consumers and suppliers of the taxed good within: (w) Panel A. (x) Panel B. (y) Panel C. (z) Panel D.

  • Q : Experiencing the Diminishing Marginal

    James has watched a latest blockbuster film twice a week for the precedent three weeks and can now narrate most of the dialogue. He is probably starting to experience: (1) Disequilibrium. (2) Diminishing the marginal utility. (3) Diminished capacity. (4) Clinical depr

  • Q : Question on ATC and MC A perfectly

    A perfectly competitive market within the long period: Data         firm A:  ATC = y2   4y + 12 an

  • Q : Economic profit generating purely

    In this illustrated figure in below the only purely competitive firm currently generating economic profit is in: (w) Firm A. (x) Firm B. (y) Firm C. (z) Firm D.

    Q : Monopsonistic exploitation-Labor union

    Can someone please help me in finding out the accurate answer from the following question. Labor union contracts, a comparable significance rule, or minimum wage laws might boost equilibrium employment when a firm has been practicing: (i) Blacklisting

  • Q : LEAST affected labor in short run The

    The short-run demand for labor would be LEAST affected by the: (w) productivity of the resource. (x) prices of substitute resources. (y) demand for goods produced by the resource. (z) fixed costs of a firm. Hey fri

  • Q : Generates price-quantity consistent for

    All prospective demanders [buyers] would be within equilibrium when this market for teleporter buttons created a price and a quantity consistent along with: (1) eliminating the shortage Q1-Q3 existing at P3<

  • Q : Transaction Costs-Process of trial and

    In an uncertain globe, people are supposed to try to make best use of their satisfaction by: (1) Determining in advance the mixture of goods that maximizes the utility and then purchasing this mix. (2) The procedure of trial and error. (3) Making marginal decisions ti

  • Q : Labor History-Blacklisting I have a

    I have a problem in economics on Labor History-Blacklisting. Please help me in the following question. Firms which colluded by circulating the names of the union organizers and hence they would have complexity getting jobs were engaged is now-illegal

  • Q : Average variable cost curve of firm Can

    Can someone specify correct answer of the given query of demonstrated figure in below that curve J is that cranberry of: (w) industry’s supply curve. (x) firm’s demand curve. (y) firm’s average variable cost curve. (z) firm’s short-run supply c